Parameter selection for peak alignment in chromatographic sample profiling: objective quality indicators and use of control samples

In chromatographic profiling applications, peak alignment is often essential as most chromatographic systems exhibit small peak shifts over time. When using currently available alignment algorithms, there are several parameters that determine the outcome of the alignment process. Selecting the optimum set of parameters, however, is not straightforward, and the quality of an alignment result is at least partly determined by subjective decisions. Here, we demonstrate a new strategy to objectively determine the quality of an alignment result. This strategy makes use of a set of control samples that are analysed both spiked and non-spiked. With this set, not only the system and the method can be checked but also the quality of the peak alignment can be evaluated. The developed strategy was tested on a representative metabolomics data set using three software packages, namely Markerlynx™, MZmine and MetAlign. The results indicate that the method was able to assess and define the quality of an alignment process without any subjective interference of the analyst, making the method a valuable contribution to the data handling process of chromatography-based metabolomics data

An iterative block-shifting approach to retention time alignment that preserves the shape and area of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry peaks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Metabolomics, petroleum and biodiesel chemistry, biomarker discovery, and other fields which rely on high-resolution profiling of complex chemical mixtures generate datasets which contain millions of detector intensity readings, each uniquely addressed along dimensions of <it>time </it>(<it>e.g.</it>, <it>retention time </it>of chemicals on a chromatographic column), a <it>spectral value </it>(<it>e.g., mass-to-charge ratio </it>of ions derived from chemicals), and the <it>analytical run number</it>. They also must rely on data preprocessing techniques. In particular, inter-run variance in the retention time of chemical species poses a significant hurdle that must be cleared before feature extraction, data reduction, and knowledge discovery can ensue. <it>Alignment methods</it>, for calibrating retention reportedly (and in our experience) can misalign matching chemicals, falsely align distinct ones, be unduly sensitive to chosen values of input parameters, and result in distortions of peak shape and area.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We present an iterative block-shifting approach for retention-time calibration that detects chromatographic features and qualifies them by retention time, spectrum, and the effect of their inclusion on the quality of alignment itself. Mass chromatograms are aligned pairwise to one selected as a reference. In tests using a 45-run GC-MS experiment, block-shifting reduced the absolute deviation of retention by greater than 30-fold. It compared favourably to COW and XCMS with respect to alignment, and was markedly superior in preservation of peak area.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Iterative block-shifting is an attractive method to align GC-MS mass chromatograms that is also generalizable to other two-dimensional techniques such as HPLC-MS.</p

Evaluation of different warping methods for the analysis of CE profiles of urinary nucleosides

Item does not contain fulltex

Development of NiCeO2ZrO2MgAl2O4 biogas reforming catalysts

status: publishe