Corridor Location: Generating Competitive and Efficient Route Alternatives

The problem of transmission line corridor location can be considered, at best, a "wicked" public systems decision problem. It requires the consideration of numerous objectives while balancing the priorities of a variety of stakeholders, and designers should be prepared to develop diverse non-inferior route alternatives that must be defensible under the scrutiny of a public forum. Political elements aside, the underlying geographical computational problems that must be solved to provide a set of high quality alternatives are no less easy, as they require solving difficult spatial optimization problems on massive GIS terrain-based raster data sets.Transmission line siting methodologies have previously been developed to guide designers in this endeavor, but close scrutiny of these methodologies show that there are many shortcomings with their approaches. The main goal of this dissertation is to take a fresh look at the process of corridor location, and develop a set of algorithms that compute path alternatives using a foundation of solid geographical theory in order to offer designers better tools for developing quality alternatives that consider the entire spectrum of viable solutions. And just as importantly, as data sets become increasingly massive and present challenging computational elements, it is important that algorithms be efficient and able to take advantage of parallel computing resources.A common approach to simplify a problem with numerous objectives is to combine the cost layers into a composite a priori weighted single-objective raster grid. This dissertation examines new methods used for determining a spatially diverse set of near-optimal alternatives, and develops parallel computing techniques for brute-force near-optimal path enumeration, as well as more elegant methods that take advantage of the hierarchical structure of the underlying path-tree computation to select sets of spatially diverse near optimal paths.Another approach for corridor location is to simultaneously consider all objectives to determine the set of Pareto-optimal solutions between the objectives. This amounts to solving a discrete multi-objective shortest path problem, which is considered to be NP-Hard for computing the full set of non-inferior solutions. Given the difficulty of solving for the complete Pareto-optimal set, this dissertation develops an approximation heuristic to compute path sets that are nearly exact-optimal in a fraction of the time when compared to exact algorithms. This method is then applied as an upper bound to an exact enumerative approach, resulting in significant performance speedups. But as analytic computing continues to moved toward distributed clusters, it is important to optimize algorithms to take full advantage parallel computing. To that extent, this dissertation develops a scalable parallel framework that efficiently solves for the supported/convex solutions of a biobjective shortest path problem. This framework is equally applicable to other biobjective network optimization problems, providing a powerful tool for solving the next generation of location analysis and geographical optimization models

New Multiobjective Shortest Path Algorithms

The main problem studied in this thesis is the Multiobjective Shortest Path (MOSP) problem. We focus on the problem variant with three or more objectives. It is a generalization of the classical Shortest Path problem in which arcs in the input graph are weighted with vectors instead of scalars. The main contribution is the Multiobjective Dijkstra Algorithm (MDA), a label- setting algorithm that achieves state of the art performance in theory and in practice. Motivated by this result, the thesis goes on with the design of variants of the MDA for different variants of the MOSP problem. For the One-to-One MOSP problem the Targeted MDA (T-MDA) has the same asymptotic running time than the MDA but trades in memory for speed in practice. The additional paths stored during the T-MDA are managed in a pseudo-lazy way. This is a novel way to organize explored paths that ensures that the algorithm’s priority queue stores at most one path per node in the input graph simultaneously. The paths that are held back from the queue are organized in lists that are kept sorted by just prepending or appending paths to them, i.e., using constant time insertions. The resulting implementation of the T-MDA solves bigger instances than the MDA and is also faster. We study the generalization of the Time-Dependent Shortest Path problem to the multiobjective case. We provide a detailed analysis of the generalization’s limitations and discuss when the MDA is applicable. For MOSP instances with large sets of optimal paths, good approximation algorithms are important. We combine the MDA with an outcome space partition technique from the literature to obtain a new FPTAS for the MOSP problem. The resulting MD-FPTAS works also for multiobjective instances of the Time-Dependent Shortest Path problem, which is a novelty. Finally, we use the MDA and its biobjective version, the BDA, to solve the Multiobjective Minimum Spanning Tree (MO-MST) problem and the k-Shortest Simple Path (k-SSP) problem, respectively. For the solution of instances of these two problems, the MDA and the BDA are used as subroutines. An MO-MST instance is solved applying the MDA on a so called transition graph. In this graph paths have equivalent costs to trees in the original graph and thus, the optimal solutions computed by the MDA in the transition graph correspond to optimal trees in the original graph. Since the transition graph has an exponential size w.r.t. the size of the original graph, we discuss new pruning techniques to reduce its number of arcs effectively. The solution of the k-SSP, which is a scalar optimization problem, using a biobjective subroutine is surprising but our new algorithm is state of the art in theory and in practice.In dieser Arbeit beschäftigen wir uns hauptsächlich mit dem Multikriterielle Kürzeste Wege (MOSP) Problem. Es ist eine Verallgemeinerung des klassischen Kürzeste Wege Problems, bei der Kanten im Eingangsgraphen mit d-dimensionalen Vektoren anstelle von Skalaren gewichtet sind. Der Hauptbeitrag der Arbeit ist der Multiobjective Dijkstra Algorithmus (MDA), ein label-setting Algorithmus, der in der Theorie und in der Praxis eine Verbesserung der in der Literatur vorhandenen Ergebnisse darstellt. Motiviert durch dieses Ergebnis entwickeln wir im weiteren Verlauf der Arbeit Varianten des MDAs für verschiedene Varianten des MOSP Problems. Für das Punkt-zu-Punkt MOSP Problem hat der Targeted MDA (T-MDA) die gleiche asymptotische Laufzeit wie der MDA. Durch einen erhöhten Speicherverbrauch ist er in der Praxis aber deutlich schneller. Die zusätzlich gespeicherten Pfade werden auf eine pseudo-lazy Art verwaltet. Dies ist eine neuartige Methode zur Organisation von explorierten Pfaden, die sicherstellt, dass die Größe der Prioritätswarteschlange des Algorithmus auf höchstens einen Pfad pro Knoten im Graphen beschränkt bleibt. Die Pfade, die aus der Warteschlange zurückgehalten werden, werden in Listen organisiert, die durch Voranstellen oder Anhängen von Pfaden sortiert bleiben. Das heißt, dass nur Konstantzeit-Operationen benötigt werden. Der T-MDA löst größere Instanzen als der MDA und ist auch schneller. Wir untersuchen die Verallgemeinerung des zeitabhängigen Kürzeste Wege Problems auf den multikriteriellen Fall. Wir bieten eine detaillierte Analyse der Grenzen und Möglichkeiten dieser Verallgemeinerung und diskutieren, wann der MDA hierauf anwendbar ist. Für MOSP Instanzen mit großen Mengen optimaler Pfade sind gute Approximationsalgorithmen wichtig. Wir kombinieren den MDA mit einer Technik zur Partitionierung des Ergebnisraums aus der Literatur, um einen neuen FPTAS für das MOSP Problem zu erhalten. Der resultierende MD-FPTAS funktioniert auch für Instanzen mit verallgemeinert zeitabhängigen Kostenfunktionen, was neuartig ist. Schließlich verwenden wir den MDA und seine bikriterielle Version als Unterroutinen, um jeweils das Multiobjective Minimum Spanning Tree (MOMST) Problem und das k-Shortest Simple Path (k-SSP) Problem zu lösen. Eine MO-MST Instanz wird gelöst, indem der MDA auf einen sogenannten Übergangsgraphen angewendet wird. In diesem Graphen haben Pfade äquivalente Kosten zu den Bäumen im ursprünglichen Graphen und somit entsprechen die optimalen Lösungen, die vom MDA im Übergangsgraphen berechnet werden, den optimalen Bäumen im ursprünglichen Graphen. Da der Übergangsgraph eine exponentielle Größe im Verhältnis zur Größe des ursprünglichen Graphen hat, diskutieren wir neue Techniken zur Reduzierung seiner Anzahl von Kanten. Die Lösung des k-SSP Problems, ein skalares Optimierungsproblem, unter Verwendung einer bikriteriellen Unterroutine ist überraschend, aber unser neuer Algorithmus ist sowohl in der Theorie als auch in der Praxis auf dem neuesten Stand

A benchmark test problem toolkit for multi-objective path optimization

Due to the complexity of multi-objective optimization problems (MOOPs) in general, it is crucial to test MOOP methods on some benchmark test problems. Many benchmark test problem toolkits have been developed for continuous parameter/numerical optimization, but fewer toolkits reported for discrete combinational optimization. This paper reports a benchmark test problem toolkit especially for multi-objective path optimization problem (MOPOP), which is a typical category of discrete combinational optimization. With the reported toolkit, the complete Pareto front of a generated test problem of MOPOP can be deduced and found out manually, and the problem scale and complexity are controllable and adjustable. Many methods for discrete combinational MOOPs often only output a partial or approximated Pareto front. With the reported benchmark test problem toolkit for MOPOP, we can now precisely tell how many true Pareto points are missed by a partial Pareto front, or how large the gap is between an approximated Pareto front and the complete one

An Analysis of Some Algorithms and Heuristics for Multiobjective Graph Search

Muchos problemas reales requieren examinar un número exponencial de alternativas para encontrar la elección óptima. A este tipo de problemas se les llama de optimización combinatoria. Además, en problemas reales normalmente se evalúan múltiples magnitudes que presentan conflicto entre ellas. Cuando se optimizan múltiples obje-tivos simultáneamente, generalmente no existe un valor óptimo que satisfaga al mismo tiempo los requisitos para todos los criterios. Solucionar estos problemas combinatorios multiobjetivo deriva comúnmente en un gran conjunto de soluciones Pareto-óptimas, que definen los balances óptimos entre los objetivos considerados. En esta tesis se considera uno de los problemas multiobjetivo más recurrentes: la búsqueda de caminos más cortos en un grafo, teniendo en cuenta múltiples objetivos al mismo tiempo. Se pueden señalar muchas aplicaciones prácticas de la búsqueda multiobjetivo en diferentes dominios: enrutamiento en redes multimedia (Clímaco et al., 2003), programación de satélites (Gabrel & Vanderpooten, 2002), problemas de transporte (Pallottino & Scutellà, 1998), enrutamiento en redes de ferrocarril (Müller-Hannemann & Weihe, 2006), planificación de rutas en redes de carreteras (Jozefowiez et al., 2008), vigilancia con robots (delle Fave et al., 2009) o planificación independiente del dominio (Refanidis & Vlahavas, 2003). La planificación de rutas multiobjetivo sobre mapas de carretera realistas ha sido considerada como un escenario de aplicación potencial para los algoritmos y heurísticos multiobjetivo considerados en esta tesis. El transporte de materias peligrosas (Erkut et al., 2007), otro problema de enrutamiento multiobjetivo relacionado, ha sido también considerado como un escenario de aplicación potencial interesante. Los métodos de optimización de un solo criterio son bien conocidos y han sido ampliamente estudiados. La Búsqueda Heurística permite la reducción de los requisitos de espacio y tiempo de estos métodos, explotando el uso de estimaciones de la distancia real al objetivo. Los problemas multiobjetivo son bastante más complejos que sus equivalentes de un solo objetivo y requieren métodos específicos. Éstos, van desde técnicas de solución exactas a otras aproximadas, que incluyen los métodos metaheurísticos aproximados comúnmente encontrados en la literatura. Esta tesis se ocupa de algoritmos exactos primero-el-mejor y, en particular, del uso de información heurística para mejorar su rendimiento. Esta tesis contribuye análisis tanto formales como empíricos de algoritmos y heurísticos para búsqueda multiobjetivo. La caracterización formal de estos algoritmos es importante para el campo. Sin embargo, la evaluación empírica es también de gran importancia para la aplicación real de estos métodos. Se han utilizado diversas clases de problemas bien conocidos para probar su rendimiento, incluyendo escenarios realistas como los descritos más