Prevalencia de infección latente de la tuberculosis y factores de riesgo entre profesionales de salud en la atención primaria en Brasil

Os profissionais de saúde apresentam risco aumentado de infecção latente da tuberculose (ILTB) em função da exposição ocupacional ao Mycobacterium tuberculosis. O estudo teve como objetivo estimar a prevalência da ILTB e fatores de risco entre profissionais de saúde na atenção primária em cinco cidades brasileiras. Realizamos um estudo transversal entre 2011 e 2013 entre profissionais de saúde na atenção primária, usando um questionário estruturado, e avaliamos a ILTB com o teste Quantiferon-TB Gold In-Tube. A magnitude das associações foi avaliada com o uso de modelos de regressão logística hierárquica. Entre 708 profissionais de saúde, a prevalência de ILTB era 27% (n = 196; IC95%: 24%-31%). Os seguintes fatores mostraram associação positiva com ILTB entre profissionais de saúde na atenção primária: idade > 50 anos (OR = 2,94; IC95%: 1,44-5,99), ausência de cicatriz de BCG (OR = 2,10; IC95%: 1,28-3,43), ex-tabagista (OR = 1,80; IC95%: 1,04-3,11), profissão enfermeiro (OR = 2,97; IC95%: 1,13-7,83), profissão técnico de enfermagem (OR = 3,10; IC95%: 1,26-7,60), profissão agente comunitário de saúde (OR = 2,60; IC95%: 1,06-6,40) e uso irregular de máscaras N95 (OR = 2,51; IC95%: 1,11-5,98). Enquanto isso, os profissionais de saúde que não trabalham em serviços de saúde que dispõem de programa de controle da TB tem menor probabilidade de apresentar ILTB (OR = 0,66; IC95%: 0,45-0,97). O estudo demonstrou risco ocupacional substancial de ILTB entre profissionais de saúde na atenção primária no Brasil. O programa brasileiro de controle da tuberculose, assim como os programas locais, devem focar esses profissionais de saúde, de risco elevado, através de atividades educativas, assim como, equipamento de proteção individual melhor para prevenir a aquisição de novos casos de infecção pela tuberculose.Health care workers (HCW) are at increased risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) from occupational exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The objective was to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for LTBI among primary HCW in five Brazilian cities. We conducted a cross-sectional study, from 2011 to 2013, among primary HCW, using a structured questionnaire and an evaluated for LTBI using the Quantiferon-TB Gold in-tube test. The magnitude of the associations was assessed using hierarchical logistic regression models. Among 708 HCW, the LTBI prevalence was 27% (n = 196; 95%CI: 24%-31%). We found that the following factors were positively associated with LTBI in primary HCW: age > 50 years (OR = 2.94; 95%CI: 1.44-5.99), absence of a BCG scar (OR = 2.10; 95%CI: 1.28-3.43), self-reported ex-smoker status (OR = 1.80; 95%CI: 1.04-3.11), being a nurse (OR = 2.97; 95%CI: 1.13-7.83), being a nurse technician (OR = 3.10; 95%CI: 1.26-7.60), being a community health agent (OR = 2.60; 95%CI: 1.06-6.40), and irregular use of N95 masks (OR = 2.51; 95%CI: 1.11-5.98). In contrast, HCWs who do not work in health care facilities with a TB control program were less likely to have LTBI (OR = 0.66; 95%CI: 0.45-0.97). This study demonstrated a substantial occupational risk of LTBI among primary HCW in Brazil. The Brazilian TB control program, as well as local programs, need to target these high-risk HCW with education, as well as with better personal protective equipment to prevent acquisition of new TB infection.Los profesionales de salud presentan un riesgo aumentado de infección latente de la tuberculosis (ILTB), en función de la exposición ocupacional al Mycobacterium tuberculosis. El objetivo del estudio fue estimar la prevalencia de la ILTB y sus factores de riesgo entre profesionales de salud en la atención primaria en cinco ciudades brasileñas. Realizamos un estudio transversal entre 2011 y 2013 entre profesionales de salud en la atención primaria, usando un cuestionario estructurado, y evaluamos la ILTB con el test Quantiferon-TB Gold In-Tube. La magnitud de las asociaciones fue evaluada con el uso de modelos de regresión logística jerárquica. Entre 708 profesionales de salud, la prevalencia de ILTB era 27% (n = 196; IC95%: 24%-31%). Los siguientes factores mostraron una asociación positiva con ILTB entre profesionales de salud en la atención primaria: edad > 50 años (OR = 2,94; IC95%: 1,44-5,99), ausencia de cicatriz de BCG (OR = 2,10; IC95%: 1,28-3,43), ex-fumador (OR = 1,80; IC95%: 1,04-3,11), profesión enfermero (OR = 2,97; IC95%: 1,13-7,83), profesión técnico de enfermería (OR = 3,10; IC95%: 1,26-7,60), profesión agente comunitario de salud (OR = 2,60; IC95%: 1,06-6,40) y uso irregular de máscaras N95 (OR = 2,51; IC95%: 1,11-5,98). Por otra parte, los profesionales de salud que no trabajan en servicios de salud que disponen de programa de control de la TB tienen una menor probabilidad de presentar ILTB (OR = 0,66; IC95%: 0,45-0,97). El estudio demostró riesgo ocupacional substancial de ILTB entre profesionales de salud en la atención primaria en Brasil. El programa brasileño de control de la tuberculosis, así como los programas locales, deben centrarse en esos profesionales de salud, de riesgo elevado, a través de actividades educativas, así como un mejor equipamiento de protección individual para prevenir el surgimiento de nuevos casos de infección por tuberculosis

Tuberculosis infection among primary health care workers

ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the prevalence of and determine the risk factors associated with latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among primary health care workers in the city of Vitória, Brazil. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with data collected through a survey regarding socio-demographic, occupational, clinical, and exposure characteristics, as well as knowledge about tuberculosis, conducted between 2011 and 2012. All participants underwent a tuberculin skin test (TST), and TSTs were read at 72 h by a trained professional. Results: A total of 218 primary health care workers participated in the study. The prevalence of TST positivity at the ≥ 10-mm and ≥ 5-mm cut-off points was, respectively, 39.4% (95% CI: 32.9-45.9) and 54.1% (95% CI: 47.4-60.7). Regarding occupational categories, community health agents had the highest proportion of TST positivity, regardless of the cut-off point (≥ 10 mm: 47.5%; and ≥ 5 mm: 60.5%). Regarding factors associated with TST results, “having had a previous TST” showed a statistically significant association with TST positivity at the ≥ 10-mm and ≥ 5-mm cut-off points (OR = 2.5 [95% CI: 1.17-5.30] and OR = 2.18 [95% CI: 1.23-3.87], respectively). Conclusions: The prevalence of LTBI was found to be high among the primary health care workers in this sample. Therefore, we recommend the establishment of a periodic screening program for LTBI and implementation of effective biosafety policies for the prevention of this infection among primary health care workers

Prevalence and risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection among primary health care workers in Brazil

Health care workers (HCW) are at increased risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) from occupational exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The objective was to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for LTBI among primary HCW in five Brazilian cities. We conducted a cross-sectional study, from 2011 to 2013, among primary HCW, using a structured questionnaire and an evaluated for LTBI using the Quantiferon-TB Gold in-tube test. The magnitude of the associations was assessed using hierarchical logistic regression models. Among 708 HCW, the LTBI prevalence was 27% (n = 196; 95%CI: 24%-31%). We found that the following factors were positively associated with LTBI in primary HCW: age > 50 years (OR = 2.94; 95%CI: 1.44-5.99), absence of a BCG scar (OR = 2.10; 95%CI: 1.28-3.43), self-reported ex-smoker status (OR = 1.80; 95%CI: 1.04-3.11), being a nurse (OR = 2.97; 95%CI: 1.13-7.83), being a nurse technician (OR = 3.10; 95%CI: 1.26-7.60), being a community health agent (OR = 2.60; 95%CI: 1.06-6.40), and irregular use of N95 masks (OR = 2.51; 95%CI: 1.11-5.98). In contrast, HCWs who do not work in health care facilities with a TB control program were less likely to have LTBI (OR = 0.66; 95%CI: 0.45-0.97). This study demonstrated a substantial occupational risk of LTBI among primary HCW in Brazil. The Brazilian TB control program, as well as local programs, need to target these high-risk HCW with education, as well as with better personal protective equipment to prevent acquisition of new TB infection

Effect of the Bolsa Familia Programme on the outcome of tuberculosis treatment: a prospective cohort study

International audienceBACKGROUND: Social protection interventions might improve tuberculosis outcomes and could help to control the epidemic in Brazil. The aim of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of the Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP) on tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Brazil.METHODS: We prospectively recruited and followed up individuals (aged ≥18 years) who initiated tuberculosis treatment at 42 health-care centres across seven cities in Brazil, between March 1, 2014, and April 30, 2017. Patients were interviewed at health-care centres and information about individual characteristics, socioeconomic status, living conditions, lifestyle, and comorbidities was recorded. Patients were separated into two groups according to BFP beneficiary status: BFP (exposed) or non-BFP (not exposed). Treatment outcome (cure, dropout, death, or development of drug-resistant tuberculosis or treatment failure) was recorded after 6 months of therapy. Pearson's χ2 test and ANOVA were used to compare tuberculosis treatment outcomes between the two groups, and we estimated the propensity score of being a beneficiary of the BFP using a logit model. We used multinomial regression models to evaluate the effect of the BFP on tuberculosis treatment outcomes.FINDINGS: 1239 individuals were included in the study, of whom 196 (16%) were beneficiaries of the BFP and 1043 (84%) were not. After 6 months of treatment, 912 (87%) of 1043 patients in the non-BFP group and 173 (88%) of 196 patients in the BFP group were cured of tuberculosis, 103 (10%) patients in the non-BFP group and 17 (9%) patients in the BFP group had dropped out, and 25 (3%) patients in the non-BFP group and six (3%) patients in the BFP group had died. Three (<1%) of 1043 patients in the non-BFP group developed drug-resistant tuberculosis. Being a BFP beneficiary had a positive effect for cure (average effect 0·076 [95% CI 0·037 to 0·11]) and a negative effect for dropout (-0·070 [-0·105 to 0·036]) and death (-0·002 [-0·021 to 0·017]).INTERPRETATION: BFP alone had a direct effect on tuberculosis treatment outcome and could greatly contribute to the goals of the WHO End TB Strategy

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AimThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery.MethodsThis was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin.ResultsOverall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P ConclusionOne in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery