348 research outputs found

    A distributed bio-inspired method for multisite grid mapping

    Get PDF
    Computational grids assemble multisite and multiowner resources and represent the most promising solutions for processing distributed computationally intensive applications, each composed by a collection of communicating tasks. The execution of an application on a grid presumes three successive steps: the localization of the available resources together with their characteristics and status; the mapping which selects the resources that, during the estimated running time, better support this execution and, at last, the scheduling of the tasks. These operations are very difficult both because the availability and workload of grid resources change dynamically and because, in many cases, multisite mapping must be adopted to exploit all the possible benefits. As the mapping problem in parallel systems, already known as NP-complete, becomes even harder in distributed heterogeneous environments as in grids, evolutionary techniques can be adopted to find near-optimal solutions. In this paper an effective and efficient multisite mapping, based on a distributed Differential Evolution algorithm, is proposed. The aim is to minimize the time required to complete the execution of the application, selecting from among all the potential ones the solution which reduces the use of the grid resources. The proposed mapper is tested on different scenarios

    Multi-objective scheduling of Scientific Workflows in multisite clouds

    Get PDF
    Clouds appear as appropriate infrastructures for executing Scientific Workflows (SWfs). A cloud is typically made of several sites (or data centers), each with its own resources and data. Thus, it becomes important to be able to execute some SWfs at more than one cloud site because of the geographical distribution of data or available resources among different cloud sites. Therefore, a major problem is how to execute a SWf in a multisite cloud, while reducing execution time and monetary costs. In this paper, we propose a general solution based on multi-objective scheduling in order to execute SWfs in a multisite cloud. The solution consists of a multi-objective cost model including execution time and monetary costs, a Single Site Virtual Machine (VM) Provisioning approach (SSVP) and ActGreedy, a multisite scheduling approach. We present an experimental evaluation, based on the execution of the SciEvol SWf in Microsoft Azure cloud. The results reveal that our scheduling approach significantly outperforms two adapted baseline algorithms (which we propose by adapting two existing algorithms) and the scheduling time is reasonable compared with genetic and brute-force algorithms. The results also show that our cost model is accurate and that SSVP can generate better VM provisioning plans compared with an existing approach.Work partially funded by EU H2020 Programme and MCTI/RNP-Brazil (HPC4E grant agreement number 689772), CNPq, FAPERJ, and INRIA (MUSIC project), Microsoft (ZcloudFlow project) and performed in the context of the Computational Biology Institute (www.ibc-montpellier.fr). We would like to thank Kary Ocaรฑa for her help in modeling and executing the SciEvol SWf.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    A Distributed Bio-Inspired Method for Multisite Grid Mapping

    Get PDF
    Computational grids assemble multisite and multiowner resources and represent the most promising solutions for processing distributed computationally intensive applications, each composed by a collection of communicating tasks. The execution of an application on a grid presumes three successive steps: the localization of the available resources together with their characteristics and status; the mapping which selects the resources that, during the estimated running time, better support this execution and, at last, the scheduling of the tasks. These operations are very difficult both because the availability and workload of grid resources change dynamically and because, in many cases, multisite mapping must be adopted to exploit all the possible benefits. As the mapping problem in parallel systems, already known as NP-complete, becomes even harder in distributed heterogeneous environments as in grids, evolutionary techniques can be adopted to find near-optimal solutions. In this paper an effective and efficient multisite mapping, based on a distributed Differential Evolution algorithm, is proposed. The aim is to minimize the time required to complete the execution of the application, selecting from among all the potential ones the solution which reduces the use of the grid resources. The proposed mapper is tested on different scenarios

    An Extensive Exploration of Techniques for Resource and Cost Management in Contemporary Cloud Computing Environments