arriba. Los resultados de esta tesis proporcionan una mejor comprensión de qué métodos de los disponibles sonmejores en situaciones prácticas. Se presentan explicaciones formales y empíricas acerca de su comportamiento. Se muestra que la búsqueda heurística reduce considerablemente los requisitos de espacio y tiempo en la mayoría de las ocasiones. En particular, se presentan los primeros resultados sistemáticos mostrando las ventajas de la aplicación de heurísticos multiobjetivo precalculados. Esta tesis también aporta un método mejorado para el precálculo de los heurísticos, y explora la conveniencia de heurísticos precalculados más informados.Many real problems require the examination of an exponential number of alternatives in order to find the best choice. They are the so-called combinatorial optimization problems. Besides, real problems usually involve the consideration of several conflicting magnitudes. When multiple objectives must be simultaneously optimized, there is generally not an optimal value satisfying the requirements for all the criteria at the same time. Solving these multiobjective combinatorial problems commonly results in a large set of Pareto-optimal solutions, which define the optimal tradeoffs between the objectives under consideration. One of most recurrent multiobjective problems is considered in this thesis: the search for shortest paths in a graph, taking into account several objectives at the same time. Many practical applications of multiobjective search in different domains can be pointed out: routing in multimedia networks (Clímaco et al., 2003), satellite scheduling (Gabrel & Vanderpooten, 2002), transportation problems (Pallottino & Scutellà, 1998), routing in railway networks (Müller-Hannemann & Weihe, 2006), route planning in road maps (Jozefowiez et al., 2008), robot surveillance (delle Fave et al., 2009) or domain independent planning (Refanidis & Vlahavas, 2003). Multiobjective route planning over realistic road maps has been considered as a potential application scenario for the multiobjective algorithms and heuristics considered in this thesis. Hazardous material transportation (Erkut et al., 2007), another related multiobjective routing problem, has also been considered as an interesting potential application scenario. Single criterion shortest path methods are well known and have been widely studied. Heuristic Search allows the reduction of the space and time requirements of these methods, exploiting estimates of the actual distance to the goal. Multiobjective problems are much more complex than their single-objective counterparts, and require specific methods. These range from exact solution techniques to approximate ones, including the metaheuristic approximate methods usually found in the literature. This thesis is concerned with exact best-first algorithms, and particularly, with the use of heuristic information to improve their performance. This thesis contributes both formal and empirical analysis of algorithms and heuristics for multiobjective search. The formal characterization of algorithms is important for the field. However, empirical evaluation is also of great importance for the real application of these methods. Several well known classes of problems have been used to test their performance, including some realistic scenarios as described above. The results of this thesis provide a better understanding of which of the available methods are better in practical situations. Formal and empirical explanations of their behaviour are presented. Heuristic search is shown to reduce considerably space and time requirements in most situations. In particular, the first systematic results showing the advantages of the application of precalculated multiobjective heuristics are presented. The thesis also contributes an improved method for heuristic precalculation, and explores the convenience of more informed precalculated heuristics.This work is partially funded by / Este trabajo está financiado por: Consejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa. Junta de Andalucía (España) Referencia: P07-TIC-0301

Multi-objective network optimization: models, methods, and applications

There can be an array of planning objectives to consider when identifying alternatives for using, modifying, or restoring natural or built environments. In this respect, multi-objective network optimization models can provide decision support to both managers and users of the system. While there can be an infinite number of feasible solutions to any multi-objective optimization problem in large networks (e.g., urban transportation systems), the efficient ones are usually more desirable in the decision-making process. However, identification of efficient solutions can be challenging in practical applications. To address this issue, this dissertation details mathematical formulations and solution algorithms for a range of real-world planning problems in the context of intelligent transportation systems, vehicle routing problem, natural conservation and landscape connectivity. While the combination of objectives being optimized is unique for each application, the underlying phenomena involves modeling movement between origins and destinations of a networked system. To demonstrate the type of insights that can be achieved using these modeling approaches, the location and number of times solutions appear in different realizations of system and given different solution approaches (e.g., exact and approximate methods) are visualized on network using a commercial geographic information system

OPTIMIZATION OF RAILWAY TRANSPORTATION HAZMATS AND REGULAR COMMODITIES

Transportation of dangerous goods has been receiving more attention in the realm of academic and scientific research during the last few decades as countries have been increasingly becoming industrialized throughout the world, thereby making Hazmats an integral part of our life style. However, the number of scholarly articles in this field is not as many as those of other areas in SCM. Considering the low-probability-and-high-consequence (LPHC) essence of transportation of Hazmats, on the one hand, and immense volume of shipments accounting for more than hundred tons in North America and Europe, on the other, we can safely state that the number of scholarly articles and dissertations have not been proportional to the significance of the subject of interest. On this ground, we conducted our research to contribute towards further developing the domain of Hazmats transportation, and sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), in general terms. Transportation of Hazmats, from logistical standpoint, may include all modes of transport via air, marine, road and rail, as well as intermodal transportation systems. Although road shipment is predominant in most of the literature, railway transportation of Hazmats has proven to be a potentially significant means of transporting dangerous goods with respect to both economies of scale and risk of transportation; these factors, have not just given rise to more thoroughly investigation of intermodal transportation of Hazmats using road and rail networks, but has encouraged the competition between rail and road companies which may indeed have some inherent advantages compared to the other medium due to their infrastructural and technological backgrounds. Truck shipment has ostensibly proven to be providing more flexibility; trains, per contra, provide more reliability in terms of transport risk for conveying Hazmats in bulks. In this thesis, in consonance with the aforementioned motivation, we provide an introduction into the hazardous commodities shipment through rail network in the first chapter of the thesis. Providing relevant statistics on the volume of Hazmat goods, number of accidents, rate of incidents, and rate of fatalities and injuries due to the incidents involving Hazmats, will shed light onto the significance of the topic under study. As well, we review the most pertinent articles while putting more emphasis on the state-of-the-art papers, in chapter two. Following the discussion in chapter 3 and looking at the problem from carrier company’s perspective, a mixed integer quadratically constraint problem (MIQCP) is developed which seeks for the minimization of transportation cost under a set of constraints including those associating with Hazmats. Due to the complexity of the problem, the risk function has been piecewise linearized using a set of auxiliary variables, thereby resulting in an MIP problem. Further, considering the interests of both carrier companies and regulatory agencies, which are minimization of cost and risk, respectively, a multiobjective MINLP model is developed, which has been reduced to an MILP through piecewise linearization of the risk term in the objective function. For both single-objective and multiobjective formulations, model variants with bifurcated and nonbifurcated flows have been presented. Then, in chapter 4, we carry out experiments considering two main cases where the first case presents smaller instances of the problem and the second case focuses on a larger instance of the problem. Eventually, in chapter five, we conclude the dissertation with a summary of the overall discussion as well as presenting some comments on avenues of future work

Analysis of FPTASes for the Multi-Objective Shortest Path Problem

We propose a new FPTAS for the multi-objective shortest path problem. The algorithm uses elements from both an exact labeling algorithm and an FPTAS proposed by Tsaggouris and Zaroliagis (2009). We analyze the running times of these three algorithms both from a the- oretical and a computational point of view. Theoretically, we show that there are instances for which the new FPTAS runs an arbitrary times faster than the other two algorithms. Fur- thermore, for the bi-objective case, the number of approximate solutions generated by the proposed FPTAS is at most the number of Pareto-optimal solutions multiplied by the number of nodes. By performing a set of computational tests, we show that the new FPTAS performs best in terms of running ti

On the optimization of green multimodal transportation: A case study of the West German canal system

In this study, we address a biobjective multimodal routing problem that consists of selecting transportation modes and their respective quantities, optimizing transshipment locations, and allocating port orders. In the objective functions, we minimize total transportation costs and use the EcoTransit methodology to minimize total greenhouse gas emissions. The optimization model selects the transportation mode and transshipment port where quantities are transshipped from one mode to another. We compare inland waterway transportation and trucks encountering infrastructure failures that require rerouting or modal shifting in a real-life case study on the supply of goods for the chemical industry in the West German canal system. We propose a population-based heuristic to solve large instances in a reasonable computation time. A sensitivity analysis of demand, of varying lock times, and of infrastructure failure scenarios was conducted. We show that compared with inland waterway transportation, multimodal transportation reduces costs by 23% because of longer lock times. Our analysis shows that the use of inland waterway transportation only during infrastructure failures imposes nearly 28% higher costs per day depending on the failure location compared to that of the case of no failures. We also show that the use of a multimodal transportation system helps to reduce this cost increase in lock failure scenarios