Circadian Rhythm and Sleep Disruption: Causes, Metabolic Consequences and Countermeasures.

Circadian (∼ 24 hour) timing systems pervade all kingdoms of life, and temporally optimize behaviour and physiology in humans. Relatively recent changes to our environments, such as the introduction of artificial lighting, can disorganize the circadian system, from the level of the molecular clocks that regulate the timing of cellular activities to the level of synchronization between our daily cycles of behaviour and the solar day. Sleep/wake cycles are intertwined with the circadian system, and global trends indicate that these too are increasingly subject to disruption. A large proportion of the world's population is at increased risk of environmentally-driven circadian rhythm and sleep disruption, and a minority of individuals are also genetically predisposed to circadian misalignment and sleep disorders. The consequences of disruption to the circadian system and sleep are profound and include myriad metabolic ramifications, some of which may be compounded by adverse effects on dietary choices. If not addressed, the deleterious effects of such disruption will continue to cause widespread health problems; therefore, implementation of the numerous behavioural and pharmaceutical interventions that can help restore circadian system alignment and enhance sleep will be important

Defective regulation of glycoprotein free alpha-subunit in males with isolated gonadotropin-releasing hormone deficiency--a clinical research center study

During long term replacement with a GnRH regimen that restores their gonadotropin and sex steroid levels to normal, men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) exhibit excessive secretion of pituitary free alpha-subunit (FAS). To characterize further the dose and duration of exogenous GnRH required to elicit this response, FAS, LH, FSH, and testosterone were determined during the first 8 weeks of GnRH administration in 10 men with IHH. The GnRH dose was increased stepwise every 2 weeks from 5 to 100 ng/kg every 2 h. Hormonal responses were compared with normative data for both pubertal boys and adult men. Low baseline levels of LH (mean +/- SEM, 0.9 +/- 0.03 IU/L), FSH (2.5 +/- 0.4 IU/L), FAS (148 +/- 21 ng/L), and testosterone (2.5 +/- 0.3 nmol/L) increased progressively after GnRH replacement. Mean FAS levels and pulse amplitudes significantly exceeded those in normal adult men by 4-6 weeks when their LH responses to GnRH administration remained below adult norms. By week 8 (50 ng GnRH/kg every 2 h), mean levels of LH, FSH, and FAS (13.7 +/- 2.1 IU/L, 15.4 +/- 4.0 IU/L, 627 +/- 75 ng/L, respectively) significantly exceeded adult male concentrations (P < 0.03). However, mean LH and FSH concentrations were not significantly different from midpubertal controls, in whom FAS levels were comparable to those in normal adults, verifying the excessive nature of FAS secretion relative to intact gonadotropins in the IHH patients. As this imbalance between FAS and dimeric gonadotropin secretion was established early in the current study when low doses of GnRH presumably resulted in low levels of receptor occupancy in vivo, it does not appear to result from partial pituitary desensitization induced by pharmacological GnRH stimulation. Rather, it appears to represent an inherent property of the GnRH-deficient state that is unmasked when GnRH input to the pituitary is restored. Further work will be necessary to elucidate the mechanism of this apparent defect in FAS regulation in GnRH-deficient men