13 research outputs found
Weighted Well-Covered Claw-Free Graphs
A graph G is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same
cardinality. Assume that a weight function w is defined on its vertices. Then G
is w-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. For
every graph G, the set of weight functions w such that G is w-well-covered is a
vector space. Given an input claw-free graph G, we present an O(n^6)algortihm,
whose input is a claw-free graph G, and output is the vector space of weight
functions w, for which G is w-well-covered. A graph G is equimatchable if all
its maximal matchings are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight
function w is defined on the edges of G. Then G is w-equimatchable if all its
maximal matchings are of the same weight. For every graph G, the set of weight
functions w such that G is w-equimatchable is a vector space. We present an
O(m*n^4 + n^5*log(n)) algorithm which receives an input graph G, and outputs
the vector space of weight functions w such that G is w-equimatchable.Comment: 14 pages, 1 figur
Edge-Stable Equimatchable Graphs
A graph is \emph{equimatchable} if every maximal matching of has the
same cardinality. We are interested in equimatchable graphs such that the
removal of any edge from the graph preserves the equimatchability. We call an
equimatchable graph \emph{edge-stable} if , that is the
graph obtained by the removal of edge from , is also equimatchable for
any . After noticing that edge-stable equimatchable graphs are
either 2-connected factor-critical or bipartite, we characterize edge-stable
equimatchable graphs. This characterization yields an time recognition algorithm. Lastly, we introduce and shortly
discuss the related notions of edge-critical, vertex-stable and vertex-critical
equimatchable graphs. In particular, we emphasize the links between our work
and the well-studied notion of shedding vertices, and point out some open
questions
On Minimum Maximal Distance-k Matchings
We study the computational complexity of several problems connected with
finding a maximal distance- matching of minimum cardinality or minimum
weight in a given graph. We introduce the class of -equimatchable graphs
which is an edge analogue of -equipackable graphs. We prove that the
recognition of -equimatchable graphs is co-NP-complete for any fixed . We provide a simple characterization for the class of strongly chordal
graphs with equal -packing and -domination numbers. We also prove that
for any fixed integer the problem of finding a minimum weight
maximal distance- matching and the problem of finding a minimum weight
-independent dominating set cannot be approximated in polynomial
time in chordal graphs within a factor of unless
, where is a fixed constant (thereby
improving the NP-hardness result of Chang for the independent domination case).
Finally, we show the NP-hardness of the minimum maximal induced matching and
independent dominating set problems in large-girth planar graphs.Comment: 15 pages, 4 figure
On the algorithmic complexity of twelve covering and independence parameters of graphs
The definitions of four previously studied parameters related to total coverings and total matchings of graphs can be restricted, thereby obtaining eight parameters related to covering and independence, each of which has been studied previously in some form. Here we survey briefly results concerning total coverings and total matchings of graphs, and consider the aforementioned 12 covering and independence parameters with regard to algorithmic complexity. We survey briefly known results for several graph classes, and obtain new NP-completeness results for the minimum total cover and maximum minimal total cover problems in planar graphs, the minimum maximal total matching problem in bipartite and chordal graphs, and the minimum independent dominating set problem in planar cubic graphs
The number of maximum matchings in a tree
We determine upper and lower bounds for the number of maximum matchings
(i.e., matchings of maximum cardinality) of a tree of given order.
While the trees that attain the lower bound are easily characterised, the trees
with largest number of maximum matchings show a very subtle structure. We give
a complete characterisation of these trees and derive that the number of
maximum matchings in a tree of order is at most (the
precise constant being an algebraic number of degree 14). As a corollary, we
improve on a recent result by G\'orska and Skupie\'n on the number of maximal
matchings (maximal with respect to set inclusion).Comment: 38 page