The effect of salt extraction on the structure of transcriptionally active genes; evidence for a DNAseI-sensitive structure which could be dependent on chromatin structure at levels higher than the 30 nm fibre.

The procedure developed by Lawson and Cole (Biochemistry, 1979, 18 2161-2166) for removing lysine-rich histones from nuclei at low pH also quantitatively extracts proteins HMG14 and 17. The effect of this low pH extraction on the DNAseI-sensitive structures of active genes in avian red blood cells has been investigated. No major perturbation of a developmentally regulated DNAseI hypersensitive site in the beta-globin domain and at the 5' end of the alpha D gene was seen. The overall DNAseI-sensitive conformation of the beta A-globin gene (relative to the ovalbumin gene) is minimally affected by pH3 salt extraction, but there is some loss of sensitivity of the alpha D gene. Removal of HMG proteins at neutral pH had no effect on the sensitivity of active genes in erythroid or fibroblast nuclei. These results, together with those carried out on DNAseI sensitivity and HMG binding to monomer nucleosomes, indicate that there is a major structural feature of active genes responsible for DNAseI-sensitivity which is independent of HMG proteins or nucleosome core particle structure but may be dependent on higher order chromatin structures

Moving ahead in diabetics' cancer screening; food for thought from the Hellenic experience

Although data from literature suggest that diabetic women are frequently under screened for gynaecological cancers little is known about screening implementation for other cancers for both genders. This study investigates comprehensive cancer screening practices of diabetics as compared with non-diabetics; analyses screening patterns both by gender and level of evidence and reveals target subgroups that should be paid more attention for screening implementation. 675 diabetics vs. 5772 non-diabetic Greek individuals entered the PACMeR 02 cancer screening study. Diabetic women reported significantly lower performance for the sex-specific evidence-based cancer screening tests and digital rectal examination (DRE) as compared with non-diabetics (P < 0.05). Diabetic women older than 60 years old, of elementary education, housewives and farmers showed the lowest performance rates (P < 0.01). Prostate cancer screening was higher among diabetic men with ultrasound and DRE reaching statistical significance (P < 0.05). Subgroups analysis did not reveal a hidden relationship. Both genders of diabetics reported never performing skin examination at higher rates (P < 0.001), although screening intent is extremely low in both diabetics and non-diabetics (<1%). Evidence-based screening coverage was inconsistent in both genders independently by the diabetic status. Primary care efforts should be provided to implement presymptomatic cancer control