14 research outputs found

    How well does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD

    No full text
    Abstract Background. COPD is the 4th leading cause of death and is characterized by significant functional decline, particularly near the end of life. COPD patients have lower rates of advance care planning than patients with other respiratory illnesses. Currently, there is no effective prognostic tool for COPD patients in the inpatient setting. The surprise question (SQ) (“Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next time frame”) has shown to be effective at predicting mortality in some patient populations but has not been studied in COPD. Objective. We sought to assess the performance of the SQ in estimating mortality and advance care planning among patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Methods. We performed a retrospective observational analysis of patients admitted to Maine Medical Center for acute exacerbation of COPD between July 2015 and September 2018. Emergency department (ED) and inpatient clinicians answer the SQ when placing admitting orders. ED clinicians answered, “Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 30 days?”, and inpatient clinicians answered, “Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next year?” Clinicians provided a binary response (“No, I would not be surprised” [SQ+] or “Yes, I would be surprised” [SQ-]). We used sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, area under the receiver operator curve, and multivariate logistic regression to assess the performance of the SQ in estimating 30-day and one-year mortality. Our secondary outcome was to assess if the surprise question prompted goals of care conversations, palliative care consultation and/or completion of advance care planning documents. Results. A total of 381 patients had responses to the 30-day SQ, and 365 patients had responses to the one-year SQ. Five percent (n = 19) of 30-day SQ responses were positive, and 30% (n = 108) of one-year SQ responses were positive. The 30-day SQ had the following test characteristics in estimating 30-day mortality: sensitivity 12%, specificity 95%, positive predictive value (PPV) 11%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 96%. The one-year SQ had the following test characteristics in estimating one-year mortality: sensitivity 47%, specificity 75%, PPV 35%, and NPV 83%. Patients with a positive one-year SQ were 2.75 times more likely to die within one year than those with a negative SQ (95% CI 1.59, 4.77, p \u3c 0.000; area under receiver operator curve 0.69) and 3.01 times more likely to have received any advance care planning during admission (95% CI 1.88, 4.82, p \u3c 0.000; area under receiver operator curve 0.75). Patients with a positive 30-day SQ were 3.83 times more likely to receive advance care planning during admission than those with a negative SQ (95% CI 1.25, 11.77, p = 0.019; area under receiver operator curve 0.79). Conclusion. The one-year surprise question can be an effective component of prognostication and care planning for COPD patients in the inpatient setting

    How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD?

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often receive burdensome care at end-of-life (EOL) and infrequently complete advance care planning (ACP). The surprise question (SQ) is a prognostic tool that may facilitate ACP. OBJECTIVE: To assess how well the SQ predicts mortality and prompts ACP for COPD patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation of COPD between July 2015 and September 2018. MAIN MEASURES: Emergency department (ED) and inpatient clinicians answered, Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 30 days (ED)/one year (inpatient)? The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of the SQ in predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality. The secondary outcome was the correlation between SQ and ACP (palliative care consultation, documented goals-of-care conversation, change in code status, or completion of ACP document). KEY RESULTS: The 30-day SQ had a high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting 30-day mortality: sensitivity 12%, specificity 95%, PPV 11%, and NPV 96%. The 1-year SQ demonstrated better accuracy for predicting 1-year mortality: sensitivity 47%, specificity 75%, PPV 35%, and NPV 83%. After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and prior 6-month admissions, 1-year SQ+ responses were associated with greater odds of 1-year mortality (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.39-4.08) versus SQ-. One-year SQ+ patients were more likely to have a goals-of-care conversation (25% vs. 11%, p \u3c 0.01) and complete an advance directive or POLST (46% vs. 23%, p \u3c 0.01). After multivariable adjustment, SQ+ responses to the 1-year SQ were associated with greater odds of ACP receipt (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.64-4.36). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year surprise question may be an effective component of prognostication and advance care planning for COPD patients in the inpatient setting

    Book reviews

    No full text
    corecore