Modélisation 3D du transfert raidatif pour simuler les images et données de spectroradiomètres et Lidars satellites et aéroportés de couverts végétaux et urbains

Les mesures de télédétection (MT) dépendent de l'interaction du rayonnement avec les paysages terrestres et l'atmosphère ainsi que des configurations instrumentales (bande spectrale, résolution spatiale, champ de vue: FOV,...) et expérimentales (structure et propriétés optiques du paysage et atmosphère,...). L'évolution rapide des techniques de télédétection requiert des outils appropriés pour valider leurs principes et améliorer l'emploi des MT. Les modèles de transfert radiatif (RTM) simulent des quantités (fonctions de distribution de la réflectance (BRDF) et température (BTDF), forme d'onde LiDAR, etc.) plus ou moins proches des MT. Ils constituent l'outil de référence pour simuler les MT, pour diverses applications : préparation et validation des systèmes d'observation, inversion de MT,... DART (Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer) est reconnu comme le RTM le plus complet et efficace. J'ai encore nettement amélioré son réalisme via les travaux de modélisation indiqués ci-dessous. 1. Discrétisation de l'espace des directions de propagation des rayons. DART simule la propagation des rayons dans les paysages terrestres et l'atmosphère selon des directions discrètes. Les méthodes classiques définissent mal le centroïde et forme des angles solides de ces directions, si bien que le principe de conservation de l'énergie n'est pas vérifié et que l'obtention de résultats précis exige un grand nombre de directions. Pour résoudre ce problème, j'ai conçu une méthode originale qui crée des directions discrètes de formes définies. 2. Simulation d'images de spectroradiomètre avec FOV fini (caméra, pushbroom,...). Les RTMs sont de type "pixel" ou "image". Un modèle "pixel" calcule une quantité unique (BRDF, BTDF) de toute la scène simulée via sa description globale (indice foliaire, fraction d'ombre,...). Un modèle "image" donne une distribution spatiale de quantités (BRDF,...) par projection orthographique des rayons sur un plan image. Tous les RTMs supposent une acquisition monodirectionnelle (FOV nul), ce qui peut être très imprécis. Pour pouvoir simuler des capteurs à FOV fini (caméra, pushbroom,...), j'ai conçu un modèle original de suivi de rayons convergents avec projection perspective. 3. Simulation de données LiDAR. Beaucoup de RTMs simulent le signal LiDAR de manière rapide mais imprécise (paysage très simplifié, pas de diffusions multiples,...) ou de manière précis mais avec de très grands temps de calcul (e.g., modèles Monte-Carlo: MC). DART emploie une méthode "quasi-MC" originale, à la fois précise et rapide, adaptée à toute configuration instrumentale (altitude de la plateforme, attitude du LiDAR, taille de l'empreinte,...). Les acquisitions multi-impulsions LiDAR (satellite, avion, terrestre) sont simulées pour toute configuration (position du LiDAR, trajectoire de la plateforme,...). Elles sont converties dans un format industriel pour être traitées par des logiciels dédiés. Un post-traitement convertit les formes d'onde LiDAR simulées en données LiDAR de comptage de photons. 4. Bruit solaire et fusion de données LiDAR et d'images de spectroradiomètre. DART peut combiner des simulations de LiDAR multi-impulsions et d'image de spectro-radiomètre (capteur hyperspectral,...). C'est une configuration à 2 sources (soleil, laser LiDAR) et 1 capteur (télescope du LiDAR). Les régions mesurées par le LiDAR, dans le plan image du sol, sont segmentées dans l'image du spectro-radiomètre, elle aussi projetée sur le plan image du sol. Deux applications sont présentées : bruit solaire dans le signal LiDAR, et fusion de données LiDAR et d'images de spectro-radiomètre. Des configurations d'acquisition (trajectoire de plateforme, angle de vue par pixel du spectro-radiomètre et par impulsion LiDAR) peuvent être importées pour encore améliorer le réalisme des MT simulées, De plus, j'ai introduit la parallélisation multi-thread, ce qui accélère beaucoup les calculsRemote Sensing (RS) data depend on radiation interaction in Earth landscapes and atmosphere, and also on instrumental (spectral band, spatial resolution, field of view (FOV),...) and experimental (landscape/atmosphere architecture and optical properties,...) conditions. Fast developments in RS techniques require appropriate tools for validating their working principles and improving RS operational use. Radiative Transfer Models (RTM) simulate quantities (bidirectional reflectance; BRDF, directional brightness temperature: BTDF, LiDAR waveform...) that aim to approximate actual RS data. Hence, they are celebrated tools to simulate RS data for many applications: preparation and validation of RS systems, inversion of RS data... Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model is recognized as the most complete and efficient RTM. During my PhD work, I further improved its modeling in terms of accuracy and functionalities through the modeling work mentioned below. 1. Discretizing the space of radiation propagation directions.DART simulates radiation propagation along a finite number of directions in Earth/atmosphere scenes. Classical methods do not define accurately the solid angle centroids and geometric shapes of these directions, which results in non-conservative energy or imprecise modeling if few directions are used. I solved this problem by developing a novel method that creates discrete directions with well-defined shapes. 2. Simulating images of spectroradiometers with finite FOV.Existing RTMs are pixel- or image-level models. Pixel-level models use abstract landscape (scene) description (leaf area index, overall fraction of shadows,...) to calculate quantities (BRDF, BTDF,...) for the whole scene. Image-level models generate scene radiance, BRDF or BTDF images, with orthographic projection of rays that exit the scene onto an image plane. All models neglect the multi-directional acquisition in the sensor finite FOV, which is unrealistic. Hence, I implemented a sensor-level model, called converging tracking and perspective projection (CTPP), to simulate camera and cross-track sensor images, by coupling DART with classical perspective and parallel-perspective projection. 3. Simulating LiDAR data.Many RTMs simulate LiDAR waveform, but results are inaccurate (abstract scene description, account of first-order scattering only...) or require tremendous computation time for obtaining accurate results (e.g., Monte-Carlo (MC) models). With a novel quasi-MC method, DART can provide accurate results with fast processing speed, for any instrumental configuration (platform altitude, LiDAR orientation, footprint size...). It simulates satellite, airborne and terrestrial multi-pulse laser data for realistic configurations (LiDAR position, platform trajectory, scan angle range...). These data can be converted into industrial LiDAR format for being processed by LiDAR processing software. A post-processing method converts LiDAR waveform into photon counting LiDAR data, through modeling single photon detector acquisition. 4. In-flight Fusion of LiDAR and imaging spectroscopy.DART can combine multi-pulse LiDAR and cross-track imaging spectroscopy (hyperspectral sensor...). It is a 2 sources (sun, LiDAR laser) and 1 sensor (LiDAR telescope) system. First, a LiDAR multi-pulse acquisition and a sun-induced spectro-radiometer radiance image are simulated. Then, the LiDAR FOV regions projected onto the ground image plane are segmented in the spectro-radiometer image, which is also projected on the ground image plane. I applied it to simulate solar noise in LiDAR signal, and to the fusion of LiDAR data and spectro-radiometer images. To further improve accuracy when simulating actual LiDAR and spectro-radiometer, DART can also import actual acquisition configuration (platform trajectory, view angle per spectro-radiometer pixel / LiDAR pulse). Moreover, I introduced multi-thread parallelization, which greatly accelerates DART simulation

