Space Time MUSIC: Consistent Signal Subspace Estimation for Wide-band Sensor Arrays

Wide-band Direction of Arrival (DOA) estimation with sensor arrays is an essential task in sonar, radar, acoustics, biomedical and multimedia applications. Many state of the art wide-band DOA estimators coherently process frequency binned array outputs by approximate Maximum Likelihood, Weighted Subspace Fitting or focusing techniques. This paper shows that bin signals obtained by filter-bank approaches do not obey the finite rank narrow-band array model, because spectral leakage and the change of the array response with frequency within the bin create \emph{ghost sources} dependent on the particular realization of the source process. Therefore, existing DOA estimators based on binning cannot claim consistency even with the perfect knowledge of the array response. In this work, a more realistic array model with a finite length of the sensor impulse responses is assumed, which still has finite rank under a space-time formulation. It is shown that signal subspaces at arbitrary frequencies can be consistently recovered under mild conditions by applying MUSIC-type (ST-MUSIC) estimators to the dominant eigenvectors of the wide-band space-time sensor cross-correlation matrix. A novel Maximum Likelihood based ST-MUSIC subspace estimate is developed in order to recover consistency. The number of sources active at each frequency are estimated by Information Theoretic Criteria. The sample ST-MUSIC subspaces can be fed to any subspace fitting DOA estimator at single or multiple frequencies. Simulations confirm that the new technique clearly outperforms binning approaches at sufficiently high signal to noise ratio, when model mismatches exceed the noise floor.Comment: 15 pages, 10 figures. Accepted in a revised form by the IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing on 12 February 1918. @IEEE201

Thinking Twice about Virtue and Vice: Philosophical Situationism and the Vicious Minds Hypothesis

This paper provides an empirical defense of credit theories of knowing against Mark Alfano’s challenges to them based on his theses of inferential cognitive situationism and of epistemic situationism. In order to support the claim that credit theories can treat many cases of cognitive success through heuristic cognitive strategies as credit-conferring, the paper develops the compatibility between virtue epistemologies qua credit theories, and dual-process theories in cognitive psychology. It also a response to Lauren Olin and John Doris’ “vicious minds” thesis, and their “tradeoff problem” for virtue theories. A genuine convergence between virtue epistemology and dual-process theory is called for, while acknowledging that this effort may demand new and more empirically well-informed projects on both sides of the division between Conservative virtue epistemology (including the credit theory of knowing) and Autonomous virtue epistemology (including projects for providing guidance to epistemic agents)

Les systèmes d'argumentation basés sur les préférences : application à la décision et à la négociation

L'argumentation est considérée comme un modèle de raisonnement basé sur la construction et l'évaluation d'arguments. Ces derniers sont sensés soutenir/expliquer/attaquer des assertions qui peuvent être des décisions, des avis, etc... Cette thèse contient trois parties. La première concerne la notion d'équivalence de systèmes d'argumentation. Nous avons proposé différents critères d'équivalence, étudié leurs liens et montré sous quelles conditions deux systèmes sont équivalents selon les critères proposés. La notion d'équivalence est ensuite utilisée pour calculer les noyaux d'un système d'argumentation. Un noyau est un sous-système fini d'un système d'argumentation et équivalent à celui-ci. La deuxième partie de la thèse concerne l'utilisation des préférences dans l'argumentation. Nous avons étudié les rôles que les préférences peuvent jouer dans un système d'argumentation. Deux rôles particuliers ont été identifiés. Nous avons montré que les travaux existant ont abordé seulement le premier rôle et les approches proposées peuvent retourner des résultats contre-intuitifs lorsque la relation d'attaque entre arguments n'est pas symétrique. Nous avons développé une approche qui pallie ces limites. La troisième partie applique notre modèle d'argumentation à la décision et à la négociation. Nous avons proposé une instanciation de notre modèle pour la décision argumentée. Puis, nous avons étudié la dynamique de cette instanciation. Plus précisément, nous avons montré comment le statut des options change à la lumière d'un nouvel argument. Nous avons également employé notre modèle afin de montrer les avantages de l'argumentation dans des dialogues de négociation.Argumentation is a promising approach for reasoning with uncertain or incoherent knowledge or more generally with common sense knowledge. It consists of constructing arguments and counter-arguments, comparing the different arguments and selecting the most acceptable among them. This thesis contains three parts. The first one concerns the notion of equivalence between two argumentation frameworks. We studied two families of equivalence: basic equivalence and strong equivalence. We proposed different equivalence criteria, investigated their links and showed under which conditions two frameworks are equivalent w.r.t. each of the proposed criteria. The notion of equivalence is then used in order to compute the core(s) of an argumentation framework. A core of a framework is its compact version, i.e. an equivalent sub-framework. The second part of the thesis concerns the use of preferences in argumentation. We investigated the roles that preferences may play in an argumentation framework. Two particular roles were identified. Besides, we showed that almost all the existing works have tackled only the first role. Moreover, the proposed approaches suffer from a drawback which consists of returning conflicting extensions. We proposed a general approach which solves this problem and takes into account both roles of preferences. The third part illustrates our preference-based argumentation frameworks (PAF) in case of decision making and negotiation. We proposed an instantiation of our PAF which rank-orders options in a decision making problem and studied the dynamics of this model. We also used our PAF in order to show the benefits of arguing in negotiation dialogues

A Bayesian theory of quantum gravity without gravitons

There currently exists no theory that explicitly demonstrates compatibility of the Standard Model in its operational regime with the general theory of relativity in an appropriate limit. Here we present a novel theory of quantum gravity that meets required compatibility, derived from Bayesian and holographic principles. Gravity is not understood as force mediated by gravitons but fundamentally as emergent spacetime dependent on entanglement. Both spacetime and quantum mechanics are understood as arising out of observer's knowledge of the world, instead of pre-existing before an observer. Spacetime exists as a picture of quantum-mechanical knowledge obtained from signals an observer received, and the general theory of relativity is understood as an equation of state, as in Jacobson (1995). Despite some departures from conventional quantum gravity understanding, the theory maintains holographic roots and upholds AdS/CFT

Creationism and evolution

In Tower of Babel, Robert Pennock wrote that “defenders of evolution would help their case immeasurably if they would reassure their audience that morality, purpose, and meaning are not lost by accepting the truth of evolution.” We first consider the thesis that the creationists’ movement exploits moral concerns to spread its ideas against the theory of evolution. We analyze their arguments and possible reasons why they are easily accepted. Creationists usually employ two contradictive strategies to expose the purported moral degradation that comes with accepting the theory of evolution. On the one hand they claim that evolutionary theory is immoral. On the other hand creationists think of evolutionary theory as amoral. Both objections come naturally in a monotheistic view. But we can find similar conclusions about the supposed moral aspects of evolution in non-religiously inspired discussions. Meanwhile, the creationism-evolution debate mainly focuses — understandably — on what constitutes good science. We consider the need for moral reassurance and analyze reassuring arguments from philosophers. Philosophers may stress that science does not prescribe and is therefore not immoral, but this reaction opens the door for the objection of amorality that evolution — as a naturalistic world view at least — supposedly endorses. We consider that the topic of morality and its relation to the acceptance of evolution may need more empirical research

Overview of contextual tracking approaches in information fusion

Proceedings of: Geospatial InfoFusion III. 2-3 May 2013 Baltimore, Maryland, United States.Many information fusion solutions work well in the intended scenarios; but the applications, supporting data, and capabilities change over varying contexts. One example is weather data for electro-optical target trackers of which standards have evolved over decades. The operating conditions of: technology changes, sensor/target variations, and the contextual environment can inhibit performance if not included in the initial systems design. In this paper, we seek to define and categorize different types of contextual information. We describe five contextual information categories that support target tracking: (1) domain knowledge from a user to aid the information fusion process through selection, cueing, and analysis, (2) environment-to-hardware processing for sensor management, (3) known distribution of entities for situation/threat assessment, (4) historical traffic behavior for situation awareness patterns of life (POL), and (5) road information for target tracking and identification. Appropriate characterization and representation of contextual information is needed for future high-level information fusion systems design to take advantage of the large data content available for a priori knowledge target tracking algorithm construction, implementation, and application.Publicad