26 research outputs found
Intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Treatment technique and ultra sound-based analysis of dose distribution
Background: To present the technique and dose distribution of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: Pelvic lymphadenectomy, prostate IORT and radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed in 11 prostate cancer patients. Prostate thickness and rectum depth were measured with intraoperative ultrasound. IORT was delivered by a mobile linear accelerator in the operating room (electron beam, 12 Gy at 90% isodose). Results: The mean preoperative probability of organ-confined disease was 10% (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomograms). Mean prostate thickness, width and length were 3.4 cm, 4.6 and 4.9 cm, respectively. Mean rectum depth was 3.3 cm. Mean doses to the posterior prostate capsule, 5-mm lateral prostate margins and at the subsequent uretheral stump area were 4.6 Gy, 8.7 Gy and 11.3 Gy, respectively. Maximum mean rectal dose was 4.9 Gy. Conclusion: IORT appeared a feasible approach for prostate cancer, showing a satisfactory dose coverage to the prostate bed with relatively low rectal dose. However, high variability in dose distribution calls for further study of patient selection criteria and dosimetry
The role of multimodal treatment in patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors
Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise typical (TC) and atypical carcinoids (AC). They represent the well differentiated (WD) or low/intermediate grade forms of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Unlike the lung poorly differentiated NENs, that are usually treated with chemotherapy, lung NETs can be managed with several different therapies, making a multidisciplinary interaction a key point. We critically discussed the multimodal clinical management of patients with advanced lung NETs. Provided that no therapeutic algorithm has been validate so far, each clinical case should be discussed within a NEN-dedicated multidisciplinary team. Among the systemic therapies available for metastatic lung NETs everolimus is the only approved drug, on the basis of the results of the phase III RADIANT-4 trial. Another phase III trial, the SPINET, is ongoing comparing lanreotide with placebo. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and chemotherapy were not studied within phase III trials for lung NETs, and they have been reported to be active within retrospective or phase II prospective studies. Temozolomide and oxaliplatin are two interesting chemotherapeutic agents in lung NETs. While some European Institutions were certificated as Centers of Excellence for gastroenteropancreatic NENs by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), an equivalent ENETS certification for lung NENs does not exist yet. Ideally a lung NEN-dedicated multidisciplinary tumor board should include NEN-dedicated medical oncologists, thoracic medical oncologist, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, interventional radiologists, endocrinologists, radiotherapists, interventional pneumologists, nuclear physician
Metronomic and metronomic-like therapies in neuroendocrine tumors - Rationale and clinical perspectives
Metronomic therapy is characterized by the administration of regular low doses of certain drugs with very low toxicity. There have been numerous debates over the empirical approach of this regimen, but fewest side effects are always something to consider in order to improve patients' quality of life. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare malignancies relatively slow-growing; therefore their treatment is often chronic, involving several different therapies for tumor growth control. Knowing that these tumors are highly vascularized, the anti-angiogenic aspect is highly regarded as something to be targeted in all patients harboring NETs. Additionally the metronomic schedule has proved to be effective on an immunological level, rendering this approach as a multi-targeted therapy. Rationalizing that advanced NETs are in many cases a chronic disease, with which patients can live for as long as possible, a systemic therapy with regular low doses and a very low toxicity is in many cases a judicious manner of pursuing stabilization. Metronomic schedule is usually correlated with chemotherapy in oncology, but other therapies, such as radiotherapy and biotherapy can be delivered in a metronomic like manner. This review describes clinical trials and case series involving metronomic therapies alone or in combination in patients with advanced NETs. Nowadays level of evidence about metronomic therapy in NETs is quite low, therefore future prospective clinical studies are needed to validate the metronomic approach in specific clinical settings
Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Prostate Cancer after Abdominoperineal Resection (CYRANO): The Combined Computer Tomography and Electromagnetic Navigation Guided Transperineal Fiducial Markers Implantation Technique
In this technical development report, we present the strategic placement of fiducial markers within the prostate under the guidance of computed tomography (CT) and electromagnetic navigation (EMN) for the delivery of ultra-hypofractionated cyberknife (CK) therapy in a patient with localized prostate cancer (PCa) who had previously undergone chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer and subsequent abdominoperineal resection due to local recurrence. The patient was positioned in a prone position with a pillow under the pelvis to facilitate access, and an electromagnetic fiducial marker was placed on the patient’s skin to establish a stable position. CT scans were performed to plan the procedure, mark virtual points, and simulate the needle trajectory using the navigation system. Local anesthesia was administered, and a 21G needle was used to place the fiducial markers according to the navigation system information. A confirmatory CT scan was obtained to ensure proper positioning. The implantation procedure was safe, without any acute side effects such as pain, hematuria, dysuria, or hematospermia. Our report highlights the ability to use EMN systems to virtually navigate within a pre-acquired imaging dataset in the interventional room, allowing for non-conventional approaches and potentially revolutionizing fiducial marker positioning, offering new perspectives for PCa treatment in selected cases
Intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: The experience of the European institute of oncology
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To present the technique
adopted for intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for locally advanced
prostate cancer.
METHODS: Between June 2005 and February 2007, 24
patients (pts) with non-metastatic prostate cancer were treated with
IORT before prostatectomy as part of their surgical procedure. Median
DJHZDV\HDUVUDQJH7HQSWVZHUHFODVVL\ubfHGDV
7FSWVDV\u9577KHPHGLDQL36$ZDVQJPODQGWKH
median bioptic Gleason Score was 7. According to NCCN 2007, risk
group distribution was as follows: intermediate risk 2 pts (8.33%) and
high risk 22 pts (91.67%). A total of 11 pts (45.83%) were treated with
neoadjuvant hormones. Immediately before IORT prostate dimensions
and rectum depth were measured with intraoperative ultrasound. IORT
was delivered by a mobile linear accelerator in the operating room.
The prescribed dose was 12 Gy at the 90% isodose. In vivo dosimetry
was performed. Three months later, postoperative external beam
radiotherapy (EBRT) of 45-50,4 Gy in 25-28 fractions was prescribed
to the prostatic bed alone and whole pelvis in case of pT3-4 pN0 and
pN1, respectively.
RESULTS: According to the MSKCC nomograms, the mean
SUHRSHUDWLYHSUREDELOLW\RIRUJDQFRQ\ubfQHGGLVHDVHH[WUDFDSVXODUGLVHDVH
and lymph node involvement were 8%, 40% and 25% respectively.
3RVWRSHUDWLYHKLVWRORJLFDO\ubfQGLQJVZHUHDVIROORZVPHGLDQ*6UDQJH
6-9), pT2 7 pts (29,2%), pT3 14 pts (58,3), pT4 3 (12,5%), pN0 12 pts,
S1SWV2UJDQFRQ\ubfQHGGLVHDVHS7S15ZDVGLDJQRVHGLQ
pts (16.6%) and no further radiation treatment was prescribed. Based
RQWKHGH\ubfQLWLYHKLVWRORJLFDOUHSRUWVSRVWRSHUDWLYHSHOYLFDQGSURVWDWLF
bed EBRT is planned in 12 and 8 pts, respectively. After a median
follow up of 9.2 months (range 3.3-15.7) only 1 patient had evidence of
biochemical relapse. No patients had major acute rectal toxicity. No acute
urinary toxicity was observed in 6 patients, 17 patients had G1 toxicity.
No increased risk of urinary incontinence was recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: IORT delivered before prostatectomy
appeared a feasible and safe approach for prostate cancer, showing
a satisfactory dose coverage to the prostate bed with relatively low
rectal wall dose. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate late toxicity
and clinical control
Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radiation Therapy A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the GETUG
International audienc