11 research outputs found
ImPACT: a multifaceted implementation for conversation partner training in aphasia in Dutch rehabilitation settings.
Purpose: Exploration of the clinical uptake of a novel conversation partner training (CPT) programme in aphasia in ten Dutch rehabilitation facilities and identification of its perceived facilitators and barriers in service providers, and the evaluation of the implementation methods used.
Method: Ten rehabilitation centres took part in a multifaceted implementation of conversation partner training over thirteen months. Each centre selected two speech and language therapists to act as knowledge brokers whose role it was to raise awareness of CPT in the team and to facilitate getting partners of people with aphasia into the programme. The implementation was evaluated using analysis of recruitment data and questionnaires, supplemented by consensus data and scrutiny of implementation plans.
Results: Successful implementation was described as 1) four dyads included during the intervention period, 2) two more dyads included after the intervention period, before the end of the study and 3) inclusion of Partners of Aphasic Clients Conversation Training (PACT) in a description of the logistics of local stroke care (stroke care pathway). Seven centres were successful in reaching the target inclusion of 6 dyads in total. Only one centre had care pathways in place. From a recruitment pool of 504 dyads, 41 dyads were recruited and 34 partners completed the implementation of PACT study (ImPACT). Observed facilitators included the motivation to engage partners in the rehabilitation process and the perceived added value of PACT. The perceived barriers focused on time limitations within current systems to discuss the consequences of PACT with relevant professionals and to establish allocated time for PACT within existing care routines.
Conclusions: The motivation of professionals to involve partners in the rehabilitation process assisted with the introduction of PACT in practice. The main barrier was time, linked to the requirement to think through integration of this innovation within existing care. Longer term evaluation would ascertain how centres sustain uptake without support
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
Background: We require high-quality information on the current burden, the types of therapy and resources available, methods of delivery, care pathways and long-term outcomes for people with aphasia.
Aim: To document and inform international delivery of post-stroke aphasia treatment, to optimise recovery and reintegration of people with aphasia.
Methods & Procedures: Multi-centre, prospective, non-randomised, open study, employing blinded outcome assessment, where appropriate, including people with post-stroke aphasia, able to attend for 30 minutes during the initial language assessment, at first contact with a speech and language therapist for assessment of aphasia at participating sites. There is no study-mandated intervention. Assessments will occur at baseline (first contact with a speech and language therapist for aphasia assessment), discharge from Speech and Language Therapy (SLT), 6 and 12-months post-stroke. Our primary outcome is changed from baseline in the Amsterdam Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT/Scenario Test for participants with severe verbal impairments) at 12-months post-stroke. Secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 months include the Therapy Outcome Measure (TOMS), Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO), Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS), Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient (WAB-AQ), stroke and aphasia quality of life scale (SAQoL-39), European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D), lesion description, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), resource use, and satisfaction with therapy provision and success. We will collect demography, clinical data, and therapy content. Routine neuroimaging and medication administration records will be accessed where possible; imaging will be pseudonymised and transferred to a central reading centre. Data will be collected in a central registry. We will describe demography, stroke and aphasia profiles and therapies available. International individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses will examine treatment responder rates based on minimal detectable change & clinically important changes from baseline for primary and secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Multivariable meta-analyses will examine associations between demography, therapy, medication use and outcomes, considering service characteristics. Where feasible, costs associated with treatment will be reported. Where available, we will detail brain lesion size and site, and examine correlations with SLT and language outcome at 12 months.
Conclusion: International differences in care, resource utilisation and outcomes will highlight avenues for further aphasia research, promote knowledge sharing and optimise aphasia rehabilitation delivery. IPD meta-analyses will enhance and expand understanding, identifying cost-effective and promising approaches to optimise rehabilitation to benefit people with aphasia
Partners van Afasiepatienten Conversatie Training (PACT). [Conversation Training for Partners of People with Aphasia]
Status afasietherapie: nieuwe gevalsbeschrijvingen uit de klinische praktijk
Status afasietherapie. Nieuwe gevalsbeschrijvingen uit de klinische praktijk
bevat dertien unieke beschrijvingen van de logopedische interventie bij cliënten met afasie, geschreven door logopedisten en klinisch linguïsten die werkzaam zijn in de klinische praktijk. De uitgave is een vervolg op Status afasietherapie. Gevalsbeschrijvingen uit de klinische praktijk uit 2003. De casuïstiek is gestoeld op de principes van Evidence Based Practice, en geeft inzicht in de keuzes die behandelaren maken in hun dagelijks klinisch handelen.
In deze uitgave is de Internationale Classificatie van Functioneren (ICF) als kader gebruikt. Alle domeinen van het ICF zijn terug te vinden in de gepresenteerde casuïstiek op een continuüm van functiegerichte benadering, gericht op leren leven met afasie, van taalherstel tot participatiegerichte benadering. Twee van de beschrijvingen betreffen respectievelijk de interventie van Primair Progressieve Afasie en kinderafasie.
Het boek nodigt logopedisten uit tot kritische reflectie ten aanzien van het eigen handelen en is uitstekend materiaal voor het onderwijs
ImPACT: a multifaceted implementation for conversation partner training in aphasia in Dutch rehabilitation settings
Disturbances of affective prosody in patients with schizophrenia; a cross sectional study
The objective was to determine whether disturbances of
affective prosody constitute part of the symptomatology of
schizophrenia. Affective prosody is defined here as a
neuropsychological function that encompasses all non-verbal aspects of
language that are necessary for recognising and conveying emotions in
communication. Twenty six schizophrenic out-patients and twenty four
normal controls underwent a standardised prosody test, assessing four
different aspects of affective prosody: spontaneous prosody, prosodic
recognition, prosodic repetition, and facial affect recognition. Patients scored significantly worse than controls on three of the
four subtests: spontaneous prosody, prosodic recognition, and prosodic repetition. There were no significant differences on a subtest for
facial affect recognition. Differences in educational level between
patients and controls could not account for these differences.