Low-Cost High-Throughput Genotyping for Diagnosing Familial Hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common but underdiagnosed genetic disorder characterized by high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and premature cardiovascular disease. Current sequencing methods to diagnose FH are expensive and time-consuming. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of a low-cost, high-throughput genotyping array for diagnosing FH. METHODS: An Illumina Global Screening Array was customized to include probes for 636 variants, previously classified as FH-causing variants. First, its theoretical coverage was assessed in all FH variant carriers diagnosed through next-generation sequencing between 2016 and 2022 in the Netherlands (n=1772). Next, the performance of the array was validated in another sample of FH variant carriers previously identified in the Dutch FH cascade screening program (n=1268). RESULTS: The theoretical coverage of the array for FH-causing variants was 91.3%. Validation of the array was assessed in a sample of 1268 carriers of whom 1015 carried a variant in LDLR, 250 in APOB, and 3 in PCSK9. The overall sensitivity was 94.7% and increased to 98.2% after excluding participants with variants not included in the array design. Copy number variation analysis yielded a 89.4% sensitivity. In 18 carriers, the array identified a total of 19 additional FH-causing variants. Subsequent DNA analysis confirmed 5 of the additionally identified variants, yielding a false-positive result in 16 subjects (1.3%).CONCLUSIONS: The FH genotyping array is a promising tool for genetically diagnosing FH at low costs and has the potential to greatly increase accessibility to genetic testing for FH. Continuous customization of the array will further improve its performance.</p

Robust estimation of bacterial cell count from optical density

Optical density (OD) is widely used to estimate the density of cells in liquid culture, but cannot be compared between instruments without a standardized calibration protocol and is challenging to relate to actual cell count. We address this with an interlaboratory study comparing three simple, low-cost, and highly accessible OD calibration protocols across 244 laboratories, applied to eight strains of constitutive GFP-expressing E. coli. Based on our results, we recommend calibrating OD to estimated cell count using serial dilution of silica microspheres, which produces highly precise calibration (95.5% of residuals &lt;1.2-fold), is easily assessed for quality control, also assesses instrument effective linear range, and can be combined with fluorescence calibration to obtain units of Molecules of Equivalent Fluorescein (MEFL) per cell, allowing direct comparison and data fusion with flow cytometry measurements: in our study, fluorescence per cell measurements showed only a 1.07-fold mean difference between plate reader and flow cytometry data

Impact of SNP microarray analysis of compromised DNA on kinship classification success in the context of investigative genetic genealogy

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data generated with microarray technologies have been used to solve murder cases via investigative leads obtained from identifying relatives of the unknown perpetrator included in accessible genomic databases, an approach referred to as investigative genetic genealogy (IGG). However, SNP microarrays were developed for relatively high input DNA quantity and quality, while DNA typically obtainable from crime scene stains is of low DNA quantity and quality, and SNP microarray data obtained from compromised DNA are largely missing. By applying the Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA) to 264 DNA samples with systematically altered quantity and quality, we empirically tested the impact of SNP microarray analysis of compromised DNA on kinship classification success, as relevant in IGG. Reference data from manufacturer-recommended input DNA quality and quantity were used to estimate genotype accuracy in the compromised DNA samples and for simulating data of different degree relatives. Although stepwise decrease of input DNA amount from 200 ng to 6.25 pg led to decreased SNP call rates and increased genotyping errors, kinship classification success did not decrease down to 250 pg for siblings and 1st cousins, 1 ng for 2nd cousins, while at 25 pg and below kinship classification success was zero. Stepwise decrease of input DNA quality via increased DNA fragmentation resulted in the decrease of genotyping accuracy as well as kinship classification success, which went down to zero at the average DNA fragment size of 150 base pairs. Combining decreased DNA quantity and quality in mock casework and skeletal samples further highlighted possibilities and limitations. Overall, GSA analysis achieved maximal kinship classification success from 800 to 200 times lower input DNA quantities than manufacturer-recommended, although DNA quality plays a key role too, while compromised DNA produced false negative kinship classifications rather than false positive ones

A comparison of genotyping arrays

Array technology to genotype single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) is widely used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), clinical diagnostics, and linkage studies. Arrays have undergone a tremendous growth in both number and content over recent years making a comprehensive comparison all the more important. We have compared 28 genotyping arrays on their overall content, genome-wide coverage, imputation quality, presence of known GWAS loci, mtDNA variants and clinically relevant genes (i.e., American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) actionable genes, pharmacogenetic genes, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes and SNV density). Our comparison shows that genome-wide coverage is highly correlated with the number of SNVs on the array but does not correlate with imputation quality, which is the main determinant of GWAS usability. Average imputation quality for all tested arrays was similar for European and African populations, indicating that this is not a good criterion for choosing a genotyping array. Rather, the additional content on the array, such as pharmacogenetics or HLA variants, should be the deciding factor. As the research question of a study will in large part determine which class of genes are of interest, there is not just one perfect array for all different research questions. This study can thus help as a guideline to determine which array best suits a study’s requirements