Electronic voting system for RIT Student Government elections

Recent studies argue that traditional voting systems do not encourage increased voter participation due to constraints in time, location, accuracy, and, accessibility. To ensure the rights of a democratic society and to enhance and secure the voting rights of citizens by surpassing all the limitations of the traditional voting system, the development of an electronic voting system is an attractive solution. Research on secure electronic voting systems has been conducted for at least the past two decades. We propose to develop an electronic voting system, called the Rochester Institute of Technology Student Government Election System (SGEES) based on Damgard et al. This voting scheme will use efficient honest-verifier zero-knowledge, which, unlike previous election schemes, are both easy to compute and to verify for both voters and authorities. Our proposed electronic voting system will allow convenient and confident voting while maintaining the accuracy of election results. This project will address the security requirements for electronic voting over the Internet, including privacy, completeness, soundness, receipt-freeness, and universal verifiability. In particular, we will research the feasibility of the voting scheme and protocols by studying three related cryptographical theories: homomorphic encryption, efficient honest-verifier zero-knowledge proofs, and threshold decryption cryptosystem

Making Sigma-Protocols Non-interactive Without Random Oracles

Damg˚ard, Fazio and Nicolosi (TCC 2006) gave a transformation of Sigma-protocols, 3-move honest verifier zero-knowledge proofs, into efficient non-interactive zero-knowledge arguments for a designated verifier. Their transformation uses additively homomorphic encryption to encrypt the verifier’s challenge, which the prover uses to compute an encrypted answer. The transformation does not rely on the random oracle model but proving soundness requires a complexity leveraging assumption. We propose an alternative instantiation of their transformation and show that it achieves culpable soundness without complexity leveraging. This improves upon an earlier result by Ventre and Visconti (Africacrypt 2009), who used a different construction which achieved weak culpable soundness. We demonstrate how our construction can be used to prove validity of encrypted votes in a referendum. This yields a voting system with homomorphic tallying that does not rely on the Fiat-Shamir heuristic

Lattice-Based proof of a shuffle

In this paper we present the first fully post-quantum proof of a shuffle for RLWE encryption schemes. Shuffles are commonly used to construct mixing networks (mix-nets), a key element to ensure anonymity in many applications such as electronic voting systems. They should preserve anonymity even against an attack using quantum computers in order to guarantee long-term privacy. The proof presented in this paper is built over RLWE commitments which are perfectly binding and computationally hiding under the RLWE assumption, thus achieving security in a post-quantum scenario. Furthermore we provide a new definition for a secure mixing node (mix-node) and prove that our construction satisfies this definition.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

On publicly verifiable secret sharing schemes

Secret sharing allows a dealer to distribute shares of a secret to a set of parties such that only so-called authorised subsets of these parties can recover the secret, whilst forbidden sets gain at most some restricted amount of information. This idea has been built upon in verifiable secret sharing to allow parties to verify that their shares are valid and will therefore correctly reconstruct the same secret. This can then be further extended to publicly verifiable secret sharing by firstly considering only public channels of communication, hence imposing the need for encryption of the shares, and secondly by requiring that any party be able to verify any other parties shares from the public encryption. In this thesis we work our way up from the original secret sharing scheme by Shamir to examples of various approaches of publicly verifiable schemes. Due to the need for encryption in private communication, different cryptographic methods allow for certain interesting advantages in the schemes. We review some important existing methods and their significant properties of interest, such as being homomorphic or efficiently verifiable. We also consider recent improvements in these schemes and make a contribution by showing that an encryption scheme by Castagnos and Laguillaumie allows for a publicly verifiable secret sharing scheme to have some interesting homomorphic properties. To explore further we look at generalisations to the recently introduced idea of Abelian secret sharing, and we consider some examples of such constructions. Finally we look at some applications of secret sharing schemes, and present our own implementation of Schoenmaker’s scheme in Python, along with a voting system on which it is based

DEMOS-2:scalable E2E verifiable elections without random oracles

Recently, Kiayias, Zacharias and Zhang-proposed a new E2E verifiable e-voting system called 'DEMOS' that for the first time provides E2E verifiability without relying on external sources of randomness or the random oracle model; the main advantage of such system is in the fact that election auditors need only the election transcript and the feedback from the voters to pronounce the election process unequivocally valid. Unfortunately, DEMOS comes with a huge performance and storage penalty for the election authority (EA) compared to other e-voting systems such as Helios. The main reason is that due to the way the EA forms the proof of the tally result, it is required to {\em precompute} a number of ciphertexts for each voter and each possible choice of the voter. This approach clearly does not scale to elections that have a complex ballot and voters have an exponential number of ways to vote in the number of candidates. The performance penalty on the EA appears to be intrinsic to the approach: voters cannot compute an enciphered ballot themselves because there seems to be no way for them to prove that it is a valid ciphertext. In contrast to the above, in this work, we construct a new e-voting system that retains the strong E2E characteristics of DEMOS (but against computational adversaries) while completely eliminating the performance and storage penalty of the EA. We achieve this via a new cryptographic construction that has the EA produce and prove, using voters' coins, the security of a common reference string (CRS) that voters subsequently can use to affix non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proofs to their ciphertexts. The EA itself uses the CRS to prove via a NIZK the tally correctness at the end. Our construction has similar performance to Helios and is practical. The privacy of our construction relies on the SXDH assumption over bilinear groups via complexity leveraging

