Perceived barriers and policy solutions in clean energy infrastructure investment

International political negotiations and national policy for climate change mitigation are increasingly focussed on the mobilisation and scale up of investments in clean energy infrastructure. This paper aims to develop the understanding of how institutional investors in the private sector perceive barriers to scaling up investment into clean energy infrastructure and what policy solutions to those barriers they advocate. This paper adds to existing scientific knowledge through a clear focus on private sector perceptions. Through the analysis of previous public statements from organisations and coalitions in the finance sector a number of investment barriers were identified. These initial barriers fed into a Delphi process. The outputs of the Delphi process were categorized into five sets of barriers and a number of policy solutions associated with investing into clean energy solutions. We conclude that there is a need for better engagement with the institutional investment community to ensure further effort on policy development that underpins investments at scale is effective and efficient

Sustainable development in english metropolitan district authorities: An investigation using unitary development plans

A survey of eight unitary development plans (UDPs) in metropolitan district authorities outside London is reviewed. The survey sought to assess the policy content of each UDP for its contribution towards the goal of sustainable development. Within the present framework of local-national relations, several areas were identified in which current UDP policies can be seen to be promoting sustainable development. Similarly, other areas of the sustainable development agenda can be seen to be outside the present content of UDPs. To carry out this exercise, a methodology to analyse development plans on their sustainability content was developed. For this purpose, the work of the Local Government Management Board was used to produce a set of 'policy directions towards sustainability', against which policies in development plans could be critically assessed.

Climate change governance: the Singapore case

Climate change (CC) impacts have negatively affected the economic and social welfare of millions of people. CC management and sustainable development have been pressing issues in several debates and in many research projects on contemporary political and economic conditions in the last few decades. The challenges of CC management are complicated and interdependent, and they must be addressed by several groups of stakeholders in the public and private sectors, and civil society. The resources, power and legitimacy for managing CC are dispersed among various sectors and among various groups of stakeholders within each sector. Therefore it is impossible to assume that a single group of stakeholders or a single sector can overcome all issues associated with CC and environmental degradation. In other words, governance to mitigate and adapt CC impacts is the charge of all groups of stakeholders at both national and international levels. Successful management of CC requires effective governance measures, institutions, structure and so on, which can enhance the competencies and contributions of all groups of stakeholders. Public-private partnerships, public engagement and participation will enable stakeholders to better contribute to protect the environment. However, such cooperation should not undermine the role of government. Government is still responsible for serving its citizens. Thus an integrated governance framework, including all sectors and both regulatory and non-regulatory mechanisms, is important to address issues associated with CC, and to mitigate and adapt to CC impacts. This chapter aims to (i) revisit the impacts of CC, (ii) introduce a governance framework for CC management, including the public and private sectors and civil society and (iii) examine the key factors affecting the success or failure of this governance framework, using Singapore as a case study. Although there are many dimensions of governance, this chapter focuses on the stakeholders and their roles to minimise the adverse impact of CC. This chapter is significant because it (i) addresses the research questions from a practical perspective, and (ii) provides information for further research in governance and CC given limited studies on governance in Singapore. Finally, other city states may benefit from both positive and negative lessons drawn from the Singapore experience in terms of how to improve strengths and overcome weaknesses in terms of governance to achieve a balance between economic development and environmental protection