60 research outputs found

    On some Graphs with a Unique Perfect Matching

    Full text link
    We show that deciding whether a given graph GG of size mm has a unique perfect matching as well as finding that matching, if it exists, can be done in time O(m)O(m) if GG is either a cograph, or a split graph, or an interval graph, or claw-free. Furthermore, we provide a constructive characterization of the claw-free graphs with a unique perfect matching

    On claw-free asteroidal triple-free graphs

    Get PDF
    AbstractWe present an O(n2.376) algorithm for recognizing claw-free AT-free graphs and a linear-time algorithm for computing the set of all central vertices of a claw-free AT-free graph. In addition, we give efficient algorithms that solve the problems INDEPENDENT SET, DOMINATING SET, and COLORING. We argue that all running times achieved are optimal unless better algorithms for a number of famous graph problems such as triangle recognition and bipartite matching have been found. Our algorithms exploit the structure of 2LexBFS schemes of claw-free AT-free graphs

    On the algorithmic complexity of twelve covering and independence parameters of graphs

    Get PDF
    The definitions of four previously studied parameters related to total coverings and total matchings of graphs can be restricted, thereby obtaining eight parameters related to covering and independence, each of which has been studied previously in some form. Here we survey briefly results concerning total coverings and total matchings of graphs, and consider the aforementioned 12 covering and independence parameters with regard to algorithmic complexity. We survey briefly known results for several graph classes, and obtain new NP-completeness results for the minimum total cover and maximum minimal total cover problems in planar graphs, the minimum maximal total matching problem in bipartite and chordal graphs, and the minimum independent dominating set problem in planar cubic graphs

    On Adaptive Algorithms for Maximum Matching

    Get PDF
    In the fundamental Maximum Matching problem the task is to find a maximum cardinality set of pairwise disjoint edges in a given undirected graph. The fastest algorithm for this problem, due to Micali and Vazirani, runs in time O(sqrt{n}m) and stands unbeaten since 1980. It is complemented by faster, often linear-time, algorithms for various special graph classes. Moreover, there are fast parameterized algorithms, e.g., time O(km log n) relative to tree-width k, which outperform O(sqrt{n}m) when the parameter is sufficiently small. We show that the Micali-Vazirani algorithm, and in fact any algorithm following the phase framework of Hopcroft and Karp, is adaptive to beneficial input structure. We exhibit several graph classes for which such algorithms run in linear time O(n+m). More strongly, we show that they run in time O(sqrt{k}m) for graphs that are k vertex deletions away from any of several such classes, without explicitly computing an optimal or approximate deletion set; before, most such bounds were at least Omega(km). Thus, any phase-based matching algorithm with linear-time phases obliviously interpolates between linear time for k=O(1) and the worst case of O(sqrt{n}m) when k=Theta(n). We complement our findings by proving that the phase framework by itself still allows Omega(sqrt{n}) phases, and hence time Omega(sqrt{n}m), even on paths, cographs, and bipartite chain graphs

    Fair allocation of indivisible goods under conflict constraints

    Full text link
    We consider the fair allocation of indivisible items to several agents and add a graph theoretical perspective to this classical problem. Thereby we introduce an incompatibility relation between pairs of items described in terms of a conflict graph. Every subset of items assigned to one agent has to form an independent set in this graph. Thus, the allocation of items to the agents corresponds to a partial coloring of the conflict graph. Every agent has its own profit valuation for every item. Aiming at a fair allocation, our goal is the maximization of the lowest total profit of items allocated to any one of the agents. The resulting optimization problem contains, as special cases, both {\sc Partition} and {\sc Independent Set}. In our contribution we derive complexity and algorithmic results depending on the properties of the given graph. We can show that the problem is strongly NP-hard for bipartite graphs and their line graphs, and solvable in pseudo-polynomial time for the classes of chordal graphs, cocomparability graphs, biconvex bipartite graphs, and graphs of bounded treewidth. Each of the pseudo-polynomial algorithms can also be turned into a fully polynomial approximation scheme (FPTAS).Comment: A preliminary version containing some of the results presented here appeared in the proceedings of IWOCA 2020. Version 3 contains an appendix with a remark about biconvex bipartite graph

    Measuring the vulnerability for classes of intersection graphs

    Get PDF
    AbstractA general method for the computation of various parameters measuring the vulnerability of a graph is introduced. Four measures of vulnerability are considered, i.e., the toughness, scattering number, vertex integrity and the size of a minimum balanced separator. We show how to compute these parameters by polynomial-time algorithms for various classes of intersection graphs like permutation graphs, bounded dimensional cocomparability graphs, interval graphs, trapezoid graphs and circular versions of these graph classes

    Total Domination, Separated Clusters, CD-Coloring: Algorithms and Hardness

    Full text link
    Domination and coloring are two classic problems in graph theory. The major focus of this paper is the CD-COLORING problem which combines the flavours of domination and colouring. Let GG be an undirected graph. A proper vertex coloring of GG is a cdcoloringcd-coloring if each color class has a dominating vertex in GG. The minimum integer kk for which there exists a cdcoloringcd-coloring of GG using kk colors is called the cd-chromatic number, χcd(G)\chi_{cd}(G). A set SV(G)S\subseteq V(G) is a total dominating set if any vertex in GG has a neighbor in SS. The total domination number, γt(G)\gamma_t(G) of GG is the minimum integer kk such that GG has a total dominating set of size kk. A set SV(G)S\subseteq V(G) is a separatedclusterseparated-cluster if no two vertices in SS lie at a distance 2 in GG. The separated-cluster number, ωs(G)\omega_s(G), of GG is the maximum integer kk such that GG has a separated-cluster of size kk. In this paper, first we explore the connection between CD-COLORING and TOTAL DOMINATION. We prove that CD-COLORING and TOTAL DOMINATION are NP-Complete on triangle-free dd-regular graphs for each fixed integer d3d\geq 3. We also study the relationship between the parameters χcd(G)\chi_{cd}(G) and ωs(G)\omega_s(G). Analogous to the well-known notion of `perfectness', here we introduce the notion of `cd-perfectness'. We prove a sufficient condition for a graph GG to be cd-perfect (i.e. χcd(H)=ωs(H)\chi_{cd}(H)= \omega_s(H), for any induced subgraph HH of GG) which is also necessary for certain graph classes (like triangle-free graphs). Here, we propose a generalized framework via which we obtain several exciting consequences in the algorithmic complexities of special graph classes. In addition, we settle an open problem by showing that the SEPARATED-CLUSTER is polynomially solvable for interval graphs
    corecore