Assessment of chronic postsurgical pain after knee replacement : a systematic review

Objective: Approximately 20% of patients experience chronic pain after total knee replacement (TKR), yet there is no consensus about how best to assess such pain. This systematic review aimed to identify measures used to characterise chronic pain after TKR. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were searched for research articles published in all languages from January 2002- November 2011. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they assessed knee pain at a minimum of 3-months after TKR, yielding a total of 1,164 articles. Data extracted included study design, country, timings of assessments, and outcome measures containing pain items. Outcome measures were compared with domains recommended by IMMPACT for inclusion in assessment of chronic pain related outcomes within clinical trials. Temporal trends were also explored. Results: The review found use of a wide variety of composite and single-item measures, with the American Knee Society Score most common. Many measures used in published studies do not capture the multi-dimensional nature of pain recommended by IMMPACT; of those commonly used, the WOMAC and Oxford Knee Score are most comprehensive. Geographical trends were evident, with nation-specific preferences for particular measures. A recent reduction in use of some clinically-administered tools was accompanied by increased use of patient-reported outcome measures. Conclusion: There was wide variation in methods of pain assessment alongside nation-specific preferences and changing temporal trends in pain assessment after TKR. Standardisation and improvements in assessment is needed to enhance the quality of research and facilitate the establishment of a core outcome set

Men, rheumatoid arthritis, psychosocial impact and self-management: A narrative review.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease affecting fewer men than women. We systematically reviewed the literature on impact and self-management of RA men. Twenty eight papers were included, and grouped into two categories: Psychosocial impact of RA; and Coping and self-management. This review finds gender differences relating to quality of life; work; distress; self-management; coping; and support. We conclude there is a dearth of literature focussing on RA men only, and mixed gender studies include insufficient men to draw strong conclusions about men. Thus, further research is needed to understand the support needs of men with RA in depth

The unconstrained evolution of fast and efficient antibiotic-resistant bacterial genomes

PublishedThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Nature Publishing Group via the DOI in this record.-The rrn knockout strains derived from E. coli MG1655 were gifted by T. Bollenbach, strain AG100 was provided by S. Levy and Candida strains were a gift from S. Bates, who are sincerely thanked for their help

Bivariate stochastic modeling of functional response with natural mortality

A correction due to Abbott (1925) is the standard method of dealing with control mortality in insect bioassay to estimate the mortality of an insect conditional on control mortality not having occurred. In this article a bivariate stochastic process for overall mortality is developed in which natural mortality and predation are jointly modeled to take account of the competing-risks associated with prey loss. The total mortality estimate from this model is essentially identical with that from more classical modeling. However, when predation loss is estimated in the absence of control mortality the results are somewhat different, with the estimate from the bivariate model being lower than that from using Abbott’s formula in conjunction with the classical model. It is argued that overdispersion in observed mortality data corresponds to correlated outcomes (death or survival) for the prey initially present, while Abbott’s correction relies implicitly on independence

Utilizing qualitative data from nominal groups: Exploring the influences on treatment outcome prioritization with rheumatoid arthritis patients

The nominal group technique generates quantitative data through a process of experts ranking items of interest. This article focuses on the additional collection of qualitative data from nominal groups with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, used to explore the influences on prioritizing treatment outcomes. Across all groups, the top five outcomes with the highest importance scores were identified as: pain; joint damage; fatigue; activities of daily living; and mobility. Qualitative findings showed that the personal impact of RA influenced decisions on how to rank specific outcomes through four domains: disease impact; adaptation to illness; external resources and stressors; and social expectations. © The Author(s) 2011

The Peaceful Atom Comes to Campus

Youthful idealism, institutional ambition, and Cold War sensibilities all helped shape the Michigan Memorial–Phoenix Project, the University of Michigan’s tribute to fallen World War II soldiers.</jats:p

Hemolytic activity of adenylate cyclase toxin fromBordetella pertussis

AbstractAdenylate cyclase (AC) toxin fromB. pertussis enters eukaryotic cells where it produces supraphysiologie levels of cAMP. Purification of AC toxin activity [(1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19279] results in increasing potency of hemolytic activity and electroelution of the 216-kDA holotoxin yields a single protein with AC enzymatic, toxin and hemolytic activities. AC toxin andE. coli hemolysin, which have DNA sequence homology [(1988) EMBO J. 7, 3997] are immunologically cross-reactive. The time courses of hemolysis elicited by the two molecules are strikingly different, however, with AC toxin eliciting cAMP accumulation with rapid onset, but hemolysis with a lag of ≥ 45 min. Finally, osmotic protection experiments indicate that the size of the putative pore produced by AC toxin is 3 5-fold smaller than that ofE. coli hemolysin

Item Development and Face Validity of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Priorities in Pharmacological Interventions Outcome Measures

© 2015, Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Background: The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is dominated by core sets and indices that have been developed by RA professionals. Previous research developed a set of eight priority treatment outcomes generated by patients to complement the professionally developed core sets for RA. Objective: This study aimed to facilitate quantitative measurement of these outcomes. Methods: Two consultation meetings with patient research partners diagnosed with RA (n=18) were held to identify face validity in existing instruments (Phase 1) at the Bristol Royal Infirmary. Where validated measures did not exist, new numerical rating scales (NRS) were constructed and discussed at two focus groups with patients diagnosed with RA (n=8) at the Bristol Royal Infirmary and the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (Phase 2). Feedback on the stem question, time frame, anchors and layout was recorded and transcribed verbatim. Results: Of the eight priorities, existing NRS for pain, activities of daily living and fatigue were voted as acceptable (Phase 1), but new NRS were required for five priorities. The partners strongly recommended that the three separate domains of severity, effect and ability to cope in each measurement area be assessed, as in the existing validated fatigue NRS. Focus group participants (Phase 2) made significant contributions to the phrasing of questions, for example how to ensure ‘mobility’ could be uniformly understood and how changes in valued activities be judged appropriately. Conclusion: Through extensive patient feedback, 24 NRS were constructed based on priorities identified by patients and encompassing domains where existing questionnaires contain many more items and do not address three important concepts endorsed by patients: severity, effect and coping. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Priorities in Pharmacological Interventions patient-reported outcome measures are now ready for the evaluation of comprehension, construct validity and sensitivity through an observational study