7 research outputs found

    Influence of the Water Content on the Diffusion Coefficients of Li⁺ and Water across Naphthalenic Based Copolyimide Cation-Exchange Membranes

    Get PDF
    The transport of lithium ions in cation-exchange membranes based on sulfonated copolyimide membranes is reported. Diffusion coefficients of lithium are estimated as a function of the water content in membranes by using pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR and electrical conductivity techniques. It is found that the lithium transport slightly decreases with the diminution of water for membranes with water content lying in the range 14 < λ < 26.5, where λ is the number of molecules of water per fixed sulfonate group. For λ < 14, the value of the diffusion coefficient of lithium experiences a sharp decay with the reduction of water in the membranes. The dependence of the diffusion of lithium on the humidity of the membranes calculated from conductivity data using Nernst–Planck type equations follows a trend similar to that observed by NMR. The possible explanation of the fact that the Haven ratio is higher than the unit is discussed. The diffusion of water estimated by 1H PFG-NMR in membranes neutralized with lithium decreases as λ decreases, but the drop is sharper in the region where the decrease of the diffusion of protons of water also undergoes considerable reduction. The diffusion of lithium ions computed by full molecular dynamics is similar to that estimated by NMR. However, for membranes with medium and low concentration of water, steady state conditions are not reached in the computations and the diffusion coefficients obtained by MD simulation techniques are overestimated. The curves depicting the variation of the diffusion coefficient of water estimated by NMR and full dynamics follow parallel trends, though the values of the diffusion coefficient in the latter case are somewhat higher. The WAXS diffractograms of fully hydrated membranes exhibit the ionomer peak at q = 2.8 nm⁻1, the peak being shifted to higher q as the water content of the membranes decreases. The diffractograms present additional peaks at higher q, common to wet and dry membranes, but the peaks are better resolved in the wet membranes. The ionomer peak is not detected in the diffractograms of dry membranes.The authors acknowledge financial support provided by the DGICYT (Dirección General de Investigación Cientifíca y Tecnológica) through Grant MAT2011-29174-C02-02

    Research on Brake Disk Heat Dissipation Rib Arrangement Spacing for High-speed Railway Train

    No full text
    Objective As the design speed of trains reaches 400 km/h level, the flow field environment under the train becomes more complex, highlighting the issues such as increased brake disc resistance and power consumption. It is imperative to conduct in-depth research on the optimal arrangement spacing of train brake disc heat dissipation ribs at this speed level. Method Using a cylindrical heat dissipation rib structure as the basis, a model is established through finite element simulation, inputting relevant parameter values. Four calculation conditions are set for the center-to-center distance (dc) circumferentially between adjacent heat dissipation ribs, and five calculation conditions are set radially for the distance (dr) between adjacent heat dissipation ribs. Various dc and dr values are calculated respectively for their impact on brake disc temperature rise, resistance, and heat dissipation power. It is aimed to determine recommended values for both dc and dr. Result & Conclusion When dr equals 40 mm (i.e. the ratio of the distance between the heat dissipation ribs and the brake disc edge to the brake disc diameter is 0.75), the brake disc temperature rise reaches the lowest value, indicating the optimal performance of brake disc. For heat dissipation ribs with a diameter equal to half of dc, the brake disc demonstrates the best overall performance

    Influence of the Water Content on the Diffusion Coefficients of Li<sup>+</sup> and Water across Naphthalenic Based Copolyimide Cation-Exchange Membranes

    No full text
    The transport of lithium ions in cation-exchange membranes based on sulfonated copolyimide membranes is reported. Diffusion coefficients of lithium are estimated as a function of the water content in membranes by using pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR and electrical conductivity techniques. It is found that the lithium transport slightly decreases with the diminution of water for membranes with water content lying in the range 14 < λ < 26.5, where λ is the number of molecules of water per fixed sulfonate group. For λ < 14, the value of the diffusion coefficient of lithium experiences a sharp decay with the reduction of water in the membranes. The dependence of the diffusion of lithium on the humidity of the membranes calculated from conductivity data using Nernst–Planck type equations follows a trend similar to that observed by NMR. The possible explanation of the fact that the Haven ratio is higher than the unit is discussed. The diffusion of water estimated by <sup>1</sup>H PFG-NMR in membranes neutralized with lithium decreases as λ decreases, but the drop is sharper in the region where the decrease of the diffusion of protons of water also undergoes considerable reduction. The diffusion of lithium ions computed by full molecular dynamics is similar to that estimated by NMR. However, for membranes with medium and low concentration of water, steady state conditions are not reached in the computations and the diffusion coefficients obtained by MD simulation techniques are overestimated. The curves depicting the variation of the diffusion coefficient of water estimated by NMR and full dynamics follow parallel trends, though the values of the diffusion coefficient in the latter case are somewhat higher. The WAXS diffractograms of fully hydrated membranes exhibit the ionomer peak at <i>q</i> = 2.8 nm<sup>–1</sup>, the peak being shifted to higher <i>q</i> as the water content of the membranes decreases. The diffractograms present additional peaks at higher <i>q</i>, common to wet and dry membranes, but the peaks are better resolved in the wet membranes. The ionomer peak is not detected in the diffractograms of dry membranes
    corecore