Toward standardization of BK virus monitoring: evaluation of the BK virus R-gene kit for quantification of BK viral load in urine, whole-blood, and plasma specimens.

Screening of BK virus (BKV) replication is recommended to identify patients at increased risk of BKV-associated diseases. However, the heterogeneity of molecular techniques hinders the establishment of universal guidelines for BKV monitoring. Here we aimed to compare the performance of the CE-marked BK virus R-gene kit (R-gene) to the performance of our in-house assay for quantification of BKV DNA loads (BKVL). A 12-specimen panel from the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) organization, 163 urine samples, and 88 paired specimens of plasma and whole blood (WB) from transplant recipients were tested. Both the R-gene and in-house assays showed a good correlation within the QCMD panel (r = 0.995 and r = 0.989, respectively). BKVL were highly correlated between assays, although positive biases were observed with the in-house assay in analysis of urine (0.72 ± 0.83 log10 copies/ml), plasma (1.17 ± 0.63 log10 copies/ml), and WB (1.28 ± 0.37 log10 copies/ml). Recalibration with a common calibrator significantly reduced the bias in comparisons between assays. In contrast, BKVL was underestimated with the in-house PCR in eight samples containing BKV genotype II, presenting point mutations at primer-annealing sites. Using the R-gene assay, plasma and WB specimens were found to be equally suitable for quantification of BKVL, as indicated by the high correlation coefficient (r = 0.965, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, the R-gene assay demonstrated reliable performance and higher accuracy than the in-house assay for quantification of BKVL in urine and blood specimens. Screening of BKV replication by a well-validated commercial kit may enable clinical laboratories to assess viral loads with greater reproducibility and precision.comparative studyevaluation studiesjournal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't2014 Dec2014 10 08importe

COVID-19 symptoms at hospital admission vary with age and sex: results from the ISARIC prospective multinational observational study

Background: The ISARIC prospective multinational observational study is the largest cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We present relationships of age, sex, and nationality to presenting symptoms. Methods: International, prospective observational study of 60 109 hospitalized symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 recruited from 43 countries between 30 January and 3 August 2020. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate relationships of age and sex to published COVID-19 case definitions and the most commonly reported symptoms. Results: ‘Typical’ symptoms of fever (69%), cough (68%) and shortness of breath (66%) were the most commonly reported. 92% of patients experienced at least one of these. Prevalence of typical symptoms was greatest in 30- to 60-year-olds (respectively 80, 79, 69%; at least one 95%). They were reported less frequently in children (≤ 18 years: 69, 48, 23; 85%), older adults (≥ 70 years: 61, 62, 65; 90%), and women (66, 66, 64; 90%; vs. men 71, 70, 67; 93%, each P &lt; 0.001). The most common atypical presentations under 60 years of age were nausea and vomiting and abdominal pain, and over 60 years was confusion. Regression models showed significant differences in symptoms with sex, age and country. Interpretation: This international collaboration has allowed us to report reliable symptom data from the largest cohort of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Adults over 60 and children admitted to hospital with COVID-19 are less likely to present with typical symptoms. Nausea and vomiting are common atypical presentations under 30 years. Confusion is a frequent atypical presentation of COVID-19 in adults over 60 years. Women are less likely to experience typical symptoms than men

Evaluation and development of markers of BK virus replication in kidney transplantation

La néphropathie à BK virus (BKV) est l'une des complications les plus fréquentes de la transplantation rénale. La prise en charge consiste en la réduction préemptive de l'immunosuppression basée sur le suivi de la charge virale, mais cette stratégie n’est pas complètement efficace et augmente le risque de rejet. Dans un premier volet, nous avons évalué la mesure de la charge virale par PCR quantitative en temps réel, permettant de mettre en évidence des facteurs de variabilité comme le polymorphisme du BKV et de valider la technique utilisée pour le suivi de notre cohorte. L’intérêt des anticorps neutralisants (AcNs) anti-BKV en tant que marqueur prédictif de la réplication BKV a ensuite été évalué dans une cohorte de 168 transplantés rénaux. Nous avons montré i) que le virus responsable de l’infection provenait du donneur ; ii) que les AcNs jouent un rôle dans la prévention de la réactivation et le contrôle de la réplication virale et iii) qu’un seuil d’AcNs de 4 log10 permettait de stratifier le risque de réplication BKV. Ce travail ouvre la voie à un suivi personnalisé en fonction du risque de réplication BKV et à de nouvelles approches immunothérapeutiques.BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy is one of the major causes of graft dysfunction and loss in kidney transplant recipients. Since no BKV-specific antiviral therapies are available, management relies on preemptive immunosuppression reduction based on viral load monitoring. However, this strategy does not fully eliminate the risk of nephropathy and can increase the risk of graft rejection. In this work, we evaluated viral load measurement by quantitative real-time PCR in an interlaboratory comparison. Variability factors such as BKV polymorphism or pre-PCR steps have been highlighted and the method used for monitoring our cohort has been validated. The role of anti-BKV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) as a predictive marker of BKV replication has been investigated in a cohort of 168 kidney transplant recipients. We showed that i) viral infection is caused by the donor strain; ii) NAbs play an essential role in viral replication prevention and control and iii) a NAbs cutoff of 4 log10 allows to stratify BKV replication risk. This work paves the way for personalized monitoring according to BKV replication risk and for new preventive or therapeutic strategies

Evaluation and development of markers of BK virus replication in kidney transplantation

La néphropathie à BK virus (BKV) est l'une des complications les plus fréquentes de la transplantation rénale. La prise en charge consiste en la réduction préemptive de l'immunosuppression basée sur le suivi de la charge virale, mais cette stratégie n’est pas complètement efficace et augmente le risque de rejet. Dans un premier volet, nous avons évalué la mesure de la charge virale par PCR quantitative en temps réel, permettant de mettre en évidence des facteurs de variabilité comme le polymorphisme du BKV et de valider la technique utilisée pour le suivi de notre cohorte. L’intérêt des anticorps neutralisants (AcNs) anti-BKV en tant que marqueur prédictif de la réplication BKV a ensuite été évalué dans une cohorte de 168 transplantés rénaux. Nous avons montré i) que le virus responsable de l’infection provenait du donneur ; ii) que les AcNs jouent un rôle dans la prévention de la réactivation et le contrôle de la réplication virale et iii) qu’un seuil d’AcNs de 4 log10 permettait de stratifier le risque de réplication BKV. Ce travail ouvre la voie à un suivi personnalisé en fonction du risque de réplication BKV et à de nouvelles approches immunothérapeutiques.BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy is one of the major causes of graft dysfunction and loss in kidney transplant recipients. Since no BKV-specific antiviral therapies are available, management relies on preemptive immunosuppression reduction based on viral load monitoring. However, this strategy does not fully eliminate the risk of nephropathy and can increase the risk of graft rejection. In this work, we evaluated viral load measurement by quantitative real-time PCR in an interlaboratory comparison. Variability factors such as BKV polymorphism or pre-PCR steps have been highlighted and the method used for monitoring our cohort has been validated. The role of anti-BKV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) as a predictive marker of BKV replication has been investigated in a cohort of 168 kidney transplant recipients. We showed that i) viral infection is caused by the donor strain; ii) NAbs play an essential role in viral replication prevention and control and iii) a NAbs cutoff of 4 log10 allows to stratify BKV replication risk. This work paves the way for personalized monitoring according to BKV replication risk and for new preventive or therapeutic strategies

In Vitro and In Vivo Models for the Study of Human Polyomavirus Infection

Developments of genome amplification techniques have rapidly expanded the family of human polyomaviruses (PyV). Following infection early in life, PyV persist in their hosts and are generally of no clinical consequence. High-level replication of PyV can occur in patients under immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy and causes severe clinical entities, such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy or Merkel cell carcinoma. The characterization of known and newly-discovered human PyV, their relationship to human health, and the mechanisms underlying pathogenesis remain to be elucidated. Here, we summarize the most widely-used in vitro and in vivo models to study the PyV-host interaction, pathogenesis and anti-viral drug screening. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the different models and the lessons learned

Towards a pharmacochemical hypothesis of the prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 by psychoactive substances

SJR 2019 Q3An increasing body of evidence suggests a protective effect of some psychoactive substances against SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus type 2). Recent findings suggest that patients with psychiatric disorders are less affected by SARS-CoV-2 than their caregivers, which may seem surprising given some of the frequent risk factors for an unfavorable course of the disease (e.g., obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases). We propose here a mixed pharmacoepidemiological and pharmacochemical hypothesis to explain these findings. A number of psychotropic drugs exhibit activities against coronaviruses (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1) and the Infectious Bronchitis Virus (IBV)) and have been put forward as potentially anti-SARS-CoV-2. These treatments include numerous mee-too drugs (chemically and pharmacologically linked to those which have demonstrated anti-SARS-CoV-2 efficacy) which are frequently prescribed in psychiatric settings. Taken alone or in polypharmacy, these drugs could have a prophylactic anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect, explaining the unexpectedly low proportion of patients with psychiatric disorders and COVID-19. Associated factors such as nicotine can also be considered in the context of a broad chemoprophylactic hypothesis in patients with psychiatric disorders taking different psychoactive substances

Acute‐onset delirium in intensive care COVID patients: association of imperfect brain repair with foodborne micro‐pollutants

International audienc