Land Deformation Monitoring using Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry

Master'sMASTER OF ENGINEERIN

Atmospheric and emissivity corrections for ground-based thermography using 3D radiative transfer modelling

Methods to retrieve urban surface temperature (Ts) from remote sensing observations with sub-building scale resolution are developed using the Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART, Gastellu-Etchegorry, Grau and Lauret, 2012) model. Corrections account for the emission and absorption of radiation by air between the surface and instrument (atmospheric correction), and for the reflected longwave infrared (LWIR) radiation from non-black-body surfaces (“emissivity” correction) within a single modelling framework. The atmospheric correction a) can use horizontally and vertically variable distributions of atmosphere properties at high resolution (< 5 m); b) is applied here with vertically extrapolated weather observations and MODTRAN atmosphere profiles; and c) is a solution to ray tracing and cross section (e.g. absorption) conflicts (e.g. cross section needs the path length but it is typically unavailable during ray tracing). The emissivity correction resolves the reflection of LWIR radiation as a series of scattering events at high spatial (< 1 m) and angular (ΔΩ ≈ 0.02 sr) resolution using a heterogeneous distribution of radiation leaving the urban surfaces. The method is applied to a novel network of seven ground-based cameras measuring LWIR radiation across a dense urban area (extent: 420 m x 420 m) where a detailed 3-dimensional representation of the surface and vegetation geometry is used. Our unique observation set allows the method to be tested over a range of realistic conditions as there are variations in: path lengths, view angles, brightness temperatures, atmospheric conditions and observed surface geometry. For pixels with 250 (± 10) m path length the median (5th and 95th percentile) atmospheric correction magnitude is up to 4.5 (3.1 and 8.1) K at 10:10 on a mainly clear-sky day. The detailed surface geometry resolves camera pixel path lengths accurately, even with complex features such as sloped roofs. The atmospheric correction method evaluation, with simultaneous “near” (~15 m) and “far” (~155 m) observations, has a mean absolute error of 0.39 K. Using broadband approximations, the emissivity correction has clear diurnal variability, particularly when a cool and shaded surface (e.g. north facing) is irradiated by warmer (up to 17.0 K) surfaces (e.g. south facing). Varying the material emissivity with bulk values common for dark building materials (ε = 0.89 → 0.97) alters the corrected roof (south facing) surface temperatures by ~3 (1.5) K, and the corrected cooler north facing surfaces by less than 0.1 K. Corrected observations, assuming a homogeneous radiation distribution from surfaces (analogous to a sky view factor correction), differ from a heterogeneous distribution by up to 0.25 K. Our proposed correction provides more accurate Ts observations with improved uncertainty estimates. Potential applications include ground-truthing airborne or space-borne surface temperatures and evaluation of urban energy balance models

Hepatic Autophagy Deficiency Compromises FXR Functionality and Causes Cholestatic Injury

Autophagy is important for hepatic homeostasis, nutrient regeneration and organelle quality control. We investigated the mechanisms by which liver injury occurred in the absence of autophagy function. We found that mice deficient in autophagy due to the lack of Atg7 or Atg5, key autophagy‐related genes, manifested intracellular cholestasis with increased levels of serum bile acids, a higher ratio of TMCA/TCA in the bile, increased hepatic bile acid load, abnormal bile canaliculi and altered expression of hepatic transporters. In determining the underlying mechanism, we found that autophagy sustained and promoted the basal and upregulated expression of Fxr in the fed and starved conditions, respectively. Consequently, expression of Fxr and its downstream genes, particularly Bsep, and the binding of FXR to the promoter regions of these genes, were suppressed in autophagy‐deficient livers. In addition, co‐deletion of Nrf2 in autophagy deficiency status reversed the FXR suppression. Furthermore, the cholestatic injury of autophagy‐deficient livers was reversed by enhancement of FXR activity or expression, or by Nrf2 deletion

Discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART 5) for modeling airborne and satellite spectroradiometer and LIDAR acquisitions of natural and urban landscapes

International audienceSatellite and airborne optical sensors are increasingly used by scientists, and policy makers, and managers for studying and managing forests, agriculture crops, and urban areas. Their data acquired with given instrumental specifications (spectral resolution, viewing direction, sensor field-of-view, etc.) and for a specific experimental configuration (surface and atmosphere conditions, sun direction, etc.) are commonly translated into qualitative and quantitative Earth surface parameters. However, atmosphere properties and Earth surface 3D architecture often confound their interpretation. Radiative transfer models capable of simulating the Earth and atmosphere complexity are, therefore, ideal tools for linking remotely sensed data to the surface parameters. Still, many existing models are oversimplifying the Earth-atmosphere system interactions and their parameterization of sensor specifications is often neglected or poorly considered. The Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model is one of the most comprehensive physically based 3D models simulating the Earth-atmosphere radiation interaction from visible to thermal infrared wavelengths. It has been developed since 1992. It models optical signals at the entrance of imaging radiometers and laser scanners on board of satellites and airplanes, as well as the 3D radiative budget, of urban and natural landscapes for any experimental configuration and instrumental specification. It is freely distributed for research and teaching activities. This paper presents DART physical bases and its latest functionality for simulating imaging spectroscopy of natural and urban landscapes with atmosphere, including the perspective projection of airborne acquisitions and LIght Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) waveform and photon counting signals

3D radiative transfer model for simulating satellite and airborne imaging spectroscopy and LIDAR data of vegetation ad urban canopies

