1,993 research outputs found
Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Wiley-Blackwell in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology on 14/05/2018, available online: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24028
The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.Counts of tweets and Mendeley user libraries have been proposed as altmetric alternatives to citation counts for the impact assessment of articles. Although both have been investigated to discover whether they correlate with article citations, it is not known whether users tend to tweet or save (in Mendeley) the same kinds of articles that they cite. In response, this article compares pairs of articles that are tweeted, saved to a Mendeley library, or cited by the same user, but possibly a different user for each source. The study analyzes 1,131,318 articles published in 2012, with minimum tweeted (10), saved to Mendeley (100), and cited (10) thresholds. The results show surprisingly minor overall overlaps between the three phenomena. The importance of journals for Twitter and the presence of many bots at different levels of activity suggest that this site has little value for impact altmetrics. The moderate differences between patterns of saving and citation suggest that Mendeley can be used for some types of impact assessments, but sensitivity is needed for underlying differences
Mining network-level properties of Twitter altmetrics data
© 2019, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary. Social networking sites play a significant role in altmetrics. While 90% of all altmetric mentions come from Twitter, the known microscopic and macroscopic properties of Twitter altmetrics data are limited. In this study, we present a large-scale analysis of Twitter altmetrics data using social network analysis techniques on the ‘mention’ network of Twitter users. Exploiting the network-level properties of over 1.4 million tweets, corresponding to 77,757 scholarly articles, this study focuses on the following aspects of Twitter altmetrics data: (a) the influence of organizational accounts; (b) the formation of disciplinary communities; (c) the cross-disciplinary interaction among Twitter users; (d) the network motifs of influential Twitter users; and (e) testing the small-world property. The results show that Twitter-based social media communities have unique characteristics, which may affect social media usage counts either directly or indirectly. Therefore, instead of treating altmetrics data as a black box, the underlying social media networks, which may either inflate or deflate social media usage counts, need further scrutiny
Social media metrics for new research evaluation
This chapter approaches, both from a theoretical and practical perspective,
the most important principles and conceptual frameworks that can be considered
in the application of social media metrics for scientific evaluation. We
propose conceptually valid uses for social media metrics in research
evaluation. The chapter discusses frameworks and uses of these metrics as well
as principles and recommendations for the consideration and application of
current (and potentially new) metrics in research evaluation.Comment: Forthcoming in Glanzel, W., Moed, H.F., Schmoch U., Thelwall, M.
(2018). Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springe
SOCIAL MEDIA FOOTPRINTS OF PUBLIC PERCEPTION ON ENERGY ISSUES IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES
Energy has been at the top of the national and global political agenda along with other concomitant challenges, such as poverty, disaster and climate change. Social perception on various energy issues, such as its availability, development and consumption deeply affect our energy future. This type of information is traditionally collected through structured energy surveys. However, these surveys are often subject to formidable costs and intensive labor, as well as a lack of temporal dimensions. Social media can provide a more cost-effective solution to collect massive amount of data on public opinions in a timely manner that may complement the survey. The purpose of this study is to use machine learning algorithms and social media conversations to characterize the spatiotemporal topics and social perception on different energy in terms of spatial and temporal dimensions. Text analysis algorithms, such as sentiment analysis and topic analysis, were employed to offer insights into the public attitudes and those prominent issues related to energy. The results show that the energy related public perceptions exhibited spatiotemporal dynamics. The study is expected to help inform decision making, formulate national energy policies, and update entrepreneurial energy development decisions
Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics
This literature review assesses indicators derived from social media sources, including both general and academic sites. Such indicators have been termed altmetrics, influmetrics, social media metrics, or a type of webometric, and have recently been commercialised by a number of companies and employed by some publishers and university administrators. The social media metrics analysed here derive mainly from Twitter, Facebook, Google+, F1000, Mendeley, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu. They have the apparent potential to deliver fast, free indicators of the wider societal impact of research, or of different types of academic impacts, complementing academic impact indicators from traditional citation indexes. Although it is unwise to employ them in formal evaluations with stakeholders, due to their susceptibility to gaming and lack of real evidence that they reflect wider research impacts, they are useful for formative evaluations and to investigate science itself. Mendeley reader counts are particularly promising
Social media in scholarly communication : a review of the literature and empirical analysis of Twitter use by SSHRC doctoral award recipients
This report has been commissioned by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) to analyze
the role that social media currently plays in scholarly communication as well as to what extent metrics derived
from social media activity related to scholarly content can be applied in an evaluation context.
Scholarly communication has become more diverse and open with research being discussed, shared and
evaluated online. Social media tools are increasingly being used in the research and scholarly communication
context, as scholars connect on Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter or specialized platforms such as ResearchGate,
Academia.edu or Mendeley. Research is discussed on blogs or Twitter, while datasets, software code and
presentations are shared on Dryad, Github, FigShare and similar websites for reproducibility and reuse. Literature
is managed, annotated and shared with online tools such as Mendeley and Zotero, and peer review is starting to
be more open and transparent. The changing landscape of scholarly communication has also brought about new
possibilities regarding its evaluation. So-called altmetrics are based on scholarly social media activity and have
been introduced to reflect scholarly output and impact beyond considering only peer-reviewed journal articles
and citations within them to measure scientific success. This includes the measurement of more diverse types of
scholarly work and various forms of impact including that on society.
This report provides an overview of how various social media tools are used in the research context based on
1) an extensive review of the current literature as well as 2) an empirical analysis of the use of Twitter by the 2010
cohort of SSHRC Doctoral Award recipients was analyzed in depth. Twitter has been chosen as one of the most
promising tools regarding interaction with the general public and scholarly communication beyond the scientific
community. The report focuses on the opportunities and challenges of social media and derived metrics and
attempts to provide SSHRC with information to develop guidelines regarding the use of social media by funded
researchers as well support the informed used of social media metrics
Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
Although counts of tweets citing academic papers are used as an informal indicator of interest,
little is known about who tweets academic papers and who uses Twitter to find scholarly
information. Without knowing this, it is difficult to draw useful conclusions from a publication
being frequently tweeted. This study surveyed 1,912 users that have tweeted journal articles
to ask about their scholarly-related Twitter uses. Almost half of the respondents (45%) did
not work in academia, despite the sample probably being biased towards academics. Twitter
was used most by people with a social science or humanities background. People tend
to leverage social ties on Twitter to find information rather than searching for relevant
tweets. Twitter is used in academia to acquire and share real-time information and to
develop connections with others. Motivations for using Twitter vary by discipline, occupation,
and employment sector, but not much by gender. These factors also influence the sharing
of different types of academic information. This study provides evidence that Twitter
plays a significant role in the discovery of scholarly information and cross-disciplinary knowledge
spreading. Most importantly, the large numbers of non-academic users support the
claims of those using tweet counts as evidence for the non-academic impacts of scholarly
researc
Tweet Along: Analyzing the Relationship Between Social Media and Television Ratings
Television ratings affect everything from advertising rates to the time a show is scheduled, and ultimately, its success. In recent years, rating methods have been updated not only to include live viewings, but also viewers who record and stream shows on the Internet. This is the result of living in a digital age. The pressure put on those who create television shows to get high ratings is even more intense, and viewers now expect a level of interaction from actors, writers and television staff on social media. This study examines the importance of the relationship between social media presence and television ratings. The author studied a popular cable television show and assessed its success based on social media presence. The hypothesis was that on days when there was more interaction with fans on the social media platform Twitter, the Nielsen Television Ratings would be the highest. The results show this to be true
- …