11,091 research outputs found

    The Visual Social Distancing Problem

    Get PDF
    One of the main and most effective measures to contain the recent viral outbreak is the maintenance of the so-called Social Distancing (SD). To comply with this constraint, workplaces, public institutions, transports and schools will likely adopt restrictions over the minimum inter-personal distance between people. Given this actual scenario, it is crucial to massively measure the compliance to such physical constraint in our life, in order to figure out the reasons of the possible breaks of such distance limitations, and understand if this implies a possible threat given the scene context. All of this, complying with privacy policies and making the measurement acceptable. To this end, we introduce the Visual Social Distancing (VSD) problem, defined as the automatic estimation of the inter-personal distance from an image, and the characterization of the related people aggregations. VSD is pivotal for a non-invasive analysis to whether people comply with the SD restriction, and to provide statistics about the level of safety of specific areas whenever this constraint is violated. We then discuss how VSD relates with previous literature in Social Signal Processing and indicate which existing Computer Vision methods can be used to manage such problem. We conclude with future challenges related to the effectiveness of VSD systems, ethical implications and future application scenarios.Comment: 9 pages, 5 figures. All the authors equally contributed to this manuscript and they are listed by alphabetical order. Under submissio

    CaloriNet: From silhouettes to calorie estimation in private environments

    Get PDF
    We propose a novel deep fusion architecture, CaloriNet, for the online estimation of energy expenditure for free living monitoring in private environments, where RGB data is discarded and replaced by silhouettes. Our fused convolutional neural network architecture is trainable end-to-end, to estimate calorie expenditure, using temporal foreground silhouettes alongside accelerometer data. The network is trained and cross-validated on a publicly available dataset, SPHERE_RGBD + Inertial_calorie. Results show state-of-the-art minimum error on the estimation of energy expenditure (calories per minute), outperforming alternative, standard and single-modal techniques.Comment: 11 pages, 7 figure

    Mining Mid-level Features for Action Recognition Based on Effective Skeleton Representation

    Get PDF
    Recently, mid-level features have shown promising performance in computer vision. Mid-level features learned by incorporating class-level information are potentially more discriminative than traditional low-level local features. In this paper, an effective method is proposed to extract mid-level features from Kinect skeletons for 3D human action recognition. Firstly, the orientations of limbs connected by two skeleton joints are computed and each orientation is encoded into one of the 27 states indicating the spatial relationship of the joints. Secondly, limbs are combined into parts and the limb's states are mapped into part states. Finally, frequent pattern mining is employed to mine the most frequent and relevant (discriminative, representative and non-redundant) states of parts in continuous several frames. These parts are referred to as Frequent Local Parts or FLPs. The FLPs allow us to build powerful bag-of-FLP-based action representation. This new representation yields state-of-the-art results on MSR DailyActivity3D and MSR ActionPairs3D

