305 research outputs found

    Diurnal and Seasonal Variations in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Associated with Photosynthesis at Leaf and Canopy Scales

    Get PDF
    There is a critical need for sensitive remote sensing approaches to monitor the parameters governing photosynthesis, at the temporal scales relevant to their natural dynamics. The photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and chlorophyll fluorescence (F) offer a strong potential for monitoring photosynthesis at local, regional, and global scales, however the relationships between photosynthesis and solar induced F (SIF) on diurnal and seasonal scales are not fully understood. This study examines how the fine spatial and temporal scale SIF observations relate to leaf level chlorophyll fluorescence metrics (i.e., PSII yield, YII and electron transport rate, ETR), canopy gross primary productivity (GPP), and PRI. The results contribute to enhancing the understanding of how SIF can be used to monitor canopy photosynthesis. This effort captured the seasonal and diurnal variation in GPP, reflectance, F, and SIF in the O2A (SIFA) and O2B (SIFB) atmospheric bands for corn (Zea mays L.) at a study site in Greenbelt, MD. Positive linear relationships of SIF to canopy GPP and to leaf ETR were documented, corroborating published reports. Our findings demonstrate that canopy SIF metrics are able to capture the dynamics in photosynthesis at both leaf and canopy levels, and show that the relationship between GPP and SIF metrics differs depending on the light conditions (i.e., above or below saturation level for photosynthesis). The sum of SIFA and SIFB (SIFA+B), as well as the SIFA+B yield, captured the dynamics in GPP and light use efficiency, suggesting the importance of including SIFB in monitoring photosynthetic function. Further efforts are required to determine if these findings will scale successfully to airborne and satellite levels, and to document the effects of data uncertainties on the scaling

    Remote sensing of red and far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate gross primary productivity and plant stress in sugar beet

    Get PDF
    Ohne den Prozess der Photosynthese wรคre das Leben auf der Erde, so wie wir es kennen, nicht mรถglich. Die Quantifizierung des Photosynthese-Prozesses und die Darstellung seiner rรคumlichen und zeitlichen Adaptierung ist eine der zentralen Herausforderungen in der terrestrischen Umweltforschung. Von Pflanzen absorbiertes Licht kann fรผr den Photosynthese Prozess genutzt, oder aber auch in Form von Wรคrme (nichtphotochemisches Quenching, NPQ) oder als Fluoreszenz abgegeben werden. Jรผngste Fortschritte in der Sensorentechnik ermรถglichen es nun, die von der Vegetation emittierte, sonneninduzierte Chlorophyll Fluoreszenz (F) mit Fernerkundungsmethoden zu erfassen. Aufgrund der direkten physikalischen Verbindung zwischen Fluoreszenz und Photosynthese erรถffnen sich dadurch neue Mรถglichkeiten, die Photosynthese-Leistung (normalerweise beschrieben als brutto Primรคrproduktion, GPP) rรคumlich und zeitlich zu quantifizieren und Pflanzenstress zu bestimmen. In dieser Dissertation wurden neuartigen boden- (SIF-Sys) und flugzeuggestรผtzte (HyPlant) gestรผtzten Messsysteme genutzt, um die zeitlichen und rรคumlichen Beziehungen zwischen F, dem photochemischen Reflexionsindex (PRI โ€“ als Indikator fรผr NPQ) und der Lichtnutzungseffizienz (LUE) unter wechselnden Umweltbedingungen zu analysieren. Dabei hat sich gezeigt, dass die Kombination aus roter und fern-roter Fluoreszenz Effizienz (F687yield und F760yield) und dem PRI 65% der tรคglichen und 89% der saisonalen Variabilitรคt der LUE von Zuckerrรผbe erklรคrt. Zusรคtzlich wurden flugzeuggestรผtzte Messungen genutzt, um die rรคumliche und zeitliche Variabilitรคt von F760yield, F680yield, dem Verhรคltnis zwischen roter und fern-roter Fluoreszenz (Fratio) und dem sogenannten verbesserten Vegetationsindex (EVI) innerhalb eines Flugstreifens und eines Tages zu bestimmen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen in Abhรคngigkeit zur Wasserverfรผgbarkeit eine hohe Variabilitรคt von F760yield und Fratio im Laufe eines Tages und hinsichtlich der Feldfruchtart. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass Fluoreszenz-Produkte sensitiv auf Pflanzenstress reagieren. Die oben beschriebenen Ergebnisse wurden genutzt, um ein empirisches GPP Modell zu entwickeln, das auf F760yield, F687yield und PRI basiert. Die Ergebnisse wurden anschlieรŸend mit GPP-Werten, die aus Eddy Kovarianz Messungen (GPPEC) abgeleitet wurden, validiert und mit den Ergebnissen dreier derzeitig genutzten Modellen verglichen, die auf Fluoreszenz und Reflexion basieren. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass das neuentwickelte Modell, welches auf Fyield und PRI Informationen basiert, die Tages- und saisonale Variabilitรคt von GPP am besten bestimmt. Die Anwendung der Modelle auf rรคumlich aufgelรถste Daten zeigt, dass generell fluoreszenzbasierte Modelle die rรคumliche Variabilitรคt von GPP besser erfassen als das Modell, welches allein auf Reflexionsindizes basiert. AbschlieรŸend wird der Entwurf fรผr ein Modell vorgeschlagen, welches, basierend auf der photosynthetischen Energiebilanz, den PRI und die absolute Fluoreszenz (Ftot) nutzt, um GPP in einer stรคrkeren prozessorientierten weise zu bestimmen. Zusammengefasst stellt diese Arbeit heraus, dass sonneninduzierte Fluoreszenz die Abschรคtzung von GPP verbessert, wobei insbesondere die Kombination aus F und PRI die vielversprechendsten Ergebnisse liefert. Zusรคtzlich wird gezeigt, dass das Verhรคltnis von roter zu fern-roter Fluoreszenz sowie Fyield ein groรŸes Potenzial haben, um stressbedingte raum-zeitlichen Pflanzenanpassungsstrategien abzubilden

