Differential β-arrestin2 requirements for constitutive and agonist-induced internalization of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor

CB1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) undergoes both constitutive and agonist-induced internalization, but the underlying mechanisms of these processes and the role of beta-arrestins in the regulation of CB1R function are not completely understood. In this study, we followed CB1R internalization using confocal microscopy and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer measurements in HeLa and Neuro-2a cells. We found that upon activation CB1R binds beta-arrestin2 (beta-arr2), but not beta-arrestin1. Furthermore, both the expression of dominant-negative beta-arr2 (beta-arr2-V54D) and siRNA-mediated knock-down of beta-arr2 impaired the agonist-induced internalization of CB1R. In contrast, neither beta-arr2-V54D nor beta-arr2-specific siRNA had a significant effect on the constitutive internalization of CB1R. However, both constitutive and agonist-induced internalization of CB1R were impaired by siRNA-mediated depletion of clathrin heavy chain. We conclude that although clathrin is required for both constitutive and agonist-stimulated internalization of CB1R, beta-arr2 binding is only required for agonist-induced internalization of the receptor suggesting that the molecular mechanisms underlying constitutive and agonist-induced internalization of CB1R are different

β-arrestin regulates estradiol membrane-initiated signaling in hypothalamic neurons.

Estradiol (E2) action in the nervous system is the result of both direct nuclear and membrane-initiated signaling (EMS). E2 regulates membrane estrogen receptor-α (ERα) levels through opposing mechanisms of EMS-mediated trafficking and internalization. While ß-arrestin-mediated mERα internalization has been described in the cortex, a role of ß-arrestin in EMS, which underlies multiple physiological processes, remains undefined. In the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARH), membrane-initiated E2 signaling modulates lordosis behavior, a measure of female sexually receptivity. To better understand EMS and regulation of ERα membrane levels, we examined the role of ß-arrestin, a molecule associated with internalization following agonist stimulation. In the present study, we used an immortalized neuronal cell line derived from embryonic hypothalamic neurons, the N-38 line, to examine whether ß-arrestins mediate internalization of mERα. β-arrestin-1 (Arrb1) was found in the ARH and in N-38 neurons. In vitro, E2 increased trafficking and internalization of full-length ERα and ERαΔ4, an alternatively spliced isoform of ERα, which predominates in the membrane. Treatment with E2 also increased phosphorylation of extracellular-signal regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) in N-38 neurons. Arrb1 siRNA knockdown prevented E2-induced ERαΔ4 internalization and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In vivo, microinfusions of Arrb1 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) into female rat ARH knocked down Arrb1 and prevented estradiol benzoate-induced lordosis behavior compared with nonsense scrambled ODN (lordosis quotient: 3 ± 2.1 vs. 85.0 ± 6.0; p < 0.0001). These results indicate a role for Arrb1 in both EMS and internalization of mERα, which are required for the E2-induction of female sexual receptivity

Hepatoma cell density promotes claudin-1 and scavenger receptor BI expression and hepatitis C virus internalization.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) entry occurs via a pH- and clathrin-dependent endocytic pathway and requires a number of cellular factors, including CD81, the tight-junction proteins claudin 1 (CLDN1) and occludin, and scavenger receptor class B member I (SR-BI). HCV tropism is restricted to the liver, where hepatocytes are tightly packed. Here, we demonstrate that SR-BI and CLDN1 expression is modulated in confluent human hepatoma cells, with both receptors being enriched at cell-cell junctions. Cellular contact increased HCV pseudoparticle (HCVpp) and HCV particle (HCVcc) infection and accelerated the internalization of cell-bound HCVcc, suggesting that the cell contact modulation of receptor levels may facilitate the assembly of receptor complexes required for virus internalization. CLDN1 overexpression in subconfluent cells was unable to recapitulate this effect, whereas increased SR-BI expression enhanced HCVpp entry and HCVcc internalization, demonstrating a rate-limiting role for SR-BI in HCV internalization

Galanin decreases NPYY1R internalization and β- Arrestin2 recruitment

We have recently described a Galanin receptor 2(GALR2) and Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor(NPYY1R) interaction at behavioural, cellular and receptor levels through GALR2/NPYY1R heterodimers. The aim of this work was to study if GALR2 and NPYY1R costimulation modified NPYY1R internalization and β-Arrestin recruitment after in HEK293T cells. HEK293T cells were transfected with NPYY1REGFPor β-Arrestin2GFP2 cloned with standard molecular biology techniques employing PCR and fragment replacement strategies. NPYY1REGFP/GALR2 and NPYY1R/GALR2 with β- Arrestin2GFP2 HEK293T coexpressing cells were incubated with NPY 1μM and/or GAL1μM, at different times. Antagonist studies were performed 15 min prior to the addition of agonist with NPYY1R antagonist BIBP3226 10μM or GALR2 antagonist M871 10 μM. Timed-interval images of NPYY1REGFP or β-Arrestin2GFP2 endosomes in different cell groups were acquired using a confocal microscope following agonist addition. Percentage of internalization was determined by Leica software analysis of total membrane fluorescence compared to total internal compartment fluorescence at the various time points. We observed that addition of NPY induced a rapid decrease in the cell surface expression of NPYY1REGFP and a redistribution of β-Arrestin2GFP2. In fact, we observed a maximum of internalization of 80% three minutes after the NPY stimulation. However, combined treatment with GAL and NPY induced a delay in the internalization of NPYY1REGFP, with a maximum of internalization thirty minutes after the co-stimulation. Moreover, a delay in the β-Arrestin2GFP2 redistribution was observed. The specific GALR2 antagonist M871 abolished these delays in internalization of NPYY1REGFP and β-Arrestin2GFP2 redistribution, suggesting that this effect was mediated through the coactivation of GALR2 and NPYY1R. These results demonstrate that costimulation with GAL and NPY delays the internalization of  NPYY1REGFP by decreasing recruitment of β-Arrestin2GFP2 and probably could change intracellular signaling. This study was supported by Junta de Andalucia CVI6476.Junta de Andalucia CVI6476.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech

Galanin receptor 2 modifies neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor internalization and β-Arrestin recruitment

We have recently described a Galanin receptor 2(GALR2) and Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor(NPYY1R) interaction at behavioural, cellular and receptor levels through GALR2/NPYY1R heterodimers. The aim of this work was to study if GALR2 and NPYY1R costimulation modified NPYY1R internalization and β-Arrestin recruitment after in HEK293T cells. HEK293T cells were transfected with NPYY1REGFPor β-Arrestin2GFP2 cloned with standard molecular biology techniques employing PCR and fragment replacement strategies. NPYY1REGFP/GALR2 and NPYY1R/GALR2 with β- Arrestin2GFP2 HEK293T coexpressing cells were incubated with NPY 1μM and/or GAL1μM, at different times. Antagonist studies were performed 15 min prior to the addition of agonist with NPYY1R antagonist BIBP3226 10μM or GALR2 antagonist M871 10 μM. Timed-interval images of NPYY1REGFP or β-Arrestin2GFP2 endosomes in different cell groups were acquired using a confocal microscope following agonist addition. Percentage of internalization was determined by Leica software analysis of total membrane fluorescence compared to total internal compartment fluorescence at the various time points. We observed that addition of NPY induced a rapid decrease in the cell surface expression of NPYY1REGFP and a redistribution of β-Arrestin2GFP2. In fact, we observed a maximum of internalization of 80% three minutes after the NPY stimulation. However, combined treatment with GAL and NPY induced a delay in the internalization of NPYY1REGFP, with a maximum of internalization thirty minutes after the co-stimulation. Moreover, a delay in the β-Arrestin2GFP2 redistribution was observed. The specific GALR2 antagonist M871 abolished these delays in internalization of NPYY1REGFP and β-Arrestin2GFP2 redistribution, suggesting that this effect was mediated through the coactivation of GALR2 and NPYY1R. These results demonstrate that costimulation with GAL and NPY delays the internalization of  NPYY1REGFP by decreasing recruitment of β-Arrestin2GFP2 and probably could change intracellular signaling. This study was supported by Junta de Andalucia CVI6476.Junta de Andalucia CVI6476.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech

Non-specific cellular uptake of surface-functionalized quantum dots

We report a systematic empirical study of nanoparticle internalization into cells via non-specific pathways. The nanoparticles were comprised of commercial quantum dots (QDs) that were highly visible under a fluorescence confocal microscope. Surface-modified QDs with basic biologically-significant moieties, e.g. carboxyl, amino, streptavidin were used, in combination with the surface derivatization with polyethylene glycol (PEG) in a range of immortalized cell lines. Internalization rates were derived from image analysis and a detailed discussion about the effect of nanoparticle size, charge and surface groups is presented. We find that PEG-derivatization dramatically suppresses the non-specific uptake while PEG-free carboxyl and amine functional groups promote QD internalization. These uptake variations displayed a remarkable consistency across different cell types. The reported results are important for experiments concerned with cellular uptake of surface-functionalized nanomaterials, both when non-specific internalization is undesirable and also when it is intended for material to be internalized as efficiently as possible. Published article at: http://iopscience.iop.org/0957-4484/21/28/285105/Comment: 14 pages 7 figure

Differences in the signaling pathways of α1A- and α1B-adrenoceptors are related to different endosomal targeting

Aims: To compare the constitutive and agonist-dependent endosomal trafficking of α1A- and α1B-adrenoceptors (ARs) and to establish if the internalization pattern determines the signaling pathways of each subtype. Methods: Using CypHer5 technology and VSV-G epitope tagged α1A- and α1B-ARs stably and transiently expressed in HEK 293 cells, we analyzed by confocal microscopy the constitutive and agonist-induced internalization of each subtype, and the temporal relationship between agonist induced internalization and the increase in intracellular calcium (determined by FLUO-3 flouorescence), or the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAP kinases (determined by Western blot). Results and Conclusions: Constitutive as well as agonist-induced trafficking of α1A and α1B ARs maintain two different endosomal pools of receptors: one located close to the plasma membrane and the other deeper into the cytosol. Each subtype exhibited specific characteristics of internalization and distribution between these pools that determines their signaling pathways: α1A-ARs, when located in the plasma membrane, signal through calcium and ERK1/2 pathways but, when translocated to deeper endosomes, through a mechanism sensitive to β-arrestin and concanavalin A, continue signaling through ERK1/2 and also activate the p38 pathway. α1B-ARs signal through calcium and ERK1/2 only when located in the membrane and the signals disappear after endocytosis and by disruption of the membrane lipid rafts by methyl-β-cyclodextrin