10,460 research outputs found

    Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory

    Get PDF
    The present study investigates the effects of trait anxiety on the neural efficiency of working memory component functions (manipulation vs. maintenance) in the absence of threat-related stimuli. For the manipulation of affectively neutral verbal information held in working memory, high- and low-anxious individuals (N = 46) did not differ in their behavioral performance, yet trait anxiety was positively related to the neural effort expended on task processing, as measured by BOLD signal changes in fMRI. Higher levels of anxiety were associated with stronger activation in two regions implicated in the goal-directed control of attention--that is, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left inferior frontal sulcus--and with stronger deactivation in a region assigned to the brain's default-mode network--that is, rostral-ventral anterior cingulate cortex. Furthermore, anxiety was associated with a stronger functional coupling of right DLPFC with ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. We interpret our findings as reflecting reduced processing efficiency in high-anxious individuals and point out the need to consider measures of functional integration in addition to measures of regional activation strength when investigating individual differences in neural efficiency. With respect to the functions of working memory, we conclude that anxiety specifically impairs the processing efficiency of (control-demanding) manipulation processes (as opposed to mere maintenance). Notably, this study contributes to an accumulating body of evidence showing that anxiety also affects cognitive processing in the absence of threat-related stimuli

    Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory

    Get PDF
    We remember a considerable number of personal experiences because we are frequently reminded of them, a process known as memory reactivation. Although memory reactivation helps to stabilize and update memories, reactivation may also introduce distortions if novel information becomes incorporated with memory. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural mechanisms mediating reactivation-induced updating in memory for events experienced during a museum tour. During scanning, participants were shown target photographs to reactivate memories from the museum tour followed by a novel lure photograph from an alternate tour. Later, participants were presented with target and lure photographs and asked to determine whether the photographs showed a stop they visited during the tour. We used a subsequent memory analysis to examine neural recruitment during reactivation that was associated with later true and false memories. We predicted that the quality of reactivation, as determined by online ratings of subjective recollection, would increase subsequent true memories but also facilitate incorporation of the lure photograph, thereby increasing subsequent false memories. The fMRI results revealed that the quality of reactivation modulated subsequent true and false memories via recruitment of left posterior parahippocampal, bilateral retrosplenial, and bilateral posterior inferior parietal cortices. However, the timing of neural recruitment and the way in which memories were reactivated contributed to differences in whether memory reactivation led to distortions or not. These data reveal the neural mechanisms recruited during memory reactivation that modify how memories will be subsequently retrieved, supporting the flexible and dynamic aspects of memory

    Exercise Training and Functional Connectivity Changes in Mild Cognitive Empairment and Healthy Elders

    Get PDF
    Background: Effective interventions are needed to improve brain function in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), an early stage of Alzheimerโ€™s disease (AD). The posterior cingulate cortex (PCC)/precuneus is a hub of the default mode network (DMN) and is preferentially vulnerable to disruption of functional connectivity in MCI and AD. Objective: We investigated whether 12 weeks of aerobic exercise could enhance functional connectivity of the PCC/precuneus in MCI and healthy elders. Methods: Sixteen MCI and 16 healthy elders (age rangeโ€Š=โ€Š60โ€“88) engaged in a supervised 12-week walking exercise intervention. Functional MRI was acquired at rest; the PCC/precuneus was used as a seed for correlated brain activity maps. Results: A linear mixed effects model revealed a significant interaction in the right parietal lobe: the MCI group showed increased connectivity while the healthy elders showed decreased connectivity. In addition, both groups showed increased connectivity with the left postcentral gyrus. Comparing pre to post intervention changes within each group, the MCI group showed increased connectivity in 10 regions spanning frontal, parietal, temporal and insular lobes, and the cerebellum. Healthy elders did not demonstrate any significant connectivity changes. Conclusion: The observed results show increased functional connectivity of the PCC/precuneus in individuals with MCI after 12 weeks of moderate intensity walking exercise training. The protective effects of exercise training on cognition may be realized through the enhancement of neural recruitment mechanisms, which may possibly increase cognitive reserve. Whether these effects of exercise training may delay further cognitive decline in patients diagnosed with MCI remains to be demonstrated

