468 research outputs found
Is Information Meaningful Data?
There is no consensus yet on the definition of semantic information. This paper contributes to the current debate by criticising and revising the Standard Definition of semantic Information (SDI) as meaningful data, in favour of the Dretske-Grice approach: meaningful and well-formed data constitute semantic information only if they also qualify as contingently truthful. After a brief introduction, SDI is criticised for providing necessary but insufficient conditions for the definition of semantic information. SDI is incorrect because truth-values do not supervene on semantic information, and misinformation (that is, false semantic information) is not a type of semantic information, but pseudo-information, that is not semantic information at all. This is shown by arguing that none of the reasons for interpreting misinformation as a type of semantic information is convincing, whilst there are compelling reasons to treat it as pseudo-information. As a consequence, SDI is revised to include a necessary truth-condition. The last section summarises the main results of the paper and indicates some interesting areas of application of the revised definition
Perception and Testimony as Data Providers
Assuming that the sceptical challenge might be either bypassed or answered, this still leaves unspecified how high-quality information about the external world is acquired. In this paper, I will argue that, if knowledge is accounted information, then when we apply this definition to the analysis of perceptual knowledge and knowledge by testimony (the only two sources of information about the external world), the result is that both qualify as data providers.Peer reviewe
Consciousness, Agents and the Knowledge Game
This paper has three goals. The first is to introduce the “knowledge game”, a new, simple and yet powerful tool for analysing some intriguing philosophical questions. The second is to apply the knowledge game as an informative test to discriminate between conscious (human) and conscious-less agents (zombies and robots), depending on which version of the game they can win. And the third is to use a version of the knowledge game to provide an answer to Dretske’s question “how do you know you are not a zombie?”
Machine Unlearning: its nature, scope, and importance for a "delete culture"
The article explores the cultural shift from recording to deleting
information in the digital age and its implications on privacy, intellectual
property (IP), and Large Language Models like ChatGPT. It begins by defining a
delete culture where information, in principle legal, is made unavailable or
inaccessible because unacceptable or undesirable, especially but not only due
to its potential to infringe on privacy or IP. Then it focuses on two
strategies in this context: deleting, to make information unavailable; and
blocking, to make it inaccessible. The article argues that both strategies have
significant implications, particularly for machine learning (ML) models where
information is not easily made unavailable. However, the emerging research area
of Machine Unlearning (MU) is highlighted as a potential solution. MU, still in
its infancy, seeks to remove specific data points from ML models, effectively
making them 'forget' completely specific information. If successful, MU could
provide a feasible means to manage the overabundance of information and ensure
a better protection of privacy and IP. However, potential ethical risks, such
as misuse, overuse, and underuse of MU, should be systematically studied to
devise appropriate policies
Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics
To create fair and accountable AI and robotics, we need precise regulation and better methods to certify, explain, and audit inscrutable systems
Recommender systems and their ethical challenges
This article presents the first, systematic analysis of the ethical challenges posed by recommender systems through a literature review. The article identifies six areas of concern, and maps them onto a proposed taxonomy of different kinds of ethical impact. The analysis uncovers a gap in the literature: currently user-centred approaches do not consider the interests of a variety of other stakeholders—as opposed to just the receivers of a recommendation—in assessing the ethical impacts of a recommender system
- …