    ๋™์˜์ƒ ์† ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋™์ž‘์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021. 2. ์ด์ œํฌ.In computer graphics, simulating and analyzing human movement have been interesting research topics started since the 1960s. Still, simulating realistic human movements in a 3D virtual world is a challenging task in computer graphics. In general, motion capture techniques have been used. Although the motion capture data guarantees realistic result and high-quality data, there is lots of equipment required to capture motion, and the process is complicated. Recently, 3D human pose estimation techniques from the 2D video are remarkably developed. Researchers in computer graphics and computer vision have attempted to reconstruct the various human motions from video data. However, existing methods can not robustly estimate dynamic actions and not work on videos filmed with a moving camera. In this thesis, we propose methods to reconstruct dynamic human motions from in-the-wild videos and to control the motions. First, we developed a framework to reconstruct motion from videos using prior physics knowledge. For dynamic motions such as backspin, the poses estimated by a state-of-the-art method are incomplete and include unreliable root trajectory or lack intermediate poses. We designed a reward function using poses and hints extracted from videos in the deep reinforcement learning controller and learned a policy to simultaneously reconstruct motion and control a virtual character. Second, we simulated figure skating movements in video. Skating sequences consist of fast and dynamic movements on ice, hindering the acquisition of motion data. Thus, we extracted 3D key poses from a video to then successfully replicate several figure skating movements using trajectory optimization and a deep reinforcement learning controller. Third, we devised an algorithm for gait analysis through video of patients with movement disorders. After acquiring the patients joint positions from 2D video processed by a deep learning network, the 3D absolute coordinates were estimated, and gait parameters such as gait velocity, cadence, and step length were calculated. Additionally, we analyzed the optimization criteria of human walking by using a 3D musculoskeletal humanoid model and physics-based simulation. For two criteria, namely, the minimization of muscle activation and joint torque, we compared simulation data with real human data for analysis. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the first two research topics, we verified the reconstruction of dynamic human motions from 2D videos using physics-based simulations. For the last two research topics, we evaluated our results with real human data.์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์Šค์—์„œ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„์€ 1960 ๋…„๋Œ€๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ช‡ ์‹ญ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์–ด ์™”์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , 3์ฐจ์› ๊ฐ€์ƒ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ƒ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์–ด๋ ต๊ณ  ๋„์ „์ ์ธ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋™์•ˆ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ณ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ฒ˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ณ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์žฅ๋น„๋“ค์ด ๋งŽ๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๊ณผ์ •์ด ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์— 2์ฐจ์› ์˜์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ๊ด„๋ชฉํ•  ๋งŒํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์Šค์™€ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๋น„์ ผ ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ๋น„๋””์˜ค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋ฅผ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์€ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์›€์ง์ด๋Š” ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ๋กœ ์ดฌ์˜ํ•œ ๋น„๋””์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๋™์ž‘์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™ ์ง€์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ ๋ชจ์…˜์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณต์ค‘์ œ๋น„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ์ตœ์‹  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋™์›ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์ž์„ธ๋“ค์€ ์บ๋ฆญํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ถค์ ์„ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ค‘๊ฐ„์— ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ •์— ์‹คํŒจํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ๋ถˆ์™„์ „ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹ฌ์ธต๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•™์Šต ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์˜์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ํฌ์ฆˆ์™€ ํžŒํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์ƒ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ์…˜ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์บ๋ฆญํ„ฐ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •์ฑ…์„ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜ ์งธ, ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์€ ๋น™์ƒ์—์„œ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์›€์ง์ž„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด ๋ชจ์…˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๊นŒ๋‹ค๋กญ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ 3์ฐจ์› ํ‚ค ํฌ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ถค์  ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐ ์‹ฌ์ธต๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•™์Šต ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ์—ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹ ์งธ, ํŒŒํ‚จ์Šจ ๋ณ‘์ด๋‚˜ ๋‡Œ์„ฑ๋งˆ๋น„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์งˆ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์›€์ง์ž„ ์žฅ์• ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ณดํ–‰์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. 2์ฐจ์› ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ •๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด๋‚ธ ๋‹ค์Œ, 3์ฐจ์› ์ ˆ๋Œ€ ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด๋‚ด์–ด ์ด๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ณดํญ, ๋ณดํ–‰ ์†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณดํ–‰ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์ธ์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋ณดํ–‰์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํƒ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทผ์œก ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์™€ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋Œ๋ฆผํž˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”, ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•œ ํ›„, ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒ˜์Œ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ฐจ์› ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์„ ์žฌํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์ค‘ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€์˜ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 2 Background 9 2.1 Pose Estimation from 2D Video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Motion Reconstruction from Monocular Video . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3 Physics-Based Character Simulation and Control . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.4 Motion Reconstruction Leveraging Physics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.5 Human Motion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.5.1 Figure Skating Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.6 Objective Gait Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.7 Optimization for Human Movement Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.7.1 Stability Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3 Human Dynamics from Monocular Video with Dynamic Camera Movements 19 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.2 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3 Pose and Contact Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.4 Learning Human Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.4.1 Policy Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.4.2 Network Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.4.3 Scene Estimator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.5 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.5.1 Video Clips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.5.2 Comparison of Contact Estimators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.5.3 Ablation Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.5.4 Robustness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.6 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4 Figure Skating Simulation from Video 42 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2 System Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.3 Skating Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.3.1 Non-holonomic Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 4.3.2 Relaxation of Non-holonomic Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.4 Data Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4.5 Trajectory Optimization and Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5.1 Trajectory Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5.2 Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.6 Experimental Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.7 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 5 Gait Analysis Using Pose Estimation Algorithm with 2D-video of Patients 61 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.2 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.2.1 Patients and video recording . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.2.2 Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents 66 5.2.3 3D Pose estimation from 2D video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 5.2.4 Gait parameter estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 5.2.5 Statistical analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3.1 Validation of video-based analysis of the gait . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3.2 gait analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 5.4.1 Validation with the conventional sensor-based method . . . . 75 5.4.2 Analysis of gait and turning in TUG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.4.3 Correlation with clinical parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.4.4 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.5 Supplementary Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 6 Control Optimization of Human Walking 80 6.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 6.2 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.1 Musculoskeletal model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.2 Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.3 Control co-activation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 6.2.4 Push-recovery experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 6.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 6.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 7 Conclusion 90 7.1 Future work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91Docto

    Robust 3D Action Recognition through Sampling Local Appearances and Global Distributions

    Full text link
    3D action recognition has broad applications in human-computer interaction and intelligent surveillance. However, recognizing similar actions remains challenging since previous literature fails to capture motion and shape cues effectively from noisy depth data. In this paper, we propose a novel two-layer Bag-of-Visual-Words (BoVW) model, which suppresses the noise disturbances and jointly encodes both motion and shape cues. First, background clutter is removed by a background modeling method that is designed for depth data. Then, motion and shape cues are jointly used to generate robust and distinctive spatial-temporal interest points (STIPs): motion-based STIPs and shape-based STIPs. In the first layer of our model, a multi-scale 3D local steering kernel (M3DLSK) descriptor is proposed to describe local appearances of cuboids around motion-based STIPs. In the second layer, a spatial-temporal vector (STV) descriptor is proposed to describe the spatial-temporal distributions of shape-based STIPs. Using the Bag-of-Visual-Words (BoVW) model, motion and shape cues are combined to form a fused action representation. Our model performs favorably compared with common STIP detection and description methods. Thorough experiments verify that our model is effective in distinguishing similar actions and robust to background clutter, partial occlusions and pepper noise