    Do daily and seasonal trends in leaf solar induced fluorescence reflect changes in photosynthesis, growth or light exposure?

    Get PDF
    Solar induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) emissions of photosynthetically active plants retrieved from space-borne observations have been used to improve models of global primary productivity. However, the relationship between SIF and photosynthesis in diurnal and seasonal cycles is still not fully understood, especially at large spatial scales, where direct measurements of photosynthesis are unfeasible. Motivated by up-scaling potential, this study examined the diurnal and seasonal relationship between SIF and photosynthetic parameters measured at the level of individual leaves. We monitored SIF in two plant species, avocado (Persea Americana) and orange jasmine (Murraya paniculatta), throughout 18 diurnal cycles during the Southern Hemisphere spring, summer and autumn, and compared them with simultaneous measurements of photosynthetic yields, and leaf and global irradiances. Results showed that at seasonal time scales SIF is principally correlated with changes in leaf irradiance, electron transport rates (ETR) and constitutive heat dissipation (YNO; p \u3c 0.001). Multiple regression models of correlations between photosynthetic parameters and SIF at diurnal time scales identified leaf irradiance as the principle predictor of SIF (p \u3c 0.001). Previous studies have identified correlations between photosynthetic yields, ETR and SIF at larger spatial scales, where heterogeneous canopy architecture and landscape spatial patterns influence the spectral and photosynthetic measurements. Although this study found a significant correlation between leaf-measured YNO and SIF, future dedicated up-scaling experiments are required to elucidate if these observations are also found at larger spatial scales

    Progress in Remote Sensing of Photosynthetic Activity over the Amazon Basin

    Get PDF
    Although quantifying the massive exchange of carbon that takes place over the Amazon Basin remains a challenge, progress is being made as the remote sensing community moves from using traditional, reflectance-based vegetation indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), to the more functional Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI). This new index, together with satellite-derived estimates of canopy light interception and Sun-Induced Fluorescence (SIF), provide improved estimates of Gross Primary Production (GPP). This paper traces the development of these new approaches, compares the results of their analyses from multiple years of data acquired across the Amazon Basin and suggests further improvements in instrument design, data acquisition and processing. We demonstrated that our estimates of PRI are in generally good agreement with eddy-flux tower measurements of photosynthetic light use efficiency (epsilon) at four sites in the Amazon Basin: r(exp 2) values ranged from 0.37 to 0.51 for northern flux sites and to 0.78for southern flux sites. This is a significant advance over previous approaches seeking to establish a link between global-scale photosynthetic activity and remotely-sensed data. When combined with measurements of Sun-Induced Fluorescence (SIF), PRI provides realistic estimates of seasonal variation in photosynthesis over the Amazon that relate well to the wet and dry seasons. We anticipate that our findings will steer the development of improved approaches to estimate photosynthetic activity over the tropics

    Dynamics of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and reflectance to detect stress-induced variations in canopy photosynthesis

    Get PDF
    Passive measurement of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (F) represents the most promising tool to quantify changes in photosynthetic functioning on a large scale. However, the complex relationship between this signal and other photosynthesis-related processes restricts its interpretation under stress conditions. To address this issue, we conducted a field campaign by combining daily airborne and ground-based measurements of F (normalized to photosynthetically active radiation), reflectance and surface temperature and related the observed changes to stress-induced variations in photosynthesis. A lawn carpet was sprayed with different doses of the herbicide Dicuran. Canopy-level measurements of gross primary productivity indicated dosage-dependent inhibition of photosynthesis by the herbicide. Dosage-dependent changes in normalized F were also detected. After spraying, we first observed a rapid increase in normalized F and in the Photochemical Reflectance Index, possibly due to the blockage of electron transport by Dicuran and the resultant impairment of xanthophyll-mediated non-photochemical quenching. This initial increase was followed by a gradual decrease in both signals, which coincided with a decline in pigment-related reflectance indices. In parallel, we also detected a canopy temperature increase after the treatment. These results demonstrate the potential of using F coupled with relevant reflectance indices to estimate stress-induced changes in canopy photosynthesis

    Heatwave breaks down the linearity between sun-induced fluorescence and gross primary production

    Get PDF
    Sun-induced fluorescence in the far-red region (SIF) is increasingly used as a remote and proximal-sensing tool capable of tracking vegetation gross primary production (GPP). However, the use of SIF to probe changes in GPP is challenged during extreme climatic events, such as heatwaves. Here, we examined how the 2018 European heatwave (HW) affected the GPP-SIF relationship in evergreen broadleaved trees with a relatively invariant canopy structure. To do so, we combined canopy-scale SIF measurements, GPP estimated from an eddy covariance tower, and active pulse amplitude modulation fluorescence. The HW caused an inversion of the photosynthesis-fluorescence relationship at both the canopy and leaf scales. The highly nonlinear relationship was strongly shaped by nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), that is, a dissipation mechanism to protect from the adverse effects of high light intensity. During the extreme heat stress, plants experienced a saturation of NPQ, causing a change in the allocation of energy dissipation pathways towards SIF. Our results show the complex modulation of the NPQ-SIF-GPP relationship at an extreme level of heat stress, which is not completely represented in state-of-the-art coupled radiative transfer and photosynthesis models.Peer reviewe

    Reduction of structural impacts and distinction of photosynthetic pathways in a global estimation of GPP from space-borne solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence

    Get PDF
    Quantifying global photosynthesis remains a challenge due to a lack of accurate remote sensing proxies. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been shown to be a good indicator of photosynthetic activity across various spatial scales. However, a global and spatially challenging estimate of terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) based on satellite SIF remains unresolved due to the confounding effects of species-specific physical and physiological traits and external factors, such as canopy structure or photosynthetic pathway (C-3 or C-4). Here we analyze an ensemble of far-red SIF data from OCO-2 satellite and ground observations at multiple sites, using the spectral invariant theory to reduce the effects of canopy structure and to retrieve a structure-corrected total canopy SIF emission (SIFtotal). We find that the relationships between observed canopy-leaving SIF and ecosystem GPP vary significantly among biomes. In contrast, the relationships between SIFtotal and GPP converge around two unique models, one for C-3 and one for C-4 plants. We show that the two single empirical models can be used to globally scale satellite SIF observations to terrestrial GPP. We obtain an independent estimate of global terrestrial GPP of 129.56 +/- 6.54 PgC/year for the 2015-2017 period, which is consistent with the state-of-the-art data- and process-oriented models. The new GPP product shows improved sensitivity to previously undetected 'hotspots' of productivity, being able to resolve the double-peak in GPP due to rotational cropping systems. We suggest that the direct scheme to estimate GPP presented here, which is based on satellite SIF, may open up new possibilities to resolve the dynamics of global terrestrial GPP across space and time.Peer reviewe

    ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ง€์†์  ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ํƒœ์–‘ ์œ ๋„ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘๋ฌผ์งˆ ๊ด€์ธก

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™, 2022.2. ๋ฅ˜์˜๋ ฌ.Monitoring phenology, physiological and structural changes in vegetation is essential to understand feedbacks of vegetation between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere by influencing the albedo, carbon flux, water flux and energy. To this end, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from satellite remote sensing have been widely used. However, there are still limitations in satellite remote sensing as 1) satellite imagery could not capture fine-scale spatial resolution of SIF signals, 2) satellite products are strongly influenced by condition of the atmosphere (e.g. clouds), thus it is challenging to know physiological and structural changes in vegetation on cloudy days and 3) satellite imagery captured a mixed signal from over- and understory, thus it is difficult to study the difference between overstory and understory phenology separately. Therefore, in order to more accurately understand the signals observed from the satellite, further studies using near-surface remote sensing system to collect ground-based observed data are needed. The main purpose of this dissertation is continuous observation of vegetation phenology and SIF using near-surface remote sensing system. To achieve the main goal, I set three chapters as 1) developing low-cost filter-based near-surface remote sensing system to monitor SIF continuously, 2) monitoring SIF in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest continuously, and 3) understanding the relationships between phenology from in-situ multi-layer canopies and satellite products. In Chapter 2, I developed the filter-based smart surface sensing system (4S-SIF) to overcome the technical challenges of monitoring SIF in the field as well as to decrease sensor cost for more comprehensive spatial sampling. I verified the satisfactory spectral performance of the bandpass filters and confirmed that digital numbers (DN) from 4S-SIF exhibited linear relationships with the DN from the hyperspectral spectroradiometer in each band (R2 > 0.99). In addition, we confirmed that 4S-SIF shows relatively low variation of dark current value at various temperatures. Furthermore, the SIF signal from 4S-SIF represents a strong linear relationship with QEpro-SIF either changing the physiological mechanisms of the plant using DCMU (3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethyurea) treatment. I believe that 4S-SIF will be a useful tool for collecting in-situ data across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Satellite-based SIF provides us with new opportunities to understand the physiological and structural dynamics of vegetation from canopy to global scales. However, the relationships between SIF and gross primary productivity (GPP) are not fully understood, which is mainly due to the challenges of decoupling structural and physiological factors that control the relationships. In Chapter 3, I reported the results of continuous observations of canopy-level SIF, GPP, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), and chlorophyll: carotenoid index (CCI) in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest. To understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between GPP and SIF, I investigated the relationships of light use efficiency (LUE_p), chlorophyll fluorescence yield (ฮฆ_F), and the fraction of emitted SIF photons escaping from the canopy (f_esc) separately. I found a strongly non-linear relationship between GPP and SIF at diurnal and seasonal time scales (R2 = 0.91 with a hyperbolic regression function, daily). GPP saturated with APAR, while SIF did not. In addition, there were differential responses of LUE_p and ฮฆ_F to air temperature. While LUE_p reached saturation at high air temperatures, ฮฆ_F did not saturate. I also found that the canopy-level chlorophyll: carotenoid index was strongly correlated to canopy-level ฮฆ_F (R2 = 0.84) implying that ฮฆ_F could be more closely related to pigment pool changes rather than LUE_p. In addition, I found that the f_esc contributed to a stronger SIF-GPP relationship by partially capturing the response of LUE_p to diffuse light. These findings can help refine physiological and structural links between canopy-level SIF and GPP in evergreen needleleaf forests. We do not fully understand what satellite NDVI derived leaf-out and full leaf dates actually observe because deciduous broadleaf forest consists of multi-layer canopies typically and mixed-signal from multi-layer canopies could affect satellite observation. Ultimately, we have the following question: What phenology do we actually see from space compared to ground observations on multi-layer canopy phenology? In Chapter 4, I reported the results of 8 years of continuous observations of multi-layer phenology and climate variables in a deciduous broadleaf forest, South Korea. Multi-channel spectrometers installed above and below overstory canopy allowed us to monitor over- and understory canopy phenology separately, continuously. I evaluated the widely used phenology detection methods, curvature change rate and threshold with NDVI observed above top of the canopy and compared leaf-out and full leaf dates from both methods to in-situ observed multi-layer phenology. First, I found that NDVI from the above canopy had a strong linear relationship with satellites NDVI (R2=0.95 for MODIS products and R2= 0.85 for Landsat8). Second, leaf-out dates extracted by the curvature change rate method and 10% threshold were well matched with understory leaf-out dates. Third, the full-leaf dates extracted by the curvature change rate method and 90% threshold were similar to overstory full-leaf dates. Furthermore, I found that overstory leaf-out dates were closely correlated to accumulated growing degree days (AGDD) while understory leaf-out dates were related to AGDD and also sensitive to the number of chill days (NCD). These results suggest that satellite-based leaf-out and full leaf dates represent understory and overstory signals in the deciduous forest site, which requires caution when using satellite-based phenology data into future prediction as overstory and understory canopy show different sensitivities to AGDD and NCD.์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์œก์ƒ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์™€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ๊ถŒ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€, ํƒ„์†Œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ •๊ทœํ™” ์‹์ƒ ์ง€์ˆ˜ (NDVI) ํƒœ์–‘ ์œ ๋„ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘๋ฌผ์งˆ (SIF)๋Š” ๋Œ€์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์šฐ์ฃผ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ๋“ค์ด ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. 1) ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ SIF ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์—†๊ณ , 2) ์œ„์„ฑ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋“ค์€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ ์งˆ (์˜ˆ, ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„)์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์•„, ํ๋ฆฐ ๋‚ ์˜ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ํž˜๋“ค๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, 3) ์œ„์„ฑ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ์„ž์ธ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๊ฐ ์ธต์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ํƒ์ง€ํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹ค์ธก ์ž๋ฃŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฃผ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์  ๋ฐ ๊ถ๊ธˆ์ฆ๋“ค์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์™„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์•„๋ž˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์„ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ Chapter: 1) SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ, 2)์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ์˜ ์—ฐ์†์ ์ธ SIF ๊ด€์ธก, 3)์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋น„๊ต๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF๋Š” ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ , ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์ž๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด, SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์ด ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์˜ค๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ํ†ต๋˜๋Š” ๊ด€์ธก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ํ˜„์ €ํžˆ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ƒ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๋ณด์ • ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์›Œ ๋†’์€ ์งˆ์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋„์ „ ์ ์ธ ๋ถ„์•ผ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 2์—์„œ๋Š” SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์†์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(Smart Surface Sensing System, 4S-SIF)์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ๋Œ€์—ญ ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋“ค๊ณผ ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„œ๋ณด ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์—ญ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๊ด€์ธก ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ž๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์˜ ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๊ฐ€ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ์žฅ ๋ฒ”์œ„(757, 760, 770 nm)์˜ ๋น› ๋ฐ ํƒœ์–‘์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ž…์‚ฌ๋˜๋Š” ๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์‹์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ/๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋œ ๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ด€์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ณ ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ธ์‹๋œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋งค๋˜๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„(QE Pro, Ocean Insight)์™€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค (R2 > 0.99). ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ, 4S-SIF์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ SIF์™€ ์ดˆ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ SIF๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์ธ DCMU(3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethyurea)์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ SIF๋“ค์€ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์žฅ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ผ์ฐจ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ(gross primary productivity, GPP)์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ตœ๊ทผ ํƒ„์†Œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๊ฐ๊ด‘๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, SIF์™€ GPP์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” SIF-GPP ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๋Š” ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์š”์ธ์„ ๋”ฐ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 3์—์„œ๋Š” ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ SIF, GPP, ํก์ˆ˜๋œ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์œ ํšจ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰ (absorbed photosynthetically active radiation, APAR), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํด๋กœ๋กœํ•„๊ณผ ์นด๋กœํ‹ฐ๋…ธ์ด๋“œ์˜ ๋น„์œจ ์ธ์ž (chlorophyll: carotenoid index, CCI)๋ฅผ ์˜จ๋Œ€์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF-GPP ๊ด€๊ณ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ด‘ ์ด์šฉํšจ์œจ (light use efficiency, LUE_p), ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ˆ˜๋“๋ฅ  (chlorophyll fluorescence yield, ฮฆ_F) ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  SIF ๊ด‘์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋น„์œจ (escape fraction, f_esc)์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF์™€ GPP์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ๋น„ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ(R2 = 0.91 with a hyperbolic regression function, daily), ์ผ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ์œ„์—์„œ SIF๋Š” APAR์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ด์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ GPP๋Š” APAR์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ํฌํ™” ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ LUE_p ์™€ ฮฆ_F ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์˜จ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. LUE_p๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์˜จ๋„์—์„œ ํฌํ™” ๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ฮฆ_F๋Š” ํฌํ™” ํŒจํ„ด์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ์˜ CCI์™€ ฮฆ_F๊ฐ€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(R2 = 0.84). ์ด๋Š” ฮฆ_F๊ฐ€ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ์ƒ‰์†Œ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ LUE_p์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋” ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, f_esc๊ฐ€ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘์˜ ์‚ฐ๋ž€๋œ ์ •๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ํ•˜์—ฌ, ฮฆ_F์™€ LUE_p์˜ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ SIF-GPP๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์ฒ ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‘์ด๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์€ ์œก์ƒ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์™€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ๊ถŒ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ˆœํ™˜์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ NDVI๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋Œ€์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ์˜ ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์ œ ์–ด๋Š ์‹œ์ ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์€ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์‚ผ์ฐจ์›์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์€ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์„ž์—ฌ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ด์ฐจ์›์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์ด ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์‹ค์ œ ํ˜„์žฅ ๊ด€์ธก๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์–ด๋Š ์‹œ์ ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ถ๊ธˆ์ฆ์ด ๋‚จ๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 4์—์„œ๋Š” ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ 8๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ๋‚ด์˜ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ฑ„๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์œ„์™€ ์•„๋ž˜์— ์„ค์น˜ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ 1) ์—ญ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 2) ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ๊ตฐ๋ฝ์˜ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€์—์„œ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ NDVI์™€ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ NDVI๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค (R2=0.95 ๋Š” MODIS ์˜์ƒ๋“ค ๋ฐ R2= 0.85 ๋Š” Landsat8). ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 10%์˜ ์—ญ์น˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 90%์˜ ์—ญ์น˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์˜จ๋„์™€ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ ์‚ฐ ์ƒ์žฅ ์˜จ๋„ ์ผ์ˆ˜ (AGDD)์™€ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” AGDD์™€ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์„ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ถ”์œ„ ์ผ์ˆ˜(NCD)์—๋„ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๊ณ , ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์˜จ๋„์— ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด, ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•  ๋•Œ, ์–ด๋–ค ์ธต์˜ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์— ์ฃผ๋œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”์ง€ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ์€ ๋„“์€ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์†์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋„๊ตฌ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ด€์ธก ๊ฐ’์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” 1) ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ, 2) ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ธก, 3) ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋˜๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ์ƒ์—… ์„ผ์„œ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์† ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•จ์ด ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ SIF๋ฅผ ์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ด์ผ์ฐจ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ SIF๋Š” ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ SIF์™€ GPP๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์†Œ ์ƒ๋ฐ˜๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ธก ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๋ด„์ฒ  ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ฐ›๊ณ , ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ผ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.Abstract i Chapter 1. Introduction 2 1. Background 2 2. Purpose 5 Chapter 2. Monitoring SIF using a filter-based near surface remote sensing system 9 1. Introduction 9 2. Instrument desing and technical spefications of the filter-based smart surface sensing system (4S-SIF) 12 2.1. Ultra-narrow band pass filter 14 2.2. Calibration of 4S-SIF 15 2.3. Temperature and humidity response 16 2.4. Evaluate SIF quality from 4S-SIF in the field 17 3. Results 20 4. Discussion 23 Chapter 3. SIF is non-linearly related to canopy photosynthesis in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest during fall transition 27 1. Introduction 27 2. Methods and Materials 31 2.1. Study site 31 2.2. Leaf-level fluorescence measurement 32 2.3. Canopy-level SIF and spectral reflectance measurement 34 2.4. SIF retrieval 37 2.5. Canopy-level photosynthesis estimates 38 2.6. Meteorological variables and APAR 39 2.7. Statistical analysis 40 3. Results 41 4. Discussion 48 4.1. Non-linear relationships between SIF and GPP 49 4.2. Role of f_esc in SIF-GPP relationship 53 4.3. Implications of non-linear SIF-GPP relationship in temperate ENF 54 5. Conclusion 57 6. Appendix 59 Chapter 4. Monitoring spring phenology of multi-layer canopy in a deciduous broadleaf forest: What signal do satellites actually see in space 65 1. Introduction 65 2. Materials and Methods 69 2.1. Study site 69 2.2. Multi-layer spectral reflectance and transmittance measurement 70 2.3. Phenometrics detection 72 2.4. In-situ multi-layer phenology 74 2.5. Satellite remote sensing data 75 2.6. Meteorological variables 75 3. Results 76 3.1. Seasonal to interannual variations of NDVI, 1-transmittance, and air temperature 76 3.2. Inter-annual variation of leaf-out and full-leaf dates 78 3.3. The relationships between dates calculated according tothreshold and in-situ multi-layer phenology 80 3.4. The relationship between multi-layer phenology, AGDD and NCD 81 4. Discussion 82 4.1. How do satellite-based leaf-out and full-leaf dates differ from in-situ multi-layer phenology 83 4.2. Are the 10 % and 90 % thresholds from satellite-basedNDVI always well matched with the leaf-out and full-leaf dates calculated by the curvature change rate 86 4.3. What are the implications of the difference between satellite-based and multi-layer phenology 87 4.4. Limitations and implications for future studies 89 5. Conclusion 91 6. Appendix 92 Chapter 5. Conclusion 114 Abstract in Korean 115๋ฐ•

    Can upscaling ground nadir SIF to eddy covariance footprint improve the relationship between SIF and GPP in croplands?

    Get PDF
    Ground solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is important for the mechanistic understanding of the dynamics of vegetation gross primary production (GPP) at fine spatiotemporal scales. However, eddy covariance (EC) observations generally cover larger footprint areas than ground SIF observations (a bare fiber with nadir), and this footprint mismatch between nadir SIF and GPP could complicate the canopy SIF-GPP relationships. Here, we upscaled nadir SIF observations to EC footprint and investigated the change in SIF-GPP relationships after the upscaling in cropland. We included 13 site-years data in our study, with seven site-years corn, four siteyears soybeans, and two site-years miscanthus, all located in the US Corn Belt. All sitesโ€™ crop nadir SIF observations collected from the automated FluoSpec2 system (a hemispheric-nadir system) were upscaled to the GPP footprint-based SIF using vegetation indices (VIs) calculated from high spatiotemporal satellite reflectance data. We found that SIF-GPP relationships were not substantially changed after upscaling nadir SIF to GPP footprint at our crop sites planted with corn, soybean, and miscanthus, with R2 change after the upscaling ranging from -0.007 to 0.051 and root mean square error (RMSE) difference from -0.658 to 0.095 umol m-2 s-1 relative to original nadir SIF-GPP relationships across all the site-years. The variation of the SIF-GPP relationship within each species across different site-years was similar between the original nadir SIF and upscaled SIF. Different VIs, EC footprint models, and satellite data led to marginal differences in the SIF-GPP relationships when upscaling nadir SIF to EC footprint. Our study provided a methodological framework to correct this spatial mismatch between ground nadir SIF and GPP observations for croplands and potentially for other ecosystems. Our results also demonstrated that the spatial mismatch between ground nadir SIF and GPP might not significantly affect the SIF-GPP relationship in cropland that are largely homogeneous
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore