1,086 research outputs found
Uncertainties in selected river water quality data
International audienceMonitoring of surface waters is primarily done to detect the status and trends in water quality and to identify whether observed trends arise from natural or anthropogenic causes. Empirical quality of river water quality data is rarely certain and knowledge of their uncertainties is essential to assess the reliability of water quality models and their predictions. The objective of this paper is to assess the uncertainties in selected river water quality data, i.e. suspended sediment, nitrogen fraction, phosphorus fraction, heavy metals and biological compounds. The methodology used to structure the uncertainty is based on the empirical quality of data and the sources of uncertainty in data (van Loon et al., 2005). A literature review was carried out including additional experimental data of the Elbe river. All data of compounds associated with suspended particulate matter have considerable higher sampling uncertainties than soluble concentrations. This is due to high variability within the cross section of a given river. This variability is positively correlated with total suspended particulate matter concentrations. Sampling location has also considerable effect on the representativeness of a water sample. These sampling uncertainties are highly site specific. The estimation of uncertainty in sampling can only be achieved by taking at least a proportion of samples in duplicates. Compared to sampling uncertainties, measurement and analytical uncertainties are much lower. Instrument quality can be stated well suited for field and laboratory situations for all considered constituents. Analytical errors can contribute considerably to the overall uncertainty of river water quality data. Temporal autocorrelation of river water quality data is present but literature on general behaviour of water quality compounds is rare. For meso scale river catchments (500?3000 km2) reasonable yearly dissolved load calculations can be achieved using biweekly sample frequencies. For suspended sediments none of the methods investigated produced very reliable load estimates when weekly concentrations data were used. Uncertainties associated with loads estimates based on infrequent samples will decrease with increasing size of rivers
Uncertainties in selected surface water quality data
International audienceMonitoring of surface waters is primarily done to detect the status and trends in water quality and to identify whether observed trends arise form natural or anthropogenic causes. Empirical quality of surface water quality data is rarely certain and knowledge of their uncertainties is essential to assess the reliability of water quality models and their predictions. The objective of this paper is to assess the uncertainties in selected surface water quality data, i.e. suspended sediment, nitrogen fraction, phosphorus fraction, heavy metals and biological compounds. The methodology used to structure the uncertainty is based on the empirical quality of data and the sources of uncertainty in data (van Loon et al., 2006). A literature review was carried out including additional experimental data of the Elbe river. All data of compounds associated with suspended particulate matter have considerable higher sampling uncertainties than soluble concentrations. This is due to high variability's within the cross section of a given river. This variability is positively correlated with total suspended particulate matter concentrations. Sampling location has also considerable effect on the representativeness of a water sample. These sampling uncertainties are highly site specific. The estimation of uncertainty in sampling can only be achieved by taking at least a proportion of samples in duplicates. Compared to sampling uncertainties measurement and analytical uncertainties are much lower. Instrument quality can be stated well suited for field and laboratory situations for all considered constituents. Analytical errors can contribute considerable to the overall uncertainty of surface water quality data. Temporal autocorrelation of surface water quality data is present but literature on general behaviour of water quality compounds is rare. For meso scale river catchments reasonable yearly dissolved load calculations can be achieved using biweekly sample frequencies. For suspended sediments none of the methods investigated produced very reliable load estimates when weekly concentrations data were used. Uncertainties associated with loads estimates based on infrequent samples will decrease with increasing size of rivers
The steering gaits of sperm
Sperm are highly specialized cells, which have been subject to substantial evolutionary pressure. Whereas some sperm features are highly conserved, others have undergone major modifications. Some of these variations are driven by adaptation to mating behaviours or fitness at the organismic level. Others represent alternative solutions to the same task. Sperm must find the egg for fertilization. During this task, sperm rely on long slender appendages termed flagella that serve as sensory antennas, propellers and steering rudders. The beat of the flagellum is periodic. The resulting travelling wave generates the necessary thrust for propulsion in the fluid. Recent studies reveal that, for steering, different species rely on different fundamental features of the beat wave. Here, we discuss some examples of unity and diversity across sperm from different species with a particular emphasis on the steering mechanisms. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue βUnity and diversity of cilia in locomotion and transportβ
Ensuring metrological control of the means of thermal control
Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°Π±ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΡΡ Π±Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π±ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
.At present, more and more devices are being used to collect non-contact and high-speed temperature control instruments that register radiation in the light and infrared ranges
Diurnal versus spatial variability of greenhouse gas emissions from an anthropogenically modified lowland river in Germany
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rivers are globally relevant, but quantification of these emissions comes with considerable uncertainty. Quantification of ecosystem-scale emissions is challenged by both spatial and short-term temporal variability. We measured spatio-temporal variability of CO2 and CH4 fluxes from a 1βkm long reach of the lowland river Elbe in Germany over 3βd to establish which factor is more relevant to be taken into consideration: small-scale spatial variability or short-term temporal variability of CO2 and CH4 fluxes.
GHG emissions from the river reach studied were dominated by CO2, and 90β% of total emissions were from the water surface, while 10β% of emissions were from dry fallen sediment at the side of the river. Aquatic CO2 fluxes were similar at different habitats, while aquatic CH4 fluxes were higher at the side of the river. Artificial structures to improve navigability (groynes) created still water areas with elevated CH4 fluxes and lower CO2 fluxes. CO2 fluxes exhibited a clear diurnal pattern, but the exact shape and timing of this pattern differed between habitats. By contrast, CH4 fluxes did not change diurnally. Our data confirm our hypothesis that spatial variability is especially important for CH4, while diurnal variability is more relevant for CO2 emissions from our study reach of the Elbe in summer. Continuous measurements or at least sampling at different times of the day is most likely necessary for reliable quantification of river GHG emissions.</p
Effect of Body Mass Index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies
Peer reviewedPublisher PD
ΠΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡ. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°: ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ³Ρ.
ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ
Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²,
ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ° Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΄ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π² Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅
Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΄ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Ρ
ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ½Π°ΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ
Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ°. ΠΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π³ΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΄ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
, Π°
ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΄ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ
Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ°.
ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±
ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ².
ΠΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌ,
ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌ Π²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
- β¦