    Study Of Human Activity In Video Data With An Emphasis On View-invariance

    Get PDF
    The perception and understanding of human motion and action is an important area of research in computer vision that plays a crucial role in various applications such as surveillance, HCI, ergonomics, etc. In this thesis, we focus on the recognition of actions in the case of varying viewpoints and different and unknown camera intrinsic parameters. The challenges to be addressed include perspective distortions, differences in viewpoints, anthropometric variations, and the large degrees of freedom of articulated bodies. In addition, we are interested in methods that require little or no training. The current solutions to action recognition usually assume that there is a huge dataset of actions available so that a classifier can be trained. However, this means that in order to define a new action, the user has to record a number of videos from different viewpoints with varying camera intrinsic parameters and then retrain the classifier, which is not very practical from a development point of view. We propose algorithms that overcome these challenges and require just a few instances of the action from any viewpoint with any intrinsic camera parameters. Our first algorithm is based on the rank constraint on the family of planar homographies associated with triplets of body points. We represent action as a sequence of poses, and decompose the pose into triplets. Therefore, the pose transition is broken down into a set of movement of body point planes. In this way, we transform the non-rigid motion of the body points into a rigid motion of body point iii planes. We use the fact that the family of homographies associated with two identical poses would have rank 4 to gauge similarity of the pose between two subjects, observed by different perspective cameras and from different viewpoints. This method requires only one instance of the action. We then show that it is possible to extend the concept of triplets to line segments. In particular, we establish that if we look at the movement of line segments instead of triplets, we have more redundancy in data thus leading to better results. We demonstrate this concept on โ€œfundamental ratios.โ€ We decompose a human body pose into line segments instead of triplets and look at set of movement of line segments. This method needs only three instances of the action. If a larger dataset is available, we can also apply weighting on line segments for better accuracy. The last method is based on the concept of โ€œProjective Depthโ€. Given a plane, we can find the relative depth of a point relative to the given plane. We propose three different ways of using โ€œprojective depth:โ€ (i) Triplets - the three points of a triplet along with the epipole defines the plane and the movement of points relative to these body planes can be used to recognize actions; (ii) Ground plane - if we are able to extract the ground plane, we can find the โ€œprojective depthโ€ of the body points with respect to it. Therefore, the problem of action recognition would translate to curve matching; and (iii) Mirror person - We can use the mirror view of the person to extract mirror symmetric planes. This method also needs only one instance of the action. Extensive experiments are reported on testing view invariance, robustness to noisy localization and occlusions of body points, and action recognition. The experimental results are very promising and demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed invariants. i

    View-invariant human movement assessment

    Get PDF

    Using the Microsoft Kinect to assess human bimanual coordination

    Get PDF
    Optical marker-based systems are the gold-standard for capturing three-dimensional (3D) human kinematics. However, these systems have various drawbacks including time consuming marker placement, soft tissue movement artifact, and are prohibitively expensive and non-portable. The Microsoft Kinect is an inexpensive, portable, depth camera that can be used to capture 3D human movement kinematics. Numerous investigations have assessed the Kinect\u27s ability to capture postural control and gait, but to date, no study has evaluated it\u27s capabilities for measuring spatiotemporal coordination. In order to investigate human coordination and coordination stability with the Kinect, a well-studied bimanual coordination paradigm (Kelso, 1984, Kelso; Scholz, & Schรถner, 1986) was adapted. ^ Nineteen participants performed ten trials of coordinated hand movements in either in-phase or anti-phase patterns of coordination to the beat of a metronome which was incrementally sped up and slowed down. Continuous relative phase (CRP) and the standard deviation of CRP were used to assess coordination and coordination stability, respectively.^ Data from the Kinect were compared to a Vicon motion capture system using a mixed-model, repeated measures analysis of variance and intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) (ICC(2,1)).^ Kinect significantly underestimated CRP for the the anti-phase coordination pattern (p \u3c.0001) and overestimated the in-phase pattern (p\u3c.0001). However, a high ICC value (r=.097) was found between the systems. For the standard deviation of CRP, the Kinect exhibited significantly higher variability than the Vicon (p \u3c .0001) but was able to distinguish significant differences between patterns of coordination with anti-phase variability being higher than in-phase (p \u3c .0001). Additionally, the Kinect was unable to accurately capture the structure of coordination stability for the anti-phase pattern. Finally, agreement was found between systems using the ICC (r=.37).^ In conclusion, the Kinect was unable to accurately capture mean CRP. However, the high ICC between the two systems is promising and the Kinect was able to distinguish between the coordination stability of in-phase and anti-phase coordination. However, the structure of variability as movement speed increased was dissimilar to the Vicon, particularly for the anti-phase pattern. Some aspects of coordination are nicely captured by the Kinect while others are not. Detecting differences between bimanual coordination patterns and the stability of those patterns can be achieved using the Kinect. However, researchers interested in the structure of coordination stability should exercise caution since poor agreement was found between systems
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore