Deduction modulo theory

This paper is a survey on Deduction modulo theor

Completeness of resolution revisited

AbstractBy a novel argument we prove the completeness of (ground) resolution. The argument allows us to give the completeness proofs for various strategies of resolution in a uniform way, thus contributing to the insight into these strategies. For example, our exposition shows how the more efficient strategies can be derived from an analysis of the redundancies in the completeness proofs. Moreover, by using Zorn's Lemma in dealing with infinite sets of ground clauses, we obtain completeness proofs which are completely independent of the cardinality of both the language and the set of clauses. We discuss the set theoretic status of these results

Linking Focusing and Resolution with Selection

Focusing and selection are techniques that shrink the proof search space for respectively sequent calculi and resolution. To bring out a link between them, we generalize them both: we introduce a sequent calculus where each occurrence of an atom can have a positive or a negative polarity; and a resolution method where each literal, whatever its sign, can be selected in input clauses. We prove the equivalence between cut-free proofs in this sequent calculus and derivations of the empty clause in that resolution method. Such a generalization is not semi-complete in general, which allows us to consider complete instances that correspond to theories of any logical strength. We present three complete instances: first, our framework allows us to show that ordinary focusing corresponds to hyperresolution and semantic resolution; the second instance is deduction modulo theory; and a new setting, not captured by any existing framework, extends deduction modulo theory with rewriting rules having several left-hand sides, which restricts even more the proof search space

Larry Wos - Visions of automated reasoning

This paper celebrates the scientific discoveries and the service to the automated reasoning community of Lawrence (Larry) T. Wos, who passed away in August 2020. The narrative covers Larry's most long-lasting ideas about inference rules and search strategies for theorem proving, his work on applications of theorem proving, and a collection of personal memories and anecdotes that let readers appreciate Larry's personality and enthusiasm for automated reasoning

On SGGS and Horn clauses

SGGS (Semantically-Guided Goal-Sensitive reasoning) is a refutationally complete theorem-proving method that offers first-order conflict-driven reasoning and is model complete in the limit. This paper investigates the behavior of SGGS on Horn clauses, which are widely used in declarative programming, knowledge representation, and verification. We show that SGGS generates the least Herbrand model of a set of definite clauses, and that SGGS terminates on Horn clauses if and only if hyperresolution does, with the advantage that SGGS builds a model. We report on experiments applying the SGGS prototype prover Koala to Horn problems, with promising performances especially on satisfiable inputs

Set of support, demodulation, paramodulation: a historical perspective

This article is a tribute to the scientific legacy of automated reasoning pioneer and JAR founder Lawrence T. (Larry) Wos. Larry's main technical contributions were the set-of-support strategy for resolution theorem proving, and the demodulation and paramodulation inference rules for building equality into resolution. Starting from the original definitions of these concepts in Larry's papers, this survey traces their evolution, unearthing the often forgotten trails that connect Larry's original definitions to those that became standard in the field