    Get PDF
    Resource and cost optimization techniques in cloud computing environments target minimizing expenditure while ensuring efficient resource utilization. This study categorizes these techniques into three primary groups: Cloud and VM-focused strategies, Workflow techniques, and Resource Utilization and Efficiency techniques. Cloud and VM-focused strategies predominantly concentrate on the allocation, scheduling, and optimization of resources within cloud environments, particularly virtual machines. These strategies aim at a balance between cost reduction and adhering to specified deadlines, while ensuring scalability and adaptability to different cloud models. However, they may introduce complexities due to their dynamic nature and continuous optimization requirements. Workflow techniques emphasize the optimal execution of tasks in distributed systems. They address inconsistencies in Quality of Service (QoS) and seek to enhance the reservation process and task scheduling. By employing models, such as Integer Linear Programming, these techniques offer precision. But they might be computationally demanding, especially for extensive problems. Techniques focusing on Resource Utilization and Efficiency attempts to maximize the use of available resources in an energy-efficient and cost-effective manner. Considering factors like current energy levels and application requirements, these models aim to optimize performance without overshooting budgets. However, a continuous monitoring mechanism might be necessary, which can introduce additional complexities

    Multi criteria decision support system for watershed management under uncertain conditions, A

    Get PDF
    2012 Summer.Includes bibliographical references.Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution is the primary cause of impaired water bodies in the United States and around the world. Elevated nutrient, sediment, and pesticide loads to waterways may negatively impact human health and aquatic ecosystems, increasing costs of pollutant mitigation and water treatment. Control of nonpoint source pollution is achievable through implementation of conservation practices, also known as Best Management Practices (BMPs). Watershed-scale NPS pollution control plans aim at minimizing the potential for water pollution and environmental degradation at minimum cost. Simulation models of the environment play a central role in successful implementation of watershed management programs by providing the means to assess the relative contribution of different sources to the impairment and water quality impact of conservation practices. While significant shifts in climatic patterns are evident worldwide, many natural processes, including precipitation and temperature, are affected. With projected changes in climatic conditions, significant changes in diffusive transport of nonpoint source pollutants, assimilative capacity of water bodies, and landscape positions of critical areas that should be targeted for implementation of conservation practices are also expected. The amount of investment on NPS pollution control programs makes it all but vital to assure the conservation benefits of practices will be sustained under the shifting climatic paradigms and challenges for adoption of the plans. Coupling of watershed models with regional climate projections can potentially provide answers to a variety of questions on the dynamic linkage between climate and ecologic health of water resources. The overarching goal of this dissertation is to develop a new analysis framework for the development of optimal NPS pollution control strategy at the regional scale under projected future climate conditions. Proposed frameworks were applied to a 24,800 ha watershed in the Eagle Creek Watershed in central Indiana. First, a computational framework was developed for incorporation of disparate information from observed hydrologic responses at multiple locations into the calibration of watershed models. This study highlighted the use of multiobjective approaches for proper calibration of watershed models that are used for pollutant source identification and watershed management. Second, an integrated simulation-optimization approach for targeted implementation of agricultural conservation practices was presented. A multiobjective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) with mixed discrete-continuous decision variables was used to identify optimal types and locations of conservation practices for nutrient and pesticide control. This study showed that mixed discrete-continuous optimization method identifies better solutions than commonly used binary optimization methods. Third, the conclusion from application of NSGA-II optimization followed by development of a multi criteria decision analysis framework to identify near-optimal NPS pollution control plan using a priori knowledge about the system. The results suggested that the multi criteria decision analysis framework can be an effective and efficient substitute for optimization frameworks. Fourth, the hydrologic and water quality simulations driven by an extensive ensemble of climate projections were analyzed for their respective changes in basin average temperature and precipitation. The results revealed that the water yield and pollutants transport are likely to change substantially under different climatic paradigms. And finally, impact of projected climate change on performance of conservation practice and shifts in their optimal types and locations were analyzed. The results showed that performance of NPS control plans under different climatic projections will alter substantially; however, the optimal types and locations of conservation practices remained relatively unchanged

    Advanced turboprop multidisciplinary design and optimization within agile project

    Get PDF
    The present paper deals with the design, analysis and optimization of a 90 passengers turboprop aircraft with a design range of 1200 nautical miles and a cruise Mach number equal to 0.56. The prescribed aircraft is one of the use cases of the AGILE European project, aiming to provide a 3rd generation of multidisciplinary design and optimization chain, following the collaborative and remote aircraft design paradigm, through an heterogenous team of experts. The multidisciplinary aircraft design analysis is set-up involving tools provided by AGILE partners distributed worldwide and run locally from partners side. A complete design of experiment, focused on wing planform variables, is performed to build response surfaces suitable for optimization purposes. The goal of the optimization is the direct operating cost, subject to wing design variables and top-level aircraft requirements

    ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘์Šค์ผ€์ผ/๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ๊ณต๊ฐ„๊ณ„ํš ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ์ถ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™์ „๊ณต, 2019. 2. ์ด๋™๊ทผ.๊ณต๊ฐ„๊ณ„ํš ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๊ด€๊ณ„์ž์™€ ๊ฒฐ๋ถ€๋œ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์ œ์•ฝ ์š”๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์  ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ์„œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ (genetic algorithms), ๋‹ด๊ธˆ์งˆ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• (simulated annealing), ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ ์ตœ์ ํ™” (ant colony optimization) ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ์‘์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ธ‰์ฆํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ค‘ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ถ€๋ฌธ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉ๋œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์œผ๋กœ exploration๊ณผ exploitation์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ์ข‹์€ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€ ์ข‹์€ ์„ฑ๊ณผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ • ์šฉ๋„ ํ˜น์€ ์‹œ์„ค์˜ ๋ฐฐ์น˜์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์ ์‘, ์žฌํ•ด ๊ด€๋ฆฌ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฐ์ธํ”„๋ผ ๊ณ„ํš๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ด์Šˆ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋ฏธํกํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ๋น„์ง€๋ฐฐ ์ •๋ ฌ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ (non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II)์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์ ์‘, ์žฌํ•ด ๊ด€๋ฆฌ, ๋„์‹œ์˜ ๋…น์ง€ ๊ณ„ํš ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ด์Šˆ๋ฅผ ๊ณต๊ฐ„๊ณ„ํš์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ด์Šˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„, ๋ชฉ์ , ์ œ์•ฝ์š”๊ฑด์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋ฒ”์œ„๊ฐ€ ์ข์•„์ง€๊ณ  ๊ณต๊ฐ„ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋Š” ๋†’์•„์ง€๋Š” ์ˆœ์„œ๋Œ€๋กœ ๋‚˜์—ดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ–‰์ •๊ตฌ์—ญ ๋„ ๊ทœ๋ชจ (province scale, ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ 1ใŽข)์—์„œ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์ ์‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋จผ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ, ํ˜„์žฌ ์ด๋ฏธ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ์‘์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์ด ์ง€์ ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐํ›„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํšŒ๋ณต ํƒ„๋ ฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œ์ผœ์•ผ ํ• ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ์ œ์‹œ๋Š” ๋ฏธํกํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ง€์—ญ๊ณ„ํš์—์„œ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์ธ ์ค‘์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ ์‘ ์ „๋žต์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ (MOGA, multi-objective genetic algorithm)์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ 9,982ใŽข์— 350๋งŒ์˜ ์ธ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์ฃผํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ์ถฉ์ฒญ๋‚จ๋„ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€์ „๊ด‘์—ญ์‹œ ์ผ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์ ์‘์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ง€์—ญ์ ์ธ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์—ฌ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฌํ•ด ํ”ผํ•ด ๋ฐ ์ „ํ™˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”, ๋ฒผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰, ์ข… ํ’๋ถ€๋„ ๋ณด์ „, ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ฐ€์น˜์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™” ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๋ชฉ์  ๋ณ„ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ ์—ฌ์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 17๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ ˆํ†  ์ตœ์  ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋Š” ์ •๋„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์ ์‘ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์—์„œ ๋” ์ข‹์€ ํผํฌ๋จผ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํšŒ๋ณตํƒ„๋ ฅ์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์œ ์—ฐํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ, ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ์‹ค๋ฌด์ž ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ, ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ํ–ฅ ํ‰๊ฐ€์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ž…๋ ฅ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ–‰์ •๊ตฌ์—ญ ๊ตฐ ๊ทœ๋ชจ (local scale, ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ 100m)์—์„œ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์žฌํ•ด ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฐ์•…์ง€ํ˜•์—์„œ ํญ์šฐ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ๋Š” ์ธ๋ช…๊ณผ ์žฌ์‚ฐ์— ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”์šฑ์ด ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฐ•์šฐ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ•๋„ ์—ญ์‹œ ์ฆ๋Œ€๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์ง€์—ญ์„ ํ”ผํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ง€์—ญ์„ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ €๊ฐ ํ˜น์€ ํšŒํ”ผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์ „๋žต์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์‹ค์ œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณ„ํš์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ์„œ ์ด๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„์ง€๋ฐฐ ์ •๋ ฌ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ II์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ ๋ฐ ์ „ํ™˜๋Ÿ‰, ํŒŒํŽธํ™”์˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€๋Š” 2018๋…„ ๋™๊ณ„์˜ฌ๋ฆผํ”ฝ ๊ฐœ์ตœ์ง€์ธ ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ํ‰์ฐฝ๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ์„œ 2006๋…„์— ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์˜ฌ๋ฆผํ”ฝ ํŠน์ˆ˜ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์••๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋‚œ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ์šฐ๋ ค๋˜๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ์ด๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋ฒˆ์˜ ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ ์–ด๋„ ํ•œ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์—์„œ ์ข‹์€ ํผํฌ๋จผ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” 100๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ ˆํ†  ์ตœ์  ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ 5๊ฐœ์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์™€ ์ „ํ™˜๋Ÿ‰ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ๊ฐ„์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ์‡„ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ ์‘ ์ „๋žต์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€์›ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ทœ๋ชจ(neighborhood scale, 2m)์—์„œ ๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด ๋…น์ง€๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ๋ชจ์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…น์ง€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์€ ๋„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์— ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋„์‹œ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๊ณ„ํš์—๋Š” ๋…น์ง€์™€ ์ง ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ „๋žต์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋…น์ง€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์€ ๋„์‹œ์ง€์—ญ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์—ด์„ฌ ํ˜„์ƒ ์™„ํ™”, ์œ ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ์ €๊ฐ, ์ƒํƒœ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์ฆ์ง„ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์  ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Œ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๊ณ„ํš์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ , ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋ฏธํกํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„์ง€๋ฐฐ ์ •๋ ฌ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ II์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…น์ง€์˜ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ์ฆ์ง„, ์—ด์„ฌ ํšจ๊ณผ ์™„ํ™”์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ์„ค์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋Š” ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋…น์ง€์˜ ์œ ํ˜•๊ณผ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ ๋…น์ง€๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ๊ฐ€์ƒ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€์— ๋ณธ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ 30๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ ˆํ†  ์ตœ์  ๋…น์ง€๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ ๋ชฉ์  ๊ฐ„ ํผํฌ๋จผ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…น์ง€์˜ ์—ด์„ฌ ์™„ํ™” ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ์ฆ์ง„ ํšจ๊ณผ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ์Šน ๊ด€๊ณ„ (synergistic relationship), ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์  ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„์šฉ ์ ˆ๊ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ์‡„ ํšจ๊ณผ (trade-off relationship)๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ ์ค‘ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๋Š” ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ, ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์—์„œ ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…น์ง€ ์„ค์น˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ ํƒ๋œ ์ฃผ์š” ํ›„๋ณด์ง€์—ญ ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ •์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ํ‰๊ฐ€, ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ ์„ ํƒ์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ˆ˜์—†์ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋…น์ง€๊ณ„ํš ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์—ญ์‹œ ๋‹ค์ž๊ฐ„ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์  ๋””์ž์ธ (co-design)์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ดˆ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.The meeting of heterogeneous goals while staying within the constraints of spatial planning is a nonlinear problem that cannot be solved by linear methodologies. Instead, this problem can be solved using multi-objective optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithms (GA), simulated annealing (SA), ant colony optimization (ACO), etc., and research related to this field has been increasing rapidly. GA, in particular, are the most frequently applied spatial optimization algorithms and are known to search for a good solution within a reasonable time period by maintaining a balance between exploration and exploitation. However, despite its good performance and applicability, it has not adequately addressed recent urgent issues such as climate change adaptation, disaster management, and green infrastructure planning. It is criticized for concentrating on only the allocation of specific land use such as urban and protected areas, or on the site selection of a specific facility. Therefore, in this study, a series of spatial optimizations are proposed to address recent urgent issues such as climate change, disaster management, and urban greening by supplementing quantitative assessment methodologies to the spatial planning process based on GA and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA II). This optimization model needs to be understood as a tool for providing a draft plan that quantitatively meets the essential requirements so that the stakeholders can collaborate smoothly in the planning process. Three types of spatial planning optimization models are classified according to urgent issues. Spatial resolution, planning objectives, and constraints were also configured differently according to relevant issues. Each spatial planning optimization model was arranged in the order of increasing spatial resolution. In the first chapter, the optimization model was proposed to simulate land use scenarios to adapt to climate change on a provincial scale. As climate change is an ongoing phenomenon, many recent studies have focused on adaptation to climate change from a spatial perspective. However, little is known about how changing the spatial composition of land use could improve resilience to climate change. Consideration of climate change impacts when spatially allocating land use could be a useful and fundamental long-term adaptation strategy, particularly for regional planning. Here climate adaptation scenarios were identified on the basis of existing extents of three land use classes using Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms (MOGA) for a 9,982 km2 region with 3.5 million inhabitants in South Korea. Five objectives were selected for adaptation based on predicted climate change impacts and regional economic conditions: minimization of disaster damageand existing land use conversionmaximization of rice yieldprotection of high-species-richness areasand economic value. The 17 Pareto land use scenarios were generated by six weighted combinations of the adaptation objectives. Most scenarios, although varying in magnitude, showed better performance than the current spatial land use composition for all adaptation objectives, suggesting that some alteration of current land use patterns could increase overall climate resilience. Given the flexible structure of the optimization model, it is expected that regional stakeholders would efficiently generate other scenarios by adjusting the model parameters (weighting combinations) or replacing the input data (impact maps) and selecting a scenario depending on their preference or a number of problem-related factors. In the second chapter, the optimization model was proposed to simulate land use scenarios for managing disaster damage due to climate change on local scale. Extreme landslides triggered by rainfall in hilly regions frequently lead to serious damage, including casualties and property loss. The frequency of landslides may increase under climate change, because of the increased variability of precipitation. Developing urban areas outside landslide risk zones is the most effective method of reducing or preventing damageplanning in real life is, however, a complex and nonlinear problem. For such multi-objective problems, GA may be the most appropriate optimization tool. Therefore, comprehensive land use allocation plans were suggested using the NSGA II to overcome multi-objective problems, including the minimization of landslide risk, minimization of change, and maximization of compactness. The study area is Pyeongchang-gun, the host city of the 2018 Winter Olympics in Korea, where high development pressure has resulted in an urban sprawl into the hazard zone that experienced a large-scale landslide in 2006. We obtained 100 Pareto plans that are better than the actual land use data for at least one objective, with five plans that explain the trade-offs between meeting the first and the second objectives mentioned above. The results can be used by decision makers for better urban planning and for climate change-related spatial adaptation. In the third chapter, the optimization model was proposed to simulate urban greening plans on a neighborhood scale. Green space is fundamental to the good quality of life of residents, and therefore urban planning or improvement projects often include strategies directly or indirectly related to greening. Although green spaces generate positive effects such as cooling and reduction of rainwater runoff, and are an ecological corridor, few studies have examined the comprehensive multiple effects of greening in the urban planning context. To fill this gap in this fields literature, this study seeks to identify a planning model that determines the location and type of green cover based on its multiple effects (e.g., cooling and enhancement of ecological connectivity) and the implementation cost using NSGA II. The 30 Pareto-optimal plans were obtained by applying our model to a hypothetical landscape on a neighborhood scale. The results showed a synergistic relationship between cooling and enhancement of connectivity, as well as a trade-off relationship between greenery effects and implementation cost. It also defined critical lots for urban greening that are commonly selected in various plans. This model is expected to contribute to the improvement of existing planning processes by repeating the positive feedback loop: from plan modification to quantitative evaluation and selection of better plans. These optimal plans can also be considered as options for co-design by related stakeholders.1. INTRODUCTION 2. CHAPTER 1: Modelling Spatial Climate Change Land use Adaptation with Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms to Improve Resilience for Rice Yield and Species Richness and to Mitigate Disaster Risk 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Study area 2.3. Methods 2.4. Results 2.5. Discussion 2.6. References 2.7. Supplemental material 3. CHAPTER 2: Multi-Objective Land-Use Allocation Considering Landslide Risk under Climate Change: Case Study in Pyeongchang-gun, Korea 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Material and Methods 3.3. Results 3.4. Discussion 3.5. Conclusion 3.6. References 4. CHAPTER 3: Multi-Objective Planning Model for Urban Greening based on Optimization Algorithms 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Methods 3.3. Results 3.4. Discussion 3.5. Conclusion 3.6. References 3.7. Appendix 5. CONCLUSION REFERENCESDocto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore