7,736 research outputs found

    A joint model-based experimental design approach for the identification of kinetic models in continuous flow laboratory reactors

    Get PDF
    Continuous flow laboratory reactors are typically used for the development of kinetic models for catalytic reactions. Sequential model-based design of experiments (MBDoE) procedures have been proposed in literature where experiments are optimally designed for discriminating amongst candidate models or for improving the estimation of kinetic parameters. However, the effectiveness of these procedures is strongly affected by the initial model uncertainty, leading to suboptimal design solutions and higher number of experiments to be executed. A joint model-based design of experiments (j-MBDoE) technique, based on multi-objective optimization, is proposed in this paper for the simultaneous solution of the dual problem of discriminating among competitive kinetic models and improving the estimation of the model parameters. The effectiveness of the proposed design methodology is tested and discussed through a simulated case study for the identification of kinetic models of methanol oxidation over silver catalyst

    Continuous-flow reactors for the rapid evolution and validation of kinetic motifs

    Get PDF
    In this paper we apply the concept of a kinetic motif as a simple way to represent all the time-dependent behaviour in a single-step or multi-step reaction system. Small-scale continuous-flow reactors offer the potential to rapidly collect large amounts of data while accessing conventionally challenging experimental conditions. The scope of the approach is demonstrated on reaction case study examples

    Closed-Loop Model-Based Design of Experiments for Kinetic Model Discrimination and Parameter Estimation: Benzoic Acid Esterification on a Heterogeneous Catalyst

    Get PDF
    An autonomous reactor platform was developed to rapidly identify a kinetic model for the esterification of benzoic acid with ethanol with the heterogeneous Amberlyst-15 catalyst. A five-step methodology for kinetic studies was employed to systematically reduce the number of experiments required to identify a practical kinetic model. This included (i) initial screening using traditional factorial designed steady-state experiments, (ii) proposing and testing candidate kinetic models, (iii) performing an identifiability analysis to reject models whose model parameters cannot be estimated for a given experimental budget, (iv) performing online Model-Based Design of Experiments (MBDoE) for model discrimination to identify the best model from a list of candidates, and (v) performing online MBDoE for improving parameter precision for the chosen model. This methodology combined with the reactor platform, which conducted all kinetic experiments unattended, reduces the number of experiments and time required to identify kinetic models, significantly increasing lab productivity

    A Multi-Objective Optimal Experimental Design Framework for Enhancing the Efficiency of Online Model-Identification Platforms

    Get PDF
    Recent advances in automation and digitization enable the close integration of physical devices with their virtual counterparts, facilitating the real-time modeling and optimization of a multitude of processes in an automatic way. The rich and continuously updated data environment provided by such systems makes it possible for decisions to be made over time to drive the process toward optimal targets. In many manufacturing processes, in order to achieve an overall optimal process, the simultaneous assessment of multiple objective functions related to process performance and cost is necessary. In this work, a multi-objective optimal experimental design framework is proposed to enhance the efficiency of online model-identification platforms. The proposed framework permits flexibility in the choice of trade-off experimental design solutions, which are calculated onlineโ€”that is, during the execution of experiments. The application of this framework to improve the online identification of kinetic models in flow reactors is illustrated using a case study in which a kinetic model is identified for the esterification of benzoic acid (BA) and ethanol in a microreactor

    The Development of Microreactor Technology for the Study of Multistep Catalytic Systems and Rapid Kinetic Modelling

    Get PDF
    Microreactor technology was applied to the study of catalytic systems because their high rates of heat and mass transport, improved safety and ease of automation makes them particularly effective research tools in this area. A multistep flow system for the synthesis of benzylacetone from benzyl alcohol via oxidation, aldol condensation and reduction reactions was developed by utilising three micropacked bed reactors and a gas liquid membrane separator. This reaction had previously been conducted in batch cascade, however, the multistep flow system enabled the achievement of higher yields with lower catalyst contact times because separating each reaction into its own reactor allowed greater freedom to tailor the operating conditions for each reaction. The multistep system also allowed the catalysts to be studied in a process wide environment, leading to the identification of significant catalyst inhibition due to by and co-products from upstream reactions. An automated closed loop microreactor platform was developed which utilised Model-Based Design of Experiments (MBDoE) algorithms for rapid kinetic modelling of catalytic reactions. The automated platform was first applied to the homogenous esterification of benzoic acid with ethanol using a sulfuric acid catalyst, where a campaign of steady-state experiments designed by online MBDoE led to the estimation of kinetic parameters with much higher precision than a factorial campaign of experiments. This reaction was then conducted with MBDoE designed transient experiments, which dramatically reduced the experimental time required. The same reaction was studied using a heterogeneous Amberlyst-15 catalyst, and by combining factorial designs, practical identifiability tests and MBDoE for model discrimination and parameter precision, a practical kinetic model was identified in just 3 days. The automated platform was applied to the oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in a micropacked bed reactor with gas-liquid flow using AuPd/TiO2 catalysts, however due to poor experimental reproducibility, a kinetic model was not identified

    Identification of kinetic models of methanol oxidation on silver in the presence of uncertain catalyst behavior

    Get PDF
    Catalytic oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde is an important industrial process due to the value of formaldehyde either as a final product or as a precursor of numerous chemicals. The study of kinetics in this system is hindered by sources of uncertainty that are inherently associated to the nature and state of the catalyst (e.g., uncertain reactivity level, deactivation phenomena), the measurement system and the structure of the kinetic model equations. In this work, a simplified kinetic model is identified from data collected from continuous flow microreactor systems where catalysts with assorted levels of reactivity are employed. Tailored model-based data mining methods are proposed and applied for the effective estimation of the kinetic parameters and for identifying robust experimental conditions to be exploited for the kinetic characterization of catalysts with different reactivity, whose kinetic behavior is yet to be investigated

    CO-PrOx over nano-Au/TiO2: Monolithic catalyst performance and empirical kinetic model fitting

    Get PDF
    In this work, the performance of ceramic monoliths washcoated with Au/TiO2 is studied on CO preferential oxidation (CO-PrOx) reaction in H2-rich environments under a wide range of operating conditions of practical interest. The parameter estimation of a nonlinear kinetic empirical model representing this system is made via genetic algorithms by fitting the model predictions against our laboratory observations. Parameter uncertainty leading to inaccurate predictions is often present when kinetic models with nonlinear rate equations are considered. Here, after the fitting was concluded, a statistical study was conducted to determine the accuracy of the parameter estimation. Activation energies of ca. 30 kJ/mol and 55 kJ/mol were adjusted for CO and H2 oxidations, respectively. The catalyst showed appropriate activity and selectivity values on the CO oxidation on a H2-rich environment. After ca. 45 h on stream the catalyst showed no deactivation. Results show that the model is suitable for reproducing the behavior of the CO-PrOx reactions and it can be used in the design of reactors for hydrogen purification.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Computational study on biomass fast pyrolysis: Hydrodynamic effects on the performance of a laboratory-scale fluidized bed reactor

    Get PDF
    Bubbling fluidized bed reactors are utilized in a wide range of chemical industries, including biomass conversion, petroleum refining, and pharmaceutical and commodity chemicals production. Establishing a comprehensive understanding of how the gas-solid hydrodynamics, specifically bubbling to slugging, affects interphase mixing and associated chemical reactions is critical for optimizing process performance. Characterization of bench scale bubbling bed hydrodynamics is vital for scaling up to pilot and industrial scale. This proposal outlines a plan to simulate a bench scale bubbling fluidized bed biomass fast pyrolysis process with emphasis on the effects of the bubbling-to-slugging transition on oil yield. Computational models of the hydrodynamics and the biomass fast pyrolysis reactions in a bubbling bed reactor are investigated using Geldart Group B particles. MFiX, an open-source software package, is utilized using the continuum (two-fluid) approach for modeling the reactor hydrodynamics. The effects of bubblies on oil yield along the reactor height is evaluated. The goal is to use pressure time series approaches to resolve previously unrecognized details of the underlying physics in hydrodynamics that affect oil yield.The implication of this work includes establishing a standard approach to optimize yield and composition from bench and industrial scale reactors

    ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋™ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๋‹ค์ƒ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์ „๋žต

