Serial-batch scheduling – the special case of laser-cutting machines

The dissertation deals with a problem in the field of short-term production planning, namely the scheduling of laser-cutting machines. The object of decision is the grouping of production orders (batching) and the sequencing of these order groups on one or more machines (scheduling). This problem is also known in the literature as "batch scheduling problem" and belongs to the class of combinatorial optimization problems due to the interdependencies between the batching and the scheduling decisions. The concepts and methods used are mainly from production planning, operations research and machine learning

A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs

Author name used in this publication: C. T. NgAuthor name used in this publication: T. C. E. Cheng2007-2008 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalAccepted ManuscriptPublishe

Scheduling Hybrid Flow Lines of Aerospace Composite Manufacturing Systems

Composite manufacturing is a vital part of aerospace manufacturing systems. Applying effective scheduling within these systems can cut the costs in aerospace companies significantly. These systems can be characterized as two-stage Hybrid Flow Shops (HFS) with identical, non-identical and unrelated parallel discrete-processing machines in the first stage and non-identical parallel batch-processing machines in the second stage. The first stage is normally the lay-up process in which the carbon fiber sheets are stacked on the molds (tools). Then, the parts are batched based on the compatibility of their cure recipe before going to the second stage into the autoclave for curing. Autoclaves require enormous capital investment and maximizing their utilization is of utmost importance. In this thesis, a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model is developed to maximize the utilization of the resources in the second stage of this HFS. CPLEX, with an underlying branch and bound algorithm, is used to solve the model. The results show the high level of flexibility and computational efficiency of the proposed model when applied to small and medium-size problems. However, due to the NP-hardness of the problem, the MILP model fails to solve large problems (i.e. problems with more than 120 jobs as input) in reasonable CPU times. To solve the larger instances of the problem, a novel heuristic method along with a Genetic Algorithm (GA) are developed. The heuristic algorithm is designed based on a careful observation of the behavior of the MILP model for different problem sets. Moreover, it is enhanced by adding a number of proper dispatching rules. As its output, this heuristic algorithm generates eight initial feasible solutions which are then used as the initial population of the proposed GA. The GA improves the initial solutions obtained from the aforementioned heuristic through its stochastic iterations until it reaches the satisfactory near-optimal solutions. A novel crossover operator is introduced in this GA which is unique to the HFS of aerospace composite manufacturing systems. The proposed GA is proven to be very efficient when applied to large-size problems with up to 300 jobs. The results show the high quality of the solutions achieved by the GA when compared to the optimal solutions which are obtained from the MILP model. A real case study undertaken at one of the leading companies in the Canadian aerospace industry is used for the purpose of data experiments and analysis

Tailoring hyper-heuristics to specific instances of a scheduling problem using affinity and competence functions

Hyper-heuristics are high level heuristics which coordinate lower level ones to solve a given problem. Low level heuristics, however, are not all as competent/good as each other at solving the given problem and some do not work together as well as others. Hence the idea of measuring how good they are (competence) at solving the problem and how well they work together (their affinity). Models of the affinity and competence properties are suggested and evaluated using previous information on the performance of the simple low level heuristics. The resulting model values are used to improve the performance of the hyper-heuristic by tailoring it not only to the specific problem but the specific instance being solved. The test case is a hard combinatorial problem, namely the Hybrid Flow Shop scheduling problem. Numerical results on randomly generated as well as real-world instances are included

Modeling and Solving Flow Shop Scheduling Problem Considering Worker Resource

In this paper, an uninterrupted hybrid flow scheduling problem is modeled under uncertainty conditions. Due to the uncertainty of processing time in workshops, fuzzy programming method has been used to control the parameters of processing time and preparation time. In the proposed model, there are several jobs that must be processed by machines and workers, respectively. The main purpose of the proposed model is to determine the correct sequence of operations and assign operations to each machine and each worker at each stage, so that the total completion time (Cmax) is minimized. Also this paper, fuzzy programming method is used for control unspecified parameter has been used from GAMS software to solve sample problems. The results of problem solving in small and medium dimensions show that with increasing uncertainty, the amount of processing time and consequently the completion time increases. Increases from the whole work. On the other hand, with the increase in the number of machines and workers in each stage due to the high efficiency of the machines, the completion time of all works has decreased. Innovations in this paper include uninterrupted hybrid flow storage scheduling with respect to fuzzy processing time and preparation time in addition to payment time. The allocation of workers and machines to jobs is another innovation of this article

