Impact of crisaborole in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis who received prior treatment

Topical treatments can provide relief with minimal adverse events (AEs) in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Crisaborole ointment 2% is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase inhibitor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of crisaborole ointment in patients with AD who had received prior treatments of corticosteroids [topical corticosteroids (TCS) or systemic corticosteroids)], topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) or no prior treatments (treatment-naive). This was a post-hoc analysis of two identically designed, vehicle-controlled, randomized, double-blind, phase III studies of patients aged ≥2 years (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02118766 and NCT02118792). Patients were assigned crisaborole or vehicle (2: 1) twice daily for 28 days and had a baseline Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score of mild (2) or moderate (3). Patients were divided into three subgroups: treatment-experienced patients who had received prior treatments of corticosteroids (systemic or dermatologic) or TCI; treatment-experienced patients who had received prior treatment with TCS or TCI; and treatment-naive patients who received no prior treatments within 90 days to screening. The primary endpoint was success in ISGA, defined as an ISGA score at day 29 of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with a ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline. Additional endpoints included a Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS) at week 4 (weekly average) of none (0) or mild (1) with a ≥ 1-grade improvement from baseline; changes in the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and Dermatitis Family Impact Questionnaire (DFI) results were also assessed at day 29. AEs, including treatment-emergent AEs and serious AEs, were analysed. A significantly higher proportion of crisaborole-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients achieved success in ISGA in all subgroups [corticosteroids or TCI: 27.9% vs. 15.9% (P = 0.001); TCS or TCI: 27.4% vs. 14.7% (P = 0.001); treatment-naive: 35.0% vs. 26.8% (P = 0.017)]. SPS score 0/1 with a ≥ 1-grade improvement was also achieved by a significantly higher proportion of crisaborole-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients in all subgroups [corticosteroids or TCI: 35.1% vs. 14.9% (P \u3c 0.001); TCS or TCI: 34.5% vs. 13.5% (P \u3c 0.001); treatment-naive: 36.3% vs. 26.0% (P = 0.01)]. Changes in the least squares mean for ADSI, DLQI, CDLQI and DFI results were also significant for crisaborole- vs. vehicle-treated patients in all subgroups except for DLQI, DFI and ADSI (not examined) results for the treatment naive subgroup. Treatment-related AEs were infrequent and mild to moderate in severity. Crisaborole demonstrated a favourable efficacy and safety profile in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with AD

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Crisaborole Ointment 2% vs. Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION: Crisaborole topical ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal, topical anti-inflammatory phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). The objective of the current analysis was to compare the efficacy of crisaborole 2% relative to pimecrolimus 1%, tacrolimus 0.03% and tacrolimus 0.1% in patients aged ≥ 2 years with mild-to-moderate AD by comparing improvement in Investigator’s Static Global Assessment scores ( (ISGA scores of 0/1 indicating “clear or almost clear”). ISGA was selected as the primary efficacy outcome given the US Food and Drug Administration’s recommendations on the use of ISGA for assessment of global severity in AD and to align with efficacy measurements in the crisaborole registration trials. Safety endpoints could not be analyzed due to differences in outcome definitions across studies. METHODS: Efficacy of crisaborole was evaluated using individual patient data (IPD) from two pivotal phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and efficacy of comparators was evaluated using published RCTs included in a previous network meta-analysis. Vehicle controls were not comparable due to differences in ingredients and population imbalance and, therefore, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was used, which reweighted IPD for crisaborole to estimate absolute response in comparator populations. RESULTS: The odds of achieving an improvement in ISGA score was higher with crisaborole 2% versus pimecrolimus 1% (odds ratio [OR] 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45–2.85; effective sample size =  627, reduced from 1021; p value < 0.001) and for crisaborole 2% versus tacrolimus 0.03% (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.09–2.05; effective sample size = 311, reduced from 1021; p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The unanchored MAIC suggests that the odds of achieving an improvement in ISGA score is greater with crisaborole 2% than with pimecrolimus 1% or tacrolimus 0.03% in patients aged ≥ 2 years with mild-to-moderate AD. These results are consistent with findings from the previously published network meta-analysis, which used a different methodology for performing indirect treatment comparisons. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00646-1

Etanercept withdrawal and retreatment in nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results of RE-EMBARK, an open-label phase IV trial

Clinical trial[Abstract] Objective: RE-EMBARK investigated etanercept (ETN) withdrawal and retreatment in patients with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) achieving inactive disease. Methods: Patients received ETN and a background nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug for 24 weeks in period 1 (P1); those achieving inactive disease (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] with C-reactive protein [CRP] < 1.3) discontinued ETN for 40 weeks or less (period 2 [P2]). Patients who flared (ASDAS with erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] ≥ 2.1) were retreated for 12 weeks in period 3 (P3). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with inactive disease who flared within 40 weeks of ETN withdrawal. Baseline characteristics were analyzed post hoc as predictors of maintenance and regaining of inactive disease, respectively, using univariate logistic and stepwise multivariable logistic regression models. Results: The proportion of patients experiencing flare following ETN withdrawal (P2) increased from 22.3% (25/112) after 4 weeks to 67% (77/115) after 40 weeks; 74.8% (86/115) experienced flare at any time during P2. Median time to flare was 16.1 weeks. Most patients (54/87, 62.1%) who were retreated with ETN in P3 reachieved inactive disease. Absence of both sacroiliitis detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) > 3 mg/L at baseline predicted inactive disease maintenance in P2 following ETN withdrawal in multivariable analysis; male sex and age younger than 40 years predicted regaining of inactive disease in P3 after flare/retreatment. There were no unexpected safety signals. Conclusion: Approximately 25% of patients maintained inactive disease for 40 weeks after discontinuing ETN. Absence of both MRI sacroiliitis and high hs-CRP at baseline predicted response maintenance after ETN withdrawal

Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

Background : Methotrexate is the most frequently used first-line antirheumatic drug. We report the findings of a phase 3 study of monotherapy with tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as compared with methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate. Methods : We randomly assigned 958 patients to receive 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily or methotrexate at a dose that was incrementally increased to 20 mg per week over 8 weeks; 956 patients received a study drug. The coprimary end points at month 6 were the mean change from baseline in the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (which ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater structural joint damage) and the proportion of patients with an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response (>= 70% reduction in the number of both tender and swollen joints and >= 70% improvement in three of five other criteria: the patient's assessment of pain, level of disability, C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, global assessment of disease by the patient, and global assessment of disease by the physician). Results : Mean changes in the modified total Sharp score from baseline to month 6 were significantly smaller in the tofacitinib groups than in the methotrexate group, but changes were modest in all three groups (0.2 points in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and <0.1 point in the 10-mg tofacitinib group, as compared with 0.8 points in the methotrexate group [ P<0.001 for both comparisons]). Among the patients receiving tofacitinib, 25.5% in the 5-mg group and 37.7% in the 10-mg group had an ACR 70 response at month 6, as compared with 12.0% of patients in the methotrexate group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Herpes zoster developed in 31 of 770 patients who received tofacitinib (4.0%) and in 2 of 186 patients who received methotrexate (1.1%). Confirmed cases of cancer (including three cases of lymphoma) developed in 5 patients who received tofacitinib and in 1 patient who received methotrexate. Tofacitinib was associated with increases in creatinine levels and in low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Conclusions : In patients who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate, tofacitinib monotherapy was superior to methotrexate in reducing signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and inhibiting the progression of structural joint damage. The benefits of tofacitinib need to be considered in the context of the risks of adverse events

Efficacy and safety of open-label etanercept on extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: part 1 (week 12) of the CLIPPER study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) in paediatric subjects with extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (eoJIA), enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: CLIPPER is an ongoing, Phase 3b, open-label, multicentre study; the 12-week (Part 1) data are reported here. Subjects with eoJIA (2-17 years), ERA (12-17 years), or PsA (12-17 years) received ETN 0.8 mg/kg once weekly (maximum 50 mg). Primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects achieving JIA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 criteria at week 12; secondary outcomes included JIA ACR 50/70/90 and inactive disease. RESULTS: 122/127 (96.1%) subjects completed the study (mean age 11.7 years). JIA ACR 30 (95% CI) was achieved by 88.6% (81.6% to 93.6%) of subjects overall; 89.7% (78.8% to 96.1%) with eoJIA, 83.3% (67.2% to 93.6%) with ERA and 93.1% (77.2% to 99.2%) with PsA. For eoJIA, ERA, or PsA categories, the ORs of ETN vs the historical placebo data were 26.2, 15.1 and 40.7, respectively. Overall JIA ACR 50, 70, 90 and inactive disease were achieved by 81.1, 61.5, 29.8 and 12.1%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), infections, and serious AEs, were reported in 45 (35.4%), 58 (45.7%), and 4 (3.1%), subjects, respectively. Serious AEs were one case each of abdominal pain, bronchopneumonia, gastroenteritis and pyelocystitis. One subject reported herpes zoster and another varicella. No differences in safety were observed across the JIA categories. CONCLUSIONS: ETN treatment for 12 weeks was effective and well tolerated in paediatric subjects with eoJIA, ERA and PsA, with no unexpected safety findings

Estimation, testing, and forecasting for long memory processes

Empirical experience over the last few decades has shown that standard iid theory or short range dependence time series models do not adequately describe many types of real data in various areas of applications such as geology, astronomy, economics, hydrology, etc. Time series models with long memory or long range dependence have been introduced and applied quite successfully to analyze such data. The area has been growing at a fast rate, with new methods emerging consistently. The theoretical literature has been primarily frequentist and asymptotic. The corresponding theoretical studies in a Bayesian framework had been lacking. In this work, we study parameter estimation, construction of noninformative priors, and forecasts of future observations in a Bayesian decision theoretic setup. We show that for point estimation of the mean of a Gaussian Fractional ARIMA process, simple estimates such as the sample mean suffice, but for interval estimation and point estimation of scale, long memory has peculiar and even calamitous effects on the performance of simple estimates. At a more basic level, just the presence of long memory can have dramatic effects on the quality of general inference and on basic Bayesian tools such as Bayes factors and their asymptotic behavior. Specifically, the null asymptotic distributions of Bayes factors and their rates of convergence depend on the value of the long memory parameter. Long memory also results in catastrophic sample size requirements just to have accuracies comparable to the iid case. Comparative evaluations show that Bayesian methods perform demonstrably better than certain other methods including the empirical BLUP and the MLE in a number of problems. There seems to be a real potential for success of Bayesian methods in other types of long memory processes

Demographics and Baseline Disease Characteristics of Early Responders to Crisaborole for Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION: Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). This post hoc, pooled analysis identified demographic characteristics associated with early response to crisaborole. METHODS: Early response was defined as day 8 Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA) success (clear [0] or almost clear [1] with ≥2-grade improvement), ISGA clear/almost clear, or Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS) response (≥1-point improvement). Correlations between early response and day-29 response were calculated. RESULTS: Patients were more likely to be early ISGA success responders if they were aged \u3c12 years (P=0.0023), were white (P=0.0316), had moderate baseline disease by ISGA (P=0.0003), had not received prior AD treatment (P=0.0213), had disease duration shorter than or equal to the median (≤6.45 years; P=0.0349), or did not concurrently use antihistamines (P=0.0148). Similar early response results were observed for patients achieving ISGA clear or almost clear; however, they were more likely to have mild baseline disease by ISGA (P\u3c0.0001) or mild percentage of treatable body surface area involvement (5 to \u3c16; P\u3c0.0001). Patients aged \u3c12 years (P=0.0001) or with moderate baseline disease (P=0.0475) were more likely to be early responders based on SPS criteria. By all 3 definitions, patients who achieved early response at day 8 were more likely to be responders at day 29 (P\u3c0.0001). CONCLUSION: Based on this analysis, patients aged \u3c12 years were more likely to be early responders to crisaborole per all 3 definitions. Early response to crisaborole was a predictor of response at day 29. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02118766 and NCT02118792 J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(6): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5095THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS

Once-Daily Crisaborole Ointment, 2%, as a Long-Term Maintenance Treatment in Patients Aged ≥ 3 Months with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A 52-Week Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) used reactively often fail to achieve lasting disease control; many of these therapies are associated with safety concerns that limit long-term use. Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD that has potential as a long-term maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of crisaborole once daily (QD) compared to vehicle QD as a maintenance therapy to reduce the incidence of flares in patients with AD who previously responded to crisaborole twice daily (BID). METHODS: CrisADe CONTROL was a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 52-week, phase III study of patients aged ≥&nbsp;3 months with mild-to-moderate AD involving ≥&nbsp;5% treatable body surface area. Eligible patients received crisaborole BID during an open-label run-in period of up to 8 weeks. Responders were randomly assigned in the double-blind maintenance period to receive either crisaborole QD or vehicle QD. Responders were defined as patients who achieved Investigators Static Global Assessment (ISGA) success (ISGA score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with a ≥ 2-grade improvement) and ≥ 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index total score (EASI-50) from baseline. Patients who experienced a flare (ISGA score ≥&nbsp;2) during the double-blind maintenance period switched to crisaborole BID for up to 12 weeks. During this period, patients were assessed every 4 weeks; if the flare resolved (ISGA score ≤ 1), patients resumed their assigned treatment. The primary endpoint was flare-free maintenance until onset of the first flare. Key secondary endpoints were number of flare-free days, number of flares, and maintenance of pruritus response until onset of the first flare. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was also analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 497 patients entered the open-label run-in period with crisaborole BID, of which 270 patients were randomized into the 52-week double-blind maintenance period of the study. Of the 270 patients, 135 were randomly assigned to the crisaborole QD group and 135 were randomly assigned to the vehicle QD group. Median time of flare-free maintenance was longer for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (111 vs 30 days, respectively; p = 0.0034). The mean number of flare-free days was higher for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (234.0 vs 199.4 days, respectively; p = 0.0346). The mean number of flares was lower for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (0.95 vs 1.36, respectively; p = 0.0042). No clear trend was observed in maintenance of pruritus response between crisaborole- and vehicle-treated patients. Crisaborole was well tolerated, with no new or unexpected safety findings when used as maintenance treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Crisaborole QD was effective and well tolerated for long-term maintenance treatment and flare reduction in adult and pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04040192, 31 July 2019

Topical Agents for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Approval of the new topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor crisaborole ointment, 2%, to treat mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) warrants careful consideration of available efficacy and safety data for topical therapies to contribute to a better understanding of the role of crisaborole in the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. A literature review was conducted to identify results of randomized, blinded, vehicle-controlled trials of topical agents for the treatment of AD published from January 1, 1997 to April 30, 2018. This review summarizes the efficacy and safety data of topical therapies including corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and crisaborole and it shows that comparison among available agents is difficult because of differing methodologies used across clinical trials and that there is considerable variability in safety reporting among AD trials. Published clinical studies for crisaborole demonstrate its efficacy and manageable safety profile. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(1):50-64. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.450