    The Effect Of Abstinence From Smoking On Stress Reactivity

    Get PDF
    Subjective stress is a well-documented predictor of early smoking relapse, yet our understanding of stress and tobacco use is limited by the reliability of current available measures of stress. Functional magnetic reasoning imaging (fMRI) could provide a much-needed objective measure of stress reactivity. The goal of this dissertation is to contribute to the understanding of abstinence-induced changes in stress reactivity by examining neural, neuroendocrine (cortisol), and subjective measures of stress response during abstinence. In addition, this study investigated the influence of individual variation in nicotine metabolism rates on these measures of stress reactivity. Seventy-five treatment-seeking smokers underwent blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) fMRI during the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) on two occasions: once during smoking satiety and once following biochemically confirmed 24-hour abstinence (order counter-balanced). The primary outcome measure was brain response during stress (vs. control) blocks of the MIST. Neural stress reactivity during abstinence (vs. satiety) was associated with significantly increased activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a brain region previously associated with inhibitory control. Greater abstinence-induced change in brain response to stress was associated with greater abstinence-induced change in subjective stress. However, there was no association with abstinence-induced change in cortisol response. In addition, higher rates of nicotine metabolism were associated with increased abstinence-induced change in self-reported stress, but not with brain or cortisol response. This study provides novel evidence that the brain response to stress is altered during the first 24 hours of a quit attempt compared to smoking satiety. These results underscore the importance of stress response during abstinence, and suggest that neuroimaging may provide a useful biomarker of stress response during the early smoking cessation, a period when smokers are most vulnerable to relapse

    Investigating the neural basis of self-awareness deficits following traumatic brain injury

    Get PDF
    Self-awareness deficits are a common and disabling consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). โ€˜On-lineโ€™ awareness is one facet of self-awareness that can be studied by examining how people monitor their performance and respond to their errors. Performance monitoring, like many of the cognitive functions disrupted after TBI, is believed to depend on the coordinated activity of neural networks. The fronto-parietal control network (FPCN) is one such network that contains a sub-network called the salience network (SN). The SN consists of the dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) and bilateral insulae cortex and is thought to monitor salient events (e.g. errors). I used advanced structure and function MRI techniques to investigate these networks and test two overarching hypotheses: first, performance monitoring is regulated by regions within the FPCN; and second, dysfunction of the FPCN leads to impaired self-awareness after TBI. My first study demonstrated two distinct frontal networks that respond to different error types. Predictable/internally signalled errors caused SN activation; whereas unpredictable/externally signalled errors caused activation of the ventral attentional network, a network thought to respond to unexpected events. This suggested the presence of parallel performance monitoring systems within the FPCN. My second study established that the โ€˜drivingโ€™ input into the SN originated in right anterior insula and subsequent behavioural adaptation was regulated by enhanced effective connectivity from the dACC to the left anterior insula. In my third study I identified a large group of TBI patients with impaired performance monitoring. These patients had additional metacognitive evidence of impaired self-awareness and demonstrated reduced functional connectivity between the dACC and the remainder of the FPCN at โ€˜restโ€™, and abnormally large insulae activation in response to errors. These studies clarified how the brain monitors and responds to salient events; and, provided evidence that self-awareness deficits after TBI are due to FPCN dysfunction, identifying this network as a potential target for future treatments.Open Acces

    Social working memory: neurocognitive networks and directions for future research.

