19 research outputs found
Ethnopharmacology in Treatment of Cancers from Yala Province
āļāļāļāļąāļāļĒāđāļ āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļĩāđāļĄāļĩāļ§āļąāļāļāļļāļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļāļāđāđāļāļ·āđāļāļŠāļģāļĢāļ§āļāļ āļđāļĄāļīāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļāļ·āļāļŠāļĄāļļāļāđāļāļĢāļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāđāļĢāļāļĄāļ°āđāļĢāđāļ āļāļēāļāļŦāļĄāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļąāļāļŦāļ§āļąāļāļĒāļ°āļĨāļē āļāļģāļāļ§āļ 10 āļāļ āļāļģāđāļāļīāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđāļēāļāđāļāļ·āļāļāļĄāļāļĢāļēāļāļĄāļāļķāļāđāļāļ·āļāļāļāļąāļāļ§āļēāļāļĄ 2561 āđāļāļĒāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļąāļĄāļ āļēāļĐāļāđāđāļāļāļāļķāđāļāđāļāļĢāļāļŠāļĢāđāļēāļ āđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļŦāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļķāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļāļāđāļĢāļāļĄāļ°āđāļĢāđāļ āļŠāļēāđāļŦāļāļļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļīāļāđāļĢāļ āļāļāļīāļāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļāļāļāļ·āļāļŠāļĄāļļāļāđāļāļĢāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļāļĐāļē āļ§āļīāļāļĩāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļĢāļĩāļĒāļĄ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļĒāļēāļāļēāļĄāļāļāļāđāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļēāļ āļāļēāļāļāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļŦāļĄāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļēāļāļŠāđāļ§āļāđāļŦāļāđāđāļāļ·āđāļāļ§āđāļēāļĄāļ°āđāļĢāđāļāđāļāļīāļāļāļēāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđāļŠāļĄāļāļļāļĨāļāļāļāļāļēāļāļļāļāļąāđāļāļŠāļĩāđ āļŠāđāļāļāļĨāđāļŦāđāđāļāļīāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļīāļāļāļāļāļīāļāđāļāļĢāđāļēāļāļāļēāļĒ āđāļāļĒāđāļŠāļāļāđāļŦāđāđāļŦāđāļāđāļāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļāļ°āļāđāļāļāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāļīāļāļāļāļāļī āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļāļ°āļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļāļāļāđāļĢāļ āļāļ·āļ āļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāđāļŠāļ āļĢāļ°āļāļāđāļĨāļ·āļāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāđāļģāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāļāđāļŠāļĩāļĒ āļŠāđāļ§āļāļŠāļĄāļļāļāđāļāļĢāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāđāļĢāļāļĄāļ°āđāļĢāđāļ āļāļāļāļģāļāļ§āļ 37 āļāļāļīāļ āļāļąāļāļāļĒāļđāđāđāļ 24 āļ§āļāļĻāđ āļ§āļāļĻāđāļāļ·āļāļāļĩāđāļāļīāļĒāļĄāđāļāđāļĄāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļļāļ āļāļ·āļ Zingiberaceae āļ§āļīāļāļĩāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļĢāļĩāļĒāļĄāļĒāļēāļāļĩāđāļāļīāļĒāļĄāļĄāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļļāļ āļāļ·āļ āļāļēāļĢāļāđāļĄāļāđāļ§āļĒāļāđāļģāđāļĨāđāļ§āļāļ·āđāļĄ āļāļąāđāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļĄāļļāļāđāļāļĢāļāļĩāđāļāļīāļĒāļĄāļāļģāļĄāļēāđāļāđāđāļāļāļģāļĢāļąāļāļĒāļēāļĄāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļļāļ āđāļāđāđāļāđ āļāļĄāļīāđāļāļāļąāļ (28.57%) āđāļĨāļ°āļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļāđāļ (28.57%) āļāļķāđāļāļŠāļĄāļļāļāđāļāļĢāļāļąāđāļāļŠāļāļāļāļāļīāļāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļāļāļ·āļāļāļĩāđāļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļĒāļāļēāļāđāļāļĩāđāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāđāļāļāļīāļĐāļāđāļāđāļāļĨāļĨāđāļĄāļ°āđāļĢāđāļ āļāļąāļāļāļąāđāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļŦāļĨāđāļēāļāļĩāđāļāļ°āđāļāđāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļāļ·āđāļāļāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ§āļīāļāļąāļĒāļĒāļēāļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāđāļĢāļāļĄāļ°āđāļĢāđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāļēāļāļĒāļēāļŠāļĄāļļāļāđāļāļĢāļāđāļāđāļÂ ABSTRACT Â This study aimed to survey local knowledge in using medicinal plants for treating cancer disease according to the ten folk healers in Yala province. The study was carried out during January-December 2018. Information was obtained by semi-structured interviews with 10 key informants to gather the data of definition of cancer, causes of disease, species of plant, plant part used, preparation and use method according to folk wisdom. From the study, most folk healers believed that cancer caused by imbalance of four basic elements resulting in abnormalities in the body by demonstrating tumors. The characteristics of cancer were inflammation (kan aksep) and hematologic and lymphatic disorders. Thirty-seven herbal species belonging to 24 families were used to treat cancer. The most used plant family was Zingiberaceae (5 species). Decoction was preferred method of drug preparation. Drinking was preferred method of drug application. The most popular medicinal plants for cancer disease were Curcuma longa (28.57%) and Tinospora crispa (28.57%); which they had already been tested for their cytotoxic activities. The information gained would be the importance basis for further drug development in cancer treatment
