Nonlinear model of leachate anaerobic digestion treatment process

In this report a continuous adaptive high−gain observer method is presented for the estimation of state variables that could not be measurable online and unknown time−varying parameters of leachate anaerobic digestion treatment process. The high−gain observer is a variant of the Luenberger extended observer and involves an adjustable gain parameter. It is characterized by easy implementation and calibration, is stable and exhibit exponential convergence. The observer is based on a simplified mathematical model of the system. Calibration of the model was performed with real data from the Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor for landfill leachate treatment in open loop under normal operational conditions. The model performance is evaluated via numerical simulations showing adequate results. The criteria used for considering the model as acceptable is to calculate the values of Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) and Prediction at level l.Peer reviewe

Nonlinear model of leachate anaerobic digestion treatment process

In this report a continuous adaptive high-gain observer method is presented for the estimation of state variables that could not be measurable online and unknown time-varying parameters of leachate anaerobic digestion treatment process. The high-gain observer is a variant of the Luenberger extended observer and involves an adjustable gain parameter. It is characterized by easy implementation and calibration, is stable and exhibit exponential convergence. The observer is based on a simplified mathematical model of the system. Calibration of the model was performed with real data from the Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor for landfill leachate treatment in open loop under normal operational conditions. The model performance is evaluated via numerical simulations showing adequate results. The criteria used for considering the model as acceptable is to calculate the values of Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) and Prediction at level l.Preprin

A Robust Extended State Observer for the Estimation of Concentration and Kinetics in a CSTR

This paper presents a state estimation structure for a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR), by means of an Asymptotic Observer jointly with a disturbance high order sliding mode-based estimator. The proposed estimation scheme allows the asymptotic reconstruction of the concentration inside the reactor based on the measures of the temperature inside the reactor and the temperature inside the jacket, in presence of changes in the global coefficient of heat transfer UA, the Arrhenius constant k0 and the activation energy E. Additionally, the structure is able to estimate UA and the kinetics term k0e−ERT. The properties of the proposed scheme are proved mathematically and verified through numerical simulations.ITESO, A.C.CINVESTAV-IP

Aerospace medicine and biology: A continuing bibliography with indexes, supplement 203

This bibliography lists 150 reports, articles, and other documents introduced into the NASA scientific and technical information system in January 1980

Time-Delay Switch Attack on Networked Control Systems, Effects and Countermeasures

In recent years, the security of networked control systems (NCSs) has been an important challenge for many researchers. Although the security schemes for networked control systems have advanced in the past several years, there have been many acknowledged cyber attacks. As a result, this dissertation proposes the use of a novel time-delay switch (TDS) attack by introducing time delays into the dynamics of NCSs. Such an attack has devastating effects on NCSs if prevention techniques and countermeasures are not considered in the design of these systems. To overcome the stability issue caused by TDS attacks, this dissertation proposes a new detector to track TDS attacks in real time. This method relies on an estimator that will estimate and track time delays introduced by a hacker. Once a detector obtains the maximum tolerable time delay of a plant’s optimal controller (for which the plant remains secure and stable), it issues an alarm signal and directs the system to its alarm state. In the alarm state, the plant operates under the control of an emergency controller that can be local or networked to the plant and remains in this stable mode until the networked control system state is restored. In another effort, this dissertation evaluates different control methods to find out which one is more stable when under a TDS attack than others. Also, a novel, simple and effective controller is proposed to thwart TDS attacks on the sensing loop (SL). The modified controller controls the system under a TDS attack. Also, the time-delay estimator will track time delays introduced by a hacker using a modified model reference-based control with an indirect supervisor and a modified least mean square (LMS) minimization technique. Furthermore, here, the demonstration proves that the cryptographic solutions are ineffective in the recovery from TDS attacks. A cryptography-free TDS recovery (CF-TDSR) communication protocol enhancement is introduced to leverage the adaptive channel redundancy techniques, along with a novel state estimator to detect and assist in the recovery of the destabilizing effects of TDS attacks. The conclusion shows how the CF-TDSR ensures the control stability of linear time invariant systems

