Short-term efficacy of physical interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Treatment efficacy of physical agents in osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK) pain has been largely unknown, and this systematic review was aimed at assessing their short-term efficacies for pain relief. METHODS: Systematic review with meta-analysis of efficacy within 1-4 weeks and at follow up at 1-12 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: 36 randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) were identified with 2434 patients where 1391 patients received active treatment. 33 trials satisfied three or more out of five methodological criteria (Jadad scale). The patient sample had a mean age of 65.1 years and mean baseline pain of 62.9 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Within 4 weeks of the commencement of treatment manual acupuncture, static magnets and ultrasound therapies did not offer statistically significant short-term pain relief over placebo. Pulsed electromagnetic fields offered a small reduction in pain of 6.9 mm [95% CI: 2.2 to 11.6] (n = 487). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS, including interferential currents), electro-acupuncture (EA) and low level laser therapy (LLLT) offered clinically relevant pain relieving effects of 18.8 mm [95% CI: 9.6 to 28.1] (n = 414), 21.9 mm [95% CI: 17.3 to 26.5] (n = 73) and 17.7 mm [95% CI: 8.1 to 27.3] (n = 343) on VAS respectively versus placebo control. In a subgroup analysis of trials with assumed optimal doses, short-term efficacy increased to 22.2 mm [95% CI: 18.1 to 26.3] for TENS, and 24.2 mm [95% CI: 17.3 to 31.3] for LLLT on VAS. Follow-up data up to 12 weeks were sparse, but positive effects seemed to persist for at least 4 weeks after the course of LLLT, EA and TENS treatment was stopped. CONCLUSION: TENS, EA and LLLT administered with optimal doses in an intensive 2-4 week treatment regimen, seem to offer clinically relevant short-term pain relief for OAK

Chronic kidney disease in the VACTERL association: clinical course and outcome

Approximately 60% of VACTERL (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheoesophageal fistula with atresia, renal defects/radial limb dysplasia) patients have renal anomalies that can be associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). With improved medical care, a large proportion of these patients survive into adulthood. Longitudinal follow-up data regarding the management of kidney disease in these children is lacking. Twelve VACTERL patients with CKD stage 2–5 and 12 age-matched controls with similar urologic anomalies and CKD [mean follow-up period 15.0 ± 1.4 (SE) and 11.9 ± 2.1 years, respectively] were identified in a single center. Eight VACTERL patients progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared to four controls (66.7 vs. 33.3%, respectively). Six VACTERL patients were dialyzed pre-transplant. Of the four patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), three had to be switched to hemodialysis due to complications, whereas two of the three controls on PD did not experience significant problems. Seven VACTERL patients underwent renal transplantation compared to four controls. Mean creatinine clearance 2 years post-transplant was 65.8 ± 6.3 in VACTERL patients vs. 87.8 ± 7.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in controls (p = 0.03). VACTERL patients had a significantly lower mean height standard deviation score than the controls (−2.34 ± 0.41 vs. −1.27 ± 0.24, respectively; p < 0.05). Based on these results, VACTERL patients with CKD develop ESRD more frequently, experience more complications with dialysis, may have a poorer transplant outcome, and have more severe growth failure than controls