Heuristic Algorithms to Minimize Total Weighted Tardiness on the Single Machine and Identical Parallel Machines with Sequence Dependent Setup and Future Ready Time

This study generates heuristic algorithms to minimize the total weighted tardiness on the single machine and identical parallel machines with sequence dependent setup and future ready time. Due to the complexity of the considered problem, we propose two new Apparent Tardiness Cost based (ATC-based) rules. The performances of these two rules are evaluated on the single machine and identical parallel machines. Besides of these two rules, we also propose a look-ahead identical parallel machines heuristic (LAIPM). When a machine becomes idle, it selects a job to process from available jobs and near future jobs. The proposed method, LAIPM, is evaluated with other look-ahead methods on the identical parallel machines

Production Scheduling

Generally speaking, scheduling is the procedure of mapping a set of tasks or jobs (studied objects) to a set of target resources efficiently. More specifically, as a part of a larger planning and scheduling process, production scheduling is essential for the proper functioning of a manufacturing enterprise. This book presents ten chapters divided into five sections. Section 1 discusses rescheduling strategies, policies, and methods for production scheduling. Section 2 presents two chapters about flow shop scheduling. Section 3 describes heuristic and metaheuristic methods for treating the scheduling problem in an efficient manner. In addition, two test cases are presented in Section 4. The first uses simulation, while the second shows a real implementation of a production scheduling system. Finally, Section 5 presents some modeling strategies for building production scheduling systems. This book will be of interest to those working in the decision-making branches of production, in various operational research areas, as well as computational methods design. People from a diverse background ranging from academia and research to those working in industry, can take advantage of this volume

Bi-Criteria Batching and Scheduling in Hybrid Flow Shops

In this research, a bi-criteria batching and scheduling problem is investigated in hybrid flow shop environments, where unrelated-parallel machines are run simultaneously with different capacities and eligibilities in processing, in some stages. The objective is to simultaneously minimize a linear combination of the total weighted completion time and total weighted tardiness. The first favors the producer’s interest by minimizing work-in-process inventory, inventory holding cost, and energy consumption as well as maximizing machine utilization, while the second favors the customers’ interest by maximizing customers’ service level and delivery speed. In particular, it disregards the group technology assumptions (GTAs) by allowing for the possibility of splitting pre-determined groups of jobs into inconsistent batches in order to improve the operational efficiency. A comparison between the group scheduling and batch scheduling approaches reveals the outstanding performance of the batch scheduling approach. As a result, contrary to the GTAs, jobs belonging to a group might be processed on more than one machine as batches, but not all machines may be capable of processing all jobs. A sequence- and machine-dependent setup time is required between each of two consecutively scheduled batches belonging to different groups. Based on manufacturing company policy, the desired lower bounds on batch sizes are considered for the number of jobs assigned to batches. Although, the direction in which all jobs move through production line is the same, some jobs may skip some stages. Furthermore, to reflect real industry requirements, the job release times and the machine availability times are considered to be dynamic, which means not all machines and jobs are available at the beginning of the planning horizon.The problem is formulated with the help of four mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) models. Two out of four MILP models are formulated as two integrated phases, i.e., batching and scheduling phases, with respect to the precedence constraints between each pair of jobs batches and or the position concept within batches. The optimal combination between batch compositions of groups are determined in the batching phase, while the optimal assignment and sequence of batches on machines and sequence of jobs within batches are determined in the scheduling phase, with respect to a set of operational constraints. A batch composition of a group corresponding to a particular stage, determined in the batching phase of the MILP model, represents the number of batches assigned to the group as well as the number and type of jobs belonging to each batch of that group. Since the first and second MILP models lead to unmanageable solution space, the relaxed MILP model, which allocates one and only one job to each batch of each group in each stage, can be developed to focus on the non-dominated solution space. The optimal solutions of MILP models and relaxed MILP model are equal, if and only if the optimal solution of the relaxed MILP model does not violate the desired lower bounds on batch sizes. Since the relaxed MILP model cannot guarantee the optimal solution of the MILP models, a third MILP model is developed by integrating batching and scheduling phases. This MILP model eliminates an exhaustive combination enumeration between batch compositions of all groups in all stages. Although the third MILP model converges to the optimal solution slower than the relaxed MILP model, it guarantees finding the optimal solution of the first and second MILP models. A comparison between four MILP models shows the superior performance of the third MILP model. However, since the problem is strongly NP-hard, it is not possible to find its optimal solution within a reasonable time as the problem size increases from small to medium to large, even by the relaxed MILP model or the fourth MILP model. Therefore, several meta-heuristic algorithms based upon basic local search, basic population-based search, and hybridization of local search and population-based searches are developed, which move back and forth between batching and scheduling phases. Tabu Search (TS) is implemented as a basic local search algorithm, while Tabu Search Path-Relinking (TS PR) is implemented as a local search algorithm enhanced with a population-based structure. TS is incorporated into the framework of path-relinking to exploit the information on good solutions. The TS PR algorithm comprises several distinguishing features including relinking procedures to effectively explore trajectories connecting elite solutions and the methods used to choose the reference solution. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is implemented as a basic population-based algorithm, while Particle Swarm Optimization enhanced with a local search algorithm (PSO LSA) is developed to realize the benefits of batching and, consequently, enhance the quality of solutions.Since there is interdependency between positions of a job in different stages of a hybrid flow shop in batch scheduling, a meta-heuristic algorithm is not capable of capturing these interdependencies and, subsequently, its efficacy can be diminished. In order to capture this interdependency, the non-, partial- complete-, and stage-based interdependency strategy are developed. In the stage-based-interdependency strategy, a complete sequence related to all of the stages is gradually determined, stage by stage. An initial solution finding mechanism is developed to trigger the search into the solution space and generate an initial population. The performances of these algorithms are compared to each other in order to identify which algorithm(s) outperforms the others. Nevertheless, the performances of the best algorithm(s) are evaluated with respect to a tight lower bound obtained from a branch-and-price (B&P) algorithm. The B&P algorithm uses Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition (DWD) to divide the original problem into a master problem and several sub-problems (SPs) corresponding to each stage. The original problem is decomposed into the SPs by three DWDs corresponding to the three MILP models. Although, by applying DWD technique in the first and second MILP models, an exhaustive combination enumeration between batch compositions of all groups in all stages is excluded and, as a result, the SPs are easier to solve than the original problem, they are still strongly NP-hard because of an enormous number of combinations between batch compositions of all groups in each stage. However, the DWD technique corresponding to the relaxed MILP model not only drastically reduces the number of variables and constraints in the SPs, but also eliminates the batching phase of the first and second MILP models. Decomposing the original problem based on the relaxed MILP model and implementing the B&P algorithm cannot guarantee optimal solutions or tight lower bounds of problems unless the number of violations in the desired lower bounds on batch sizes is not significant. Therefore, the third MILP model is decomposed by DWD so that the B&P algorithm is capable of finding tight lower bounds even for large-size instances of the problem. A comparison between the lower bounds obtained from the B&P algorithm and CPLEX reveals the impressive performance of the B&P algorithm, particularly for large-size problems. The evaluation of the best algorithms based upon these tight lower bounds developed by the B&P algorithm, uncovers the outstanding performance of hybrid algorithms compared to the results obtained from CPLEX.Keywords: Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model, Branch-and-Price Optimization Algorithm, Sequence- and Machine-Dependent Setup Time, Column Generation, Group Scheduling, Particle Swarm Optimization, Batching and Scheduling, Hybrid Flow Shop, Tabu Search, Desired Lower Bounds on Batch Sizes, Bi-Criteria Objective, Path-Relinkin