Quality of life of parents with children living at home: when one parent has cancer

Goals of work This study examined the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients diagnosed 1-5 years previously and their spouses, with children 4-18 years living at home. Relationships between parents' QoL and the children's functioning were explored. Patients and methods 166 cancer patients and their spouses provided information on their QoL (RAND-36) and on their children's functioning (Child Behavior Checklist). Main results Male and female patients scored similarly to a norm population on five domains. Patients' QoL was clinically relevantly and/or statistically lower on social functioning, role limitations because of physical problems, and vitality than the norm. Male spouses' QoL was comparable to the norm. However, female spouses reported better physical functioning but more social problems. QoL varied according to type of cancer, treatment intensity, and recurrence. Using the QoL composite scores, a significant relationship was found between patients' psychosocial and physical functioning and spouses' psychosocial functioning. Patients' psychosocial functioning correlated moderately strongly to weakly with their reports of their younger children's and adolescents' functioning; physical functioning correlated only weakly with adolescents' functioning. The patients' functioning related weakly to moderately strongly to adolescents' self-reports of functioning. Spouses' psychosocial functioning weakly related to their and adolescents' reports of adolescents' functioning. Conclusion Cancer patients' QoL 1-5 years after diagnosis was decreased in three of eight domains; their spouses seem to be doing well. Parents' physical and psychosocial functioning related weakly to moderately strongly to their children's functioning, depending on the child's age and information source. The patients' functioning related more strongly to the children's functioning than the spouses' did

Cancer-related fatigue and rehabilitation: a randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing physical training combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy with physical training only and with no intervention

Background. Research suggests that cancer rehabilitation reduces fatigue in survivors of cancer. To date, it is unclear what type of rehabilitation is most beneficial. Objective. This randomized controlled trial compared the effect on cancer-related fatigue of physical training combined with cognitive behavioral therapy with physical training alone and with no intervention. Design. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 147 survivors of cancer were randomly assigned to a group that received physical training combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy (PT + CBT group, n = 76) or to a group that received physical training alone (PT group, n = 71). In addition, a nonintervention control group (WLC group) consisting of 62 survivors of cancer who were on the waiting lists of rehabilitation centers elsewhere was included. Setting. The study was conducted at 4 rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands. Patients. All patients were survivors of cancer. Intervention. Physical training consisting of 2 hours of individual training and group sports took place twice weekly, and cognitive-behavioral therapy took place once weekly for 2 hours. Measurements. Fatigue was assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory before and immediately after intervention (12 weeks after enrollment). The WLC group completed questionnaires at the same time points. Results. Baseline fatigue did not differ significantly among the 3 groups. Over time, levels of fatigue significantly decreased in all domains in all groups, except in mental fatigue in the WLC group. Analyses of variance of postintervention fatigue showed statistically significant group effects on general fatigue, on physical and mental fatigue, and on reduced activation but not on reduced motivation. Compared with the WLC group, the PT group reported significantly greater decline in 4 domains of fatigue, whereas the PT + CBT group reported significantly greater decline in physical fatigue only. No significant differences in decline in fatigue were found between the PT + CBT and PT groups. Conclusions. Physical training combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy and physical training alone had significant and beneficial effects on fatigue compared with no intervention. Physical training was equally effective as or more effective than physical training combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy in reducing cancer-related fatigue, suggesting that cognitive-behavioral therapy did not have additional beneficial effects beyond the benefits of physical training