Capacitated Center Problems with Two-Sided Bounds and Outliers

In recent years, the capacitated center problems have attracted a lot of research interest. Given a set of vertices $V$, we want to find a subset of vertices $S$, called centers, such that the maximum cluster radius is minimized. Moreover, each center in $S$ should satisfy some capacity constraint, which could be an upper or lower bound on the number of vertices it can serve. Capacitated $k$-center problems with one-sided bounds (upper or lower) have been well studied in previous work, and a constant factor approximation was obtained. We are the first to study the capacitated center problem with both capacity lower and upper bounds (with or without outliers). We assume each vertex has a uniform lower bound and a non-uniform upper bound. For the case of opening exactly $k$ centers, we note that a generalization of a recent LP approach can achieve constant factor approximation algorithms for our problems. Our main contribution is a simple combinatorial algorithm for the case where there is no cardinality constraint on the number of open centers. Our combinatorial algorithm is simpler and achieves better constant approximation factor compared to the LP approach

Privacy Preserving Clustering with Constraints

The k-center problem is a classical combinatorial optimization problem which asks to find k centers such that the maximum distance of any input point in a set P to its assigned center is minimized. The problem allows for elegant 2-approximations. However, the situation becomes significantly more difficult when constraints are added to the problem. We raise the question whether general methods can be derived to turn an approximation algorithm for a clustering problem with some constraints into an approximation algorithm that respects one constraint more. Our constraint of choice is privacy: Here, we are asked to only open a center when at least l clients will be assigned to it. We show how to combine privacy with several other constraints

Constrained Clustering Problems and Parity Games

Clustering is a fundamental tool in data mining. It partitions points into groups (clusters) and may be used to make decisions for each point based on its group. We study several clustering objectives. We begin with studying the Euclidean k-center problem. The k-center problem is a classical combinatorial optimization problem which asks to select k centers and assign each input point in a set P to one of the centers, such that the maximum distance of any input point to its assigned center is minimized. The Euclidean k-center problem assumes that the input set P is a subset of a Euclidean space and that each location in the Euclidean space can be chosen as a center. We focus on the special case with k = 1, the smallest enclosing ball problem: given a set of points in m-dimensional Euclidean space, find the smallest sphere enclosing all the points. We combine known results about convex optimization with structural properties of the smallest enclosing ball to create a new algorithm. We show that on instances with rational coefficients our new algorithm computes the exact center of the optimal solutions and has a worst-case run time that is polynomial in the size of the input. We use the new algorithm to show that we can solve the Euclidean k-center problem in polynomial time for constant k and dimension m. The general unconstrained clustering problems are mostly very well studied. The k-center problem for example allows for elegant 2-approximation algorithms(Gonzalez 1985, Hochbaum,Shmoys 1986). However, the situation becomes significantly more difficult when constraints are added to the problem. We first look at the fair clustering. The fairness constraint is motivated by the fact that the general process of computing a clustering may harm protected (minority) classes if the clustering algorithm does not adequately represent them in desirable clusters -- especially if the data is already biased. At NIPS 2017, Chierichetti et al. proposed a model for fair clustering requiring the representation in each cluster to (approximately) preserve the global fraction of each protected class. Restricting to two protected classes, they developed both a 4-approximation algorithm for the fair k-center problem and an O(t)-approximation algorithm for the fair k-median problem, where t is a parameter for the fairness model. For multiple protected classes, the best known result is a 14-approximation algorithm for fair k-center (Rösner, Schmidt 2018). We extend and improve the known results. Firstly, we give a 5-approximation algorithm for the fair k-center problem with multiple protected classes. Secondly, we propose a relaxed fairness notion under which we can give bicriteria constant-factor approximation algorithms for the fair version of all of the classical clustering objectives (k-center, k-supplier, k-median, k-means and facility location). The latter approximation algorithms are achieved by a framework that takes an arbitrary existing unfair (integral) solution and a fair (fractional) LP solution and combines them into an essentially fair clustering with a weakly supervised rounding scheme. In this way, a fair clustering can be established belatedly, in a situation where for example the centers are already fixed. The second clustering constraint we study is privacy: Here, we are asked to only open a center when at least l points will be assigned to it. We raise the question whether a general method can be derived to turn an approximation algorithm for a clustering problem with some constraints into an approximation algorithm that additionally respects privacy. We show how to combine privacy with several other constraints and obtain approximation algorithms for the k-center problem with several combinations of constraints. In this dissertation we also study parity games, a two player game played on a directed graph. We study the case in which one of the two players controls only a small number k of nodes and the other player controls the n-k other nodes of the game. Our main result is a fixed-parameter-tractable algorithm that solves bipartite parity games in time k^{O(sqrt{k})} O(n^3), and general parity games in time (p+k)^{O(sqrt{k})} O(pnm), where p is the number of distinct priorities and m is the number of edges. For all games with k = o(n) this improves the previously fastest algorithm by Jurdziński, Paterson, and Zwick (2008). We also obtain novel kernelization results and an improved deterministic algorithm for parity games on graphs with small average node-degree

A Survey on Approximation in Parameterized Complexity: Hardness and Algorithms

Parameterization and approximation are two popular ways of coping with NP-hard problems. More recently, the two have also been combined to derive many interesting results. We survey developments in the area both from the algorithmic and hardness perspectives, with emphasis on new techniques and potential future research directions

Randomized approximation algorithms : facility location, phylogenetic networks, Nash equilibria

Despite a great effort, researchers are unable to find efficient algorithms for a number of natural computational problems. Typically, it is possible to emphasize the hardness of such problems by proving that they are at least as hard as a number of other problems. In the language of computational complexity it means proving that the problem is complete for a certain class of problems. For optimization problems, we may consider to relax the requirement of the outcome to be optimal and accept an approximate (i.e., close to optimal) solution. For many of the problems that are hard to solve optimally, it is actually possible to efficiently find close to optimal solutions. In this thesis, we study algorithms for computing such approximate solutions

Dynamic vehicle routing problems: Three decades and counting

Since the late 70s, much research activity has taken place on the class of dynamic vehicle routing problems (DVRP), with the time period after year 2000 witnessing a real explosion in related papers. Our paper sheds more light into work in this area over more than 3 decades by developing a taxonomy of DVRP papers according to 11 criteria. These are (1) type of problem, (2) logistical context, (3) transportation mode, (4) objective function, (5) fleet size, (6) time constraints, (7) vehicle capacity constraints, (8) the ability to reject customers, (9) the nature of the dynamic element, (10) the nature of the stochasticity (if any), and (11) the solution method. We comment on technological vis-à-vis methodological advances for this class of problems and suggest directions for further research. The latter include alternative objective functions, vehicle speed as decision variable, more explicit linkages of methodology to technological advances and analysis of worst case or average case performance of heuristics.© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

LIPIcs, Volume 258, SoCG 2023, Complete Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 258, SoCG 2023, Complete Volum