A SURVEY OF MEDICINAL PLANTS AROUND UPPER SONGKHLA LAKE, THAILAND
The aim of this study was to explore medicinal plants from upper Songkhla lake, Songkhla and Phatthalung provinces. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven key informants to get information regarding to the local names, parts and utilization, method of preparation, route of administration and properties of plants. Voucher specimens were prepared, identified and deposited. In total, 95 species belonging to 82 genera in 46 families were found. Among them 26 groups of ailments could be classified, and most of herbal plants were used for antipyretic (24.30%). However, only 39 medicinal plants were related to biological activities previously reported. Therefore, it is interesting to focus on these activities of remaining plants to confirm folk utilization of local healers. This compilation of medicinal plants will promote their practical use and be the data evidence for further conservation of the plants
āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļĢāļ§āļāļāļ·āļāļŠāļĄāļļāļāđāļāļĢāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļāļģāļĢāļļāļāļāļģāļĨāļąāļ āļāļēāļāļāļļāļāļĒāļēāļāđāļŦāđāļāļāļēāļāļīāđāļāļēāļāļāļĄāđāļāļāļāļē āļāļąāļāļŦāļ§āļąāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļĩāđ A Survey of Medicinal Plants for Restoratives from Khao Phanom Bencha National Park, Krabi Province
AbstractObjective: To survey medicinal plants for restoratives from Khao PhanomBencha National Park, Krabi province. Methods: Representative routes forstudying were selected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 2herbalists to collect the information of herbal species, plant parts used, usemethods and properties. Voucher specimens and plant identification wereperformed. It was carried out during Jun. 2012 â Feb. 2013. Results: Atotal of 65 species were found to use for restoratives. They were belongingto 39 families and 53 genera. The most frequently used families wereRubiaceae (9 species), Euphorbiaceae (7 species) and Annonaceae (3species). The plant habit was primarily found as shrub. When used asrestoratives, the underground part decoction was predominantly performed.All medicinal plants could be categorized into 6 groups according to theirproperties, i.e., restoratives, element tonic, erectile dysfunction relief,ligament and synovial fluid tonic, muscle pain relief, and panacea. Amongthem, most plants were used as restoratives. In addition, 10 folk remediesused for restorative were collected. Conclusion: The findings could beuseful for further study that related to herbal remedies for restoratives. Thisbasic information also supports the eco-tourism and sustainabledevelopment of Khao Phanom Bencha National Park in Krabi province.Keywords: medicinal plants, restoratives, Khao Phanom Bencha NationalPark, Krabi provinc
Comparison of active constituents, antioxidant capacity, and Îą-glucosidase inhibition in Pluchea indica leaf extracts at different maturity stages
Optimization of extraction method and HPLC analysis of six caffeoylquinic acids in Pluchea indica leaves from different provenances in Thailand
Gnetum gnemon L.Gnetaceae
Cambodia: khalet, voe, (general), klot (Phnom Kulen). Indonesia: belinjo, melinjo (general), gnemo, rukiti (Molluccas), kaâcuang (Dayak Kanayatn), koânyah (Enggano ethnic in Sumatra), lewehuka, mlinjo, morahuka (Wonani Island), tangkil (Betawi, Javanese, Sundanese). Malaysia: amaninjau (general), dodah (Bidayuh), sabong (Bintulu), belinjau, garintul, meninjau, melindju, malinju, sabe, sangkok, tankil (Peninsular), sabong (Iban). Philippines: bago (general), bago, magatungal (Lanao, Cotabato), bago, bagu (Bataan, Tayabas, Camarines), banago (Visaya, Bohol), kunan (Davao), nabo (Bicol). Papua New Guinea: ambian, ambiamtupe (Maring), doro (Valaila), genda (Buna), suffitz (Yalu), tu-a (Suku). Singapura: melindjo. Thailand: puk miang (general), pee sae, phak miang (Thai), liang, miang phak kaniang, pak kaliang, peedae, phak (Southern Thailand). Vietnam: bet, gam cay, rau danh. English: Spanish koint fir (Asyira et al. 2016; Cadiz and Florido 2001; Chuakul et al. 2004; Manangka et al. 2017; Markgraf 1948; Neamsuvan et al. 2013; Rahayu et al. 2019; Royyani et al. 2018; Sunarti and Rugayah 2013; Ting et al. 2017; Walker 2016)