Costos y viabilidad económica de la producción y comercialización de la conserva de trucha (Oncorhynchus mykiss) en escabeche

Puno is the first rainbow trout producing region in Peru. The objective of the study was to study the feasibility of giving added value to trout. The cost analysis and financial viability of the production of six types of canned pickled trout preserves were considered. The fillets were obtained from trout fed with three commercial foods (Salmofood®, Naltech® and Tomasino®) and the preserves had two presentations (can vs. glass). The production costs were calculated through a documented record of data at market prices. The general theory of production costs was applied and through the cash flow financial tool the profitability indicators were found. The financial net present value (NPVf) was positive for all six presentations. The internal rate of return (IRR), both for canning (34.5, 37.5 and 42.8%) and for glass canning (34.7, 38.2 and 44.3%) was higher than the opportunity cost of capital (COK) and in both cases, the benefit-cost ratio (B/C) was similar and greater than one (1.05, 1.06 and 1.07) for the three commercial foods, respectively. The capital recovery period was between 5 and 6 years for the two types of preserves. In conclusion, the pickled trout canning project is profitable and, therefore, its investment is recommended to contribute to the sustainability of production and improve the income of producers in the region.Puno es la primera región productora de truchas arcoíris en el Perú. El estudio tuvo como objetivo estudiar la factibilidad de dar valor agregado a la trucha. Se consideró el análisis de costos y la viabilidad financiera de la producción de seis tipos de conservas de trucha en escabeche. Los filetes fueron obtenidos de truchas alimentadas con tres alimentos comerciales (Salmofood®, Naltech® y Tomasino®) y las conservas tuvieron dos presentaciones (lata vs. vidrio). Los costos de producción se calcularon mediante un registro documentado de datos a precios de mercado. Se aplicó la teoría general de costos de producción y mediante la herramienta financiera de flujo de caja se hallaron los indicadores de rentabilidad. El valor actual neto financiero (VANf) fue positivo para las seis presentaciones. La tasa interna de retorno (TIR), tanto para la conserva de lata (34.5, 37.5 y 42.8%) como para la conserva en vidrio (34.7, 38.2 y 44.3%) fue mayor al costo de oportunidad del capital (COK) y en ambos casos la ratio beneficio-costo (B/C) fue similar y mayor a uno (1.05, 1.06 y 1.07) para los tres alimentos comerciales, respectivamente. El periodo de recuperación del capital estuvo entre 5 y 6 años para los dos tipos de conservas. En conclusión, el proyecto de elaboración de conservas de trucha en escabeche es rentable y, por tanto, es recomendable su inversión para contribuir con la sostenibilidad de la producción y mejorar los ingresos de los productores de la región

Diminishing benefits of urban living for children and adolescents’ growth and development

Optimal growth and development in childhood and adolescence is crucial for lifelong health and well-being1–6. Here we used data from 2,325 population-based studies, with measurements of height and weight from 71 million participants, to report the height and body-mass index (BMI) of children and adolescents aged 5–19 years on the basis of rural and urban place of residence in 200 countries and territories from 1990 to 2020. In 1990, children and adolescents residing in cities were taller than their rural counterparts in all but a few high-income countries. By 2020, the urban height advantage became smaller in most countries, and in many high-income western countries it reversed into a small urban-based disadvantage. The exception was for boys in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa and in some countries in Oceania, south Asia and the region of central Asia, Middle East and north Africa. In these countries, successive cohorts of boys from rural places either did not gain height or possibly became shorter, and hence fell further behind their urban peers. The difference between the age-standardized mean BMI of children in urban and rural areas was <1.1 kg m–2 in the vast majority of countries. Within this small range, BMI increased slightly more in cities than in rural areas, except in south Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and some countries in central and eastern Europe. Our results show that in much of the world, the growth and developmental advantages of living in cities have diminished in the twenty-first century, whereas in much of sub-Saharan Africa they have amplified