8 research outputs found

    Good modelling practice in applying computational fluid dynamics for WWTP modelling

    No full text
    International audienceComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling in the wastewater treatment (WWT) field is continuing to grow and be used to solve increasingly complex problems. However, the future of CFD models and their value to the wastewater field are a function of their proper application and knowledge of their limits. As has been established for other types of wastewater modelling (i.e. biokinetic models)​, it is timely to define a good modelling practice (GMP) for wastewater CFD applications. An International Water Association (IWA) working group has been formed to investigate a variety of issues and challenges related to CFD modelling in water and WWT. This paper summarizes the recommendations for GMP of the IWA working group on CFD. The paper provides an overview of GMP and, though it is written for the wastewater application, is based on general CFD procedures. A forthcoming companion paper to provide specific details on modelling of individual wastewater components forms the next step of the working group

    Long-term Impact of Early MS Treatment with Interferon Beta-1b (IFNB-1b): Clinical, MRI, Employment, and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) at the 11-Year Follow-up of BENEFIT (BENEFIT 11) (P7.012)

    No full text
    International audienceOBJECTIVE:To study long-term outcomes in patients treated with IFNB-1b after clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). BACKGROUND:In BENEFIT, patients with CIS were randomized to IFNB-1b or placebo (PL) treatment. After the second clinical event or after 2 years, all patients were treated with IFNB-1b. Mean delay of IFNB-1b in PL was 1.33 years. Comprehensive clinical, MRI, and PROs at 11 years post-randomization are reported. DESIGN/METHODS:All originally randomized patients were asked to undergo clinical, MRI, laboratory, and PRO assessments 11 years after randomization. RESULTS:281 patients were identified (60[percnt] of originally randomized, 72.6[percnt] of eligible patients at participating sites); 278 enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar to the original BENEFIT population. At Year 11, patients randomized to IFNB-1b still had lower overall annualized relapse rate (p=0.0018) and longer time to first relapse (p=0.0005) and clinically definite MS (p=0.0012). Median EDSS score was 2.0 (change from baseline 0.5) in both groups. PASAT scores remained high (overall median 56 [IQR 10]). Of the 81.3[percnt] working at CIS start, 73.4[percnt] were still employed (64.4[percnt] fulltime). 12.2[percnt] retired early or were on long-term disability (2.9[percnt] at baseline). 64.0[percnt] did not report any sick leave during the past 12 months. Health-related quality of life remained stable (median [IQR] change from baseline EQ-5D: 0.000 [0.209], FAMS TOI: -7.54 [27.17]. Median (IQR) fatigue (FSMC) score: 45.00 (40.00), 46[percnt] of patients without fatigue (cut-off score\textless43), median (IQR) depression (CES-D) score: 9.00 (15.00). MRI findings were similar across groups: 86.4[percnt] had no gadolinium-enhancing lesions; median (IQR) number of new T2 lesions since 5-year MRI: 2.0 (6.0), T2 volume: 1760.0mmÂł (3963.0mmÂł), cortical lesions: 2.0 (5.0), brain volume 1519.0cmÂł (152.0mmÂł), mean cortical thickness 2.64mmÂł (0.56mmÂł). CONCLUSIONS:Results from BENEFIT11 support a long-term impact of early treatment with IFNB-1b on clinical measures, including cognition and fatigue, and health economic and MRI outcomes. Study Supported by:Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Disclosure: Dr. Edan has received personal compensation for activities with LFB, Biogenidec, speaking from Serono, Inc., Sanofi, Teva, and Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation as a consultant and/or scientific advisory board member. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Chugai, EMD Canada, Genzyme, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva Canada Innovation. Dr. Montalban has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer, Biogen Idec, EMD, Genentech, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Neurotec, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Almirall. Dr. Miller has received personal compensation for activities with UCL Institute of Neurology, Biogen Idec, GlaxoSmithKline Inc., Novartis, Merck & Co. Inc., Chugai, and Mitsubishi Pharma. Dr. Miller has received personal compensation in an editorial capac Dr. Hartung has holds stock and/or stock options from Opexa Therapeutics. Dr. Hemmer has received personal compensation for activities with Roche, Novartis, Bayer Schering, Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, GlaxoSmithKline, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Micromet, and Genzyme as a scientific advisory board member. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation for activities Acorda Therapeutics, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Biogen Idec, Eli Lilly & Company, EMD Serono, Genzyme Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. Dr. Barkhof has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Schering Pharma, Sanofi, Genzyme, Biogen Idec, Teva, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Synthon BV, and Janssen Research as a consultant. Dr. Schippling has received personal compensation for activities with Novartis. Dr. Schippling has received research support from Bayer Schering and Biogen Idec. Dr. Schulze has received personal compensation for activities with PAREXEL International as an employee. Dr. Pleimes has received personal compensation for activities with Myelo Therapeutics GmbH as an employee, and with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp. as an employee and consultant. Dr. Pohl has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation as an employee. Dr. Pohl owns stock and/or stock options in Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Dr. Sandbrink has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation as an employee. Dr. Sandbrink holds stock and/or stock options in Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Dr. Suarez has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation as an employee. Dr. Wicklein has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation as an employee. Dr. Kappos has received personal compensation for activities with Actelion Pharmaceutical

    The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial

    No full text
    To assess outcomes for patients treated with interferon beta-1b immediately after clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or after a short delay.status: publishe

    The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE To assess outcomes for patients treated with interferon beta-1b immediately after clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or after a short delay. METHODS Participants in BENEFIT (Betaferon/Betaseron in Newly Emerging MS for Initial Treatment) were randomly assigned to receive interferon beta-1b (early treatment) or placebo (delayed treatment). After conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) or 2 years, patients on placebo could switch to interferon beta-1b or another treatment. Eleven years after randomization, patients were reassessed. RESULTS Two hundred seventy-eight (59.4%) of the original 468 patients (71.3% of those eligible at participating sites) were enrolled (early: 167 [57.2%]; delayed: 111 [63.1%]). After 11 years, risk of CDMS remained lower in the early-treatment arm compared with the delayed-treatment arm (p = 0.0012), with longer time to first relapse (median [Q1, Q3] days: 1,888 [540, not reached] vs 931 [253, 3,296]; p = 0.0005) and lower overall annualized relapse rate (0.21 vs 0.26; p = 0.0018). Only 25 patients (5.9%, overall; early, 4.5%; delayed, 8.3%) converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores remained low and stable, with no difference between treatment arms (median [Q1, Q3]: 2.0 [1.0, 3.0]). The early-treatment group had better Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task-3 total scores (p = 0.0070). Employment rates remained high, and health resource utilization tended to be low in both groups. MRI metrics did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS Although the delay in treatment was relatively short, several clinical outcomes favored earlier treatment. Along with low rates of disability and disease progression in both groups, this supports the value of treatment at CIS. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT01795872. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that early compared to delayed treatment prolongs time to CDMS in CIS after 11 years
    corecore