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ™”ํ•™์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ์ด์ข…๋ฏผ.๋ณธ ๋ฐ•์‚ฌํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง, ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ณด์ •๋ฒ•, ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ์‚ฐ์—…์šฉ ํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ „๋žต์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ™”ํ•™ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์ œ์ผ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋‹จ์œ„์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ทธ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด๋‚˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ ๊ทœ์น™์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜„์‹ค์ด๋‹ค. ์‚ฐ์—… ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ, ํ™”ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชน์‹œ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ฐจ์ด๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•„ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ํ•ด๋ฒ•์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค๋”๋ผ๋„ ๋ถ€์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๊ธด ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์–ด ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ํž˜๋“ค๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ ๋‚ด ํ˜„์ƒ์˜ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ๊ณผ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ์ฐจ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ ‘๊ทผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฌํš ๋ชจ๋ธ(CFD-based compartmental model)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด, ๋ถˆ๊ท ์ผํ•œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ˜• ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์—์„œ๋„ ๊ธด ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ์˜ ๋™์  ๋ชจ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ํฐ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์™„๋ฒฝํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ท ์ผํ•œ ์ž‘์€ ๊ตฌํš๋“ค์˜ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ฐ ๊ตฌํš์„ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์†๋„์‹๋“ค๊ณผ CFD ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜จ ์œ ๋™ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ท ํ˜• ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์ฒด, ์•ก์ฒด, ๊ณ ์ฒด 3์ƒ์ด ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์œ ๋™์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ์ˆ˜์„ฑ ๊ด‘๋ฌผ ํƒ„์‚ฐํ™” ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ฏธ๋ถ„ ๋Œ€์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(DAE)์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋ ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ์ƒ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฐ˜์‘๋“ค(๊ธฐ-์•ก ๊ฐ„ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ „๋‹ฌ ๋ฐ˜์‘, ๊ณ ์ฒด ์šฉํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์‘, ์ด์˜จ ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ˜์‘, ์•™๊ธˆ ์นจ์ „ ๋ฐ˜์‘)๊ณผ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™, ๋ฐ˜์‘์—ด, ์—ด์—ญํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ์šด์ „ ์ƒ์˜ ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ด์‚ฐํ™”ํƒ„์†Œ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ, pH ๋ฐ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ œ ์šด์ „ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋ณด์ •์ด ์ „ํ˜€ ์—†์ด๋„ 7 % ์ด๋‚ด์˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋ถ€์ •ํ™•์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ›„ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ณด์ •์œผ๋กœ ๊ทน๋ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ด‘๋ฌผ ํƒ„์‚ฐํ™” ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ๋ณด์ •(Bayesian calibration)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ค‘ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์— 8๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•œ ํ›„, ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ •๋ฒ•(Bayesian parameter estimation) ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ๊ทœ๋ชจ์—์„œ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋“ค์˜ ์‚ฌํ›„ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์–ป์–ด์ง„ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ถ„ํฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์˜ ๋ถˆ์™„์ „์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ด‰์šฐ๋ฆฌ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž˜ ๋”ฐ๋ผ๊ฐ€๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก์น˜(stochastic model response)๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 16๊ฐœ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹ ๋ฐ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์…‹์˜ ํ”ผํŒ… ์—๋Ÿฌ(fitting error)๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์ ์ธ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜(deterministic optimization)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋น„์Šทํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ์“ฐ์ด๊ธฐ์— ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๊ธด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉ์  ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์ ํ™”(Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization, MBO)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•˜๋Š” CFD ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๊ธฐ-์•ก ๊ต๋ฐ˜ ํƒฑํฌ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋น„๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ถ„์œจ(gas holdup)๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋‹จ 100 ํšŒ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํŒŒ๋ ˆํ†  ์ปค๋ธŒ(Pareto curve)๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„์•ˆ๋“ค์€ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์— ๋ณด๊ณ ๋œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. . ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ CFD ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฌํš ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋ฒ•, ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ณด์ •๋ฒ• ๋ฐ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ฐ ํ™”ํ•™์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์‚ฐ์—… ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์— ์ ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.This thesis presents a design strategy for industrial-scale chemical reactors which consists of multi-scale modeling, post-modeling calibration, and optimization. Although the reactor design problem is a primary step in the development of most chemical processes, it has been relied on simple models, experiments and rules of thumbs rather than taking advantage of recent numerical techniques. It is because industrial-size reactors show high complexity and scale differences both physically and chemically, which makes it difficult to be mathematically modeled. Even after the model is constructed, it suffers from inaccuracies and heavy simulation time to be applied in optimization algorithms. The complexity and scale difference problem in modeling can be solved by introducing multi-scale modeling approaches. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based compartmental model makes it possible to simulate hours of dynamics in large size reactors which show inhomogeneous mixing patterns. It regards the big reactor as a network of small zones in which perfect mixing can be assumed and solves mass and energy balance equations with kinetics and flow information adopted from CFD hydrodynamics model at each zone. An aqueous mineral carbonation reactor with complex gasโ€“liquidโ€“solid interacting flow patterns was modeled using this method. The model considers the gas-liquid mass transfer, solid dissolution, ionic reactions, precipitations, hydrodynamics, heat generation and thermodynamic changes by the reaction and discrete operational events in the form of differential algebraic equations (DAEs). The total CO2 removal efficiency, pH, and temperature changes were predicted and compared to real operation data. The errors were within 7 % without any post-adjustment. The inaccuracy problem of model can be overcome by post-modeling approach, such as the calibration with experiments. The model for aqueous mineral carbonation reactor was intensified via Bayesian calibration. Eight parameters were intrduced in the uncertain parts of the rigorous reactor model. Then the calibration was performed by estimating the parameter posterior distribution using Bayesian parameter estimation framework and lab-scale experiments. The developed Bayesian parameter estimation framework involves surrogate models, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with tempering, global optimization, and various analysis tools. The obtained parameter distributions reflected the uncertain or multimodal natures of the parameters due to the incompleteness of the model and the experiments. They were used to earn stochastic model responses which show good fits with the experimental results. The fitting errors of all the 16 datasets and the unseen test set were measured to be comparable or lower than when deterministic optimization methods are used. The heavy simulation time problem for mathematical optimization can be resolved by applying Bayesian optimizaion algorithm. CFD based optimal design tool for chemical reactors, in which multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MBO) is utilized to reduce the number of required CFD runs, is proposed. The developed optimizer was applied to minimize the power consumption and maximize the gas holdup in a gas-sparged stirred tank reactor, which has six design variables. The saturated Pareto front was obtained after only 100 iterations. The resulting Pareto front consists of many near-optimal designs with significantly enhanced performances compared to conventional reactors reported in the literature. It is anticipated that the suggested CFD-based compartmental modeling, post-modeling Bayesian calibration, and Bayesian optimization methods can be applied in general industrial-scale chemical reactors with complex physical and chemical features.1. Introduction 1 1.1. Industrial-scale chemical reactor design 1 1.2. Role of mathematical models in reactor design 2 1.3. Intensification of reactor models through calibration 5 1.3.1. Bayesian parameter estimation 6 1.4. Optimization of the reactor models 7 1.4.1. Bayesian optimization 9 1.5. Aqueous mineral carbonation process : case study subject 10 1.6. Outline of the thesis 12 2. Multi-scale modeling of industrial-scale aqueous mineral carbonation reactor for long-time dynamic simulation 14 2.1. Objective 14 2.2. Experimental setup 15 2.3. Mathematical models 19 2.3.1. Reactor model 19 2.3.2. CFD model 28 2.3.3. Numerical setting 30 2.4. Results and discussions 32 2.4.1. CFD-based compartmental model for industrial-scale reactor. 32 2.4.2. Design and simulation of higher-scale reactors 42 2.5. Conclusions 47 3. Model intensification of aqueous mineral carbonation kinetics via Bayesian calibration 50 3.1. Objective 50 3.2. Experimental methods 51 3.2.1. Solution and gas preparation 51 3.2.2. Laboratory-scale mineral carbonation process 53 3.3. Mathematical models 56 3.3.1. Kinetics of aqueous mineral carbonation process 56 3.3.2. Differential algebraic equation (DAE) model for the reactor 65 3.3.3. Discrete events for simulation procedure 71 3.3.4. Numerical setting 72 3.4. Bayesian parameter estimation 72 3.4.1. Problem formulation 73 3.4.2. Bayesian posterior inference 76 3.4.3. Sampling 81 3.5. Results and discussions 82 3.5.1. Stochastic output response 82 3.5.2. Quality of parameter estimtates 86 3.5.3. Assessment of parameter uncertainties 91 3.5.4. Kinetics study with the proposed model parameters 99 3.6. Conclusions 103 4. Multi-objective optimization of chemical reactor design using computational fluid dynamics 106 4.1. Objective 106 4.2. Problem Formulation 107 4.3. Optimization scheme 113 4.3.1. Multi-objective optimization algorithm 113 4.3.2. CFD-MBO optimizer 120 4.4. CFD modeling 125 4.4.1. Tank specifications 125 4.4.2. Governing equations 125 4.4.3. Simulation methods 127 4.5. Results and discussion 128 4.5.1. CFD model validation 128 4.5.2. Optimization results 130 4.5.3. Analysis of optimal designs 139 4.6. Conclusions 144 5. Concluding Remarks 146 Bibliography 149 Abstract in Korean (๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก) 163Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore