23 research outputs found

    A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Circumcision is a common procedure, but regional and societal attitudes differ on whether there is a need for a male to be circumcised and, if so, at what age. This is an important issue for many parents, but also pediatricians, other doctors, policy makers, public health authorities, medical bodies, and males themselves.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>We show here that infancy is an optimal time for clinical circumcision because an infant's low mobility facilitates the use of local anesthesia, sutures are not required, healing is quick, cosmetic outcome is usually excellent, costs are minimal, and complications are uncommon. The benefits of infant circumcision include prevention of urinary tract infections (a cause of renal scarring), reduction in risk of inflammatory foreskin conditions such as balanoposthitis, foreskin injuries, phimosis and paraphimosis. When the boy later becomes sexually active he has substantial protection against risk of HIV and other viral sexually transmitted infections such as genital herpes and oncogenic human papillomavirus, as well as penile cancer. The risk of cervical cancer in his female partner(s) is also reduced. Circumcision in adolescence or adulthood may evoke a fear of pain, penile damage or reduced sexual pleasure, even though unfounded. Time off work or school will be needed, cost is much greater, as are risks of complications, healing is slower, and stitches or tissue glue must be used.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>Infant circumcision is safe, simple, convenient and cost-effective. The available evidence strongly supports infancy as the optimal time for circumcision.</p

    Die Stoffwechselwirkungen der Schilddrüsenhormone

    Get PDF

    ‘Circumcision pain’ unlikely to cause autism

    No full text

    Infantile myofibromatosis: The most common fibrous tumor of infancy

    No full text
    We describe the clinical courses of four infants with infantile myofibromatosis (IM). This entity is a mesenchymal disorder of early infancy characterized by the formation of tumors in skin, muscle, viscera, bone, and subcutaneous tissues. Previously known as congenital generalized fibromatosis, IM was formerly thought to be a rare condition that was frequently fatal. The majority of the 170 affected patients we describe have been diagnosed since 1980. Furthermore, the mortality rate for these patients is <15%. Our review includes the clinical manifestations, as well as histopathologic features, and discusses the prognosis in affected infants. We found that infants with solitary lesions or multiple lesions without visceral involvement generally have a benign course. However, in patients with the multicentric form of the disorder and visceral involvement, 73% have died. Because the lesions may not be easily discernible and most spontaneously resolve, the condition is underdiagnosed and underreported. IM is the most common fibrous tumor of infancy and must be considered when evaluating children who present with either solitary or multiple tumors, particularly during the neonatal period

    Bronchopulmonary segmental lavage with Surfaxin (KL(4)-surfactant) for acute respiratory distress syndrome

    No full text
    We performed a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of sequential bronchopulmonary segmental lavage with a dilute synthetic surfactant (Surfaxin) in 12 adults with ARDS. Patients received one of three dosing regimens in which aliquots of Surfaxin were administered via a wedged bronchoscope to each of the 19 bronchopulmonary segments. Suctioning was performed 10-30 s after instillation of individual aliquots. Group 1 patients (n = 3) received one 30-ml aliquot of a 2.5-mg/ml concentration of Surfaxin in each segment, followed by a second 30-ml aliquot with a 10-mg/ml concentration. Group 2 patients (n = 4) received two 30-ml aliquots of the 2.5-mg/ml concentration followed by a third lavage with the 10-mg/ml concentration. Group 3 patients (n = 5) received therapy identical to that received by patients in Group 2 and were eligible for repeat dosing 6 to 24 h later. All patients tolerated the procedure. There were no serious adverse experiences ascribed to either the procedure or the surfactant. In the 96 h after treatment initiation, FI(O(2)) decreased from 0.80 to 0.52 and PEEP decreased from 10.3 to 7.6 cm H(2)O. Bronchoscopic cleansing of the lungs with dilute Surfaxin may offer a safe and feasible approach to improving outcomes in patients with ARDS. Wiswell TE, Smith RM, Katz LB, Mastroianni L, Wong DY, Willms D, Heard S, Wilson M, Hite RD, Anzueto A, Revak SD, Cochrane CG. Bronchopulmonary segmental lavage with Surfaxin (KL(4)-surfactant) for acute respiratory distress syndrome
    corecore