9 research outputs found

    An algorithm to schedule water delivery in pressurized irrigation networks

    Get PDF
    This study presents a deterministic constrained optimisation algorithm developed for using in a pressurized irrigation network. In irrigation networks โ€”or water networks supplied by a head tankโ€” utility managers can fully adapt the delivery times to suit their needs. The program provides a strategy for scheduling water delivery at a constant flow rate (opening and closing of hydrants, units, and subunits) to minimise energy consumption. This technique improves on earlier approaches by employing a deterministic method with little computing time. This method has been tested in the University of Alicante pressurized irrigation network, where decision-makers have identified the need to diminish the energy expenditure for watering Universityโ€™s gardens.This work was supported by the research project โ€œDESENREDAโ€ through the 2021 call โ€œEstancias de movilidad en el extranjero Jose Castillejoโ€ of the Ministerio de Universidades (CAS21/00085) and for the project โ€œHi-Edu Carbonโ€ Erasmus Plus Programme, Key Action KA22021, action type (2021-1-SK01-KA220-HED-000023274

    Thermography methods to assess stomatal behaviour in a dynamic environment.

    Get PDF
    Although thermography allows rapid, non-invasive measurements of large numbers of plants, it has not been used extensively due to the difficulty in deriving biologically relevant information such as leaf transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gsw) from thermograms. Methods normalizing leaf temperature using temperatures from reference materials (e.g. with and without evaporative flux) to generate stress indices are generally preferred due to their ease of use to assess plant water status. Here, a simplified method to solve dynamic energy balance equations is presented, which enables the calculation of 'wet' and 'dry' leaf temperatures in order to derive stress indices, whilst providing accurate estimates of E and gsw. Comparing stress indices and gas exchange parameters highlights the limitation of stress indices in a dynamic environment and how this problem can be overcome using artificial leaf references with known conductance. Additionally, applying the equations for each pixel of a thermogram to derive the rapidity of stomatal response over the leaf lamina in wheat revealed the spatial heterogeneity of stomatal behaviour. Rapidity of stomatal movements is an important determinant of water use efficiency, and our results showed 'patchy' responses that were linked to both the spatial and temporal response of gsw

    Comparison of stationary and mobile canopy sensing systems for irrigation management of maize and soybean in Nebraska

    Get PDF
    Accurate knowledge of plant and field characteristics is crucial for irrigation management. Irrigation can potentially be better managed by utilizing data collected from various sensors installed on different platforms. The accuracy and repeatability of each data source are important considerations when selecting a sensing system suitable for irrigation management. The objective of this study was to compare data from multispectral (red and near-infrared bands) and thermal (long wave thermal infrared band) sensors mounted on different platforms to investigate their comparative usability and accuracy. The different sensor platforms included stationary posts fixed on the ground, the lateral of a center pivot irrigation system, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), and Planet (PlanetScope multispectral imager, Planet Labs, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.) satellites. The surface reflectance data from multispectral (MS) sensors were used to compute the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). The experimental plots were managed with rainfed and irrigated treatments. Irrigation was applied according to a spatial evapotranspiration model informed with Planet satellite imagery. The NDVI and SAVI curves computed from the different sensing systems exhibited similar patterns and were able to capture differences between the rainfed and irrigated treatments when the crops were approaching senescence. Strong correlations were observed for canopy temperature measurements between the stationary and pivot-mounted infrared thermometer (IRT) sensors (p-value of less than 0.01 for the correlations) when canopy were scanned with no irrigation application (dry scans). The best correlation was obtained for the irrigated maize, which yielded r2 of 0.99, RMSE of 0.4ยฐC, and MAE of 0.3ยฐC. The correlation for the canopy temperature data collected during dry scan between UAS and pivot-mounted thermal sensors was weak with r2 = 0.26 to 0.28, larger RMSE values of 3.7ยฐC and MAE values of 3.4ยฐC. Secondary analysis between thermal data from stationary and pivot-mounted IRTs collected during wet scans (during an irrigation event) demonstrated reduced canopy temperature from pivot-mounted IRTs by approximately 2ยฐC for irrigated soybean due to wetting of the canopy by the irrigation. Understanding the performance of these sensor systems is valuable in configuring practical design and operational considerations when using sensor feedback for irrigation management

    Automatic Irrigation Scheduling on a Hedgerow Olive Orchard Using an Algorithm of Water Balance Readjusted with Soil Moisture Sensors

    Get PDF
    Recent technological advances have made possible automated irrigation scheduling using decision-support tools. These tools help farmers to make better decisions in the management of their irrigation system, thus increasing yields while preserving water resources. The aim of this study is to evaluate in a commercial plot an automated irrigation system combined with remote-sensing techniques and soil mapping that allows the establishment of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) strategies. The study was carried out over 3 years (2015โ€“2017) in a commercial hedgerow olive orchard of the variety โ€˜Arbequinaโ€™ located in Alvarado (Extremadura, Spain). An apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) map and a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) map were generated to characterize the spatial variability of the plot and classify the zones in homogeneous areas. Then, reference points were selected to monitor the different irrigation sectors. In 2015, the plot was irrigated according to the farmerโ€™s technical criteria throughout the plot. In 2016 and 2017, two different areas of the plot were irrigated applying an RDI strategy, one under expert supervision and the other automatically. The results show that in a heterogeneous plot the use of new technologies can be useful to establish the ideal location for an automatic irrigation system. Furthermore, automatic irrigation scheduling made it possible to establish an RDI strategy recommended by an expert, resulting in the homogenization of production throughout the plot without the need for human intervention.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Toward automated irrigation management with integrated crop water stress index and spatial soil water balance

    Get PDF
    Decision support systems intended for precision irrigation aim at reducing irrigation applications while optimizing crop yield to achieve maximum crop water productivity (CWP). These systems incorporate on-site sensor data, remote sensing inputs, and advanced algorithms with spatial and temporal characteristics to compute precise crop water needs. The availability of variable rate irrigation (VRI) systems enables irrigation applications at a sub-field scale. The combination of an appropriate VRI system along with a precise decision support system would be ideal for improved CWP. The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate two decision support systems in terms of seasonal applied irrigation, crop yield, and CWP. This study implemented the Spatial EvapoTranspiration Modeling Interface (SETMI) model and the Irrigation Scheduling Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (ISSCADA) system for management of a center pivot irrigation system in a 58-ha maize-soybean field during the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. The irrigation scheduling methods included: ISSCADA plant feedback, ISSCADA hybrid, common practice, and SETMI. These methods were applied at irrigation levels of 0, 50, 100, and 150% of the full irrigation prescribed by the respective irrigation scheduling method. Data from infrared thermometers (IRTs), soil water sensors, weather stations, and satellites were used in the irrigation methods. Mean seasonal irrigation prescribed was different among the irrigation levels and methods for the 2 years. The ISSCADA plant feedback prescribed the least irrigation among the methods for majority of the cases. The common practice prescribed the largest seasonal irrigation depth among the methods for three crop-year cases. The maize yield in rainfed was found to be significantly lower than the irrigated levels in 2020 since 2020 was a dry year. No significant differences were observed in crop yield among the different irrigation methods for both years. The CWP among the different irrigation methods ranged between 2.72 and 3.15 kg mโˆ’3 for 2020 maize, 1.03 and 1.13 kg mโˆ’3 for 2020 soybean, 3.57 and 4.24 kg mโˆ’3 for 2021 maize, and 1.19 and 1.48 kg mโˆ’3 for 2021 soybean. Deficit level (50%) had the largest irrigation water productivity in all crop-year cases in this study. The ISSCADA and SETMI systems were found to reduce irrigation applications as compared to the common practice while maintaining crop yield. This study was the first to implement the newly developed integrated crop water stress index (iCWSI) thresholds and the ISSCADA system for site-specific irrigation of maize and soybean in Nebraska

    Crop response to thermal stress without yield loss in irrigated maize and soybean in Nebraska