Probabilistic Observers for a Class of Uncertain Biological Processes

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jabout/5510/ProductInformation.htmlIn this paper, probabilistic observers are considered for a class of continuous biological processes described by mass-balance-based models. It is assumed that the probability density functions (PDFs) of the uncertain parameters and inputs of the model, as well as the PDFs of the missing initial conditions are known. Then, the PDFs of the unmeasured state variables are obtained, at any time, by considering the image of these initial PDFs by the flow of the dynamic model (differential system). In comparison to classical open-loop asymptotic and interval observers, the method provides information on the confidence level of the estimates rather than simple upper and lower bounds. Moreover, unlike Kalman filters, probabilistic observers are not restricted to Gaussian distributions for the uncertain parameters. The design and application of a probabilistic observer to an industrial wastewater treatment plant is presented. Finally, a number of practical considerations is discussed in connection to both implementation and utilization issues

Full-Scale Digesters: Model Predictive Control with Online Kinetic Parameter Identification Strategy

This work presents a nonlinear model predictive control scheme with a novel structure of observers aiming to create a methodology that allows feasible implementations in industrial anaerobic reactors. In this way, a new step-by-step procedure scheme has been proposed and tested by solving two specific drawbacks reported in the literature responsible for the inefficiencies of those systems in real environments. Firstly, the implementation of control structures based on modeling depends on microorganisms’ concentration measurements; the technology that achieves this is not cost-effective nor viable. Secondly, the reaction rates cannot be considered static because, in the extended anaerobic digestion model (EAM2), the large fluctuation of parameters is unavoidable. To face these two drawbacks, the concentration of acidogens and methanogens, and the values of the two reaction rates considered have been estimated by a structure of two observers using data collected by sensors. After 90 days of operation, the error in convergence was lower than 5% for both observers. Four model predictive controller (MPC) configurations are used to test all the previous information trying to maximize the volume of methane and demonstrate a satisfactory operation in a wide range of scenarios. The results demonstrate an increase in efficiency, ranging from 17.4% to 24.4%, using as a reference an open loop configuration. Finally, the operational robustness of the MPC is compared with simulations performed by traditional alternatives used in industry, the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers, where some simple operational scenarios to manage for an MPC are longer sufficient to disrupt a normal operation in a PID controller. For this controller, the simulation shows an error close to the 100% of the reference valu

Dynamical Analysis and Robust Control Synthesis for Water Treatment Processes

Nowadays, water demand and water scarcity are very urgent issues due to population growth, drought and poor water quality all over the world. Therefore, water treatment plants are playing a vital role for good living condition of human. Water area needs more concentration study to increase water productivity and decrease water cost. This dissertation presents the analysis and control of water treatment plants using robust control techniques. The applied control algorithms include H∞, gain scheduled and observer-based loop-shaping control technique. They are modern control algorithms and very powerful in robust controlling of systems with uncertainties and disturbances. The water treatment plants include a desalination system and a wastewater process. Since fresh water scarcity is getting more serious, the desalination plants are to produce drinking water and wastewater treatment plants give the reusable water. The desalination system is a RO one used to produce drinking water from seawater and brackish water. The nonlinear behaviors of this system is carefully analyzed before the linearization. Due to the uncertainty caused by concentration polarization, the system is linearized using linear state-space parametric uncertainty framework. The system also suffer from many disturbances which water hammer is one of the most influential one. The mixed robust H∞ and μ-synthesis control algorithm is applied to control the RO system coping with large uncertainties, disturbances and noises. The wastewater treatment process is an activated sludge process. This biological process use microorganisms to convert organic and certain inorganic matter from wastewater into cell mass. The process is very complex with many coupled biological and chemical reactions. Due to the large variation in the influent flow, the system is modelized and linearized as a linear parametric varying system using affine parameter-dependent representation. Since the influent flow is quickly variable and easily to be measured, the robust gain scheduled robust controller is applied to deal with the large uncertainty caused by the scheduled parameter. This control algorithm often gives better performances than those of general robust H∞ one. In the wastewater treatment plant, there exist an anaerobic digestion, which is controlled by the observer-based loop-shaping algorithm. The simulations show that all the controllers can effectively deal with large uncertainties, disturbances and noises in water treatment plants. They help improve the system performances and safeties, save energy and reduce product water costs. The studies contribute some potential control approaches for water treatment plants, which is currently a very active research area in the world.Contents ······················································································· iv List of Tables ··············································································· viii List of Figures ··············································································· ix Chapter 1. Introduction ···································································· 1 1.1 Reverse osmosis process ···································································· 2 1.2 Activated sludge process ···································································· 6 1.3 Robust H∞ and gain scheduling control ··················································· 10 Chapter 2. Robust H∞ controller ······················································· 13 2.1 Introduction ·················································································· 13 2.2 Uncertainty modelling ······································································ 13 2.2.1 Unstructured uncertainties ···························································· 14 2.2.2 Parametric uncertainties ······························································· 15 2.2.3 Structured uncertainties ································································ 16 2.2.4 Linear fractional transformation ······················································ 16 2.3 Stability criterion ············································································ 17 2.3.1 Small gain theorem ····································································· 17 2.3.2 Structured singular value (muy) synthesis brief definition ·························· 19 2.4 Robustness analysis and controller design ··············································· 20 2.4.1 Forming generalised plant and N-delta structure ····································· 20 2.4.2 Robustness analysis ···································································· 24 2.5 Reduced controller ·········································································· 26 2.5.1 Truncation ··············································································· 27 2.5.2 Residualization ········································································· 29 2.5.3 Balanced realization···································································· 29 2.5.4 Optimal Hankel norm approximation ················································ 31 Chapter 3. Robust gain scheduling controller ······································· 37 3.1 Introduction ·················································································· 37 3.2 Linear parameter varying (LPV) system ·················································· 39 3.3 Matrix Polytope ·············································································· 40 3.4 Polytope and affine parameter-dependent representation ······························· 41 3.4.1 Polytope representation ································································ 41 3.4.2 Affine parameter-dependent representation ········································· 42 3.5 Quadratic stability of LPV systems and quadratic (robust) H∞ performance ········· 43 3.6 Robust gain scheduling ····································································· 44 3.6.1 LPV system linearization ······························································ 44 3.6.2 Polytope-based gain scheduling ······················································ 45 3.6.3 LFT-based gain scheduling ··························································· 48 Chapter 4. Mixed robust H∞ and μ-synthesis controller applied for a reverse osmosis desalination system ····························································· 52 4.1 RO principles ················································································ 52 4.1.1 Osmosis and reverse osmosis ························································· 52 4.1.2 Dead-end filtration and cross-flow filtration ········································ 53 4.2 Membranes ··················································································· 54 4.2.1 Structure and material ································································· 54 4.2.2 Hollow fine fiber membrane module ················································ 55 4.2.3 Spiral wound membrane module ····················································· 57 4.3 Nonlinear RO modelling and analysis ···················································· 58 4.3.1 RO system introduction ······························································· 58 4.3.2 Modelling ··············································································· 60 4.3.3 Nonlinear analysis ······································································ 62 4.3.4 Concentration polarization ···························································· 64 4.4 Water hammer phenomenon ······························································· 66 4.4.1 Water hammer, column separation and vaporous cavitation ······················ 66 4.4.2 Water hammer analysis and simulation ·············································· 69 4.4.3 Prevention of water hammer effect··················································· 78 4.5 RO linearization ············································································· 79 4.5.1 Nominal linearization ·································································· 79 4.5.2 Uncertainty modeling ·································································· 81 4.5.3 Parametric uncertainty linearization ················································· 83 4.6 Robust H∞ controller design for RO system ·············································· 85 4.6.1 Control of uncertain RO system ······················································ 85 4.6.2 Robustness analysis and H∞ controller design ······································ 86 4.7 Simulation result and discussion··························································· 90 4.8 Conclusion ··················································································· 95 Chapter 5. Robust gain scheduling control of activated sludge process ······· 96 5.1 Introduction about activated sludge process ············································· 96 5.1.1 State variables ·········································································· 98 5.1.2 ASM1 processes ······································································ 100 5.1.3 The control problem of activated sludge process ································· 102 5.2 System modelling ········································································· 104 5.3 Model linearization ········································································ 107 5.4 Robust gain-schedule controller design for activated sludge process ··············· 109 5.5 Simulation result and discussion························································· 115 5.6 Conclusion ················································································· 120 Chapter 6. Observer-based loop-shaping control of anaerobic digestion ···· 121 6.1 Introduction ················································································ 121 6.1.1 Control problem in anaerobic digestion ··········································· 122 6.2 System modelling ········································································· 123 6.3 Controller design ·········································································· 124 6.3.1 H∞ loop-shaping controller ························································· 125 6.3.2 Coprime factor uncertainty ·························································· 126 6.3.3 Control synthesis ····································································· 127 6.4 Simulation result ··········································································· 131 6.5 Conclusion ················································································· 133 Chapter 7. Conclusion ··································································· 134 References ·················································································· 136 Appendices ················································································· 144Docto