    Get PDF
    Navigating the social world requires the ability to maintain and manipulate information about people's beliefs, traits, and mental states. We characterize this capacity as social working memory (SWM). To date, very little research has explored this phenomenon, in part because of the assumption that general working memory systems would support working memory for social information. Various lines of research, however, suggest that social cognitive processing relies on a neurocognitive network (i.e., the "mentalizing network") that is functionally distinct from, and considered antagonistic with, the canonical working memory network. Here, we review evidence suggesting that demanding social cognition requires SWM and that both the mentalizing and canonical working memory neurocognitive networks support SWM. The neural data run counter to the common finding of parametric decreases in mentalizing regions as a function of working memory demand and suggest that the mentalizing network can support demanding cognition, when it is demanding social cognition. Implications for individual differences in social cognition and pathologies of social cognition are discussed

    Early error detection predicted by reduced pre-response control process: an ERP topographic mapping study

    Get PDF
    Advanced ERP topographic mapping techniques were used to study error monitoring functions in human adult participants, and test whether proactive attentional effects during the pre-response time period could later influence early error detection mechanisms (as measured by the ERN component) or not. Participants performed a speeded go/nogo task, and made a substantial number of false alarms that did not differ from correct hits as a function of behavioral speed or actual motor response. While errors clearly elicited an ERN component generated within the dACC following the onset of these incorrect responses, I also found that correct hits were associated with a different sequence of topographic events during the pre-response baseline time-period, relative to errors. A main topographic transition from occipital to posterior parietal regions (including primarily the precuneus) was evidenced for correct hits similar to 170-150 ms before the response, whereas this topographic change was markedly reduced for errors. The same topographic transition was found for correct hits that were eventually performed slower than either errors or fast (correct) hits, confirming the involvement of this distinctive posterior parietal activity in top-down attentional control rather than motor preparation. Control analyses further ensured that this pre-response topographic effect was not related to differences in stimulus processing. Furthermore, I found a reliable association between the magnitude of the ERN following errors and the duration of this differential precuneus activity during the pre-response baseline, suggesting a functional link between an anticipatory attentional control component subserved by the precuneus and early error detection mechanisms within the dACC. These results suggest reciprocal links between proactive attention control and decision making processes during error monitoring

    ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ฐจ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ธ๋ฌธ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์ธ์ง€๊ณผํ•™์ „๊ณต, 2020. 8. ์ด๋™์ˆ˜.Response inhibition is one of the essential cognitive functions and suppresses inappropriate responses for goal-directed behavior. When a brain is cognitively engaged, it enters a cognitive state that task-positive regions are activated, and the default mode network is deactivated (DMN). In contrast, DMN is activated, and task-positive regions are deactivated at rest. The transition between the states is important for the cognitive function, and recent studies have found that the salience network (SN) plays a crucial role in detecting and processing a salient signal and suppressing DMN at rest. It can be assumed that there exists optimized connectivity to perform response inhibition successfully and that it will also appear in resting-state requiring no cognitive effort. It was hypothesized that lower functional connectivity within SN and higher functional connectivity within DMN and greater anti-correlation between then is related to better response inhibition. The response inhibition of individuals was measured by the stop-signal task and the Stroop task. The correlation between intra-/inter-component functional connectivity derived from independent component analysis with dual regression and task performances were examined to test the hypothesis. The intra-/inter-component structural connectivity analysis using diffusion tensor imaging was conducted to provide a deeper understanding of functional connectivity. Topological characteristics of inter-component functional connectivity were also examined using the minimum spanning tree (MST) of each individual to provide a heuristic insight from the topological view. The results indicate that the functional connectivity within SN, but not DMN components, and the functional and structural connectivity between SN and DMN components are critical to elucidate individual differences in response inhibition. Higher structural connectivity but low functional connectivity of SN at rest was an important feature for superior response inhibition. The stronger structural connectivity and stronger anti-correlation between SN and DMN components were also indicative of better response inhibition. MST of a subject with the best performance showed direct connections between SN and anterior DMN/pDMN, whereas the MST of the one with the worst performance does not. These intra-/inter components connectivities reflect the organization of the brain that enables competent response inhibition and account for individual differences. This study might suggest that the individuals characteristics of large-scale network components at rest provide evidence to illustrate response inhibition of an individual without any experimental scan.๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด์ƒํ–‰๋™์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ •์‹  ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ๋„ ๊นŠ์€ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋‡Œ๋Š” ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ๋•Œ, ์ž‘์—… ๊ด€๋ จ ์˜์—ญ๋“ค์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ž๊ธฐ ์ฐธ์กฐ์  ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์˜์—ญ๋“ค์€ ๋น„ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ์ž‘์—… ๊ด€๋ จ ์˜์—ญ๋“ค์€ ๋น„ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์˜์—ญ์€ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ (salience network)๋Š” ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ž๊ทน์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋˜ํ•œ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํ™œ์„ฑ์„ ์–ต์ œํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ„ ์ „ํ™˜์— ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์—๋„ ๋ฐ˜์˜๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ, ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋†’์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ทธ ๋‘˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋†’์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ญ ์ƒ๊ด€ (anti-correlation)์ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์— ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์„ธ์› ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ๋Š” ์ •์ง€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๊ณผ์ œ์™€ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฃน ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ๋“ค๊ณผ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋‚ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋‘ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ๊ณผ์ œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๊ณผ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊นŠ์€ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•์‚ฐ ํ…์„œ ์˜์ƒ๊ณผ ํŠธ๋ž™ํ† ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ผ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์™€์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ํ† ํด๋กœ์ง€ ํŠน์„ฑ ์—ญ์‹œ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋ฏธ๋‹ˆ๋ฉˆ ์ŠคํŒจ๋‹ ํŠธ๋ฆฌ(MST: minimum spanning tree)๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋‚ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์€ ๊ฐ•ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ์•ฝํ•œ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์ผ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์ด ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ญ ์ƒ๊ด€์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‘ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ญ ์ƒ๊ด€์ด ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ† ํด๋กœ์ง€ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์ด ์ข‹์€ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž์˜ MST๋Š” ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋“ค ๊ฐ„์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚˜์œ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ์˜ ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋‚ด ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ญ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋‚ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์€ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ณผ์ œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์ค‘์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋™์•ˆ์˜ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.1. Introduction 1 1.1. Response inhibition and its neural correlates 1 1.1.1. Cognitive tasks to measure response inhibition 1 1.1.2. The neural correlates of response inhibition 2 1.1.3. Response inhibition and resting-state brain 3 1.2. Investigations on large-scale networks underlying response inhibition 4 1.2.1. Resting-state networks and response inhibition 4 1.2.2. Structural connectivity 6 1.2.3. Topological characteristics 7 1.2.4. The aim of the present study 8 2. Methods 9 2.1. Subjects 9 2.2. Behavioral tasks to assess response inhibition 11 2.3. Brain imaging data acquisition and preprocessing 14 2.3.1. Resting-state fMRI 14 2.3.2. Diffusion tensor imaging 15 2.4. Resting-state networks and functional connectivity analysis 16 2.4.1. Group independent component analysis to identify resting-state networks 16 2.4.2. Dual regression to obtain subject-specific data of components 17 2.4.3. Estimation of subject-specific intra-/inter-component functional connectivity 21 2.5. Structural connectivity analysis 21 2.5.1. Structural connectivity and response inhibition 21 2.5.2. Relationship between functional connectivity and structural connectivity 22 2.6. Topological data analysis 25 2.6.1. Minimum spanning tree 25 3. Results 27 3.1. The performances of behavioral tasks 27 3.2. Intra-component connectivity and response inhibition 30 3.3. Inter-component connectivity and response inhibition 35 3.4. Relationship between functional connectivity and structural connectivity 41 3.5. Minimum spanning tree 43 4. Discussion 46 4.1. Resting-state network and cognition 46 4.2. Salience network and response inhibition 47 4.3. Connectivity and structural connectivity between SN and DMN 50 4.3.1. Functional connectivity between SN and DMN 50 4.3.2. Structural connectivity between SN and DMN 51 4.3.3. Topological characteristics between SN and DMN 53 4.4. Limitations of the study 54 5. Conclusion 56 References 57 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก 70Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore