Detection of opinion spam with character n-grams

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_21In this paper we consider the detection of opinion spam as a stylistic classi cation task because, given a particular domain, the deceptive and truthful opinions are similar in content but di ffer in the way opinions are written (style). Particularly, we propose using character ngrams as features since they have shown to capture lexical content as well as stylistic information. We evaluated our approach on a standard corpus composed of 1600 hotel reviews, considering positive and negative reviews. We compared the results obtained with character n-grams against the ones with word n-grams. Moreover, we evaluated the e ffectiveness of character n-grams decreasing the training set size in order to simulate real training conditions. The results obtained show that character n-grams are good features for the detection of opinion spam; they seem to be able to capture better than word n-grams the content of deceptive opinions and the writing style of the deceiver. In particular, results show an improvement of 2:3% and 2:1% over the word-based representations in the detection of positive and negative deceptive opinions respectively. Furthermore, character n-grams allow to obtain a good performance also with a very small training corpus. Using only 25% of the training set, a Na ve Bayes classi er showed F1 values up to 0.80 for both opinion polarities.This work is the result of the collaboration in the frame-work of the WIQEI IRSES project (Grant No. 269180) within the FP7 Marie Curie. The second author was partially supported by the LACCIR programme under project ID R1212LAC006. Accordingly, the work of the third author was in the framework the DIANA-APPLICATIONS-Finding Hidden Knowledge inTexts: Applications (TIN2012-38603-C02-01) project, and the VLC/CAMPUS Microcluster on Multimodal Interaction in Intelligent Systems.Hernández Fusilier, D.; Montes Gomez, M.; Rosso, P.; Guzmán Cabrera, R. (2015). Detection of opinion spam with character n-grams. En Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 16th International Conference, CICLing 2015, Cairo, Egypt, April 14-20, 2015, Proceedings, Part II. Springer International Publishing. 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_21S285294Blamey, B., Crick, T., Oatley, G.: RU:-) or:-(? character-vs. word-gram feature selection for sentiment classification of OSN corpora. Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIX, 207–212 (2012)Drucker, H., Wu, D., Vapnik, V.N.: Support Vector Machines for Spam Categorization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 10(5), 1048–1054 (2002)Feng, S., Banerjee, R., Choi, Y.: Syntactic Stylometry for Deception Detection. Association for Computational Linguistics, short paper. ACL (2012)Feng, S., Xing, L., Gogar, A., Choi, Y.: Distributional Footprints of Deceptive Product Reviews. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International AAAI Conference on WebBlogs and Social Media (June 2012)Gyongyi, Z., Garcia-Molina, H., Pedersen, J.: Combating Web Spam with Trust Rank. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, vol. 30, pp. 576–587. VLDB Endowment (2004)Hall, M., Eibe, F., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: an Update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 10–18 (2009)Hernández-Fusilier, D., Guzmán-Cabrera, R., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P.: Using PU-learning to Detect Deceptive Opinion Spam. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 38–45 (2013)Hernández-Fusilier, D., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., Guzmán-Cabrera, R.: Detecting Positive and Negative Deceptive Opinions using PU-learning. Information Processing & Management (2014), doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.11.001Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Opinion Spam and Analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, pp. 219–230 (2008)Jindal, N., Liu, B., Lim, E.: Finding Unusual Review Patterns Using Unexpected Rules. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2010, pp. 210–220(October 2010)Kanaris, I., Kanaris, K., Houvardas, I., Stamatatos, E.: Word versus character n-grams for anti-spam filtering. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 16(6), 1047–1067 (2007)Lim, E.P., Nguyen, V.A., Jindal, N., Liu, B., Lauw, H.W.: Detecting Product Review Spammers Using Rating Behaviours. In: CIKM, pp. 939–948 (2010)Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Synthesis Lecture on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2012)Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., Wang, J., Glance, N., Jindal, N.: Detecting Group Review Spam. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 93–94 (2011)Ntoulas, A., Najork, M., Manasse, M., Fetterly, D.: Detecting Spam Web Pages through Content Analysis. Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 83–92 (2006)Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by any Stretch of the Imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 309–319 (2011)Ott, M., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Negative Deceptive Opinion Spam. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 309–319 (2013)Raymond, Y.K., Lau, S.Y., Liao, R., Chi-Wai, K., Kaiquan, X., Yunqing, X., Yuefeng, L.: Text Mining and Probabilistic Modeling for Online Review Spam Detection. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 2(4), Article: 25, 1–30 (2011)Stamatatos, E.: On the robustness of authorship attribution based on character n-gram features. Journal of Law & Policy 21(2) (2013)Wu, G., Greene, D., Cunningham, P.: Merging Multiple Criteria to Identify Suspicious Reviews. In: RecSys 2010, pp. 241–244 (2010)Xie, S., Wang, G., Lin, S., Yu, P.S.: Review Spam Detection via Time Series Pattern Discovery. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 635–636 (2012)Zhou, L., Sh, Y., Zhang, D.: A Statistical Language Modeling Approach to Online Deception Detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 20(8), 1077–1081 (2008

Character N-Grams for Detecting Deceptive Controversial Opinions

[EN] Controversial topics are present in the everyday life, and opinions about them can be either truthful or deceptive. Deceptive opinions are emitted to mislead other people in order to gain some advantage. In the most of the cases humans cannot detect whether the opinion is deceptive or truthful, however, computational approaches have been used successfully for this purpose. In this work, we evaluate a representation based on character n-grams features for detecting deceptive opinions. We consider opinions on the following: abortion, death penalty and personal feelings about the best friend; three domains studied in the state of the art. We found character n-grams effective for detecting deception in these controversial domains, even more than using psycholinguistic features. Our results indicate that this representation is able to capture relevant information about style and content useful for this task. This fact allows us to conclude that the proposed one is a competitive text representation with a good trade-off between simplicity and performance.We would like to thank CONACyT for partially supporting this work under grants 613411, CB-2015-01-257383, and FC-2016/2410. The work of the last author was partially funded by the Spanish MINECO under the research project SomEMBED (TIN2015-71147-C2-1-P).Sánchez-Junquera, JJ.; Luis Villaseñor Pineda; Montes Gomez, M.; Rosso, P. (2018). Character N-Grams for Detecting Deceptive Controversial Opinions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 11018:135-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98932-7_13S13514011018Aritsugi, M., et al.: Combining word and character n-grams for detecting deceptive opinions, vol. 1, pp. 828–833. IEEE (2017)Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Interpersonal deception theory. Commun. Theory 6(3), 203–242 (1996)Cagnina, L.C., Rosso, P.: Detecting deceptive opinions: intra and cross-domain classification using an efficient representation. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 25(Suppl. 2), 151–174 (2017)Feng, S., Banerjee, R., Choi, Y.: Syntactic stylometry for deception detection, pp. 171–175. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)Fusilier, D.H., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., Cabrera, R.G.: Detection of opinion spam with character n-grams. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2015. LNCS, vol. 9042, pp. 285–294. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_21Hernández-Castañeda, Á., Calvo, H., Gelbukh, A., Flores, J.J.G.: Cross-domain deception detection using support vector networks. Soft Comput. 21(3), 1–11 (2016)Mihalcea, R., Strapparava, C.: The lie detector: explorations in the automatic recognition of deceptive language. In: Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pp. 309–312. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, pp. 309–319. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)Pérez-Rosas, V., Mihalcea, R.: Cross-cultural deception detection. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), vol. 2, pp. 440–445 (2014)Sapkota, U., Solorio, T., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Bethard, S.: Not all character n-grams are created equal: a study in authorship attribution. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 93–102 (2015)Vrij, A.: Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities. Wiley, Hoboken (2008

Satirical News Detection and Analysis using Attention Mechanism and Linguistic Features

Satirical news is considered to be entertainment, but it is potentially deceptive and harmful. Despite the embedded genre in the article, not everyone can recognize the satirical cues and therefore believe the news as true news. We observe that satirical cues are often reflected in certain paragraphs rather than the whole document. Existing works only consider document-level features to detect the satire, which could be limited. We consider paragraph-level linguistic features to unveil the satire by incorporating neural network and attention mechanism. We investigate the difference between paragraph-level features and document-level features, and analyze them on a large satirical news dataset. The evaluation shows that the proposed model detects satirical news effectively and reveals what features are important at which level.Comment: EMNLP 2017, 11 page

Detecting Sockpuppets in Deceptive Opinion Spam

This paper explores the problem of sockpuppet detection in deceptive opinion spam using authorship attribution and verification approaches. Two methods are explored. The first is a feature subsampling scheme that uses the KL-Divergence on stylistic language models of an author to find discriminative features. The second is a transduction scheme, spy induction that leverages the diversity of authors in the unlabeled test set by sending a set of spies (positive samples) from the training set to retrieve hidden samples in the unlabeled test set using nearest and farthest neighbors. Experiments using ground truth sockpuppet data show the effectiveness of the proposed schemes.Comment: 18 pages, Accepted at CICLing 2017, 18th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistic

Detecting Deceptive Opinions: Intra and Cross-domain Classification using an Efficient Representation

Electronic versíon of an article published as International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 25, 2, 2017, 151-174. DOI:10.1142/S0218488517400165 © copyright World Scientific Publishing Company. https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/ijufks[EN] Online opinions play an important role for customers and companies because of the increasing use they do to make purchase and business decisions. A consequence of that is the growing tendency to post fake reviews in order to change purchase decisions and opinions about products and services. Therefore, it is really important to filter out deceptive comments from the retrieved opinions. In this paper we propose the character n-grams in tokens, an efficient and effective variant of the traditional character n-grams model, which we use to obtain a low dimensionality representation of opinions. A Support Vector Machines classifier was used to evaluate our proposal on available corpora with reviews of hotels, doctors and restaurants. In order to study the performance of our model, we make experiments with intra and cross-domain cases. The aim of the latter experiment is to evaluate our approach in a realistic cross-domain scenario where deceptive opinions are available in a domain but not in another one. After comparing our method with state-of-the-art ones we may conclude that using character n-grams in tokens allows to obtain competitive results with a low dimensionality representation.This publication was made possible by NPRP grant #9-175-1-033 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.Cagnina, L.; Rosso, P. (2017). Detecting Deceptive Opinions: Intra and Cross-domain Classification using an Efficient Representation. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 25(2):151-174. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488517400165S151174252Cambria, E. (2016). Affective Computing and Sentiment Analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(2), 102-107. doi:10.1109/mis.2016.31Cambria, E., & Hussain, A. (2015). Sentic Computing. Cognitive Computation, 7(2), 183-185. doi:10.1007/s12559-015-9325-0Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009). The WEKA data mining software. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11(1), 10-18. doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278Hancock, J. T., Curry, L. E., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. (2007). On Lying and Being Lied To: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication. Discourse Processes, 45(1), 1-23. doi:10.1080/01638530701739181Hernández Fusilier, D., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., & Guzmán Cabrera, R. (2015). Detecting positive and negative deceptive opinions using PU-learning. Information Processing & Management, 51(4), 433-443. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.11.001Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50-60. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491MONTAÑÉS, E., QUEVEDO, J. R., COMBARRO, E. F., DÍAZ, I., & RANILLA, J. (2007). A HYBRID FEATURE SELECTION METHOD FOR TEXT CATEGORIZATION. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(02), 133-151. doi:10.1142/s0218488507004492Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665-675. doi:10.1177/0146167203029005010Raudys, S. J., & Jain, A. K. (1991). Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: recommendations for practitioners. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(3), 252-264. doi:10.1109/34.75512Wang, G., Xie, S., Liu, B., & Yu, P. S. (2012). Identify Online Store Review Spammers via Social Review Graph. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 3(4), 1-21. doi:10.1145/2337542.2337546Webb, G. I. (2000). Machine Learning, 40(2), 159-196. doi:10.1023/a:100765951484

Deep Learning for User Comment Moderation

Experimenting with a new dataset of 1.6M user comments from a Greek news portal and existing datasets of English Wikipedia comments, we show that an RNN outperforms the previous state of the art in moderation. A deep, classification-specific attention mechanism improves further the overall performance of the RNN. We also compare against a CNN and a word-list baseline, considering both fully automatic and semi-automatic moderation

A survey on author profiling, deception, and irony detection for the Arabic language

"This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving."[EN] The possibility of knowing people traits on the basis of what they write is a field of growing interest named author profiling. To infer a user's gender, age, native language, language variety, or even when the user lies, simply by analyzing her texts, opens a wide range of possibilities from the point of view of security. In this paper, we review the state of the art about some of the main author profiling problems, as well as deception and irony detection, especially focusing on the Arabic language.Qatar National Research Fund, Grant/Award Number: NPRP 9-175-1-033Rosso, P.; Rangel-Pardo, FM.; Hernandez-Farias, DI.; Cagnina, L.; Zaghouani, W.; Charfi, A. (2018). A survey on author profiling, deception, and irony detection for the Arabic language. Language and Linguistics Compass. 12(4):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12275S120124Abuhakema , G. Faraj , R. Feldman , A. Fitzpatrick , E. 2008 Annotating an arabic learner corpus for error Proceedings of The sixth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008Adouane , W. Dobnik , S. 2017 Identification of languages in algerian arabic multilingual documents Proceedings of The Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop (WANLP)Adouane , W. Semmar , N. Johansson , R 2016a Romanized berber and romanized arabic automatic language identification using machine learning Proceedings of the Third Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects; COLING 53 61Adouane , W. Semmar , N. Johansson , R. 2016b ASIREM participation at the discriminating similar languages shared task 2016 Proceedings of the Third Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects; COLING 163 169Adouane , W. Semmar , N. Johansson , R. Bobicev , V. 2016c Automatic detection of arabicized berber and arabic varieties Proceedings of the Third Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects; COLING 63 72Alfaifi , A. Atwell , E. Hedaya , I. 2014 Arabic learner corpus (ALC) v2: A new written and spoken corpus of Arabic learnersAlharbi , K. 2015 The irony volcano explodes black comedyAli , A. Bell , P. Renals , S. 2015 Automatic dialect detection in Arabic broadcast speechAlmeman , K. Lee , M. 2013 Automatic building of Arabic multi dialect text corpora by bootstrapping dialect words 1 6Aloshban , N. Al-Dossari , H. 2016 A new approach for group spam detection in social media for Arabic language (AGSD) 20 23Al-Sabbagh , R. Girju , R. 2012 YADAC: Yet another dialectal Arabic corpusAlsmearat , K. Al-Ayyoub , M. Al-Shalabi , R. 2014 An extensive study of the bag-of-words approach for gender identification of Arabic articlesAlsmearat , K. Shehab , M. Al-Ayyoub , M. Al-Shalabi , R. Kanaan , G. 2015 Emotion analysis of Arabic articles and its impact on identifying the authors genderArfath , P. Al-Badrashiny , M. Diab , M. El Kholy , A. Eskander , R. Habash , N. Pooleery , M. Rambow , O. Roth , R. M. 2014 MADAMIRA: A fast, comprehensive tool for morphological analysis and disambiguation of ArabicBarbieri , F. Basile , V. Croce , D. Nissim , M. Novielli , N. Patti , V. 2016 Overview of the Evalita 2016 sentiment polarity classification taskBarbieri , F. Saggion , H 2014 Modelling irony in twitter 56 64Barbieri , F. Saggion , H. Ronzano , F 2014 Modelling sarcasm in Twitter, a novel approachBasile , V. Bolioli , A. Nissim , M. Patti , V. Rosso , P. 2014 Overview of the Evalita 2014 sentiment polarity classification taskBlanchard, D., Tetreault, J., Higgins, D., Cahill, A., & Chodorow, M. (2013). TOEFL11: A CORPUS OF NON-NATIVE ENGLISH. ETS Research Report Series, 2013(2), i-15. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02331.xBosco, C., Patti, V., & Bolioli, A. (2013). Developing Corpora for Sentiment Analysis: The Case of Irony and Senti-TUT. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 55-63. doi:10.1109/mis.2013.28Bouamor , H. Habash , N. Salameh , M. Zaghouani , W. Rambow , O. Abdulrahim , D. Oflazer , K. 2018 The MADAR Arabic Dialect Corpus and LexiconBouchlaghem , R. Elkhlifi , A. Faiz , R. 2014 Tunisian dialect Wordnet creation and enrichment using web resources and other Wordnets 104 113 https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-3613Boujelbane , R. BenAyed , S. Belguith , L. H. 2013 Building bilingual lexicon to create dialect Tunisian corpora and adapt language modelCagnina L. Rosso , P 2015 Classification of deceptive opinions using a low dimensionality representationCavalli-Sforza , V. Saddiki , H. Bouzoubaa , K. Abouenour , L. Maamouri , M. Goshey , E. 2013 Bootstrapping a Wordnet for an Arabic dialect from other Wordnets and dictionary resourcesCotterell , R. Callison-Burch , C. 2014 A multi-dialect, multi-genre corpus of informal written ArabicDahlmeier , D. Tou Ng , H. Mei Wu , S. 2013 Building a large annotated corpus of learner English: the NUS corpus of learner English 22 31Darwish , K. Sajjad , H. Mubarak , H. 2014 Verifiably effective Arabic dialect identification 1465 1468Duh , K. Kirchhoff , K. 2006 Lexicon acquisition for dialectal Arabic using transductive learningElfardy , E. Diab , M. T. 2013 Sentence level dialect identification in Arabic 456 461Estival , D. Gaustad , T. Hutchinson , B. Bao-Pham , S. Radford , W. 2008 Author profiling for English and Arabic emailsFitzpatrick, E., Bachenko, J., & Fornaciari, T. (2015). Automatic Detection of Verbal Deception. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 8(3), 1-119. doi:10.2200/s00656ed1v01y201507hlt029Franco-Salvador, M., Rangel, F., Rosso, P., Taulé, M., & Antònia Martít, M. (2015). Language Variety Identification Using Distributed Representations of Words and Documents. Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction, 28-40. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24027-5_3Ghosh , A. Li , G. Veale , T. Rosso , P. Shutova , E. Barnden , J. Reyes , A. 2015 Semeval-2015 task 11: Sentiment analysis of figurative language in twitter 470 478Graff , D. Maamouri , M. 2012 Developing LMF-XML bilingual dictionaries for colloquial Arabic dialects 269 274Habash , N. Khalifa , S. Eryani , F. Rambow , O. Abdulrahim , D. Erdmann , A. Saddiki , H. 2018 Unified Guidelines and Resources for Arabic Dialect OrthographyHabash , N. Rambow , O. Kiraz , G. 2005 Morphological analysis and generation for Arabic dialectsHaggan, M. (1991). Spelling errors in native Arabic-speaking English majors: A comparison between remedial students and fourth year students. System, 19(1-2), 45-61. doi:10.1016/0346-251x(91)90007-cHassan , H. Daud , N. M. 2011 Corpus analysis of conjunctions: Arabic learners difficulties with collocationsHayes-Harb, R. (2006). Native Speakers of Arabic and ESL Texts: Evidence for the Transfer of Written Word Identification Processes. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 321. doi:10.2307/40264525Hernández-Farías, I., Benedí, J.-M., & Rosso, P. (2015). Applying Basic Features from Sentiment Analysis for Automatic Irony Detection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 337-344. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19390-8_38Hernández Fusilier, D., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., & Guzmán Cabrera, R. (2015). Detecting positive and negative deceptive opinions using PU-learning. Information Processing & Management, 51(4), 433-443. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.11.001Karoui , J. Benamara , F. Moriceau , V. Aussenac-Gilles , N. Hadrich Belguith , L. 2015 Towards a contextual pragmatic model to detect irony in tweetsKaroui , J. Zitoune , F. B. Moriceau , V. 2017 SOUKHRIA: Towards an irony detection system for Arabic in social mediaLjubesic , N. Mikelic , N. Boras , D. 2007 Language identification: How to distinguish similar languagesLópez-Monroy, A. P., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Escalante, H. J., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., & Stamatatos, E. (2015). Discriminative subprofile-specific representations for author profiling in social media. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 134-147. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.024Magdy, W., Darwish, K., & Weber, I. (2016). #FailedRevolutions: Using Twitter to study the antecedents of ISIS support. First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v21i2.6372Maier , W. Gomez-Rodriguez , C. 2014 Language variety identification in Spanish tweetsMalmasi , S. Dras , M. 2014 Arabic native language identificationMechti , S. Abbassi , A. Belguith , L. H. Faiz , R. 2016 An empirical method using features combination for Arabic native language identificationMukherjee, A., Liu, B., & Glance, N. (2012). Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’12. doi:10.1145/2187836.2187863Proceedings of the EMNLP’2014 Workshop on Language Technology for Closely Related Languages and Language Variants. (2014). doi:10.3115/v1/w14-42Pennebaker , J. W. Chung , C. K. Ireland , M. E. Gonzales , A. L. Booth , R. J. 2007 The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007 http://www.liwc.net/LIWC2007LanguageManual.pdf http://liwc.netPotthast , M. Rangel , F. Tschuggnall , M. Stamatatos , E. Rosso , P. Stein , B. 2017 Overview of PAN'17 G. Jones 10456 Springer, ChamRandall M. Groom , N. 2009 The BUiD Arab learner corpus: a resource for studying the acquisition of l2 English spellingRangel , F. Rosso , P. 2015 On the multilingual and genre robustness of emographs for author profiling in social media 274 280 Springer-Verlag, LNCSRangel, F., & Rosso, P. (2016). On the impact of emotions on author profiling. Information Processing & Management, 52(1), 73-92. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.06.003Rangel , F. Rosso , P. Koppel , M. Stamatatos , E. Inches , G. 2013 Overview of the author profiling task at PAN 2013 P. Forner R. Navigli D. TufisRangel , F. Rosso , P. Potthast , M. Stein , B. Daelemans , W. 2015 Overview of the 3rd author profiling task at PAN 2015 L. Cappellato N. Ferro G. Jones E. San JuanRangel , F. Rosso , P. Verhoeven , B. Daelemans , W. Potthast , M. Stein , B. 2016 Overview of the 4th author profiling task at PAN 2016: Cross-genre evaluationsRefaee , E. Rieser , V. 2014 An Arabic twitter corpus for subjectivity and sentiment analysis 2268 2273Reyes, A., Rosso, P., & Buscaldi, D. (2012). From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 74, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2012.02.005Reyes, A., Rosso, P., & Veale, T. (2012). A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter. Language Resources and Evaluation, 47(1), 239-268. doi:10.1007/s10579-012-9196-xRosso, P., & Cagnina, L. C. (2017). Deception Detection and Opinion Spam. Socio-Affective Computing, 155-171. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55394-8_8Saâdane , H. 2015 Traitement Automatique de L'Arabe Dialectalise: Aspects Methodologiques et AlgorithmiquesSaâdane , H. Nouvel , D. Seffih , H. Fluhr , C. 2017 Une approche linguistique pour la détection des dialectes arabesSadat , F. Kazemi , F. Farzindar , A. 2014 Automatic identification of Arabic language varieties and dialects in social mediaSadhwani , P. 2005 Phonological and orthographic knowledge: An Arab-Emirati perspectiveSchler , J. Koppel , M. Argamon , S. Pennebaker , J. W. 2006 Effects of age and gender on blogging 199 205Shoufan , A. Al-Ameri , S. 2015 Natural language processing for dialectical Arabic: A surveySoliman , T. Elmasry , M. Hedar , A-R. Doss , M. 2013 MINING SOCIAL NETWORKS' ARABIC SLANG COMMENTSSulis, E., Irazú Hernández Farías, D., Rosso, P., Patti, V., & Ruffo, G. (2016). Figurative messages and affect in Twitter: Differences between #irony, #sarcasm and #not. Knowledge-Based Systems, 108, 132-143. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.035Tetreault , J. Blanchard , D. Cahill , A. 2013 A report on the first native language identification shared task Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications 48 57Tillmann , C. Mansour , S. Al Onaizan , Y. 2014 Improved sentence-level Arabic dialect classification Proceedings of the VarDia006C Workshop 110 119Tono, Y. (2012). International Corpus of Crosslinguistic Interlanguage: Project overview and a case study on the acquisition of new verb co-occurrence patterns. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 27-46. doi:10.1075/tufs.4.07tonWahsheh , H. A. Al-Kabi , M. N. Alsmadi , I. M. 2013b SPAR: A system to detect spam in Arabic opinionsZaghouani , W. Charfi , A. 2018a Arap-Tweet: A Large Multi-Dialect Twitter Corpus for Gender, Age and Language Variety Identification Miyazaki, JapanZaghouani , W. Charfi , A. 2018b Guidelines and Annotation Framework for Arabic Author Profiling Miyazaki, JapanZaghouani , W. Mohit , B. Habash , N. Obeid , O. Tomeh , N. Rozovskaya , A. Farra , N. Alkuhlani , S. Oflazer , K. 2014 Large scale Arabic error annotation: Guidelines and frameworkZaghouani , W. Habash , N. Bouamor , H. Rozovskaya , A. Mohit , B. Heider , A. Oflazer , K. 2015 Correction annotation for non-native Arabic texts: Guidelines and corpus Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop 129 139Zaidan , O. F. Callison-Burch , C 2011 The Arabic online commentary dataset: An annotated dataset of informal Arabic with high dialectal content Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: short papers -Volume 2 Association for Computational Linguistics 37 41Zaidan, O. F., & Callison-Burch, C. (2014). Arabic Dialect Identification. Computational Linguistics, 40(1), 171-202. doi:10.1162/coli_a_00169Zampieri , M. Gebre , B. G. 2012 Automatic identification of language varieties: The case of PortugueseZampieri , M. Tan , L. Ljubesic , N. Tiedemann , J. 2014 A report on the DSL shared task 2014 Proceedings of the First Workshop on Applying NLP Tools to Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects 58 67Zampieri , M. Tan , L. Ljubesic , N. Tiedemann , J. Nakov , P. 2015 Overview of the DSL shared task 2015 1Zbib , R. Malchiodi , E. Devlin , J. Stallard , D. Matsoukas , S. Schwartz , R. Makhoul , J. Zaidan , O. F. Callison Burch , C. 2012 Machine translation of Arabic dialects Proceedings of the 2012 conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human language technologies Association for Computational Linguistics 49 5