An adaptation reference-point-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.It is well known that maintaining a good balance between convergence and diversity is crucial to the performance of multiobjective optimization algorithms (MOEAs). However, the Pareto front (PF) of multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) affects the performance of MOEAs, especially reference point-based ones. This paper proposes a reference-point-based adaptive method to study the PF of MOPs according to the candidate solutions of the population. In addition, the proportion and angle function presented selects elites during environmental selection. Compared with five state-of-the-art MOEAs, the proposed algorithm shows highly competitive effectiveness on MOPs with six complex characteristics

Evolutionary many-objective optimisation: pushing the boundaries

This thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University LondonMany-objective optimisation poses great challenges to evolutionary algorithms. To start with, the ineffectiveness of the Pareto dominance relation, which is the most important criterion in multi-objective optimisation, results in the underperformance of traditional Pareto-based algorithms. Also, the aggravation of the conflict between proximity and diversity, along with increasing time or space requirement as well as parameter sensitivity, has become key barriers to the design of effective many-objective optimisation algorithms. Furthermore, the infeasibility of solutions' direct observation can lead to serious difficulties in algorithms' performance investigation and comparison. In this thesis, we address these challenges, aiming to make evolutionary algorithms as effective in many-objective optimisation as in two- or three-objective optimisation. First, we significantly enhance Pareto-based algorithms to make them suitable for many-objective optimisation by placing individuals with poor proximity into crowded regions so that these individuals can have a better chance to be eliminated. Second, we propose a grid-based evolutionary algorithm which explores the potential of the grid to deal with many-objective optimisation problems. Third, we present a bi-goal evolution framework that converts many objectives of a given problem into two objectives regarding proximity and diversity, thus creating an optimisation problem in which the objectives are the goals of the search process itself. Fourth, we propose a comprehensive performance indicator to compare evolutionary algorithms in optimisation problems with various Pareto front shapes and any objective dimensionality. Finally, we construct a test problem to aid the visual investigation of evolutionary search, with its Pareto optimal solutions in a two-dimensional decision space having similar distribution to their images in a higher-dimensional objective space. The work reported in this thesis is the outcome of innovative attempts at addressing some of the most challenging problems in evolutionary many-objective optimisation. This research has not only made some of the existing approaches, such as Pareto-based or grid-based algorithms that were traditionally regarded as unsuitable, now effective for many-objective optimisation, but also pushed other important boundaries with novel ideas including bi-goal evolution, a comprehensive performance indicator and a test problem for visual investigation. All the proposed algorithms have been systematically evaluated against existing state of the arts, and some of these algorithms have already been taken up by researchers and practitioners in the field.Department of Computer Science, Brunel University Londo

Initialization of a Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms Knowledge Acquisition System for Renewable Energy Power Plants

pp. 185-204The design of Renewable Energy Power Plants (REPPs) is crucial not only for the investments' performance and attractiveness measures, but also for the maximization of resource (source) usage (e.g. sun, water, and wind) and the minimization of raw materials (e.g. aluminum: Al, cadmium: Cd, iron: Fe, silicon: Si, and tellurium: Te) consumption. Hence, several appropriate and satisfactory Multi-objective Problems (MOPs) are mandatory during the REPPs' design phases. MOPs related tasks can only be managed by very well organized knowledge acquisition on all REPPs' design equations and models. The proposed MOPs need to be solved with one or more multiobjective algorithm, such as Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs). In this respect, the first aim of this research study is to start gathering knowledge on the REPPs' MOPs. The second aim of this study is to gather detailed information about all MOEAs and available free software tools for their development. The main contribution of this research is the initialization of a proposed multi-objective evolutionary algorithm knowledge acquisition system for renewable energy power plants (MOEAs-KAS-FREPPs) (research and development loopwise process: develop, train, validate, improve, test, improve, operate, and improve). As a simple representative example of this knowledge acquisition system research with two selective and elective proposed standard objectives (as test objectives) and eight selective and elective proposed standard constraints (as test constraints) are generated and applied as a standardized MOP for a virtual small hydropower plant design and investment. The maximization of energy generation (MWh) and the minimization of initial investment cost (million €) are achieved by the Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA), the Niched Sharing Genetic Algorithm/Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-I), and the NSGA-II algorithms in the Scilab 6.0.0 as only three standardized MOEAs amongst all proposed standardized MOEAs on two desktop computer configurations (Windows 10 Home 1709 64 bits, Intel i5-7200 CPU @ 2.7 GHz, 8.00 GB RAM with internet connection and Windows 10 Pro, Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 650 @ 3.20 GHz, 6,00 GB RAM with internet connection). The algorithm run-times (computation time) of the current applications vary between 20.64 and 59.98 seconds.S

Stochastic Fractal Based Multiobjective Fruit Fly Optimization

The fruit fly optimization algorithm (FOA) is a global optimization algorithm inspired by the foraging behavior of a fruit fly swarm. In this study, a novel stochastic fractal model based fruit fly optimization algorithm is proposed for multiobjective optimization. A food source generating method based on a stochastic fractal with an adaptive parameter updating strategy is introduced to improve the convergence performance of the fruit fly optimization algorithm. To deal with multiobjective optimization problems, the Pareto domination concept is integrated into the selection process of fruit fly optimization and a novel multiobjective fruit fly optimization algorithm is then developed. Similarly to most of other multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), an external elitist archive is utilized to preserve the nondominated solutions found so far during the evolution, and a normalized nearest neighbor distance based density estimation strategy is adopted to keep the diversity of the external elitist archive. Eighteen benchmarks are used to test the performance of the stochastic fractal based multiobjective fruit fly optimization algorithm (SFMOFOA). Numerical results show that the SFMOFOA is able to well converge to the Pareto fronts of the test benchmarks with good distributions. Compared with four state-of-the-art methods, namely, the non-dominated sorting generic algorithm (NSGA-II), the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2), multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO), and multiobjective self-adaptive differential evolution (MOSADE), the proposed SFMOFOA has better or competitive multiobjective optimization performance

Evolutionary Algorithms for Static and Dynamic Multiobjective Optimization

Many real-world optimization problems consist of a number of conflicting objectives that have to be optimized simultaneously. Due to the presence of multiple conflicting ob- jectives, there is no single solution that can optimize all the objectives. Therefore, the resulting multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) resort to a set of trade-off op- timal solutions, called the Pareto set in the decision space and the Pareto front in the objective space. Traditional optimization methods can at best find one solution in a sin- gle run, thereby making them inefficient to solve MOPs. In contrast, evolutionary algo- rithms (EAs) are able to approximate multiple optimal solutions in a single run. This strength makes EAs good candidates for solving MOPs. Over the past several decades, there have been increasing research interests in developing EAs or improving their perfor- mance, resulting in a large number of contributions towards the applicability of EAs for MOPs. However, the performance of EAs depends largely on the properties of the MOPs in question, e.g., static/dynamic optimization environments, simple/complex Pareto front characteristics, and low/high dimensionality. Different problem properties may pose dis- tinct optimization difficulties to EAs. For example, dynamic (time-varying) MOPs are generally more challenging than static ones to EAs. Therefore, it is not trivial to further study EAs in order to make them widely applicable to MOPs with various optimization scenarios or problem properties. This thesis is devoted to exploring EAs’ ability to solve a variety of MOPs with dif- ferent problem characteristics, attempting to widen EAs’ applicability and enhance their general performance. To start with, decomposition-based EAs are enhanced by incorpo- rating two-phase search and niche-guided solution selection strategies so as to make them suitable for solving MOPs with complex Pareto fronts. Second, new scalarizing functions are proposed and their impacts on evolutionary multiobjective optimization are exten- sively studied. On the basis of the new scalarizing functions, an efficient decomposition- based EA is introduced to deal with a class of hard MOPs. Third, a diversity-first- and-convergence-second sorting method is suggested to handle possible drawbacks of convergence-first based sorting methods. The new sorting method is then combined with strength based fitness assignment, with the aid of reference directions, to optimize MOPs with an increase of objective dimensionality. After that, we study the field of dynamic multiobjective optimization where objective functions and constraints can change over time. A new set of test problems consisting of a wide range of dynamic characteristics is introduced at an attempt to standardize test environments in dynamic multiobjective optimization, thereby aiding fair algorithm comparison and deep performance analysis. Finally, a dynamic EA is developed to tackle dynamic MOPs by exploiting the advan- tages of both generational and steady-state algorithms. All the proposed approaches have been extensively examined against existing state-of-the-art methods, showing fairly good performance in a variety of test scenarios. The research work presented in the thesis is the output of initiative and novel attempts to tackle some challenging issues in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. This re- search has not only extended the applicability of some of the existing approaches, such as decomposition-based or Pareto-based algorithms, for complex or hard MOPs, but also contributed to moving forward research in the field of dynamic multiobjective optimiza- tion with novel ideas including new test suites and novel algorithm design

Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in uncertain environments

Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for data clustering

In this work we investigate the use of Multi-Objective metaheuristics for the data-mining task of clustering. We �first investigate methods of evaluating the quality of clustering solutions, we then propose a new Multi-Objective clustering algorithm driven by multiple measures of cluster quality and then perform investigations into the performance of different Multi-Objective clustering algorithms. In the context of clustering, a robust measure for evaluating clustering solutions is an important component of an algorithm. These Cluster Quality Measures (CQMs) should rely solely on the structure of the clustering solution. A robust CQM should have three properties: it should be able to reward a \good" clustering solution; it should decrease in value monotonically as the solution quality deteriorates and, it should be able to evaluate clustering solutions with varying numbers of clusters. We review existing CQMs and present an experimental evaluation of their robustness. We find that measures based on connectivity are more robust than other measures for cluster evaluation. We then introduce a new Multi-Objective Clustering algorithm (MOCA). The use of Multi-Objective optimisation in clustering is desirable because it permits the incorporation of multiple measures of cluster quality. Since the definition of what constitutes a good clustering is far from clear, it is beneficial to develop algorithms that allow for multiple CQMs to be accommodated. The selection of the clustering quality measures to use as objectives for MOCA is informed by our previous work with internal evaluation measures. We explain the implementation details and perform experimental work to establish its worth. We compare MOCA with k-means and find some promising results. We�find that MOCA can generate a pool of clustering solutions that is more likely to contain the optimal clustering solution than the pool of solutions generated by k-means. We also perform an investigation into the performance of different implementations of MOEA algorithms for clustering. We�find that representations of clustering based around centroids and medoids produce more desirable clustering solutions and Pareto fronts. We also �find that mutation operators that greatly disrupt the clustering solutions lead to better exploration of the Pareto front whereas mutation operators that modify the clustering solutions in a more moderate way lead to higher quality clustering solutions. We then perform more specific investigations into the performance of mutation operators focussing on operators that promote clustering solution quality, exploration of the Pareto front and a hybrid combination. We use a number of techniques to assess the performance of the mutation operators as the algorithms execute. We confirm that a disruptive mutation operator leads to better exploration of the Pareto front and mutation operators that modify the clustering solutions lead to the discovery of higher quality clustering solutions. We find that our implementation of a hybrid mutation operator does not lead to a good improvement with respect to the other mutation operators but does show promise for future work

Evolutionary Computation 2020

Intelligent optimization is based on the mechanism of computational intelligence to refine a suitable feature model, design an effective optimization algorithm, and then to obtain an optimal or satisfactory solution to a complex problem. Intelligent algorithms are key tools to ensure global optimization quality, fast optimization efficiency and robust optimization performance. Intelligent optimization algorithms have been studied by many researchers, leading to improvements in the performance of algorithms such as the evolutionary algorithm, whale optimization algorithm, differential evolution algorithm, and particle swarm optimization. Studies in this arena have also resulted in breakthroughs in solving complex problems including the green shop scheduling problem, the severe nonlinear problem in one-dimensional geodesic electromagnetic inversion, error and bug finding problem in software, the 0-1 backpack problem, traveler problem, and logistics distribution center siting problem. The editors are confident that this book can open a new avenue for further improvement and discoveries in the area of intelligent algorithms. The book is a valuable resource for researchers interested in understanding the principles and design of intelligent algorithms

Evolutionary Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimisation : A survey

Peer reviewedPostprin

PSA based multi objective evolutionary algorithms

It has generally been acknowledged that both proximity to the Pareto front and a certain diversity along the front, should be targeted when using evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Recently, a new partitioning mechanism, the Part and Select Algorithm (PSA), has been introduced. It was shown that this partitioning allows for the selection of a well-diversified set out of an arbitrary given set, while maintaining low computational cost. When embedded into an evolutionary search (NSGA-II), the PSA has significantly enhanced the exploitation of diversity. In this paper, the ability of the PSA to enhance evolutionary multiobjective algorithms (EMOAs) is further investigated. Two research directions are explored here. The first one deals with the integration of the PSA within an EMOA with a novel strategy. Contrary to most EMOAs, that give a higher priority to proximity over diversity, this new strategy promotes the balance between the two. The suggested algorithm allows some dominated solutions to survive, if they contribute to diversity. It is shown that such an approach substantially reduces the risk of the algorithm to fail in finding the Pareto front. The second research direction explores the use of the PSA as an archiving selection mechanism, to improve the averaged Hausdorff distance obtained by existing EMOAs. It is shown that the integration of the PSA into NSGA-II-I and Δ p -EMOA as an archiving mechanism leads to algorithms that are superior to base EMOAS on problems with disconnected Pareto fronts. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland