479 research outputs found
A review of Australasian investigations into problem solving and the novice programmer
This Australasian focused review compares a number of recent studies that have identified difficulties encountered by novices while learning programming and problem solving. These studies have shown that novices are not performing at expected levels and many novices have only a fragile knowledge of programming, which may prevent them from learning and applying problem solving strategies. The review goes on to explore proposals for explicitly incorporating problem solving strategy instruction into introductory programming curricula and assessment, in an attempt to produce improved learning outcomes for novices. Finally, directions suggested by the reviewed studies are gathered and some unanswered questions are raised
Emergent requirements for supporting introductory programming
The problems associated with learning and teaching first year University Computer Science (CS1) programming classes are summarized showing that various support tools and techniques have been developed and evaluated. From this review of applicable support the paper derives ten requirements that a support tool should have in order to improve CS1 student success rate with respect to learning and understanding
Introductory programming: a systematic literature review
As computing becomes a mainstream discipline embedded in the school curriculum and acts as an enabler for an increasing range of academic disciplines in higher education, the literature on introductory programming is growing. Although there have been several reviews that focus on specific aspects of introductory programming, there has been no broad overview of the literature exploring recent trends across the breadth of introductory programming.
This paper is the report of an ITiCSE working group that conducted a systematic review in order to gain an overview of the introductory programming literature. Partitioning the literature into papers addressing the student, teaching, the curriculum, and assessment, we explore trends, highlight advances in knowledge over the past 15 years, and indicate possible directions for future research
Four approaches to teaching programming
Based on a survey of literature, four different approaches to teaching introductory programming are identified and described. Examples of the practice of each approach are identified representing procedural, visual, and object-oriented programming language paradigms. Each approach is then further analysed, identifying advantages and disadvantages for the student and the teacher. The first approach, code analysis, is analogous to reading before writing, that is, recognising the parts and what they mean. It requires learners to analyse and understand existing code prior to producing their own. An alternative is the building blocks approach, analogous to learning vocabulary, nouns and verbs, before constructing sentences. A third approach is identified as simple units in which learners master solutions to small problems before applying the learned logic to more complex problems. The final approach, full systems, is analogous to learning a foreign language by immersion whereby learners design a solution to a non-trivial problem and the programming concepts and language constructs are introduced only when the solution to the problem requires their application. The conclusion asserts that competency in programming cannot be achieved without mastering each of the approaches, at least to some extent. Use of the approaches in combination could provide novice programmers with the opportunities to acquire a full range of knowledge, understanding, and skills. Several orders for presenting the approaches in the classroom are proposed and analysed reflecting the needs of the learners and teachers. Further research is needed to better understand these and other approaches to teaching programming, not in terms of learner outcomes, but in terms of teachers’ actions and techniques employed to facilitate the construction of new knowledge by the learners. Effective classroom teaching practices could be informed by further investigations into the effect on progression of different toolset choices and combinations of teaching approache
Student success model in programming course: A case study in UUM
The complexity and difficulty ascribed to computer programming has been asserted to be the causes of its high rate of failure record and attrition. It is opined that programming either to novice, middle learner, and the self-branded geeks is always a course to be apprehensive of different studies with varying findings. Studies on factors leading to the success of programming course in higher institution have been carried out. The record at Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) shows that 38% of semester one undergraduate students failed the programming course in 2013. This
really motivates this study, which aims at investigating the practical factors affecting
the success of programming courses, and to position its’ theoretically findings to
complement the existing findings. Data were gathered using a quantitative approach, in which a set of questionnaire were distributed to 282 sampled respondents, who are undergraduate and postgraduate students of Information Technology (IT) and Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Having screened and cleaned the data, which led to the deletion of four outlier records, independent T-test,
correlation, and regression were run to test the hypotheses. The results of Pearson
correlation test reveal that teaching tools, OOP concepts, motivation, course evaluation, and mathematical aptitude are positively related to academic success in programming course, while fear is found to be negatively related. In addition, the regression analysis explains that all the elicited independent variables except fear are strongly related. Besides, the independent T-test also discovers no deference between groups with and without previous programming experience
Fostering Program Comprehension in Novice Programmers - Learning Activities and Learning Trajectories
This working group asserts that Program Comprehension (ProgComp) plays a critical part in the process of writing programs. For example, this paper is written from a basic draft that was edited and revised until it clearly presented our idea. Similarly, a program is written incrementally, with each step tested, debugged and extended until the program achieves its goal. Novice programmers should develop program comprehension skills as they learn to code so that they are able both to read and reason about code created by others, and to reflect on their code when writing, debugging or extending it. To foster such competencies our group identified two main goals: (g1) to collect and define learning activities that explicitly address key components of program comprehension and (g2) to define tentative theoretical learning trajectories that will guide teachers as they select and sequence those learning activities in their CS0/CS1/CS2 or K-12 courses. The WG has completed the first goal and laid down a strong foundation towards the second goal as presented in this report. After a thorough literature review, a detailed description of the Block Model is provided, as this model has been used with a dual purpose, to classify and present an extensive list of ProgComp tasks, and to describe a possible learning trajectory for a complex task, covering different cells of the Block Model matrix. The latter is intended to help instructors to decompose complex tasks and identify which aspects of ProgComp are being fostered
Self-organising Roles in Agile Globally Distributed Teams
The ability to self-organise is posited to be a fundamental requirement for successful agile teams. In particular, self-organising teams are said to be crucial in agile globally distributed software development (AGSD) settings, where distance exacerbates team issues. We used contextual analysis to study the specific interaction behaviours and enacted roles of practitioners working in multiple AGSD teams. Our results show that the teams studied were extremely task focussed, and those who occupied team lead or programmer roles were central to their teams’ self-organisation. These findings have implications for AGSD teams, and particularly for instances when programmers – or those occupying similar non-leadership positions – may not be willing to accept such responsibilities. We discuss the implications of our findings for information system development (ISD) practice
Task-related models for teaching and assessing iteration learning in high school
A number of studies report about students’ difficulties with basic flow-control constructs,
and specifically with iteration. Although such issues are less explored in the
context of pre-tertiary education, this seems to be especially the case for high-school
programming learning, where the difficulties concern both the “mechanical” features
of the notional machine as well as the logical aspects connected with the constructs,
ranging from the implications of loop conditions to a more abstract grasp of the
underlying algorithms.
For these reasons, the aim of this work is to: i) identifying methodological tools
to enhance a comprehensive understanding of the iteration constructs, ii) suggest
strategies to teach iterations.
We interviewed 20 experienced upper secondary teachers of introductory programming
in different kinds of schools. The interviews were mainly aimed at ascertaining
teachers’ beliefs about major sources of issues for basic programming
concepts and their approach to the teaching and learning of iteration constructs.
Once teachers’ perception of students’ difficulties have been identified, we have
submitted, to a sample of 164 students, a survey which included both questions on
their subjective perception of difficulty and simple tasks probing their understanding
of iteration. Data collected from teachers and students confirm that iteration is a
central programming concept and indicate that the treatment of conditions and
nested constructs are major sources of students’ difficulties with iteration.
The interviews allowed us to identify a list of problems that are typically presented
by teachers to explain the iterations. Hence, a catalogue of significant program
examples has been built to support students’ learning, tasks with characteristics
different from those typically presented in class.
Based on the outcome of previous steps, a survey to collect related information
and good practices from a larger sample of teachers has been designed. Data
collected have been analysed distinguishing an orientation towards more conceptual
objectives, and one towards more practical objectives. Furthermore, regarding
evaluation, a orientation focused on process-based assessment and another on
product-based assessment.
Finally, based on the outcome of previous students’ survey and drawing from
the proposed examples catalogue, we have designed and submitted a new students’
survey, composed of a set of small tasks, or tasklets, to investigate in more depth
on high-school students’ understanding of iteration in terms of code reading abilities.
The chosen tasklets covered the different topics: technical program feature,
correlation between tracing effort and abstraction, the role of flow-charts, students’
perception of self-confidence concerning high-level thinking skills.A number of studies report about students’ difficulties with basic flow-control constructs,
and specifically with iteration. Although such issues are less explored in the
context of pre-tertiary education, this seems to be especially the case for high-school
programming learning, where the difficulties concern both the “mechanical” features
of the notional machine as well as the logical aspects connected with the constructs,
ranging from the implications of loop conditions to a more abstract grasp of the
underlying algorithms.
For these reasons, the aim of this work is to: i) identifying methodological tools
to enhance a comprehensive understanding of the iteration constructs, ii) suggest
strategies to teach iterations.
We interviewed 20 experienced upper secondary teachers of introductory programming
in different kinds of schools. The interviews were mainly aimed at ascertaining
teachers’ beliefs about major sources of issues for basic programming
concepts and their approach to the teaching and learning of iteration constructs.
Once teachers’ perception of students’ difficulties have been identified, we have
submitted, to a sample of 164 students, a survey which included both questions on
their subjective perception of difficulty and simple tasks probing their understanding
of iteration. Data collected from teachers and students confirm that iteration is a
central programming concept and indicate that the treatment of conditions and
nested constructs are major sources of students’ difficulties with iteration.
The interviews allowed us to identify a list of problems that are typically presented
by teachers to explain the iterations. Hence, a catalogue of significant program
examples has been built to support students’ learning, tasks with characteristics
different from those typically presented in class.
Based on the outcome of previous steps, a survey to collect related information
and good practices from a larger sample of teachers has been designed. Data
collected have been analysed distinguishing an orientation towards more conceptual
objectives, and one towards more practical objectives. Furthermore, regarding
evaluation, a orientation focused on process-based assessment and another on
product-based assessment.
Finally, based on the outcome of previous students’ survey and drawing from
the proposed examples catalogue, we have designed and submitted a new students’
survey, composed of a set of small tasks, or tasklets, to investigate in more depth
on high-school students’ understanding of iteration in terms of code reading abilities.
The chosen tasklets covered the different topics: technical program feature,
correlation between tracing effort and abstraction, the role of flow-charts, students’
perception of self-confidence concerning high-level thinking skills
A study of novice programmer performance and programming pedagogy.
Identifying and mitigating the difficulties experienced by novice programmers is an active
area of research that has embraced a number of research areas. The aim of this research
was to perform a holistic study into the causes of poor performance in novice
programmers and to develop teaching approaches to mitigate them. A grounded action
methodology was adopted to enable the primary concepts of programming cognitive
psychology and their relationships to be established, in a systematic and formal manner.
To further investigate novice programmer behaviour, two sub-studies were conducted
into programming performance and ability.
The first sub-study was a novel application of the FP-Tree algorithm to determine if
novice programmers demonstrated predictable patterns of behaviour. This was the first
study to data mine programming behavioural characteristics rather than the learner’s
background information such as age and gender. Using the algorithm, patterns of
behaviour were generated and associated with the students’ ability. No patterns of
behaviour were identified and it was not possible to predict student results using this
method. This suggests that novice programmers demonstrate no set patterns of
programming behaviour that can be used determine their ability, although problem
solving was found to be an important characteristic. Therefore, there was no evidence
that performance could be improved by adopting pedagogies to promote simple changes
in programming behaviour beyond the provision of specific problem solving instruction.
A second sub-study was conducted using Raven’s Matrices which determined that
cognitive psychology, specifically working memory, played an important role in novice
programmer ability. The implication was that programming pedagogies must take into
consideration the cognitive psychology of programming and the cognitive load imposed
on learners.
Abstracted Construct Instruction was developed based on these findings and forms a new
pedagogy for teaching programming that promotes the recall of abstract patterns while
reducing the cognitive demands associated with developing code. Cognitive load is
determined by the student’s ability to ignore irrelevant surface features of the written
problem and to cross-reference between the problem domain and their mental program
model. The former is dealt with by producing tersely written exercises to eliminate
distractors, while for the latter the teaching of problem solving should be delayed until
the student’s program model is formed. While this does delay the development of
problem solving skills, the problem solving abilities of students taught using this pedagogy
were found to be comparable with students taught using a more traditional approach.
Furthermore, monitoring students’ understanding of these patterns enabled micromanagement of the learning process, and hence explanations were provided for novice
behaviour such as difficulties using arrays, inert knowledge and “code thrashing”.
For teaching more complex problem solving, scaffolding of practice was investigated
through a program framework that could be developed in stages by the students.
However, personalising the level of scaffolding required was complicated and found to be
difficult to achieve in practice.
In both cases, these new teaching approaches evolved as part of a grounded theory study
and a clear progression of teaching practice was demonstrated with appropriate
evaluation at each stage in accordance with action researc
- …