8,416 research outputs found
On the number of fully packed loop configurations with a fixed associated matching
We show that the number of fully packed loop configurations corresponding to
a matching with nested arches is polynomial in if is large enough,
thus essentially proving two conjectures by Zuber [Electronic J. Combin. 11
(2004), Article #R13].Comment: AnS-LaTeX, 43 pages; Journal versio
On Visibility Representations of Non-planar Graphs
A rectangle visibility representation (RVR) of a graph consists of an
assignment of axis-aligned rectangles to vertices such that for every edge
there exists a horizontal or vertical line of sight between the rectangles
assigned to its endpoints. Testing whether a graph has an RVR is known to be
NP-hard. In this paper, we study the problem of finding an RVR under the
assumption that an embedding in the plane of the input graph is fixed and we
are looking for an RVR that reflects this embedding. We show that in this case
the problem can be solved in polynomial time for general embedded graphs and in
linear time for 1-plane graphs (i.e., embedded graphs having at most one
crossing per edge). The linear time algorithm uses a precise list of forbidden
configurations, which extends the set known for straight-line drawings of
1-plane graphs. These forbidden configurations can be tested for in linear
time, and so in linear time we can test whether a 1-plane graph has an RVR and
either compute such a representation or report a negative witness. Finally, we
discuss some extensions of our study to the case when the embedding is not
fixed but the RVR can have at most one crossing per edge
Compact Drawings of 1-Planar Graphs with Right-Angle Crossings and Few Bends
We study the following classes of beyond-planar graphs: 1-planar, IC-planar,
and NIC-planar graphs. These are the graphs that admit a 1-planar, IC-planar,
and NIC-planar drawing, respectively. A drawing of a graph is 1-planar if every
edge is crossed at most once. A 1-planar drawing is IC-planar if no two pairs
of crossing edges share a vertex. A 1-planar drawing is NIC-planar if no two
pairs of crossing edges share two vertices. We study the relations of these
beyond-planar graph classes (beyond-planar graphs is a collective term for the
primary attempts to generalize the planar graphs) to right-angle crossing (RAC)
graphs that admit compact drawings on the grid with few bends. We present four
drawing algorithms that preserve the given embeddings. First, we show that
every -vertex NIC-planar graph admits a NIC-planar RAC drawing with at most
one bend per edge on a grid of size . Then, we show that
every -vertex 1-planar graph admits a 1-planar RAC drawing with at most two
bends per edge on a grid of size . Finally, we make two
known algorithms embedding-preserving; for drawing 1-planar RAC graphs with at
most one bend per edge and for drawing IC-planar RAC graphs straight-line
Bounds on the maximum multiplicity of some common geometric graphs
We obtain new lower and upper bounds for the maximum multiplicity of some
weighted and, respectively, non-weighted common geometric graphs drawn on n
points in the plane in general position (with no three points collinear):
perfect matchings, spanning trees, spanning cycles (tours), and triangulations.
(i) We present a new lower bound construction for the maximum number of
triangulations a set of n points in general position can have. In particular,
we show that a generalized double chain formed by two almost convex chains
admits {\Omega}(8.65^n) different triangulations. This improves the bound
{\Omega}(8.48^n) achieved by the double zig-zag chain configuration studied by
Aichholzer et al.
(ii) We present a new lower bound of {\Omega}(12.00^n) for the number of
non-crossing spanning trees of the double chain composed of two convex chains.
The previous bound, {\Omega}(10.42^n), stood unchanged for more than 10 years.
(iii) Using a recent upper bound of 30^n for the number of triangulations,
due to Sharir and Sheffer, we show that n points in the plane in general
position admit at most O(68.62^n) non-crossing spanning cycles.
(iv) We derive lower bounds for the number of maximum and minimum weighted
geometric graphs (matchings, spanning trees, and tours). We show that the
number of shortest non-crossing tours can be exponential in n. Likewise, we
show that both the number of longest non-crossing tours and the number of
longest non-crossing perfect matchings can be exponential in n. Moreover, we
show that there are sets of n points in convex position with an exponential
number of longest non-crossing spanning trees. For points in convex position we
obtain tight bounds for the number of longest and shortest tours. We give a
combinatorial characterization of the longest tours, which leads to an O(nlog
n) time algorithm for computing them
Toward the Rectilinear Crossing Number of : New Drawings, Upper Bounds, and Asymptotics
Scheinerman and Wilf (1994) assert that `an important open problem in the
study of graph embeddings is to determine the rectilinear crossing number of
the complete graph K_n.' A rectilinear drawing of K_n is an arrangement of n
vertices in the plane, every pair of which is connected by an edge that is a
line segment. We assume that no three vertices are collinear, and that no three
edges intersect in a point unless that point is an endpoint of all three. The
rectilinear crossing number of K_n is the fewest number of edge crossings
attainable over all rectilinear drawings of K_n.
For each n we construct a rectilinear drawing of K_n that has the fewest
number of edge crossings and the best asymptotics known to date. Moreover, we
give some alternative infinite families of drawings of K_n with good
asymptotics. Finally, we mention some old and new open problems.Comment: 13 Page
On FPL configurations with four sets of nested arches
The problem of counting the number of Fully Packed Loop (FPL) configurations
with four sets of a,b,c,d nested arches is addressed. It is shown that it may
be expressed as the problem of enumeration of tilings of a domain of the
triangular lattice with a conic singularity. After reexpression in terms of
non-intersecting lines, the Lindstr\"om-Gessel-Viennot theorem leads to a
formula as a sum of determinants. This is made quite explicit when
min(a,b,c,d)=1 or 2. We also find a compact determinant formula which generates
the numbers of configurations with b=d.Comment: 22 pages, TeX, 16 figures; a new formula for a generating function
adde
- …