Video Feedback and Video Modeling in Teaching Laparoscopic Surgery: A Visionary Concept from Kiel

Learning curves for endoscopic surgery are long and flat. Various techniques and methods are now available for surgical endoscopic training, such as pelvitrainers, virtual trainers, and body donor surgery. Video modeling and video feedback are commonly used in professional training. We report, for the first time, the application of video modeling and video feedback for endoscopic training in gynecology. The purpose is to present an innovative method of training. Attendees (residents and specialists) of minimally invasive surgery courses were asked to perform specific tasks, which were video recorded in a multimodular concept. Feedback was given later by an expert at a joint meeting. The attendees were asked to fill a questionnaire in order to assess video feedback given by the expert. The advantages of video feedback and video modeling for the development of surgical skills were given a high rating (median 84%, interquartile ranges (IQR) 72.5-97.5%, n = 37). The question as to whether the attendees would recommend such training was also answered very positively (median 100%, IQR 89.5-100%, n = 37). We noted a clear difference between subjective perception and objective feedback (58%, IQR 40.5-76%, n = 37). Video feedback and video modeling are easy to implement in surgical training setups, and help trainees at all levels of education

Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Minimally invasive surgery has become a common term in visceral as well as gynecologic surgery. It has almost evolved into its own surgical speciality over the past 20 years. Today, being firmly established in every subspeciality of visceral surgery, it is now no longer a distinct skillset, but a fixed part of the armamentarium of surgical options available. In every indication, the advantages of a minimally invasive approach include reduced intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, and shorter rehabilitation times, as well as a marked reduction of overall and surgical postoperative morbidity. In the advent of modern oncologic treatment algorithms, these effects not only lower the immediate impact that an operation has on the patient, but also become important key steps in reducing the side-effects of surgery. Thus, they enable surgery to become a module in modern multi-disciplinary cancer treatment, which blends into multimodular treatment options at different times and prolongs and widens the possibilities available to cancer patients. In this quickly changing environment, the requirement to learn and refine not only open surgical but also different minimally invasive techniques on high levels deeply impact modern surgical training pathways. The use of modern elearning tools and new and praxis-based surgical training possibilities have been readily integrated into modern surgical education,which persists throughout the whole surgical career of modern gynecologic and visceral surgery specialists

Surgeons and ethical challenges in operating room

Ethics lie in the heart of professionalism. In surgery, it represents an essential element, with surgeons facing ethical challenges in their routine practice. The rapid expansion of surgical technology and innovation along with the use of resources and consideration of conflict of interest have brought up the need for the development of current surgical code of ethics. Operating room represents a stressful environment where patients\u27 lives depend upon careful preparation, planning and execution. The progression of surgery within the operating room must be done in harmony and in line with the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Discussion of ethical problems arising in the operating room is not a common subject in surgical literature. The current narrative review was planned to cover ethical concerns related to patients\u27 safety and privacy in the operating room and some of the evolving topics, like ethics of overlapping surgery, live surgical broadcast and \u27do not resuscitate\u27 policy in the operating room

A safe model for implementing live streaming of surgery to improve surgical education

BackgroundLive surgery broadcasting has had increasing use in medical education, especially in distributed education models. However, there have been several concerns raised regarding its safety and ethics with many surgical colleges banning its use.AimsOur study aimed to implement a model of live surgery broadcasting of Orthopaedic surgery that utilised its educational benefits whilst addressing the current concerns.Methods A telemedicine system using a one-way transmission microphone was installed in a tertiary public hospital to securely transmit live Orthopaedic surgery broadcasting from an operating theatre to a lecture theatre holding either medical students, surgical nurses or musculoskeletal physiotherapists. We performed common Orthopaedic operations on patients that were known to the surgeon within their routine time limits. An evaluation survey was administered at the end of each live surgery session using a 5-point Likert scale and open answers. Questions addressed the quality and usefulness of this education model for each discipline.Results Five live surgery broadcasting sessions were conducted and 179 survey responses received. 38% of medical students had never attended theatre with 71% having never seen a common Orthopaedic operation. Most surgical nurses and musculoskeletal physiotherapists had also never seen common orthopaedic procedures. There was a statistically significant benefit in the improvement of educational experience gained by live surgery broadcasting for all five sessions (p < 0.01). Over 80% of all cohorts would like to expand this model to include other surgical specialties.ConclusionLive surgery broadcasting can successfully provide educational benefit to medical students, surgical nurses and musculoskeletal physiotherapists without infringing upon patient safety

Standard vs delayed ligature of the dorsal vascular complex during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a randomized controlled trial

xx

Evaluation of Laparoscopy Virtual Reality Training on the Improvement of Trainees' Surgical Skills.

Background and objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the benefit of training with virtual reality simulation. The secondary objective was to describe the short-term skill acquisition obtained by simulation training and to determine the factors affecting its magnitude. Materials and Methods: We prospectively performed a three-stage evaluation: face, constructive, and predictive to evaluate the training with a laparoscopic simulator with haptic feedback. The participants (n = 63) were divided according to their level of experience into three groups: 16% residents; 46% specialists and 38% were consultants. Results: Face evaluation demonstrates the acceptance of the design and realism of the tasks; it showed a median score of eight (IQR 3) on a Likert scale and 54% of participants (n = 34) gave the tissue feedback a moderate rating. Constructive evaluation demonstrates the improvement of the participants in the training session and the ability of the designed task to distinguish the experienced from the inexperienced surgeon based on the performance score, at task I (transfer of pegs) and II (laparoscopic salpingectomy). There was an improvement in both tasks with a significant increase in score and reduction in time. The study showed that those with a high score at the pre-test recorded a high score post-test, showing a significant pair-wise comparison (Z) and correlation (p) showing a significant statistical significance (p < 0.001). The predictive evaluation demonstrates the beneficiary effect of training four weeks afterward on the practice of surgeons addressed with five questions. It showed an improvement regarding implementation into daily routine, performance of procedure, suturing, shortening of the operative time, and complication management. Conclusions: Virtual reality simulation established high ratings for both realism and training capacity, including clinical relevance, critical relevance, and maintaining training enthusiasm

EAU policy on live surgery events

Context Live surgery is an important part of surgical education, with an increase in the number of live surgery events (LSEs) at meetings despite controversy about their real educational value, risks to patient safety, and conflicts of interest. Objective To provide a European Association of Urology (EAU) policy on LSEs to regulate their organisation during urologic meetings. Evidence acquisition The project was carried out in phases: a systematic literature review generating key questions, surveys sent to Live Surgery Panel members, and Internet- and panel-based consensus finding using the Delphi process to agree on and formulate a policy. Evidence synthesis The EAU will endorse LSEs, provided that the EAU Code of Conduct for live surgery and all organisational requirements are followed. Outcome data must be submitted to an EAU Web-based registry and complications reported using the revised Martin criteria. Regular audits will take place to evaluate compliance as well as the educational role of live surgery. Conclusions This policy represents the consensus view of an expert panel established to advise the EAU. The EAU recognises the educational role of live surgery and endorses live case demonstration at urologic meetings that are conducted within a clearly defined regulatory framework. The overriding principle is that patient safety must take priority over all other considerations in the conduct of live surgery. Patient summary Controversy exists regarding the true educational value of live surgical demonstrations on patients at surgical meetings. An EAU committee of experts developed a policy on how best to conduct live surgery at urologic meetings. The key principle is to ensure safety for every patient, including a code of conduct and checklist for live surgery, specific rules for how the surgery is organised and performed, and how each patient's results are reported to the EAU. For detailed information, please visit www.uroweb.org. © 2014 European Association of Urology