45 research outputs found

    Multiobjective particle swarm optimization: Integration of dynamic population and multiple-swarm concepts and constraint handling

    Get PDF
    Scope and Method of Study: Over the years, most multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithms are developed to effectively and efficiently solve unconstrained multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). However, in the real world application, many optimization problems involve a set of constraints (functions). In this study, the first research goal is to develop state-of-the-art MOPSOs that incorporated the dynamic population size and multipleswarm concepts to exploit possible improvement in efficiency and performance of existing MOPSOs in solving the unconstrained MOPs. The proposed MOPSOs are designed in two different perspectives: 1) dynamic population size of multiple-swarm MOPSO (DMOPSO) integrates the dynamic swarm population size with a fixed number of swarms and other strategies to support the concepts; and 2) dynamic multiple swarms in multiobjective particle swarm optimization (DSMOPSO), dynamic swarm strategy is incorporated wherein the number of swarms with a fixed swarm size is dynamically adjusted during the search process. The second research goal is to develop a MOPSO with design elements that utilize the PSO's key mechanisms to effectively solve for constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs).Findings and Conclusions: DMOPSO shows competitive to selected MOPSOs in producing well approximated Pareto front with improved diversity and convergence, as well as able to contribute reduced computational cost while DSMOPSO shows competitive results in producing well extended, uniformly distributed, and near optimum Pareto fronts, with reduced computational cost for some selected benchmark functions. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to study the impact of the tuning parameters on the performance of DSMOPSO and to provide recommendation on parameter settings. For the proposed constrained MOPSO, simulation results indicate that it is highly competitive in solving the constrained benchmark problems

    A quantum behaved particle swarm approach to multi-objective optimization

    Get PDF
    Many real-world optimization problems have multiple objectives that have to be optimized simultaneously. Although a great deal of effort has been devoted to solve multi-objective optimization problems, the problem is still open and the related issues still attract significant research efforts. Quantum-behaved Particle Swarm Optimization (QPSO) is a recently proposed population based metaheuristic that relies on quantum mechanics principles. Since its inception, much effort has been devoted to develop improved versions of QPSO designed for single objective optimization. However, many of its advantages are not yet available for multi-objective optimization. In this thesis, we develop a new framework for multi-objective problems using QPSO. The contribution of the work is threefold. First a hybrid leader selection method has been developed to compute the attractor of a given particle. Second, an archiving strategy has been proposed to control the growth of the archive size. Third, the developed framework has been further extended to handle constrained optimization problems. A comprehensive investigation of the developed framework has been carried out under different selection, archiving and constraint handling strategies. The developed framework is found to be a competitive technique to tackle this type of problems when compared against the state-of-the-art methods in multi-objective optimization

    Multi-objective tools for the vehicle routing problem with time windows

    Get PDF
    Most real-life problems involve the simultaneous optimisation of two or more, usually conflicting, objectives. Researchers have put a continuous effort into solving these problems in many different areas, such as engineering, finance and computer science. Over time, thanks to the increase in processing power, researchers have created methods which have become increasingly sophisticated. Most of these methods have been based on the notion of Pareto dominance, which assumes, sometimes erroneously, that the objectives have no known ranking of importance. The Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (VRPTW) is a logistics problem which in real-life applications appears to be multi-objective. This problem consists of designing the optimal set of routes to serve a number of customers within certain time slots. Despite this problem’s high applicability to real-life domains (e.g. waste collection, fast-food delivery), most research in this area has been conducted with hand-made datasets. These datasets sometimes have a number of unrealistic features (e.g. the assumption that one unit of travel time corresponds to one unit of travel distance) and are therefore not adequate for the assessment of optimisers. Furthermore, very few studies have focused on the multi-objective nature of the VRPTW. That is, very few have studied how the optimisation of one objective affects the others. This thesis proposes a number of novel tools (methods + dataset) to address the above- mentioned challenges: 1) an agent-based framework for cooperative search, 2) a novel multi-objective ranking approach, 3) a new dataset for the VRPTW, 4) a study of the pair-wise relationships between five common objectives in VRPTW, and 5) a simplified Multi-objective Discrete Particle Swarm Optimisation for the VRPTW

    Traveling Salesman Problem

    Get PDF
    The idea behind TSP was conceived by Austrian mathematician Karl Menger in mid 1930s who invited the research community to consider a problem from the everyday life from a mathematical point of view. A traveling salesman has to visit exactly once each one of a list of m cities and then return to the home city. He knows the cost of traveling from any city i to any other city j. Thus, which is the tour of least possible cost the salesman can take? In this book the problem of finding algorithmic technique leading to good/optimal solutions for TSP (or for some other strictly related problems) is considered. TSP is a very attractive problem for the research community because it arises as a natural subproblem in many applications concerning the every day life. Indeed, each application, in which an optimal ordering of a number of items has to be chosen in a way that the total cost of a solution is determined by adding up the costs arising from two successively items, can be modelled as a TSP instance. Thus, studying TSP can never be considered as an abstract research with no real importance

    Multi-objective tools for the vehicle routing problem with time windows

    Get PDF
    Most real-life problems involve the simultaneous optimisation of two or more, usually conflicting, objectives. Researchers have put a continuous effort into solving these problems in many different areas, such as engineering, finance and computer science. Over time, thanks to the increase in processing power, researchers have created methods which have become increasingly sophisticated. Most of these methods have been based on the notion of Pareto dominance, which assumes, sometimes erroneously, that the objectives have no known ranking of importance. The Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (VRPTW) is a logistics problem which in real-life applications appears to be multi-objective. This problem consists of designing the optimal set of routes to serve a number of customers within certain time slots. Despite this problem’s high applicability to real-life domains (e.g. waste collection, fast-food delivery), most research in this area has been conducted with hand-made datasets. These datasets sometimes have a number of unrealistic features (e.g. the assumption that one unit of travel time corresponds to one unit of travel distance) and are therefore not adequate for the assessment of optimisers. Furthermore, very few studies have focused on the multi-objective nature of the VRPTW. That is, very few have studied how the optimisation of one objective affects the others. This thesis proposes a number of novel tools (methods + dataset) to address the above- mentioned challenges: 1) an agent-based framework for cooperative search, 2) a novel multi-objective ranking approach, 3) a new dataset for the VRPTW, 4) a study of the pair-wise relationships between five common objectives in VRPTW, and 5) a simplified Multi-objective Discrete Particle Swarm Optimisation for the VRPTW

    Multi objective particle swarm optimization: algorithms and applications

    Get PDF
    Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

    Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering Design Optimization

    Get PDF
    Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are population-based global optimizers, which, due to their characteristics, have allowed us to solve, in a straightforward way, many real world optimization problems in the last three decades, particularly in engineering fields. Their main advantages are the following: they do not require any requisite to the objective/fitness evaluation function (continuity, derivability, convexity, etc.); they are not limited by the appearance of discrete and/or mixed variables or by the requirement of uncertainty quantification in the search. Moreover, they can deal with more than one objective function simultaneously through the use of evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms. This set of advantages, and the continuously increased computing capability of modern computers, has enhanced their application in research and industry. From the application point of view, in this Special Issue, all engineering fields are welcomed, such as aerospace and aeronautical, biomedical, civil, chemical and materials science, electronic and telecommunications, energy and electrical, manufacturing, logistics and transportation, mechanical, naval architecture, reliability, robotics, structural, etc. Within the EA field, the integration of innovative and improvement aspects in the algorithms for solving real world engineering design problems, in the abovementioned application fields, are welcomed and encouraged, such as the following: parallel EAs, surrogate modelling, hybridization with other optimization techniques, multi-objective and many-objective optimization, etc
    corecore