Kelayakan Finansial Pengembangan Usaha Tani dalam suatu Wilayah Lingkar Tambang Emas di Kabupaten Bombana, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara

EnglishGold mining have positive contribution to the regional economic growth, but cause negative impacts to farmers in the mining ring area. The purpose of this study is to evaluate financial feasibility of farming and to identify the best farming practices within a gold mining ring area in Bombana District of Southeast Sulawesi Province. Data were collected through personal interviews with farmers and focused group discussion using the word cafe format. The respondents consist of purposively selected 90 farmers and 37 resource persons representing stakeholders. Financial feasibility was analyzed using the B/C ratio and the farming best practices were selected using the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) analysis through the Preference Ranking Organization for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE). The study shows that there are three types of land in the mining ring area, namely, land that is not mined, land that has not been mined, and land that has been mined. All crops cultivated by farmers are financially feasible. The PROMETHEE analysis shows that the non-mined land should be developed for plantation crops, the land that has not been mined is best for food crop farmings; and the mined land is best utilized for forestry crops.IndonesianPertambangan emas dapat memberikan kontribusi positif terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi wilayah, namun juga berdampak negatif terhadap petani di wilayah lingkar tambang. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui kelayakan finansial USAha tani dan mengidentifikasi USAha tani apakah yang sebaiknya dilakukan di wilayah lingkar tambang emas. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Wilayah Lingkar Tambang Emas Kabupaten Bombana, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara dengan petani wakil USAha tani setiap tanaman dan focused group discussion dengan format word cafe. Responden terdiri dari 90 orang masyarakat petani yang dipilih secara sengaja dan 37 orang narasumber wakil pemangku kepentingan. Analisis kelayakan finansial dilakukan dengan metode rasio penerimaan terhadap biaya, sedangkan pemilihan alternatif USAha tani dilakukan dengan analisis Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) melalui Preference Ranking Organization for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam wilayah lingkar tambang terdapat tiga jenis lahan, yakni lahan yang tidak ditambang, lahan yang belum ditambang, dan lahan yang sudah ditambang. Semua jenis tanaman yang diusahakan petani layak diusahakan secara finansial. Hasil analisis PROMETHEE mendapatkan bahwa lahan yang tidak ditambang sebaiknya dikembangkan USAha tani tanaman perkebunan; lahan yang belum ditambang pilihan utamanya untuk USAha tani tanaman pangan; dan lahan yang sudah ditambang sebaiknya dimanfaatkan untuk USAha tani tanaman kehutanan

Analysis of Potential Development of Inland Fishery in the District of East Kolaka

The existence of Fishery Potential resources in the county of East Kolaka is a comparatif advantage that will be valuable if it is supported by analysis of potency about inland fishery development according to the area characteristics. The objectives of this research are to analyze the strategies and potencies of inland fishery in East Kolaka. The research location was focused on the center of inland fishery development in all districts areas. The method of data analyses were consist of qualitative, quantitative and spatial analyses. From the result of this research, it can be concluded that: (a) The district of Ladongi and Mowewe are considerably accepted as the center of fish breeding, (b) the center of fish maturation in the development of inland fishery is divided into five subclusters, (ponds, rawa, bendungan/waduk, river and persawahan, (c) the center of inland fish pocessing consists of two subclusters which are cullinary and fishery product diversivication

Analisis Situasional Kompetensi Praktisi Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia Menghadapi MEA 2015

. ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) will be implemented at the early 2016 referred to the agreement signed by all ASEAN countries\u27 leaders. One of the agreement content is the free flow of skilled labor including Human Resources (HR) professional. Indonesia\u27s HR practitioners are not fully ready to face this upcoming more open competition. HR professional competency in Indonesia needs to be examined deeply to find its existence to be seen from HR practitioners\u27 point of view. This research uses descriptive statistic method to map ideas, perceptions, and opinions from HR practitioners pertaining their competencies. Respondents come from Jabodetabek area and the big cities in Java Island due to the main location of private companies. Sampling frame is purposive non random sampling to cover members of Indonesia HR Management Association via online questionnaire study. There are 250 respondents who filled the questionnaries completely. Research findings show that the educational background of Indonesia\u27s HR practitioners is various and dominated by Management, then followed by Psychology, Technic, and Law. HR evolution in Indonesia indicates mostly being exposed in administration dan industrial relations (35%), 21% has been involved in strategic decision making process, and 20% has demonstrated as strategic partner and change agent. HR competency standard and its development and certification programs are perceived very important and urgent to be developed further, although the uqualization of development opportunity is not well distributed across Indonesia areas. Organization/company has already showed significant recognition to HR profession by giving the highest position at director level (34,8%), General Manager (14%), and Manager (32,4%). More than half respondent stated not ready to face the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), however the acceleration process of HR practitioners\u27 competency development program needs to be done in order to enhance the competitiveness in regional and global competition

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries