Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Macroecologia, biogeografia e áreas prioritárias para conservação no cerrado

MACROECOLOGIA, BIOGEOGRAFIA Y ÁREAS PRIORITÁRIAS PARA CONSERVACIÓN EN EL CERRADO. Actualmente hay consenso entre los científicos sobre la existencia de una "crisis de la biodiversidad", producto de la constante e intensa pérdida de hábitat natural causada por la expansión de la ocupación humana. Debido a que la Biología de la Conservación ha sido muchas veces reconocida como una ciencia de crisis, ésta debe proporcionar información capaz de mediar, de la forma más científica posible, la toma de decisiones necesarias. Dentro de éstas, una de las más importantes es indicar regiones prioritarias para la conservación, ya que por motivos obvios, no es posible preservar todos los ecosistemas por completo. En este contexto, recientemente se sugirió que la aplicación de principios, teorías y análisis provenientes de la biogeografía y de la macroecología serían importantes en la Biología de la Conservación, formalizando un abordaje que también ha sido denominado "Biogeografía de la Conservación". De este modo, el objetivo de este artículo es discutir y revisar dichos componentes de la Biogeografía de la conservación, utilizando un abordaje macroecológico, para desarrollar y aplicar métodos de planeamiento sistemático en conservación, utilizando el bioma Cerrado como modelo de estudio. Inicialmente se discutieron los patrones de riqueza y diversidad beta, y posteriormente cómo estos patrones pueden ser correlacionados con la ocupación humana del Bioma. Dicha relación es fundamental para subsidiar la aplicación de modelos de planeamiento sistemático de conservación a escala regional (análisis de insostenibilidad, complementariedad y de lagunas). También es preciso considerar que existen serias fallas en el conocimiento sobre los patrones de biodiversidad en la región y que la elección de grupos indicadores puede ser importante para minimizar problemas generados por la falta de conocimiento. De este modo, este abordaje es interesante en un escenario de grandes incertidumbres (ausencia de datos detallados) y de la rápida transformación del paisaje, posibilitando la optimización de estudios a gran escala para luego transferir los resultados a escalas espaciales locales y realmente relevantes para la conservación. Posteriormente, en estas regiones, pueden ser realizados estudios más detallados, a fin de evaluar patrones de viabilidad poblacional, fragmentación de hábitat y regiones potenciales de mantenimiento de diversidad genética.MACROECOLOGY, BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PRIORITARY AREAS FOR CONSERVATION IN THE BRAZILIAN CERRADO. Worldwide scientists claim there is an ongoing crisis in biodiversity associated with increased human occupation. The field of conservation biology, is known as a crisis science / field, as it basically aims at obtaining useful information for better dealing with the ongoing crisis, thus supporting the decisions made by scientists to reduce biodiversity losses. Among these actions, of paramount importance is the suggestion of priority regions for conservation, given that conservation of entire ecosystems or biomes is impracticable. In this context, it has been suggested that the application of biogeography and macroecology principles, theorems, and methods could be of great help to conservation biology, which formalizes a new approach named conservation biogeography. The present paper discusses the use of macroecology to build and implement systematic conservation programs using the Cerrado of Central Brazil as model system. We start by discussing species richness and beta diversity, and how human occupation of Cerrado relates with it. This is important because the nature of this relationship is incorporated into regional systematic conservation plans, also including species complementarity, irrepleceability and gap analyses. It is also important taking into consideration that obtained results can be biased by poor knowledge of local biodiversity; For example "Wallacean and Linnean shortfalls" may allow choosing a best set of indicator groups for analyses. Thus, conservation biogeography is a useful approach when there are broad uncertainties associated with poor data quality in greatly threatened regions, allowing for a first glance at the region, which might suggest areas deserving greater attention for detailed studies to evaluate population viability, habitat fragmentation, genetic diversity, and any other aspects needed for effective implementation of conservation actions.Há consenso entre os cientistas de que a há atualmente uma "crise da biodiversidade", resultado da constante e intensa perda de habitat natural causada pela expansão da ocupação. Como a biologia da conservação tem sido muitas vezes reconhecida como uma ciência da crise, ela deve fornecer informações capazes de mediar, de forma mais científica possível, as tomadas de decisão que são necessárias. Dentre estas, uma das mais importantes é indicar regiões prioritárias para a conservação, já que por motivos óbvios não é possível preservar todos os ecossistemas por inteiro. Nesse contexto, recentemente sugeriu-se que a aplicação de princípios, teorias e análises provenientes da biogeografia e da macroecologia seriam importantes na Biologia da Conservação, formalizando uma abordagem que tem sido denominada "Biogeografia da Conservação". Assim, o objetivo deste artigo é discutir e revisar esses componentes da biogeografia da conservação, utilizando uma abordagem macroecológica para desenvolver e aplicar métodos de planejamento sistemático em conservação, utilizando o bioma Cerrado como um modelo de estudo. Foram discutidos inicialmente os padrões de riqueza e diversidade beta e, em um segundo momento, como esses padrões podem ser correlacionados à ocupação humana do Bioma. Essa relação é fundamental para subsidiar a aplicação de modelos de planejamento sistemático de conservação em escala regional (análises de insubstituibilidade, complementaridade e de lacunas). É preciso considerar também que há sérias falhas de conhecimento sobre os padrões de biodiversidade na região e que a escolha de grupos indicadores pode ser importante para minimizar problemas gerados pela falta de conhecimento. Assim, essa abordagem é interessante em um cenário de grandes incertezas (ausência de dados detalhados) e de rápida transformação da paisagem, possibilitando a otimização de estudos em grandes escalas e depois transferir os resultados para escalas espaciais mais locais e realmente relevantes para a conservação. Nessas regiões, podem ser realizados, em um segundo momento, estudos mais detalhados a fim de avaliar padrões de viabilidade populacional, fragmentação de habitat e regiões potenciais de manutenção da diversidade genética

AMAZONIA CAMTRAP: A data set of mammal, bird, and reptile species recorded with camera traps in the Amazon forest

The Amazon forest has the highest biodiversity on Earth. However, information on Amazonian vertebrate diversity is still deficient and scattered across the published, peer-reviewed, and gray literature and in unpublished raw data. Camera traps are an effective non-invasive method of surveying vertebrates, applicable to different scales of time and space. In this study, we organized and standardized camera trap records from different Amazon regions to compile the most extensive data set of inventories of mammal, bird, and reptile species ever assembled for the area. The complete data set comprises 154,123 records of 317 species (185 birds, 119 mammals, and 13 reptiles) gathered from surveys from the Amazonian portion of eight countries (Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Peru, Suriname, and Venezuela). The most frequently recorded species per taxa were: mammals: Cuniculus paca (11,907 records); birds: Pauxi tuberosa (3713 records); and reptiles: Tupinambis teguixin (716 records). The information detailed in this data paper opens up opportunities for new ecological studies at different spatial and temporal scales, allowing for a more accurate evaluation of the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, climate change, and other human-mediated defaunation processes in one of the most important and threatened tropical environments in the world. The data set is not copyright restricted; please cite this data paper when using its data in publications and we also request that researchers and educators inform us of how they are using these data

NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES: a data set on carnivore distribution in the Neotropics

Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non-detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peer-reviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non-detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio-temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other large-scale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data

Neotropical freshwater fisheries : A dataset of occurrence and abundance of freshwater fishes in the Neotropics

The Neotropical region hosts 4225 freshwater fish species, ranking first among the world's most diverse regions for freshwater fishes. Our NEOTROPICAL FRESHWATER FISHES data set is the first to produce a large-scale Neotropical freshwater fish inventory, covering the entire Neotropical region from Mexico and the Caribbean in the north to the southern limits in Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, and Uruguay. We compiled 185,787 distribution records, with unique georeferenced coordinates, for the 4225 species, represented by occurrence and abundance data. The number of species for the most numerous orders are as follows: Characiformes (1289), Siluriformes (1384), Cichliformes (354), Cyprinodontiformes (245), and Gymnotiformes (135). The most recorded species was the characid Astyanax fasciatus (4696 records). We registered 116,802 distribution records for native species, compared to 1802 distribution records for nonnative species. The main aim of the NEOTROPICAL FRESHWATER FISHES data set was to make these occurrence and abundance data accessible for international researchers to develop ecological and macroecological studies, from local to regional scales, with focal fish species, families, or orders. We anticipate that the NEOTROPICAL FRESHWATER FISHES data set will be valuable for studies on a wide range of ecological processes, such as trophic cascades, fishery pressure, the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation, and the impacts of species invasion and climate change. There are no copyright restrictions on the data, and please cite this data paper when using the data in publications