Investigação sobre brucelose bovina na Ilha de Fernando de Noronha, Pernambuco, Brasil

Considering the lack of information about livestock diseases on Brazilian oceanic islands, the occurrence of bovine brucellosis was investigated on the island of Fernando de Noronha, state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Serum samples were collected in October 2009, from all the 105 cows raised on the island at that time. These were examined concurrently using the Rose Bengal test and the Complement Fixation Test. All the samples were negative in both tests, indicating that the cows on the island were likely free from infection by smooth forms of Brucella. These results can partly be explained by the prohibition of introduction and importation of both small and large-sized animals that had been implemented through District Decree 19 of February 28, 2004.Tendo em vista a inexistência de informações sobre a ocorrência da brucelose bovina em ilhas oceânicas brasileiras, investigou-se a presença da infecção na ilha de Fernando de Noronha, Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Soros de todas as 105 fêmeas bovinas existentes, colhidos em outubro de 2009, foram examinados concomitantemente pelo teste do Antígeno Acidificado Tamponado e pela Reação de Fixação de Complemento. Todas as amostras foram negativas em ambos os testes, indicando que provavelmente os animais presentes na ilha encontravam-se livres da infecção por Brucella. Estes resultados podem ser explicados, em partes, pela proibição da introdução e importação de grandes e pequenos animais, implementada pelo Decreto Distrital 19, de 28 de fevereiro de 2004

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

FREQÜÊNCIA DE AGLUTININAS ANTI-Brucella abortus EM CAPRINOS E OVINOS DO SERTÃO DO ESTADO DE PERNAMBUCO, BRASIL FREQUENCY OF ANTI-Brucella abortus AGGLUTININS IN GOATS AND sheep OF THE “SERTÃO” (BACKLANDS) OF THE STATE OF PERNAMBUCO, BRAZIL

Objetivou-se investigar a freqüência de aglutininas anti-Brucella abortus em caprinos e ovinos do Sertão do Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Foram processadas 700 amostras de soros sangüíneos, das quais 340 eram da espécie caprina (115 machos e 225 fêmeas) e 360 (136 machos e 224 fêmeas) ovina. Empregou-se a técnica do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT) corado com rosa bengala (RB). Das 340 amostras de caprinos avaliadas, duas (0,6%) foram reagentes ao AAT. Não se observaram associações significativas para as variáveis faixa etária (p= 0,430), raça (p= 0,936) e sexo (p= 0,562). Das 360 amostras de ovinos, nove (2,5%) foram reagentes. Também não houve associação significativa entre as variáveis analisadas e a soropositividade para brucelose: faixa etária (p= 0,522); raça (p= 0,576) e sexo (p= 0,461). Verificou-se associação significativa (p= 0,042) entre as espécies estudadas e soropositividade para brucelose nos animais investigados. A soropositividade para Brucella abortus em caprinos e ovinos foi descrita pela primeira vez no Sertão de Pernambuco, fato que pode dificultar o sucesso do Programa Nacional de Controle e Erradicação da Brucelose, tendo em vista que nessa região é comum a criação consorciada de pequenos ruminantes com bovinos, além de representar riscos à Saúde Pública.<br /><br />PALAVRAS-CHAVES: Brucelose, ovinos, caprinos, pequenos ruminantes, sorodiagnóstico. The objective was to investigate the frequency of anti-Brucella abortus agglutinins in goats and sheep of the backlands of the State of Pernambuco, Brazil. 700 samples of sanguine serums were processed, of which 340 were of the goat (115 males and 225 females) and 360 (136 males and 224 females) sheep. The technique of the Tamponed Acidified Antigen (AAT) dyed with Bengalese Rose (BR) was used. Of the 340 samples of goat evaluated two (0.6%) were reactive to AAT. Significant associations were not observed for the variable age group (p = 0.430); race (p = 0.936) and sex (p = 0.562). Of the 360 sheep samples, nine (2.5%) were reactive. There also was no significant association between the analyzed variables and the seropositiveness for brucellosis: age group (p = 0.522); race (p = 0.576) and sex (p = 0.461). Significant association was observed (p = 0.042) among the studied species and seropositiveness for brucellosis in the investigated animals. The seropositiveness for Brucella abortus in goats and sheep was traced for the first time in the “Sertão” (dry interior region, backlands) of Pernambuco, fact that can hinder the success of the National Program of Control and Erradication of Brucellosis, due to the fact that it is common to raise small ruminants with bovines in this area, besides representing risks to Public Health. <br /> <br />KEY WORDS: Brucellosis, ovines, caprines, small ruminants, serodiagnosis

Validação interlaboratorial do teste de polarização fluorescente para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina

Esta investigação teve por objetivo validar o teste de polarização fluorescente (TPF) para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina, determinando a sensibilidade (SE) e a especificidade relativas (SP) e verificando a reprodutibilidade do teste em quatro laboratórios no Brasil. Foram selecionadas 1.389 amostras de soro sanguíneo, as quais foram inicialmente submetidas aos testes do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT) e mercaptoetanol (2-ME). As mesmas amostras foram submetidas à reação de fixação de complemento (RFC) e ao TPF. Para a avaliação do TPF, foi adotada a combinação dos resultados do AAT, da RFC e do 2-ME, utilizados como população de referência (padrão-ouro). Para a determinação do ponto de corte do TPF que proporciona a melhor combinação de sensibilidade e especificidade, foi usada a análise TG-ROC. A concordância entre os resultados dos quatro laboratórios foi determinada com base no indicador kappa e no coeficiente de correlação de Pearson. Os pontos de corte do TPF situaram-se entre 85,2 e 93,6 mP, conforme o laboratório. A sensibilidade variou de 91,7 a 97,3%, e a especificidade situou-se na faixa de 82,6 a 98,3%. Na comparação entre os resultados do TPF dos quatro laboratórios, o indicador kappa ficou entre 0,69 e 0,95, o que indica, na maioria das situações, reprodutibilidade excelente, e o coeficiente de correlação variou entre 0,76 e 0,99. Os resultados indicaram que o TPF apresentou bom desempenho, na maioria das situações, com sensibilidade e especificidade elevadas. Em comparação com os testes convencionais, o TPF apresenta as vantagens de ser de execução mais rápida e mais fácil e não estar sujeito à ocorrência de prozona, como a RFC e o 2-ME, nem de atividade anticomplementar, como a RFC.The purpose of this research was the interlaboratorial validation of the polarization fluorescence assay (PFA) for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis, verifying the relative sensitivity, the relative specificity and the reproducibility of the test in four Brazilian laboratories. Serum samples from 1,389 bovines were selected and submitted to the rose Bengal (RBT) and 2-mercaptoethanol tests in one of the laboratories. The same samples were tested by the complement fixation (CFT) test and by the PFA in the four laboratories participating of the research. The reference population (golden standard) used to evaluate the PFA was the combination of the results of RBT, CFT and 2-ME. TGROC analysis was used to obtain the cut-off that provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity. The agreement between laboratories was obtained by the kappa statistic and Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The PFA cut-off values were from 85.2 to 93.6. The sensitivity of the PFA assay varied from 91.7% to 97.3%, and the specificity values varied from 82.6% to 98.3%. When comparing PFA results from the four laboratories, the kappa values was between 0.69 and 0.95, which indicates, in most situations, excellent reproducibility, and the correlation coefficient varied from 0.76 to 0.99. The results showed that the PFA had a good performance, with high sensitivity and specificity. Compared to the conventional tests, the PFA has the advantages of being easy and quick to perform, and it is not prone to the occurrence of prozone, as the CFT or the 2-ME, nor to the occurrence of anticomplementary effect, as the CFT

Validação interlaboratorial do teste de polarização fluorescente para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina Interlaboratorial validation of the fluorescence polarization assay for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis

Esta investigação teve por objetivo validar o teste de polarização fluorescente (TPF) para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina, determinando a sensibilidade (SE) e a especificidade relativas (SP) e verificando a reprodutibilidade do teste em quatro laboratórios no Brasil. Foram selecionadas 1.389 amostras de soro sanguíneo, as quais foram inicialmente submetidas aos testes do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT) e mercaptoetanol (2-ME). As mesmas amostras foram submetidas à reação de fixação de complemento (RFC) e ao TPF. Para a avaliação do TPF, foi adotada a combinação dos resultados do AAT, da RFC e do 2-ME, utilizados como população de referência (padrão-ouro). Para a determinação do ponto de corte do TPF que proporciona a melhor combinação de sensibilidade e especificidade, foi usada a análise TG-ROC. A concordância entre os resultados dos quatro laboratórios foi determinada com base no indicador kappa e no coeficiente de correlação de Pearson. Os pontos de corte do TPF situaram-se entre 85,2 e 93,6 mP, conforme o laboratório. A sensibilidade variou de 91,7 a 97,3%, e a especificidade situou-se na faixa de 82,6 a 98,3%. Na comparação entre os resultados do TPF dos quatro laboratórios, o indicador kappa ficou entre 0,69 e 0,95, o que indica, na maioria das situações, reprodutibilidade excelente, e o coeficiente de correlação variou entre 0,76 e 0,99. Os resultados indicaram que o TPF apresentou bom desempenho, na maioria das situações, com sensibilidade e especificidade elevadas. Em comparação com os testes convencionais, o TPF apresenta as vantagens de ser de execução mais rápida e mais fácil e não estar sujeito à ocorrência de prozona, como a RFC e o 2-ME, nem de atividade anticomplementar, como a RFC.<br>The purpose of this research was the interlaboratorial validation of the polarization fluorescence assay (PFA) for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis, verifying the relative sensitivity, the relative specificity and the reproducibility of the test in four Brazilian laboratories. Serum samples from 1,389 bovines were selected and submitted to the rose Bengal (RBT) and 2-mercaptoethanol tests in one of the laboratories. The same samples were tested by the complement fixation (CFT) test and by the PFA in the four laboratories participating of the research. The reference population (golden standard) used to evaluate the PFA was the combination of the results of RBT, CFT and 2-ME. TG-ROC analysis was used to obtain the cut-off that provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity. The agreement between laboratories was obtained by the kappa statistic and Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The PFA cut-off values were from 85.2 to 93.6. The sensitivity of the PFA assay varied from 91.7% to 97.3%, and the specificity values varied from 82.6% to 98.3%. When comparing PFA results from the four laboratories, the kappa values was between 0.69 and 0.95, which indicates, in most situations, excellent reproducibility, and the correlation coefficient varied from 0.76 to 0.99. The results showed that the PFA had a good performance, with high sensitivity and specificity. Compared to the conventional tests, the PFA has the advantages of being easy and quick to perform, and it is not prone to the occurrence of prozone, as the CFT or the 2-ME, nor to the occurrence of anti-complementary effect, as the CFT

Validação interlaboratorial do teste de polarização fluorescente para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina

Esta investigação teve por objetivo validar o teste de polarização fluorescente (TPF) para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina, determinando a sensibilidade (SE) e a especificidade relativas (SP) e verificando a reprodutibilidade do teste em quatro laboratórios no Brasil. Foram selecionadas 1.389 amostras de soro sanguíneo, as quais foram inicialmente submetidas aos testes do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT) e mercaptoetanol (2-ME). As mesmas amostras foram submetidas à reação de fixação de complemento (RFC) e ao TPF. Para a avaliação do TPF, foi adotada a combinação dos resultados do AAT, da RFC e do 2-ME, utilizados como população de referência (padrão-ouro). Para a determinação do ponto de corte do TPF que proporciona a melhor combinação de sensibilidade e especificidade, foi usada a análise TG-ROC. A concordância entre os resultados dos quatro laboratórios foi determinada com base no indicador kappa e no coeficiente de correlação de Pearson. Os pontos de corte do TPF situaram-se entre 85,2 e 93,6 mP, conforme o laboratório. A sensibilidade variou de 91,7 a 97,3%, e a especificidade situou-se na faixa de 82,6 a 98,3%. Na comparação entre os resultados do TPF dos quatro laboratórios, o indicador kappa ficou entre 0,69 e 0,95, o que indica, na maioria das situações, reprodutibilidade excelente, e o coeficiente de correlação variou entre 0,76 e 0,99. Os resultados indicaram que o TPF apresentou bom desempenho, na maioria das situações, com sensibilidade e especificidade elevadas. em comparação com os testes convencionais, o TPF apresenta as vantagens de ser de execução mais rápida e mais fácil e não estar sujeito à ocorrência de prozona, como a RFC e o 2-ME, nem de atividade anticomplementar, como a RFC.The purpose of this research was the interlaboratorial validation of the polarization fluorescence assay (PFA) for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis, verifying the relative sensitivity, the relative specificity and the reproducibility of the test in four Brazilian laboratories. Serum samples from 1,389 bovines were selected and submitted to the rose Bengal (RBT) and 2-mercaptoethanol tests in one of the laboratories. The same samples were tested by the complement fixation (CFT) test and by the PFA in the four laboratories participating of the research. The reference population (golden standard) used to evaluate the PFA was the combination of the results of RBT, CFT and 2-ME. TG-ROC analysis was used to obtain the cut-off that provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity. The agreement between laboratories was obtained by the kappa statistic and Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The PFA cut-off values were from 85.2 to 93.6. The sensitivity of the PFA assay varied from 91.7% to 97.3%, and the specificity values varied from 82.6% to 98.3%. When comparing PFA results from the four laboratories, the kappa values was between 0.69 and 0.95, which indicates, in most situations, excellent reproducibility, and the correlation coefficient varied from 0.76 to 0.99. The results showed that the PFA had a good performance, with high sensitivity and specificity. Compared to the conventional tests, the PFA has the advantages of being easy and quick to perform, and it is not prone to the occurrence of prozone, as the CFT or the 2-ME, nor to the occurrence of anti-complementary effect, as the CFT.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP

Validação interlaboratorial do teste de polarização fluorescente para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina

Esta investigação teve por objetivo validar o teste de polarização fluorescente (TPF) para o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose bovina, determinando a sensibilidade (SE) e a especificidade relativas (SP) e verificando a reprodutibilidade do teste em quatro laboratórios no Brasil. Foram selecionadas 1.389 amostras de soro sanguíneo, as quais foram inicialmente submetidas aos testes do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT) e mercaptoetanol (2-ME). As mesmas amostras foram submetidas à reação de fixação de complemento (RFC) e ao TPF. Para a avaliação do TPF, foi adotada a combinação dos resultados do AAT, da RFC e do 2-ME, utilizados como população de referência (padrão-ouro). Para a determinação do ponto de corte do TPF que proporciona a melhor combinação de sensibilidade e especificidade, foi usada a análise TG-ROC. A concordância entre os resultados dos quatro laboratórios foi determinada com base no indicador kappa e no coeficiente de correlação de Pearson. Os pontos de corte do TPF situaram-se entre 85,2 e 93,6 mP, conforme o laboratório. A sensibilidade variou de 91,7 a 97,3%, e a especificidade situou-se na faixa de 82,6 a 98,3%. Na comparação entre os resultados do TPF dos quatro laboratórios, o indicador kappa ficou entre 0,69 e 0,95, o que indica, na maioria das situações, reprodutibilidade excelente, e o coeficiente de correlação variou entre 0,76 e 0,99. Os resultados indicaram que o TPF apresentou bom desempenho, na maioria das situações, com sensibilidade e especificidade elevadas. Em comparação com os testes convencionais, o TPF apresenta as vantagens de ser de execução mais rápida e mais fácil e não estar sujeito à ocorrência de prozona, como a RFC e o 2-ME, nem de atividade anticomplementar, como a RFC.The purpose of this research was the interlaboratorial validation of the polarization fluorescence assay (PFA) for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis, verifying the relative sensitivity, the relative specificity and the reproducibility of the test in four Brazilian laboratories. Serum samples from 1,389 bovines were selected and submitted to the rose Bengal (RBT) and 2-mercaptoethanol tests in one of the laboratories. The same samples were tested by the complement fixation (CFT) test and by the PFA in the four laboratories participating of the research. The reference population (golden standard) used to evaluate the PFA was the combination of the results of RBT, CFT and 2-ME. TGROC analysis was used to obtain the cut-off that provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity. The agreement between laboratories was obtained by the kappa statistic and Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The PFA cut-off values were from 85.2 to 93.6. The sensitivity of the PFA assay varied from 91.7% to 97.3%, and the specificity values varied from 82.6% to 98.3%. When comparing PFA results from the four laboratories, the kappa values was between 0.69 and 0.95, which indicates, in most situations, excellent reproducibility, and the correlation coefficient varied from 0.76 to 0.99. The results showed that the PFA had a good performance, with high sensitivity and specificity. Compared to the conventional tests, the PFA has the advantages of being easy and quick to perform, and it is not prone to the occurrence of prozone, as the CFT or the 2-ME, nor to the occurrence of anticomplementary effect, as the CFT