    Get PDF
    Thermal sensing provides rapid and accurate estimation of crop water stress through canopy temperature data. Canopy temperature is highly dependent on the transpiration rate of the leaves. It is usually assumed that any reduction in crop evapotranspiration (ET) leads to crop yield loss. As a result, an increase in canopy temperature due to a decrease in crop ET would indicate crop yield loss. This research evaluated the hypothesis that crop water stress could be detected using canopy temperature measurements (increased leaf temperature) from infrared thermometers (IRTs) before incurring crop yield loss. This would be possible in a narrow range when the photosynthesis rate (and carbon assimilation) is limited by solar radiation (energy-limiting water stress) while the leaf has abundant carbon dioxide for photosynthesis. Once photosynthesis becomes limited by carbon dioxide (carbon-dioxide-limiting water stress), then yield reduction would occur. In this field experiment, measured response variables included the integrated crop water stress index (iCWSI), ET, and crop yield for maize and soybean during the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. The irrigation was applied at four different refill levels: rainfed (0%), deficit (50%), full (100%), and over (150%). The irrigation depth was prescribed using four different irrigation methods. The field was irrigated with a center pivot irrigation system, which was also used as a platform to mount IRT sensors. The iCWSI thresholds required for irrigation management were determined using the iCWSI dataset collected in 2020. The low, medium, and high iCWSI thresholds were 120, 150, and 180, respectively for maize and 110, 130, and 150, respectively for soybean. These thresholds should be updated with iCWSI data from future studies in this region to increase the credibility of the thresholds for irrigation management. The mean iCWSI values for consecutive days after a wetting event substantially increased with time for each irrigation level and a larger range in iCWSI values was observed among the irrigation levels after three days from a wetting event. The seasonal iCWSI for different levels were found to be negatively correlated with seasonal evapotranspiration for both years. The correlations between seasonal ET and crop yield were significant with the rainfed and deficit levels for maize (p-value \u3c 0.001) and soybean (p-value = 0.04) in 2020. The iCWSI and yield data for the fully watered plots indicated that thermal stress was detected using the sensing system without incurring yield loss (i.e., energy-limiting water stress). The ET and yield data for 2021 indicated that reduction in seasonal crop ET did not result in yield loss which also supported the hypothesis. Future studies should investigate whether this phenomenon of detecting crop water stress in an early stage without yield loss is observed in other climates and locations

    Toward automated irrigation management with integrated crop water stress index and spatial soil water balance

    Get PDF
    Decision support systems intended for precision irrigation aim at reducing irrigation applications while optimizing crop yield to achieve maximum crop water productivity (CWP). These systems incorporate on-site sensor data, remote sensing inputs, and advanced algorithms with spatial and temporal characteristics to compute precise crop water needs. The availability of variable rate irrigation (VRI) systems enables irrigation applications at a sub-field scale. The combination of an appropriate VRI system along with a precise decision support system would be ideal for improved CWP. The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate two decision support systems in terms of seasonal applied irrigation, crop yield, and CWP. This study implemented the Spatial EvapoTranspiration Modeling Interface (SETMI) model and the Irrigation Scheduling Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (ISSCADA) system for management of a center pivot irrigation system in a 58-ha maize-soybean field during the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. The irrigation scheduling methods included: ISSCADA plant feedback, ISSCADA hybrid, common practice, and SETMI. These methods were applied at irrigation levels of 0, 50, 100, and 150% of the full irrigation prescribed by the respective irrigation scheduling method. Data from infrared thermometers (IRTs), soil water sensors, weather stations, and satellites were used in the irrigation methods. Mean seasonal irrigation prescribed was different among the irrigation levels and methods for the 2 years. The ISSCADA plant feedback prescribed the least irrigation among the methods for majority of the cases. The common practice prescribed the largest seasonal irrigation depth among the methods for three crop-year cases. The maize yield in rainfed was found to be significantly lower than the irrigated levels in 2020 since 2020 was a dry year. No significant differences were observed in crop yield among the different irrigation methods for both years. The CWP among the different irrigation methods ranged between 2.72 and 3.15 kg mโˆ’3 for 2020 maize, 1.03 and 1.13 kg mโˆ’3 for 2020 soybean, 3.57 and 4.24 kg mโˆ’3 for 2021 maize, and 1.19 and 1.48 kg mโˆ’3 for 2021 soybean. Deficit level (50%) had the largest irrigation water productivity in all crop-year cases in this study. The ISSCADA and SETMI systems were found to reduce irrigation applications as compared to the common practice while maintaining crop yield. This study was the first to implement the newly developed integrated crop water stress index (iCWSI) thresholds and the ISSCADA system for site-specific irrigation of maize and soybean in Nebraska

    ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋ฐ ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ƒ์œก ์„ผ์‹ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์–‘์•ก ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†์—…์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์‹œ์Šคํ…œยท์†Œ์žฌํ•™๋ถ€(๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณตํ•™), 2020. 8. ๊น€ํ•™์ง„.In current closed hydroponics, the nutrient solution monitoring and replenishment are conducted based on the electrical conductivity (EC) and pH, and the fertigation is carried out with the constant time without considering the plant status. However, the EC-based management is unable to detect the dynamic changes in the individual nutrient ion concentrations so the ion imbalance occurs during the iterative replenishment, thereby leading to the frequent discard of the nutrient solution. The constant time-based fertigation inevitably induces over- or under-supply of the nutrient solution for the growing plants. The approaches are two of the main causes of decreasing water and nutrient use efficiencies in closed hydroponics. Regarding the issues, the precision nutrient solution management that variably controls the fertigation volume and corrects the deficient nutrient ions individually would allow both improved efficiencies of fertilizer and water use and increased lifespan of the nutrient solution. The objectives of this study were to establish the precision nutrient solution management system that can automatically and variably control the fertigation volume based on the plant-growth information and supply the individual nutrient fertilizers in appropriate amounts to reach the optimal compositions as nutrient solutions for growing plants. To achieve the goal, the sensing technologies for the varying requirements of water and nutrients were investigated and validated. Firstly, an on-the-go monitoring system was constructed to monitor the lettuces grown under the closed hydroponics based on the nutrient film technique for the entire bed. The region of the lettuces was segmented by the excess green (ExG) and Otsu method to obtain the canopy cover (CC). The feasibility of the image processing for assessing the canopy (CC) was validated by comparing the computed CC values with the manually analyzed CC values. From the validation, it was confirmed the image monitoring and processing for the CC measurements were feasible for the lettuces before harvest. Then, a transpiration rate model using the modified Penman-Monteith equation was fitted based on the obtained CC, radiation, air temperature, and relative humidity to estimate the water need of the growing lettuces. Regarding the individual ion concentration measurements, two-point normalization, artificial neural network, and a hybrid signal processing consisting of the two-point normalization and artificial neural network were compared to select an effective method for the ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) application in continuous and autonomous monitoring of ions in hydroponic solutions. The hybrid signal processing showed the most accuracy in sample measurements, but the vulnerability to the sensor malfunction made the two-point normalization method with the most precision would be appropriate for the long-term monitoring of the nutrient solution. In order to determine the optimal injection amounts of the fertilizer salts and water for the given target individual ion concentrations, a decision tree-based dosing algorithm was designed. The feasibility of the dosing algorithm was validated with the stepwise and varying target focusing replenishments. From the results, the ion-specific replenishments formulated the compositions of the nutrient solution successfully according to the given target values. Finally, the proposed sensing and control techniques were integrated to implement the precision nutrient solution management, and the performance was verified by a closed lettuce cultivation test. From the application test, the fertigation volume was reduced by 57.4% and the growth of the lettuces was promoted in comparison with the constant timer-based fertigation strategy. Furthermore, the system successfully maintained the nutrient balance in the recycled solution during the cultivation with the coefficients of variance of 4.9%, 1.4%, 3.2%, 5.2%, and 14.9%, which were generally less than the EC-based replenishment with the CVs of 6.9%, 4.9%, 23.7%, 8.6%, and 8.3% for the NO3, K, Ca, Mg, and P concentrations, respectively. These results implied the developed precision nutrient solution management system could provide more efficient supply and management of water and nutrients than the conventional methods, thereby allowing more improved water and nutrient use efficiencies and crop productivity.ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ์ˆœํ™˜์‹ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์–‘์•ก์˜ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๋ณด์ถฉ์€ ์ „๊ธฐ์ „๋„๋„ (EC, electrical conductivity) ๋ฐ pH๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์–‘์•ก์˜ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์€ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ƒ์œก ์ƒํƒœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์—†์ด ํ•ญ์ƒ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ํŽŒํ”„๊ฐ€ ๋™์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋˜๋Š” ํ˜•ํƒœ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ EC ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์–‘์•ก ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„์˜ ๋™์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์–ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณต๋˜๋Š” ๋ณด์ถฉ ์ค‘ ๋ถˆ๊ท ํ˜•์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด ์–‘์•ก์˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ ์ •๋œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ์˜ ์–‘์•ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰์€ ์ž‘๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ณผ์ž‰ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถˆ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ๋ฌผ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ ธ ๋ฌผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์˜ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด, ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ์„ฑ๋ถ„๋งŒ์„ ์„ ํƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ถฉํ•˜๊ณ , ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ์ƒ์œก ์ •๋„์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์–‘์•ก์„ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋†์—…์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์–‘์•ก ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๋น„๋ฃŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์˜ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๊ณผ ์–‘์•ก์˜ ์žฌ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ฆ์ง„์„ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฐ€๋ณ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ƒ์œก ์ •๋ณด์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์–‘์•ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ณ , ์ž‘๋ฌผ ์ƒ์žฅ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์กฐ์„ฑ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ํ˜„์žฌ ์–‘์•ก์˜ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„ ์„ผ์‹ฑ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€๋งŒํผ์˜ ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์–‘๋ถ„ ๋น„๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ถฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์–‘์•ก ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณ€์ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ์–‘๋ถ„ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ž‘๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฌผ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ธก์ • ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ถ„์„ ํ™œ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ•๋ง‰๊ฒฝ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ˆœํ™˜์‹ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ž๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒ์ถ”์˜ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋“ค์„ ์ „์ฒด ๋ฒ ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜์ƒ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ ์˜์ƒ ์ค‘ ์ƒ์ถ” ๋ถ€๋ถ„๋งŒ์„ excess green (ExG)๊ณผ Otsu ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ํˆฌ์˜์ž‘๋ฌผ๋ฉด์  (CC, canopy cover)์„ ํš๋“ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜์ƒ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง์ ‘ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ํˆฌ์˜์ž‘๋ฌผ๋ฉด์  ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์ด๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋น„๊ต ๊ฒ€์ฆ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ํˆฌ์˜์ž‘๋ฌผ๋ฉด์  ์ธก์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์˜์ƒ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„์ด ์ˆ˜ํ™• ์ „๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์ƒ์ถ”์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ดํ›„ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ ํˆฌ์˜์ž‘๋ฌผ๋ฉด์ ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์˜จ, ์ƒ๋Œ€์Šต๋„, ์ผ์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์œก ์ค‘์ธ ์ƒ์ถ”๋“ค์ด ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ์–‘์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด Penman-Monteith ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ฆ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์‹ค์ œ ์ฆ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ๋†’์€ ์ผ์น˜๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ์„œ๋Š”, ์ด์˜จ์„ ํƒ์„ฑ์ „๊ทน (ISE, ion-selective electrode)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ์–‘์•ก ๋‚ด ์ด์˜จ์˜ ์—ฐ์†์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ž์œจ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 2์  ์ •๊ทœํ™”, ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ด ๋‘˜์„ ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์„ผ์„œ ๊ณ ์žฅ์— ์ทจ์•ฝํ•œ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ 2์  ์ •๊ทœํ™” ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์„ผ์„œ ์–ด๋ ˆ์ด์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ ํ•ฉํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ด์˜จ ๋†๋„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ’์— ๋งž๋Š” ๋น„๋ฃŒ ์—ผ ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ตœ์  ์ฃผ์ž…๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •ํŠธ๋ฆฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๋น„๋ฃŒ ํˆฌ์ž… ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ๋น„๋ฃŒ ํˆฌ์ž… ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ˆœ์ฐจ์ ์ธ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด์ถฉ ๋ฐ ํŠน์ • ์„ฑ๋ถ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ง‘์ค‘์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ถ€์—ฌํ•œ ๋ณด์ถฉ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ’๋“ค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–‘์•ก์„ ์กฐ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ๋ฐ ์ œ์–ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ NFT ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ˆœํ™˜์‹ ์ˆ˜๊ฒฝ์žฌ๋ฐฐ ๋ฐฐ๋“œ์— ์ƒ์ถ” ์žฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ, ์ข…๋ž˜์˜ ๊ณ ์ • ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์–‘์•ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ๋Œ€๋น„ 57.4%์˜ ์–‘์•ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ์™€ ์ƒ์ถ” ์ƒ์œก์˜ ์ด‰์ง„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋™์‹œ์—, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ NO3, K, Ca, Mg, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  P์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ 4.9%, 1.4%, 3.2%, 5.2%, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  14.9% ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ EC๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ณด์ถฉ ๋ฐฉ์‹์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜ 6.9%, 4.9%, 23.7%, 8.6%, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  8.3%๋ณด๋‹ค ๋Œ€์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์ด์˜จ ๊ท ํ˜• ์œ ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๊ด€๋น„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์–‘์•ก์˜ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–‘์•ก ์ด์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์ฆ์ง„์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROUND 1 Nutrient Imbalance 2 Fertigation Scheduling 3 OBJECTIVES 7 ORGANIZATION OF THE DISSERTATION 8 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 10 VARIABILITY OF NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS IN HYDROPONICS 10 LIMITATIONS OF CURRENT NUTRIENT SOLUTION MANAGEMENT IN CLOSED HYDROPONIC SYSTEM 11 ION-SPECIFIC NUTRIENT MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT IN CLOSED HYDROPONICS 13 REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES FOR PLANT MONITORING 17 FERTIGATION CONTROL METHODS BASED ON REMOTE SENSING 19 CHAPTER 3. ON-THE-GO CROP MONITORING SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATION OF THE CROP WATER NEED 21 ABSTRACT 21 INTRODUCTION 21 MATERIALS AND METHODS 23 Hydroponic Growth Chamber 23 Construction of an On-the-go Crop Monitoring System 25 Image Processing for Canopy Cover Estimation 29 Evaluation of the CC Calculation Performance 32 Estimation Model for Transpiration Rate 32 Determination of the Parameters of the Transpiration Rate Model 33 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 35 Performance of the CC Measurement by the Image Monitoring System 35 Plant Growth Monitoring in Closed Hydroponics 39 Evaluation of the Crop Water Need Estimation 42 CONCLUSIONS 46 CHAPTER 4. HYBRID SIGNAL-PROCESSING METHOD BASED ON NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTION OF NO3, K, CA, AND MG IONS IN HYDROPONIC SOLUTIONS USING AN ARRAY OF ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODES 48 ABSTRACT 48 INTRODUCTION 49 MATERIALS AND METHODS 52 Preparation of the Sensor Array 52 Construction and Evaluation of Data-Processing Methods 53 Preparation of Samples 57 Procedure of Sample Measurements 59 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 63 Determination of the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Structure 63 Evaluation of the Processing Methods in Training Samples 64 Application of the Processing Methods in Real Hydroponic Samples 67 CONCLUSIONS 72 CHAPTER 5. DECISION TREE-BASED ION-SPECIFIC NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM FOR CLOSED HYDROPONICS 74 ABSTRACT 74 INTRODUCTION 75 MATERIALS AND METHODS 77 Decision Tree-based Dosing Algorithm 77 Development of an Ion-Specific Nutrient Management System 82 Implementation of Ion-Specific Nutrient Management with Closed-Loop Control 87 System Validation Tests 89 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 91 Five-stepwise Replenishment Test 91 Replenishment Test Focused on The Ca 97 CONCLUSIONS 99 CHAPTER 6. ION-SPECIFIC AND CROP GROWTH SENSING BASED NUTRIENT SOLUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR CLOSED HYDROPONICS 101 ABSTRACT 101 INTRODUCTION 102 MATERIALS AND METHODS 103 System Integration 103 Implementation of the Precision Nutrient Solution Management System 106 Application of the Precision Nutrient Solution Management System to Closed Lettuce Soilless Cultivation 112 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 113 Evaluation of the Plant Growth-based Fertigation in the Closed Lettuce Cultivation 113 Evaluation of the Ion-Specific Management in the Closed Lettuce Cultivation 118 CONCLUSIONS 128 CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSIONS 130 CONCLUSIONS OF THE STUDY 130 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDY 134 LIST OF REFERENCES 136 APPENDIX 146 A1. Python Code for Controlling the Image Monitoring and CC Calculation 146 A2. Ion Concentrations of the Solutions used in Chapter 4 (Unit: mgโˆ™Lโˆ’1) 149 A3. Block Diagrams of the LabVIEW Program used in Chapter 4 150 A4. Ion Concentrations of the Solutions used in Chapters 5 and 6 (Unit: mgโˆ™Lโˆ’1) 154 A5. Block Diagrams of the LabVIEW Program used in the Chapters 5 and 6 155 ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 160Docto
    corecore