Les mesures de télédétection (MT) dépendent de l'interaction du rayonnement avec les paysages terrestres et l'atmosphère ainsi que des configurations instrumentales (bande spectrale, résolution spatiale, champ de vue: FOV,...) et expérimentales (structure et propriétés optiques du paysage et atmosphère,...). L'évolution rapide des techniques de télédétection requiert des outils appropriés pour valider leurs principes et améliorer l'emploi des MT. Les modèles de transfert radiatif (RTM) simulent des quantités (fonctions de distribution de la réflectance (BRDF) et température (BTDF), forme d'onde LiDAR, etc.) plus ou moins proches des MT. Ils constituent l'outil de référence pour simuler les MT, pour diverses applications : préparation et validation des systèmes d'observation, inversion de MT,... DART (Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer) est reconnu comme le RTM le plus complet et efficace. J'ai encore nettement amélioré son réalisme via les travaux de modélisation indiqués ci-dessous. 1. Discrétisation de l'espace des directions de propagation des rayons. DART simule la propagation des rayons dans les paysages terrestres et l'atmosphère selon des directions discrètes. Les méthodes classiques définissent mal le centroïde et forme des angles solides de ces directions, si bien que le principe de conservation de l'énergie n'est pas vérifié et que l'obtention de résultats précis exige un grand nombre de directions. Pour résoudre ce problème, j'ai conçu une méthode originale qui crée des directions discrètes de formes définies. 2. Simulation d'images de spectroradiomètre avec FOV fini (caméra, pushbroom,...). Les RTMs sont de type "pixel" ou "image". Un modèle "pixel" calcule une quantité unique (BRDF, BTDF) de toute la scène simulée via sa description globale (indice foliaire, fraction d'ombre,...). Un modèle "image" donne une distribution spatiale de quantités (BRDF,...) par projection orthographique des rayons sur un plan image. Tous les RTMs supposent une acquisition monodirectionnelle (FOV nul), ce qui peut être très imprécis. Pour pouvoir simuler des capteurs à FOV fini (caméra, pushbroom,...), j'ai conçu un modèle original de suivi de rayons convergents avec projection perspective. 3. Simulation de données LiDAR. Beaucoup de RTMs simulent le signal LiDAR de manière rapide mais imprécise (paysage très simplifié, pas de diffusions multiples,...) ou de manière précis mais avec de très grands temps de calcul (e.g., modèles Monte-Carlo: MC). DART emploie une méthode "quasi-MC" originale, à la fois précise et rapide, adaptée à toute configuration instrumentale (altitude de la plateforme, attitude du LiDAR, taille de l'empreinte,...). Les acquisitions multi-impulsions LiDAR (satellite, avion, terrestre) sont simulées pour toute configuration (position du LiDAR, trajectoire de la plateforme,...). Elles sont converties dans un format industriel pour être traitées par des logiciels dédiés. Un post-traitement convertit les formes d'onde LiDAR simulées en données LiDAR de comptage de photons. 4. Bruit solaire et fusion de données LiDAR et d'images de spectroradiomètre. DART peut combiner des simulations de LiDAR multi-impulsions et d'image de spectro-radiomètre (capteur hyperspectral,...). C'est une configuration à 2 sources (soleil, laser LiDAR) et 1 capteur (télescope du LiDAR). Les régions mesurées par le LiDAR, dans le plan image du sol, sont segmentées dans l'image du spectro-radiomètre, elle aussi projetée sur le plan image du sol. Deux applications sont présentées : bruit solaire dans le signal LiDAR, et fusion de données LiDAR et d'images de spectro-radiomètre. Des configurations d'acquisition (trajectoire de plateforme, angle de vue par pixel du spectro-radiomètre et par impulsion LiDAR) peuvent être importées pour encore améliorer le réalisme des MT simulées, De plus, j'ai introduit la parallélisation multi-thread, ce qui accélère beaucoup les calculsRemote Sensing (RS) data depend on radiation interaction in Earth landscapes and atmosphere, and also on instrumental (spectral band, spatial resolution, field of view (FOV),...) and experimental (landscape/atmosphere architecture and optical properties,...) conditions. Fast developments in RS techniques require appropriate tools for validating their working principles and improving RS operational use. Radiative Transfer Models (RTM) simulate quantities (bidirectional reflectance; BRDF, directional brightness temperature: BTDF, LiDAR waveform...) that aim to approximate actual RS data. Hence, they are celebrated tools to simulate RS data for many applications: preparation and validation of RS systems, inversion of RS data... Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model is recognized as the most complete and efficient RTM. During my PhD work, I further improved its modeling in terms of accuracy and functionalities through the modeling work mentioned below. 1. Discretizing the space of radiation propagation directions.DART simulates radiation propagation along a finite number of directions in Earth/atmosphere scenes. Classical methods do not define accurately the solid angle centroids and geometric shapes of these directions, which results in non-conservative energy or imprecise modeling if few directions are used. I solved this problem by developing a novel method that creates discrete directions with well-defined shapes. 2. Simulating images of spectroradiometers with finite FOV.Existing RTMs are pixel- or image-level models. Pixel-level models use abstract landscape (scene) description (leaf area index, overall fraction of shadows,...) to calculate quantities (BRDF, BTDF,...) for the whole scene. Image-level models generate scene radiance, BRDF or BTDF images, with orthographic projection of rays that exit the scene onto an image plane. All models neglect the multi-directional acquisition in the sensor finite FOV, which is unrealistic. Hence, I implemented a sensor-level model, called converging tracking and perspective projection (CTPP), to simulate camera and cross-track sensor images, by coupling DART with classical perspective and parallel-perspective projection. 3. Simulating LiDAR data.Many RTMs simulate LiDAR waveform, but results are inaccurate (abstract scene description, account of first-order scattering only...) or require tremendous computation time for obtaining accurate results (e.g., Monte-Carlo (MC) models). With a novel quasi-MC method, DART can provide accurate results with fast processing speed, for any instrumental configuration (platform altitude, LiDAR orientation, footprint size...). It simulates satellite, airborne and terrestrial multi-pulse laser data for realistic configurations (LiDAR position, platform trajectory, scan angle range...). These data can be converted into industrial LiDAR format for being processed by LiDAR processing software. A post-processing method converts LiDAR waveform into photon counting LiDAR data, through modeling single photon detector acquisition. 4. In-flight Fusion of LiDAR and imaging spectroscopy.DART can combine multi-pulse LiDAR and cross-track imaging spectroscopy (hyperspectral sensor...). It is a 2 sources (sun, LiDAR laser) and 1 sensor (LiDAR telescope) system. First, a LiDAR multi-pulse acquisition and a sun-induced spectro-radiometer radiance image are simulated. Then, the LiDAR FOV regions projected onto the ground image plane are segmented in the spectro-radiometer image, which is also projected on the ground image plane. I applied it to simulate solar noise in LiDAR signal, and to the fusion of LiDAR data and spectro-radiometer images. To further improve accuracy when simulating actual LiDAR and spectro-radiometer, DART can also import actual acquisition configuration (platform trajectory, view angle per spectro-radiometer pixel / LiDAR pulse). Moreover, I introduced multi-thread parallelization, which greatly accelerates DART simulation

Simulation de données et fusion du spectromètre d'imagerie et du système multi-capteurs LiDAR à l'aide d'un modèle dard

International audienceMulti-sensor systems are increasingly demanding in recent remote sensing (RS) applications. Combination of LiDAR and imaging spectrometers is an emerging technique used by several recent airborne systems. The combined data provide both functional and structural information, which makes this technique a unique tool for understanding and management of the Earth's ecosystems. The rapid development of this technique demands the simulation and validation of the combined data. In this paper, we introduce a new method to simulate data fusion of multi-sensor system which combined LiDAR and imaging spectrometer, with any experimental, instrumental, and geometrical configurations of systems. This method is implemented in the latest release of discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART) model

The SPART model: A soil-plant-atmosphere radiative transfer model for satellite measurements in the solar spectrum

Radiative transfer models (RTMs) of vegetation canopies can be applied for the retrieval of numerical values of vegetation properties from satellite data. For such retrieval, it is necessary first to apply atmospheric correction to translate the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) satellite data into top-of-canopy (TOC) values. This atmospheric correction typically assumes a Lambertian surface reflection, which introduces errors if the real surface is non-Lambertian. Furthermore, atmospheric correction requires atmospheric characterization as input, which is not always available. In this study, we present an RTM for soil-plant-atmosphere systems to model TOC and TOA reflectance as observed by sensors, and to retrieve vegetation properties directly from TOA reflectance skipping the atmosphere correction processes with the inversion mode of the RTM. The model uses three computationally efficient RTMs for soil (BSM), vegetation canopies (PROSAIL) and atmosphere (SMAC), respectively. The sub-models are coupled by using the four-stream theory and the adding method. The resulting ‘Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Radiative Transfer model’ (SPART) simulates directional TOA spectral observations, with all major effects included, such as sun-observer geometries and non-Lambertian reflectance of the land surface. A sensitivity anaylsis of the model shows that neglecting anisotropic reflection of the surface in coupling the surface with atmosphere causes considerable errors in TOA reflectance. The model was validated by comparing TOC and TOA reflectance simulations with those simulated with the atmosphere-included version of the DART RTM model. We show that the differences between DART and SPART are less than 7% for simulating TOC reflectance, and are less than 20% (less than 10% at most bands) for simulating TOA reflectance. The model performance in retrieving key vegetation and atmospheric properties was evaluted by using a synthetic dataset and a satellite dataset. The inversion mode allows estimating vegetation properties along with atmospheric properties and TOC reflectance with reasonable accuracy directly from TOA observations, and remarkable accuracy can be achieved if prior information is used in the model inversion. The model can be used to investigate the sensitivity of surface and atmospheric properties on TOC and TOA reflectance and for the simulation of synthetic data of existing and forthcoming satellite missions. More importantly, it facilitates a quantitative use of remote sensing data from satellites directly without the need for atmospheric correction