13,073 research outputs found

    The Potential of Synergistic Static, Dynamic and Speculative Loop Nest Optimizations for Automatic Parallelization

    Get PDF
    Research in automatic parallelization of loop-centric programs started with static analysis, then broadened its arsenal to include dynamic inspection-execution and speculative execution, the best results involving hybrid static-dynamic schemes. Beyond the detection of parallelism in a sequential program, scalable parallelization on many-core processors involves hard and interesting parallelism adaptation and mapping challenges. These challenges include tailoring data locality to the memory hierarchy, structuring independent tasks hierarchically to exploit multiple levels of parallelism, tuning the synchronization grain, balancing the execution load, decoupling the execution into thread-level pipelines, and leveraging heterogeneous hardware with specialized accelerators. The polyhedral framework allows to model, construct and apply very complex loop nest transformations addressing most of the parallelism adaptation and mapping challenges. But apart from hardware-specific, back-end oriented transformations (if-conversion, trace scheduling, value prediction), loop nest optimization has essentially ignored dynamic and speculative techniques. Research in polyhedral compilation recently reached a significant milestone towards the support of dynamic, data-dependent control flow. This opens a large avenue for blending dynamic analyses and speculative techniques with advanced loop nest optimizations. Selecting real-world examples from SPEC benchmarks and numerical kernels, we make a case for the design of synergistic static, dynamic and speculative loop transformation techniques. We also sketch the embedding of dynamic information, including speculative assumptions, in the heart of affine transformation search spaces

    Thread partitioning and value prediction for exploiting speculative thread-level parallelism

    Get PDF
    Speculative thread-level parallelism has been recently proposed as a source of parallelism to improve the performance in applications where parallel threads are hard to find. However, the efficiency of this execution model strongly depends on the performance of the control and data speculation techniques. Several hardware-based schemes for partitioning the program into speculative threads are analyzed and evaluated. In general, we find that spawning threads associated to loop iterations is the most effective technique. We also show that value prediction is critical for the performance of all of the spawning policies. Thus, a new value predictor, the increment predictor, is proposed. This predictor is specially oriented for this kind of architecture and clearly outperforms the adapted versions of conventional value predictors such as the last value, the stride, and the context-based, especially for small-sized history tables.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

    Object oriented execution model (OOM)

    Get PDF
    This paper considers implementing the Object Oriented Programming Model directly in the hardware to serve as a base to exploit object-level parallelism, speculation and heterogeneous computing. Towards this goal, we present a new execution model called Object Oriented execution Model - OOM - that implements the OO Programming Models. All OOM hardware structures are objects and the OOM Instruction Set directly utilizes objects while hiding other complex hardware structures. OOM maintains all high-level programming language information until execution time. This enables efficient extraction of available parallelism in OO serial code at execution time with minimal compiler support. Our results show that OOM utilizes the available parallelism better than the OoO (Out-of-Order) modelPeer ReviewedPostprint (published version

    Speculative Approximations for Terascale Analytics

    Full text link
    Model calibration is a major challenge faced by the plethora of statistical analytics packages that are increasingly used in Big Data applications. Identifying the optimal model parameters is a time-consuming process that has to be executed from scratch for every dataset/model combination even by experienced data scientists. We argue that the incapacity to evaluate multiple parameter configurations simultaneously and the lack of support to quickly identify sub-optimal configurations are the principal causes. In this paper, we develop two database-inspired techniques for efficient model calibration. Speculative parameter testing applies advanced parallel multi-query processing methods to evaluate several configurations concurrently. The number of configurations is determined adaptively at runtime, while the configurations themselves are extracted from a distribution that is continuously learned following a Bayesian process. Online aggregation is applied to identify sub-optimal configurations early in the processing by incrementally sampling the training dataset and estimating the objective function corresponding to each configuration. We design concurrent online aggregation estimators and define halting conditions to accurately and timely stop the execution. We apply the proposed techniques to distributed gradient descent optimization -- batch and incremental -- for support vector machines and logistic regression models. We implement the resulting solutions in GLADE PF-OLA -- a state-of-the-art Big Data analytics system -- and evaluate their performance over terascale-size synthetic and real datasets. The results confirm that as many as 32 configurations can be evaluated concurrently almost as fast as one, while sub-optimal configurations are detected accurately in as little as a 1/20th1/20^{\text{th}} fraction of the time

    Analysis of the overheads incurred due to speculation in a task based programming model

    Get PDF
    In order to efficiently utilize the ever increasing processing power of multi-cores, a programmer must extract as much parallelism as possible from a given application. However with every such attempt there is an associated overhead of its implementation. A parallelization technique is beneficial only if its respective overhead is less than the performance gains realized. In this paper we analyze the overhead of one such endeavor where, in SMPSs, speculation is used to execute tasks ahead in time. Speculation is used to overcome the synchronization pragmas in SMPSs which block the generation of work and lead to the underutilization of the available resources. TinySTM, a Software Transactional Memory library is used to maintain correctness in case of mis-speculation. In this paper, we analyze the affect of TinySTM on a set of SMPSs applications which employ speculation to improve the performance. We show that for the chosen set of benchmarks, no performance gains are achieved if the application spends more than 1% of its execution time in TinySTM.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

    Constructs and evaluation strategies for intelligent speculative parallelism - armageddon revisited

    Get PDF
    This report addresses speculative parallelism (the assignment of spare processing resources to tasks which are not known to be strictly required for the successful completion of a computation) at the user and application level. At this level, the execution of a program is seen as a (dynamic) tree —a graph, in general. A solution for a problem is a traversal of this graph from the initial state to a node known to be the answer. Speculative parallelism then represents the assignment of resources to múltiple branches of this graph even if they are not positively known to be on the path to a solution. In highly non-deterministic programs the branching factor can be very high and a naive assignment will very soon use up all the resources. This report presents work assignment strategies other than the usual depth-first and breadth-first. Instead, best-first strategies are used. Since their definition is application-dependent, the application language contains primitives that allow the user (or application programmer) to a) indícate when intelligent OR-parallelism should be used; b) provide the functions that define "best," and c) indícate when to use them. An abstract architecture enables those primitives to perform the search in a "speculative" way, using several processors, synchronizing them, killing the siblings of the path leading to the answer, etc. The user is freed from worrying about these interactions. Several search strategies are proposed and their implementation issues are addressed. "Armageddon," a global pruning method, is introduced, together with both a software and a hardware implementation for it. The concepts exposed are applicable to áreas of Artificial Intelligence such as extensive expert systems, planning, game playing, and in general to large search problems. The proposed strategies, although showing promise, have not been evaluated by simulation or experimentation

    Mixing Hardware and Software Reversibility for Speculative Parallel Discrete Event Simulation

    Get PDF
    Speculative parallel discrete event simulation requires a support for reversing processed events, also called state recovery, when causal inconsistencies are revealed. In this article we present an approach where state recovery relies on a mix of hardware- and software-based techniques. We exploit the Hardware Transactional Memory (HTM) support, as offered by Intel Haswell CPUs, to process events as in-memory transactions, which are possibly committed only after their causal consistency is verified. At the same time, we exploit an innovative software-based reversibility technique, fully relying on transparent software instrumentation targeting x86/ELF objects, which enables undoing side effects by events with no actual backward re-computation. Each thread within our speculative processing engine dynamically (on a per-event basis) selects which recovery mode to rely on (hardware vs software) depending on varying runtime dynamics. The latter are captured by a lightweight analytic model indicating to what extent the HTM support (not paying any instrumentation cost) is efficient, and after what level of events’ parallelism it starts degrading its performance, e.g., due to excessive data conflicts while manipulating causality meta-data within HTM-based transactions. We released our implementation as open source software and provide experimental results for an assessment of its effectiveness. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
    • …
    corecore