Multi-party trust computation in decentralized environments in the presence of malicious adversaries

In this paper, we describe a decentralized privacy-preserving protocol for securely casting trust ratings in distributed reputation systems. Our protocol allows n participants to cast their votes in a way that preserves the privacy of individual values against both internal and external attacks. The protocol is coupled with an extensive theoretical analysis in which we formally prove that our protocol is resistant to collusion against as many as n-1 corrupted nodes in both the semi-honest and malicious adversarial models. The behavior of our protocol is tested in a real P2P network by measuring its communication delay and processing overhead. The experimental results uncover the advantages of our protocol over previous works in the area; without sacrificing security, our decentralized protocol is shown to be almost one order of magnitude faster than the previous best protocol for providing anonymous feedback

A Generalisation, a Simplification and some Applications of Paillier’s Probabilistic Public-Key System

We propose a generalisation of Paillier's probabilistic publickey system, in which the expansion factor is reduced and which allows to adjust the block length of the scheme even after the public key has been fixed, without losing the homomorphic property. We show thatthe generalisation is as secure as Paillier's original system.We construct a threshold variant of the generalised scheme as well as zero-knowledge protocols to show that a given ciphertext encrypts one of a set of given plaintexts, and protocols to verify multiplicative relations on plaintexts. We then show how these building blocks can be used for applying thescheme to efficient electronic voting. This reduces dramatically the work needed to compute the final result of an election, compared to the previously best known schemes. We show how the basic scheme for a yes/no vote can be easily adapted to casting a vote for up to t out of L candidates. The same basic building blocks can also be adapted to provide receipt-free elections, under appropriate physical assumptions. The scheme for 1 out of L elections can be optimised such that for a certainrange of parameter values, a ballot has size only O(log L) bits

An Efficient E2E Verifiable E-voting System without Setup Assumptions

End-to-end (E2E) verifiability is critical if e-voting systems are to be adopted for use in real-world elections. A new E2E e-voting system doesn't require additional setup assumptions and uses conventional cryptographic building blocks

End-to-end verifiable elections in the standard model

We present the cryptographic implementation of “DEMOS”, a new e-voting system that is end-to-end verifiable in the standard model, i.e., without any additional “setup” assumption or access to a random oracle (RO). Previously known end-to-end verifiable e-voting systems required such additional assumptions (specifically, either the existence of a “randomness beacon” or were only shown secure in the RO model). In order to analyze our scheme, we also provide a modeling of end-to-end verifiability as well as privacy and receipt-freeness that encompasses previous definitions in the form of two concise attack games. Our scheme satisfies end-to-end verifiability information theoretically in the standard model and privacy/receipt-freeness under a computational assumption (subexponential Decisional Diffie Helman). In our construction, we utilize a number of techniques used for the first time in the context of e-voting schemes that include utilizing randomness from bit-fixing sources, zero-knowledge proofs with imperfect verifier randomness and complexity leveraging

Zero Knowledge Protocols and Applications

The historical goal of cryptography is to securely transmit or store a message in an insecure medium. In that era, before public key cryptography, we had two kinds of people: those who had the correct key, and those who did not. Nowadays however, we live in a complex world with equally complex goals and requirements: securely passing a note from Alice to Bob is not enough. We want Alice to use her smartphone to vote for Carol, without Bob the tallier, or anyone else learning her vote; we also want guarantees that Alice’s ballot contains a single, valid vote and we want guarantees that Bob will tally the ballots properly. This is in fact made possible because of zero knowledge protocols. This thesis presents research performed in the area of zero knowledge protocols across the following threads: we relax the assumptions necessary for the Damgard, Fazio and ˚ Nicolosi (DFN) transformation, a technique which enables one to collapse a number of three round protocols into a single message. This approach is motivated by showing how it could be used as part of a voting scheme. Then we move onto a protocol that lets us prove that a given computation (modeled as an arithmetic circuit) was performed correctly. It improves upon the state of the art in the area by significantly reducing the communication cost. A second strand of research concerns multi-user signatures, which enable a signer to sign with respect to a set of users. We give new definitions for important primitives in the area as well as efficient instantiations using zero knowledge protocols. Finally, we present two possible answers to the question posed by voting receipts. One is to maximise privacy by building a voting system that provides receipt-freeness automatically. The other is to use them to enable conventual and privacy preserving vote copying