19,487 research outputs found
Global optimality conditions and optimization methods for polynomial programming problems and their applications
The polynomial programming problem which has a polynomial objective function, either with no constraints or with polynomial constraints occurs frequently in engineering design, investment science, control theory, network distribution, signal processing and locationallocation contexts. Moreover, the polynomial programming problem is known to be Nondeterministic Polynomial-time hard (NP-hard). The polynomial programming problem has attracted a lot of attention, including quadratic, cubic, homogenous or normal quartic programming problems as special cases. Existing methods for solving polynomial programming problems include algebraic methods and various convex relaxation methods. Especially, among these methods, semidefinite programming (SDP) and sum of squares (SOS) relaxations are very popular. Theoretically, SDP and SOS relaxation methods are very powerful and successful in solving the general polynomial programming problem with a compact feasible region. However, the solvability in practice depends on the size or the degree of the polynomial programming problem and the required accuracy. Hence, solving large scale SDP problems still remains a computational challenge. It is well-known that traditional local optimization methods are designed based on necessary local optimality conditions, i.e., Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions. Motivated by this, some researchers proposed a necessary global optimality condition for a quadratic programming problem and designed a new local optimization method according to the necessary global optimality condition. In this thesis, we try to apply this idea to cubic and quatic programming problems, and further to general unconstrained and constrained polynomial programming problems. For these polynomial programming problems, we will investigate necessary global optimality conditions and design new local optimization methods according to these conditions. These necessary global optimality conditions are generally stronger than KKT conditions. Hence, the obtained new local minimizers by using the new local optimization methods may improve some KKT points. Our ultimate aim is to design global optimization methods for these polynomial programming problems. We notice that the filled function method is one of the well-known and practical auxiliary function methods used to achieve a global minimizer. In this thesis, we design global optimization methods by combining the new proposed local optimization methods and some auxiliary functions. The numerical examples illustrate the efficiency and stability of the optimization methods. Finally, we discuss some applications for solving some sensor network localization problems and systems of polynomial equations. It is worth mentioning that we apply the idea and the results for polynomial programming problems to nonlinear programming problems (NLP). We provide an optimality condition and design new local optimization methods according to the optimality condition and design global optimization methods for the problem (NLP) by combining the new local optimization methods and an auxiliary function. In order to test the performance of the global optimization methods, we compare them with two other heuristic methods. The results demonstrate our methods outperform the two other algorithms.Doctor of Philosoph
Global optimality conditions and optimization methods for constrained polynomial programming problems
The general constrained polynomial programming problem (GPP) is considered in this paper. Problem (GPP) has a broad range of applications and is proved to be NP-hard. Necessary global optimality conditions for problem (GPP) are established. Then, a new local optimization method for this problem is proposed by exploiting these necessary global optimality conditions. A global optimization method is proposed for this problem by combining this local optimization method together with an auxiliary function. Some numerical examples are also given to illustrate that these approaches are very efficient. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
Conic Optimization Theory: Convexification Techniques and Numerical Algorithms
Optimization is at the core of control theory and appears in several areas of
this field, such as optimal control, distributed control, system
identification, robust control, state estimation, model predictive control and
dynamic programming. The recent advances in various topics of modern
optimization have also been revamping the area of machine learning. Motivated
by the crucial role of optimization theory in the design, analysis, control and
operation of real-world systems, this tutorial paper offers a detailed overview
of some major advances in this area, namely conic optimization and its emerging
applications. First, we discuss the importance of conic optimization in
different areas. Then, we explain seminal results on the design of hierarchies
of convex relaxations for a wide range of nonconvex problems. Finally, we study
different numerical algorithms for large-scale conic optimization problems.Comment: 18 page
Projection methods in conic optimization
There exist efficient algorithms to project a point onto the intersection of
a convex cone and an affine subspace. Those conic projections are in turn the
work-horse of a range of algorithms in conic optimization, having a variety of
applications in science, finance and engineering. This chapter reviews some of
these algorithms, emphasizing the so-called regularization algorithms for
linear conic optimization, and applications in polynomial optimization. This is
a presentation of the material of several recent research articles; we aim here
at clarifying the ideas, presenting them in a general framework, and pointing
out important techniques
Inverse polynomial optimization
We consider the inverse optimization problem associated with the polynomial
program f^*=\min \{f(x): x\in K\}y\in
K\tilde{f}fy\tilde{f}Kd\tilde{f}\Vert f-\tilde{f}\Vert\ell_1\ell_2\ell_\infty\tilde{f}_df(\y)f^*\ell_1\tilde{f}$ takes a
simple and explicit canonical form. Some variations are also discussed.Comment: 25 pages; to appear in Math. Oper. Res; Rapport LAAS no. 1114
- âŠ